
Peek inside Princess' life in Sydney
A future Queen is heading down under to pursue tertiary education at the prestigious University of Sydney.
When Norwegian Princess Ingrid Alexandra begins her Bachelor of Arts degree in August, ahead of the university's Semester 2, she will call St Andrew's College home.
The college, which is one of the university's exclusive student residences, is in Sydney's inner west.
It has been home to the likes of former Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor, Olympian Rohan Browning and Bondi Vet Dr Chris Brown.
The college costs more than $20,000 a semester to board and features a gym, bar, food hall and yoga studio.
News of the young royal living on campus was leaked to Daily Mail Australia when students received an email from Dr Daniel Tyler, the principal at St Andrew's College earlier this week.
A press release from the Norwegian Palace was issued a short time later.
'She has chosen a three-year degree with a focus on international relations and political economy,' the palace said.
'Her Royal Highness looks forward to dedicating herself to her studies in the years to come.'
Princess Alexandra is the daughter of Crown Prince Haakon and Crown Princess Mette-Marit, and the grandchild of King Harald V who has held the Norwegian throne since 1991.
The 21-year-old is second in line to succeed him behind her father.
Students at St Andrew's College received an email on Tuesday from Principal Dr Daniel Tyler announcing the royal's arrival, Daily Mail Australia reported.
'Princess Ingrid Alexandra of Norway is moving to Sydney to study an Arts degree at the University of Sydney,' the email read. She will be living in an exclusive student residence on campus at St Andrews College, with Principal Dr Daniel Tyler sending out an email announcing the news to students on Tuesday. Justin Lloyd. Credit: News Corp Australia
'I am pleased to let you know she will be joining 'Drews and living on site. I know she is looking forward to integrating into College and university life.
'There may be media interest and enquiries. Please join us in respecting her privacy.
'We will share reminders about security on the College site ahead of Semester 2.'
The Princess is not the first international royal to travel to Australia to study.
Danish Count Nikolai of Monpezat completed a semester of his business degree as part of an exchange program at the University of Technology Sydney in 2023 while pursuing his master's at Copenhagen Business School.
It was revealed by The Daily Telegraph earlier this month that Count Nikolai now calls Sydney home, quietly settling in with his long-time girlfriend and model Benedikte Thoustrup.
He now has a full time job, and may be one of the elite that Princess Alexandra spends time with during her trip.
Other children of wealthy and well-known families who also frequent the Harbour City include Chloe Green, daughter of British retail billionaire Sir Philip Green, Christian Wilkins, son of TV presenter Richard Wilkins, as well as granddaughter of the late media mogul Kerry Packer, Francesca Packer Barham.
Brooklyn Beckham, son of David and Victoria Beckham, and Sunday Rose Kidman Urban, daughter of Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban, are also known to occasionally visit.
Sydney has been home to another royal in somewhat recent years.
Queen Mary of Denmark was living in Sydney when she met Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark at the Slip Inn.
The then advertising executive met the future King of Denmark while he was in Sydney to support the Danish sailing team at the 2000 Olympic Games.
The two embarked upon a long-distance relationship over the next few months before Mary moved from Australia to Denmark in 2001.
After four years of dating, the couple married in 2004.
She became the Queen of Denmark upon the abdication of Queen Margrethe II last year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
8 hours ago
- Perth Now
Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without makeup on: 'I'd rather bury myself in the back garden...'
Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without wearing makeup. The 74-year-old actress has been a mainstay on British television for decades but insisted that she would rather "bury [herself] in the back garden" than go out with a bare face. She told MyWeekly: "I would rather bury myself in my back garden than go outside without make-up on. I love to go full face glam and describe my style as a bit of everything." The former 'Benidorm' star added that one of her "pet hates" in life is being called old, and tries to take inspiration from her late mother when it comes to ageing. She said: "Being called a pensioner or senior citizen is one of my pet hates. It infers you're past it and that's rubbish. I don't want to be treated in a certain way because of my age. "My mum was 89 when she died. But up until near the end, she went out dancing every night, she sailed, she went on skiing holidays. She never thought, 'Oh, I'm a certain age so I mustn't do that any more!'" The former 'Coronation Street' actress thinks that it is "important" that others do the same, and insisted she will never let anything like age get in the way of what she really wants to do. She added: "I think it's important that we all stand up and say and do the same. We must stop being so timid and downtrodden. Get out there, do what you want! Go bungee-jumping if it's what you've always dreamed of! Don't ever let anyone stop you from being who you are."

Sydney Morning Herald
12 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are
Last week, Jesse Armstrong, the British director behind Succession, released his first feature-length film – a thinly veiled satire about the tech oligarchs who dominate our lives and, increasingly, have a say over what constitutes free speech. Though it would be easy to write Mountainhead off as pure fiction, to anyone who has spent time around these people, as I have, it was eerily accurate. The four fictional billionaires are flush with obscene wealth accumulated in the technological miracle of the past two decades. Having all flown in on their respective private jets, they decamp to a remote mansion for a weekend of poker and bounce between 'friendly' shit talking, writing their net worth on their chests, planning a coup, and watching mass violence unfold around the world thanks to one of the character's apps (likely a nod to Facebook's amplification of content that ultimately contributed to genocide in Myanmar). In writing the script, Armstrong borrowed from real life, using Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Andreesen and Sam Bankman-Fried as inspiration. Some of the most important and influential people of Silicon Valley, these men all share a belief in the saving grace of their own genius, even as one of them serves a 25-year sentence for duping people out of billions. Loading Though the world mostly thinks of Silicon Valley as some kind of liberal bastion, at its core, it is libertarian (even the film's title is a nod to 'the godmother of American libertarianism', Ayn Rand). When I lived in San Francisco, where I was working for the Biden-Harris administration and the Democratic National Convention, I quickly realised that the prevailing attitude is that governments and regulations are pesky and burdensome – that they only serve to obstruct technological progress they're too small-minded to understand. Working among and moving in the same social circles as senior tech executives and some of today's best known billionaires, you'd see just how weird they were. They would brag about sleeping in the office or demanding staff miss important family events. I once watched the son of a tech billionaire demand that a senior US government official record a video to ask a girl out for him. In 2022, when autonomous-driving taxis started appearing on the streets of San Francisco, this confrontation between big-tech cockiness and government process showed up loud and clear. The businesses making the taxis failed to notify local officials before rolling out the vehicles, and only partially released their data to regulators. When one tech company's fleet was taken off the roads due to safety concerns, other tech companies lobbied to get rid of human taxi drivers entirely. Sure, there's a lot less awkward chat in driverless taxis, but for technology with such a profound impact as vehicles driving around a city with no human behind the wheel, transparent oversight should be non-negotiable.

The Age
12 hours ago
- The Age
I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are
Last week, Jesse Armstrong, the British director behind Succession, released his first feature-length film – a thinly veiled satire about the tech oligarchs who dominate our lives and, increasingly, have a say over what constitutes free speech. Though it would be easy to write Mountainhead off as pure fiction, to anyone who has spent time around these people, as I have, it was eerily accurate. The four fictional billionaires are flush with obscene wealth accumulated in the technological miracle of the past two decades. Having all flown in on their respective private jets, they decamp to a remote mansion for a weekend of poker and bounce between 'friendly' shit talking, writing their net worth on their chests, planning a coup, and watching mass violence unfold around the world thanks to one of the character's apps (likely a nod to Facebook's amplification of content that ultimately contributed to genocide in Myanmar). In writing the script, Armstrong borrowed from real life, using Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Andreesen and Sam Bankman-Fried as inspiration. Some of the most important and influential people of Silicon Valley, these men all share a belief in the saving grace of their own genius, even as one of them serves a 25-year sentence for duping people out of billions. Loading Though the world mostly thinks of Silicon Valley as some kind of liberal bastion, at its core, it is libertarian (even the film's title is a nod to 'the godmother of American libertarianism', Ayn Rand). When I lived in San Francisco, where I was working for the Biden-Harris administration and the Democratic National Convention, I quickly realised that the prevailing attitude is that governments and regulations are pesky and burdensome – that they only serve to obstruct technological progress they're too small-minded to understand. Working among and moving in the same social circles as senior tech executives and some of today's best known billionaires, you'd see just how weird they were. They would brag about sleeping in the office or demanding staff miss important family events. I once watched the son of a tech billionaire demand that a senior US government official record a video to ask a girl out for him. In 2022, when autonomous-driving taxis started appearing on the streets of San Francisco, this confrontation between big-tech cockiness and government process showed up loud and clear. The businesses making the taxis failed to notify local officials before rolling out the vehicles, and only partially released their data to regulators. When one tech company's fleet was taken off the roads due to safety concerns, other tech companies lobbied to get rid of human taxi drivers entirely. Sure, there's a lot less awkward chat in driverless taxis, but for technology with such a profound impact as vehicles driving around a city with no human behind the wheel, transparent oversight should be non-negotiable.