Manchester bar owner warns soaring costs threaten many businesses
A bar owner has said he fears many small businesses are at risk of being "killed off" by a cocktail of rising costs.Mark Wrigley, who runs Atlas Bar in Manchester city centre, said he was worried that measures announced by the government in the Autumn budget would "wipe out" already struggling firms.Employers' National Insurance (NI) contributions and the National Minimum Wage increase in April.A Treasury spokesperson said the government was determined to "kickstart economic growth", for example by "permanently cutting business rates" and "capping corporation tax for the duration of [the current] parliament".
Mr Wrigley estimates the Budget measures, combined with rising business rates and energy bills, will add at least £55,000 to his costs this year unless he takes action."I spent a few weeks with my head in my hands," he told the BBC.Mr Wrigley, who has owned Atlas Bar since 2012, said he felt "disillusioned", arguing that the government's policies were "stifling growth"."We were going to take on extra staff and extend opening hours," he said. "But we're not doing it now."Instead, the bar owner said he had decided to cut staff hours and increase prices."I'm very concerned," he said."But I've got to be hopeful (about the future) because I have 28 members of staff who rely on the business."
'Clobbered on all sides'
Elsewhere in Greater Manchester, Tony Cunningham, owner of Leckenby's Tea Room in Bury, said he was facing "the most difficult time in 27 years"."Our business rates are more than doubling in April," he explained. "Our electricity is going up by over 30% and then National Insurance and wages are both going up by 10%."We're really getting clobbered on all sides."Mr Cunningham said businesses like his would have to increase their prices to survive.
The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) said firms were being "hammered" by tax rises and claimed many in the hospitality sector had already closed ahead of April's changes."We know many have fallen by the wayside," said Robert Downes, from the FSB in Greater Manchester."I suspect there may be more to come."Mr Downes called on the government to "cushion the blow", arguing that rising business costs would be bad for the overall economy."If you're punishing firms with super high tax bills, that is not going to trigger growth," he warned.The Treasury spokesperson said: "We delivered a once-in-a-Parliament budget to wipe the slate clean."Now we are focused on going further and faster to kickstart economic growth."We're also levelling the playing field for high street businesses, by permanently cutting business rates and removing the £110,000 cap [for business rates relief] for over 280,000 retail, hospitality and leisure business properties, while also capping corporation tax for the duration of Parliament."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Treasury 'already drawing up tax rises for the Autumn' as grim poll shows just a fifth of Brits say Rachel Reeves had priorities right in Spending Review
The Treasury is already said to be drawing up tax rise options for the Autumn as economists warn Rachel Reeves ' plans no longer add up. Dividends and bank profits are among the areas being mooted for drumming up revenue to balance the books. The Chancellor declined to rule out tax rises again this morning, amid fears that the Israel-Iran conflict could deal another hammer blow to the prospects for growth. Meanwhile, a poll has suggested that last week's Spending Review did not go down well with Brits. Just 19 per cent thought the package had the right priorities - with 36 per cent saying it did not. More than half expect the economy to get worse over the next year. Ms Reeves insists her spending plans for the next three years are 'fully' funded. But critics have claimed the stalling economy, together with pressures on defence and a Labour revolt on benefits mean she is writing cheques with 'fantasy' money. The issues could crystalise at the Budget in the Autumn, when many believe the independent OBR will downgrade growth forecasts. GDP shrank by 0.3 per cent in April, although it has grown over the past quarter. The IFS think-tank has warned that tax rises look 'almost inevitable', ridiculing the government's claim to have identified billions of pounds in 'efficiencies' during a 'zero-based' overhaul of costs. According to the Sunday Times, a list of potential tax increases drawn up in the Treasury includes raising the bank surcharge. That is a levy on profits on top of the 25 per cent corporation tax rate. It was cut from 8 per cent to 3 per cent under the Tories, with suggestions it could return to 5 or 6 per cent. Another apparent option is increasing tax on dividends, often taken by company directors instead of wages. Currently the highest rate stands at 39 per cent - lower than the 45 per cent top rate of income tax. Removing a tax-free £500 dividend allowance would bring in hundreds of millions of pounds for the Treasury, but could punish small investors. Challenged on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that 'lots of experts' were already saying she would need to put taxes up, Ms Reeves said: 'Well we're a strong economy with strong foundations and we have weathered other shocks... 'We are still the only country to have secured a deal with the United States, and in addition we've got trade deals with India and the EU, so we are working hard as a government to strengthen our economy, to grow our economy in a way that creates good jobs here in Britain, paying decent wages, to put more money in peoples' pockets.' Options are always drawn up within the Treasury ahead of fiscal events, and not necessarily implemented. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Rachel Reeves today refused to rule out coming back with more tax rises later this year as the impact of her decisions on the economy worsens. 'Meanwhile today the Sunday Times has revealed Rachel Reeves' team have drawn up a secret tax rising dossier outlining how to hit the British people with higher taxes. This is despite the Chancellor promising not to come back for more taxes after spooking markets last year. 'The truth is Rachel Reeves is more than likely to put her hands in the pockets of British taxpayers and business to pay for her mistakes.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves accused of leaving devolved nations in red after NICs rise
Rachel Reeves has been accused of shortchanging the UK's devolved nations after leaving the Welsh, Scottish and northern Irish governments with multimillion-pound funding gaps. The chancellor said the Treasury would fully cover the 1.2% rise in national insurance contributions for employers on salaries above £5,000, which came in on 6 April. However, Reeves has calculated the amount of money needed by using the Barnett formula, which ensures funding increases proportional to England in terms of population. Cardiff, Edinburgh and Belfast – which all operate larger public sectors than England – now say they have been left in the red. The Celtic nations' finance officials have argued the move violates the UK's statement of funding policy, which states each constituent government is not allowed to act in a way that creates adverse financial implications for the others. The Welsh cabinet secretary for finance, Mark Drakeford, announced last week that the Welsh government would use £36m annually, taken from its reserves, to plug half the gap, but a further £36m would have to be funded by public sector employers, including health boards, all 22 local councils, Natural Resources Wales and Cardiff airport. The funding shortage amounts to cuts across the board of about 14%. Drakeford said: 'We have made our position very clear with the Treasury that using the Barnett formula in this instance is a breach of the rules. If this was a one-off, we may have been able to use more of our reserves to cover the shortfall, but as it is, this will unfairly impact Wales year after year.' The bill for Scotland's public services amounts to an estimated £700m, and about £200m in northern Ireland. The Treasury has agreed an additional £339m for Edinburgh and £146m for Belfast. Scotland's budget is already under significant pressure from the rising cost of devolved welfare benefits, public sector pay settlements, and new policy commitments – including the mitigation of the two-child limit. Holyrood's finance secretary, Shona Robison, has called repeatedly for the tax increase to be fully funded by the UK government. She said: 'We have been calling for the UK government to abandon its employer national insurance rise, which risks damaging the economy by making it harder for businesses to take on or keep staff. 'Failing that, we have asked that they fully fund this tax increase to ensure Scotland's NHS, councils and other public services don't lose out on vital revenue. 'As such, it is deeply disappointing that the funding falls so far short of the more than £700m bill we estimate public services face. It feels like Scotland is now being punished for having decided to employ more people in the public sector and to invest in key public services.' The UK government has defended the use of the Barnett formula in calculating public sector national insurance contributions. A spokesperson said the changes were 'in line with agreed funding arrangements and longstanding precedent'. However, the row has reignited a longstanding debate over whether the Barnett formula – in use since 1978 – is fit for purpose, and whether it should be reformed or scrapped in favour of a universal needs-based approach. It also adds to growing friction between the Welsh Labour and UK Labour administrations. Wales has consistently voted Labour for 100 years, and Welsh Labour has controlled the Senedd since its inception in 1999. However, with a year to go before the next Welsh elections, recent polling has suggested the party will trail in third place behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK, with just 18% of votes, putting the first minister and Welsh Labour leader, Eluned Morgan, under pressure to differentiate her wing of the party from its Westminster counterpart. Rory Carroll contributed reporting
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Reeves vows to shield UK from Israel-Iran price shock
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says the government will do "everything in [its] power" to protect people in the UK from the knock-on economic effects of the conflict between Iran and would not "take anything off the table" in response to the threat of rising energy costs, she told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme. The global oil price rose sharply on Friday following the initial attacks by Israel and Iran's subsequent response.A rise in the cost of oil pushes up petrol and diesel prices and can fuel inflation more broadly. Following Russia's full scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, oil prices spiked to nearly $130 a barrel, contributing to higher prices for UK shoppers on everything from transport to the cost of a barrel of oil, currently around $75, is still lower than it was in January. "There is no complacency from myself or the Treasury," Reeves told the 2022, following the start of the Ukraine war, the Conservative government responded to higher energy prices by stepping in to help households with their bills."We are not anywhere near that stage at the moment," the chancellor energy bills respond slowly to rising wholesale energy prices, and average bills, as set by the price cap, are due to come down in the conflict continues, and in particular if there is disruption to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway off the south coast of Iran, the price of oil and gas could rise oil market experts say there is currently less upward pressure on the price of oil than there was three years ago. How the Israel-Iran conflict could affect energy prices Reeves said the situation in the Middle East was part of the reason that she had raised spending on both defence and energy security, in her announcement last week, which outlined the government's budgets for the rest of the parliament."A lack of investment in our own domestic energy production has left us exposed," she said."The investment [announced in the Spending Review] in nuclear energy, in offshore wind, in onshore wind, in carbon capture and storage, is all about ensuring we are more self-sufficient as a nation," she of those investments will take several years to complete, but some of the government's planned investments could have an impact "in the shorter term" such as investment in home insulation, she added. Lord John Browne, former chief executive of the energy giant BP, said he also believed it was time to "push very hard" on energy security, and on the transition away from fossil fuels. Lord Browne, who now chairs BeyondNetZero, a fund investing in carbon transition technologies, told Laura Kuenssberg some of the government's plans were "too bullish" and would take more time than chancellor Mel Stride said the implications of the latest conflict for "oil prices, equity prices... trading and inflation and therefore interest rates and the general state of the world economy" were very said the UK economy needed to be "much stronger" to cope with the challenges it is now facing, adding that the government had made the wrong choices by increasing taxes on business. Plans for borrowing and spending had kept inflation higher, he said.
