
‘He's Trying to Colonize This Community': Inside Elon Musk's Plan to Take Over This Texas Town
A 9-foot tall bust of Elon Musk, inspired by the meme 'Elon I Drew You / You Are My Hero, Elon', stands off of Boca Chica Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, where the tech billionaire is looking to incorporate his first company town. | Photos by Brenda Bazán for POLITICO
BOCA CHICA VILLAGE, Texas — Driving down a long empty stretch of Highway 4 in South Texas, there are few indications that this windswept corner of the nation, bound by the Gulf of Mexico and the Rio Grande, is host to more than dense mesquite thickets and the ghosts of the Civil War. The land feels vast, unchanging and decidedly apolitical — bigger than people altogether.
That is, until a break in the brush reveals an enormous gold bust of Elon Musk, staring into the distance.
Then, signs of the political moment are everywhere. U.S. Immigration and Enforcement agents in bullet-proof jackets flag down passing cars at an inland border checkpoint.
A road leading off the highway reads 'Mars-a-Lago.' A hundred yards away, bookending an old, black Studebaker parked for-sale in a dusty pullout, murals of Musk's face and the DOGE Shiba Inu plaster two 30-foot concrete towers.
And finally, rising from the empty salt plains, in the shadow of a towering rocketship and suborbital launch vehicles, sit homes and hangars, office buildings and neighborhood streets. This is Starbase, the soon-to-be newest city in Texas, and Elon Musk's first company town. The far-flung settlement, populated almost entirely by SpaceX employees and construction workers, is the site of SpaceX's launchpad for their next-generation of Starship rockets, and home base for humanity's future colonization of Mars.
'What's happening here is incredible,' said Kit Frederic, an Oregon resident who bought a nearby plot of undeveloped land recently, enticed by its proximity to space flight. 'Someday every state in the union is going to want something like this.'
Right now, this roughly 1.5 square mile community is technically unincorporated Boca Chica Village. But on Saturday, the 200-odd residents — the vast majority of whom are SpaceX employees — will decide whether the land surrounding Musk's massive rocket launchpad should become its own city: Starbase, Texas. It is an election that the region has been marching toward since December, when several dozen residents submitted a petition to South Texas' Cameron County asking it to schedule an election that would incorporate Starbase as its own municipality. The move would give SpaceX increased autonomy, virtually its own government, and greater ability to build where and how it wants.
Nearly 2,000 miles from Washington, this election comes at a strange time for Musk. A man who seems to disregard (or 'delete') regulations and systems that do not serve him is now aiming to define ordinances on the most local level, building a new city from the ground up in rural Texas. After a period in which Musk was seen as a shadow president, he will now become the de-facto mayor of his own small town.
But residents of the closest city, Brownsville, population 200,000, a border community just 20 miles away, are not uniformly ready to welcome Mayor Musk as their newest neighbor. Since SpaceX's arrival in Cameron County a decade earlier, rents have risen nearly 15 percent and access to a nearby beach has been restricted for locals during rocket launches, drawing ire and frustration from residents shut off from their main point of access to recreation along the coast. Musk's actions at the federal level have led to concern about what an untrammeled Elon would look like in South Texas.
And yet, for months, the outcome of the election has appeared as something of a foregone conclusion. Much of the land within the proposed new city limits belongs to the company. Most of the voters are SpaceX employees. Gunnar Milburn, Space X's security manager, was listed as the town's first potential mayor. His name has since been replaced by Robert Peden, a vice president at SpaceX. Two other employees, the engineering manager and the senior director of environmental health and safety, would serve as city commissioners. As is the case nationally, Musk would serve as an unelected overseer.
The election comes at a key moment in the relationship between Musk and Cameron County, and the nation writ large. At the national level, Musk has emerged as one of the least-liked members of the Trump administration, even among Republicans, as his influence in the White House begins to wane. In Cameron County, local elected officials, long supportive of SpaceX's presence, have begun to draw a firmer line over the powers it should hold. As the hours inch toward election day, local activists and organizers who have been fighting SpaceX for years are attempting a last-ditch effort to sway voters. The measure's passage could lead to possible land grabs through eminent domain, diminished public beach access and less oversight of the company's activities. Its failure, meanwhile, would serve as a public black eye for Musk, and an indication of limited support even within his own company.
Now, 100 years after the era of the company town, the richest man on Earth appears set on reprising the concept for the space age.
On a recent weekday in 'downtown' Starbase, a man on an electric scooter and wearing a T-shirt reading 'For God, For Country, For Space Exploration' whizzed down a newly paved road named 'Memes Street.' Nearby, work crews toiled on a new row of black-and-white ranch houses.
If not for the rockets and towers rising above the buildings, you could almost mistake Memes Street for a particularly dense, newly constructed neighborhood in Austin (or, maybe, a modern facsimile of the 'doom towns' built to be destroyed during nuclear tests). Teslas and Cybertrucks fill most driveways, along with a smattering of dirt bikes. There is a small soccer field nearby. Dozens of airstream trailers serving as temporary housing are parked on an astroturf lawn.
Primarily, there is construction. In every direction, heavy equipment is coming and going, gnashing out new territory from the sand and gravel in the shadow of the SpaceX logo. Where there were once empty salt plains, there are now a handful of gridded streets, and the early stages of a new community.
In 10 years, if the election goes as planned, this moment will serve as a postcard from the city's humble beginnings. But already, what is now known as Starbase has undergone an incredible transformation from what recently was a handful of residences scattered along minimally maintained county roads.
A decade ago, SpaceX arrived in South Texas with great fanfare and anticipation. After a public courtship with half a dozen other locations around the country, SpaceX had remarkably chosen Cameron County, once one of the poorest in the nation, to build its launch pad and rocket facilities. At the time, the company was widely perceived as a trailblazing startup and the move heralded as an economic coup for the approximately 400,000-person county, which has long struggled with high poverty rates and low educational attainment.
SpaceX said it chose the South Texas coast due to its low latitude, over-water launch opportunities and low population density — but the company also got a great deal. As part of the agreement, Cameron County chose to give Space X a 10-year break on property taxes. To rationalize the decision, then-County Judge Carlos Cascos said the project would bring hundreds of jobs and millions of dollars in economic impact to the region.
The exact location of the launch pad would be near the shores of the Gulf of Mexico, about 20 miles east of the border city of Brownsville, in a small, unincorporated community called Boca Chica Village. Once the site of the final battle of the Civil War, the area was minimally populated and primarily notable as the only point of access to Boca Chica Beach, a beautiful sandy stretch that meets the mouth of the Rio Grande.
Development for the complex began in the late 2010s. Though it was originally intended as the location for rocket launch and industrial facilities to support the Falcon 9 rocket, Musk shifted gears in 2018 to instead use the launch site to support the construction and testing of SpaceX's next-gen rocket, the Starship.
'We've got a lot of land with nobody around, and so if it blows up, it's cool,' Musk said at the time.
But of course, there were people around. And for many residents of Cameron County, the novelty of the high-tech industry's arrival quickly wore off. As SpaceX built out their infrastructure, there was concern over environmental degradation and lawsuits from local groups alleging pollution of a nearby bay. Some residents were distressed by the intense vibrations and explosions of rocket launches, anxious that the earthquake-like rumblings were cracking their foundations and knocking doors off hinges. Perhaps the largest sticking point was access to Boca Chica Beach, the longtime family gathering place, which was now periodically off-limits as the highway closed for launches.
Over the 10 years since its arrival in Cameron County, SpaceX does seem to have delivered economically. The company claims to have created over 3,000 jobs for the region and generated nearly $100 million in economic impact. Thousands of employees and contractors now work at the facility, which has become the main production and testing location for Musk's Starship rockets.
And yet, not all seem to view them as friendly neighbors.
'They're claiming they're bringing economic incentives, but the rent is going up, the roads are crumbling,' said Bekah Hinojosa, a community organizer from the Rio Grande Valley. 'It is getting harder to live here. All this seems to benefit is fancy restaurants with SpaceX clientele.'
To Hinojosa, the county's decision to coddle SpaceX was a betrayal. As she sees it, the leadership that was supposed to lead the community into the future instead sold it down the river, creating high-paying jobs for tech bros shipped in from other cities — not for Brownsville residents, the overwhelming majority of whom are Latino and working class.
SpaceX did not respond to questions from POLITICO Magazine. But Cameron County's top executive, Judge Eddie Treviño, a Democrat, said welcoming SpaceX into the fold was a calculated and necessary risk. Recent reporting indicates that the number of high-income households in Brownsville doubled in recent years. SpaceX is the largest employer in the city, employing over 1,000 residents of the Rio Grande Valley.
'We've had a brain drain for decades,' Treviño said. 'And thankfully, we're seeing that brain drain exodus decreasing and even becoming the opposite.'
For years, public officials have been widely supportive of SpaceX and its relationship with the county. The looming addition of a new company city has not changed that. The incorporation wouldn't meaningfully change the relationship between the county and the company, and Treviño isn't taking a stance on the election.
But the incorporation could very much change the relationship between county residents and SpaceX.
As SpaceX was making moves toward a vote on Starbase, Musk's company was also supporting a legislative package, one bill for the House, the other for the Senate, in the Texas statehouse. The identical bills would give municipalities with 'spaceports' the ability to limit access to public beaches, a move which seemed specifically targeted at Boca Chica. That would mean SpaceX would have the right to close Highway 4 in Cameron County for any activity that involves space flight. Currently, only the county can close the highway.
The incorporation of Spacebase seems to be primarily a question of control for SpaceX. The new city would directly manage its building and permitting, eliminating regulatory hurdles it might have to jump through at the county level. It would control its own land use laws and local taxes, and would also allow it to apply for state and federal grants. Although the ability to shut down the highway for launches is helpful, a Starbase city would have autonomy that extends far beyond that.
To activists like Hinojosa, the bills are just the first step in a series of power grabs that will likely define the era of Starbase, Texas, which she views as part of the slow colonization of her hometown by the tech oligarchy.
But even for local elected officials, after all the years of tax breaks and public support, the bills were finally enough to draw a line in the sand. Soon after the hearing, Cameron County Commissioner Sofia Benavides (a Democrat) wrote on Facebook that she 'vehemently' opposed the legislation. Treviño, long a champion of SpaceX, said the county 'would not be in support of it,' and publicly criticized the bills for provoking unnecessary conflict. On Monday, state lawmakers voted not to advance one of the bills.
The moment could prove a ripple in otherwise placid waters, and Treviño said he still believes the relationship between county and company is mutually beneficial. In his view, any community — New York, Austin, Dallas — would make the same decision if faced with the financial realities of the region. There was no other path forward.
But he also grew up in Cameron County. He, too, has fond memories of swimming at Boca Chica Beach as a child.
'I think for most people, no matter what SpaceX does, they'll never accept them.' Treviño said. 'My job has been to figure out how to bring better paying jobs to our community.
'And I hope to God that we're not wrong about this.'
In mid-April, days before early voting was set to begin, five volunteers from Hinojosa's South Texas Environmental Justice Network packed into cars in downtown Brownsville and headed out toward the launch complex, script and informational pamphlets in hand, on a last-ditch mission to sway the Starbase election.
Like Hinojosa, they fear what Starbase, Texas would mean for the rest of Cameron County and for SpaceX employees. They believe Musk, who they argue has proven to be a bad neighbor, wants to build a wealthy enclave removed from the surrounding community. The residents of Starbase, themselves, would be subject to the vagaries of Elon's moods — living on his property, under his laws. With its own government, the town would not be beholden to the will of the voters in the broader county.
For months, the election had been framed as a done deal — an assumption made largely because SpaceX employees would make up nearly the entire voting population. Maybe, just maybe, the volunteers later recounted to POLITICO Magazine, that premise was actually wrong. At the very least, they would try to make the case to voters against incorporation. Within half-an-hour after leaving Brownsville, they were on Memes Street, knocking on doors.
But as they moved from house to house on a newly constructed block, past the airstream trailers and the soccer field, it quickly became clear that something was off. Home by home, the volunteers said, they were turned away by Starbase residents. As soon as the topic of incorporation was raised, residents quickly shut their doors, glancing around them, seeming either apprehensive or downright scared to talk.
'Every single person we talked to, they would say, 'I'm not at liberty to respond. I cannot state my opinion. No comment,'' said Viviana Treviño, an organizer and biology professor at a nearby university who is not related to Judge Treviño. 'It's like they were following a script.'
Within 15 minutes, an unmarked white truck filled with what Treviño described as 'mall cops with bullet proof vests' confronted the group and told them that they were on private property. Treviño challenged the men, who identified themselves as SpaceX security, asking why they had the right to boot canvassers off a public thoroughfare. The volunteers said security refused to answer their questions and again forcefully told them to leave. The group returned to their cars, surprised and scared, as they drove back toward Brownsville. (SpaceX did not respond to multiple requests for comment.)
The group had planned to conduct a series of other organizing events leading up to the election; multiple rounds of door knocking, a table outside the polls in Starbase on Saturday. After the incident with security, they said, many of those tactics now felt unsafe or unrealistic. If the beach closures and bills to expand influence were evidence that a future Starbase would not operate like a normal city, the response to a few county residents canvassing voters seemed all the more concerning.
'I've done political organizing in much more conservative towns, and I've never felt the degree of discomfort that I felt while I was there,' said Kit Noel, another member of the group.
'It was surreal. It was jarring.'
Still, beyond almost getting arrested for knocking on a few doors, the organizers felt there was a silver lining in their brief political exercise. In their quick conversations with people on Starbase, Viviana Treviño and Noel got the sense that the election result, in fact, may not be such a foregone conclusion after all.
According to the canvassers, one man, a Brownsville native who now works for SpaceX and lives in the area, said he was concerned about the lack of beach access for the community. Another told them he and his friends didn't like the idea of living under their boss' banner. A local who lived in the area for decades said he opposed the incorporation, but was resigned to it.
Should Starbase become its own city, it undoubtedly will impact the way they operate within Cameron County. But ultimately, it would be the residents of Starbase themselves who would be most affected, with company employees living under the auspices of their employer — much like an old California timber town a century earlier.
According to Brian Highsmith, an incoming professor at UCLA who has studied the governance structure of company towns, residents have good reason to fear publicly speaking against their employer.
'You don't have to speculate about what would happen. They would reasonably make the conclusion that if they defy the interests of the company or Elon Musk, they would be fired,' Highsmith said. 'Those do not seem like unreasonable fears to me.'
For decades, company towns were part of the structure of the U.S. economic machine. Workers lived where they worked, paying in scrip at the company store, sleeping in buildings owned and operated by their employer. Over time, the rise of the automobile, increased unionization and economic shifts made that model obsolete. For companies too, the system posed challenges. Running a city, as Highsmith put it, 'is expensive and onerous.' Today, there are few remaining case studies — the most notable example being Walt Disney World's special district within Orlando, which has faced its own problems.
It's unclear if the residents of Starbase feel themselves as a link in that chain, or as a separate entity entirely. As Noel and Treviño learned, they aren't keen to talk about it. But it's likely that SpaceX is moving forward with eyes wide open, aware that for whatever downfalls they may face, they gain back with the independence and autonomy of their own government.
'For Disney at least, the special district has worked out very well for their interests, and very poorly for the interests of the people of greater Orlando,' Highsmith said.
'I suspect that would be the case here.'
Today, there is no shortage of Elon Musk acolytes on the fringes of the Starbase complex. Space travel fanboys wearing SpaceX ball caps mingle with families snapping photos of the launch pad and rockets. The Musk iconography surrounding the base — his DOGE mural, the gold bust with 'memelord' emblazoned at the base — feel like strange physical manifestations of internet culture planted in the vastness of the Rio Grande Valley. Even if Musk's star is fading in Washington, his loyal fanbase still lurks in the periphery of his orbit, as far south as Cameron County.
But if the statue of Elon is any indication of the national mood, things have shifted. Just days before early voting was set to begin, the gold bust of Elon was violently attacked. Large portions of the statue's chin and the left side of its face were smashed off. The vandalism was later covered up with a tarp, giving the impression that Musk was wearing a large blue bonnet. Now, a giant Band-Aid covers up the gouge.
Saturday's election will decide what future role Musk will play in local government in this far flung corner of the map. But the backlash has already begun.
'It's the richest man on the planet using us as a testing ground,' Hinojosa said. 'Elon Musk is on his way to colonizing Mars.
'First, he's trying to colonize this community.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?
Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the U.S. political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the U.S. government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalization". Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by U.S. states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. So far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the U.S. while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump set to attend UFC 316 in New Jersey this weekend
President Trump set to attend UFC 316 in New Jersey this weekend Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump attends UFC 309 at Madison Square Garden President-elect Donald Trump walked into Madison Square Garden alongside UFC CEO Dana White, Elon Musk and Kid Rock for UFC 309. As his feud with tech billionaire and former MAGA darling Elon Musk exploded into public view this week, the White House says President Donald Trump is planning to attend a UFC event in New Jersey this weekend. The event, UFC 316, is slated for Saturday, June 7 at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. The president is scheduled to depart the White House for his golf club in New Jersey Friday afternoon, according to his official schedule, and return to the White House Sunday night. Musk has been high-profile guest for some of Trump's previous visits to the octagon, but the pair had a public falling-out this week after Musk's departure from the Trump administration. 'Siri, play Bad Blood': Internet reacts to Elon Musk and Trump 'breakup' The Trump-Musk fight took off this week when Musk called for Republicans to kill the House-passed tax bill that is a signature part of the second-term president's legislative agenda, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' Two days later, Trump told reporters at the Oval Office on June 5 that he was 'very disappointed' with Musk and suggested their 'great relationship' was over. In response, Musk took to social media shortly afterward to blast the president, saying Trump wouldn't have won a second term and Republicans would have fared worse in elections in both chambers of the U.S. Congress were it not for his efforts on the 2024 campaign trail, where he poured a quarter of a million dollars into Trump's campaign. The tussle escalated in a back-and-forth between the two men, with Trump suggested going after Musk's companies and their federal contracts, and Musk alleging that Trump's name was in the Justice Department's files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The pair's most recent fight appearance was in April, when Trump and Musk sat ringside at UFC 314 in Miami. The president has long attended UFC events, as CEO Dana White was a prominent supporter of Trump during his 2024 presidential campaign. When is UFC 316? UFC 316, which is headlined by Sean O'Malley vs. Merab Dvalishvili, is set to take place at 10 p.m. ET/7 p.m. PT at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. The main card is available for pay-per-view on ESPN. More: Sean O'Malley vs. Merab Dvalishvili 2 predictions; full card, odds, picks for UFC 316 Contributing: Riley Beggin, Sudiksha Kochi and Cydney Henderson, USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk lost $34 billion in net worth as Tesla stock tanked amid Trump online war
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, lost $34 billion in net worth on Thursday after his company's stock plummeted in response to the online fight he got in with President Donald Trump. Over the last week, some Tesla stock investors had begun pulling their investments as Musk insulted Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and made a swift exit from his 'special government employee' position. But, investors acted much more quickly while witnessing the two men engage in a back-and-forth on their respective social media platforms. Trump claimed he asked 'crazy' Musk to leave his administration. Musk took credit for Trump's election win. Trump threatened to pull Musk's government contracts. Musk accused Trump of being named in the 'Epstein files.' Down the stock went, ending the day at a 14 percent loss – equating to a $34 billion valuation for Musk. While many claim to have anticipated the online feud, it's a long way away from Musk jumping for joy onstage at Trump's rallies or the duo's Oval Office press conferences. The cracks started to appear in their relationship after the tech mogul refused to stand by and praise Trump's spending bill, which he has characterized as disastrous for the government. Musk's Thursday loss is part of the 33 percent decline Tesla's stock has seen since Inauguration Day. Although the stock had significant gains after the election, much of that has been wiped out by growing criticisms of Musk's role in the government, DOGE, and now his exit. Musk is still the world's richest man, but a $34 billion drop in net worth is still notable given it's the second-largest loss of the 500 wealthiest people on the planet recorded by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. 'The only bigger one: his own wipeout in November 2021,' Bloomberg reported. But the tech entrepreneur still has plenty of other endeavors to drive his wealth, including SpaceX, one of the world's most valuable private startups, according to Bloomberg, Neuralink and xAI. As the dust settles from the powerful individuals' fight, it's still unclear what path forward Musk and his subsidiaries will take now that Trump has bashed Tesla's climate-conscious mission and threatened to revoke Musk's critical government contracts. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data