Ukraine completes screening of three clusters for EU accession negotiations
Marta Kos, European Commissioner for Enlargement, has announced that Ukraine has already completed the screening of three negotiation clusters for EU accession talks.
Source: a statement by Kos before the start of a meeting of the EU Council on defence and foreign affairs on 20 May in Brussels
Details: These are clusters 1 – Fundamentals, 2 – Internal Market and 6 – Foreign Relations.
Quote from Kos: "Ukraine has done its homework, so it's ready for Cluster 1 Fundamentals to be open. And now the Council will have all the elements to make a decision. Last week, we sent two other screenings to the Council – Cluster 2 and Cluster 6 for both countries, Ukraine and Moldova."
Details: Kos said that if the work were to advance with the same speed as it does now, all screenings could have been processed by autumn.
She said that it would also be a message for Ukraine. Kos stressed that Ukraine's integration into the EU would be a key element of the security guarantees after peace talks started. She pointed out that it concerned not only the security of Ukraine but also the security of Europe and the European Union.
Background:
On 16 January 2025, the European Commission sent the EU Council its first screening report on Cluster 1, Fundamentals, for Ukraine.
However, in February 2025, Hungary blocked the opening of the first negotiation cluster with Ukraine and promised to block the opening of clusters until consultations with the population on this issue were held.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán already voted in a poll against Ukraine's membership in the EU.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
The ‘Trump Doctrine' revealed
'I run the country and the world,' President Trump boasted to reporters for the Atlantic in April, by way of explaining how his current presidency differs from his first. Even for the clinically braggadocious Trump, that was a mouthful. Yes, alas, he does run the country, with a bold recklessness like no president before him, and often lawlessly. He's virtually unchallenged by a supposedly co-equal Congress run by obeisant fellow Republicans who are scared of him and his voters, and he's only partly limited by federal courts that are constrained, as he's not, by fealty to the slow and deliberative rule of law. But Trump running the world? That's hardly clear. As often as not, the world seems to be running him. Yes, Trump is wielding power and forcing global leaders and foreign economies to react to his diktats. He's inflicting incalculable damage: by his hostility to the United States' longtime democratic allies and to the 80-year-old international structure that's bound them; by his shameful deference to the world's dictators; by his global trade war; and not least, by his near-wipeout of U.S. humanitarian aid resulting in the confirmed deaths of uncountable numbers of the globe's poorest people. Yet there is no peace between Ukraine and its Russian invader, despite then-candidate Trump's frequent claims he'd settle the worst European conflict since World War II even before he got to the White House. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is doubling down on his scorched-earth war in Gaza, though Trump told his pal Bibi last year to end the killing, before Trump took office. Talks with Iran are reported near collapse on a deal to prevent the country from building nuclear arms, replacing the Obama-brokered pact that was doing just that before Trump scrapped it. And despite White House bluster in April about cutting 90 trade deals in 90 days, as nations pleaded for relief from Trump's tariffs, no final agreements have been announced by the self-described artist of the deal. For more than a century, as the United States evolved from an isolated giant buffered by two oceans into the world's superpower, people here and abroad have looked to American presidents' early actions and pronouncements to discern a guiding doctrine. After all, not just Americans but all the globe's residents have a stake in U.S. policies — as HIV-infected children in Africa, Ukrainian soldiers, foreign traders and consumers, and many others are sadly finding. A Trump Doctrine is easily discernible in the president's foreign policy record: It's 'Me, Myself and I.' Aside from his vague 'America First' (white) nationalist sloganeering, Trump speaks and acts in ways that reflect little appreciation for the national interest or democratic ideals. He's all about himself and his interests — increasingly, that literally means his business interests. Trump's foreign policy is strictly transactional, motivated by what's in it for him, personally and politically. Which is why, contrary to past presidents for decades, Trump twice now has made his first foreign trip as president not to allies in Europe or North America who share America's values, but to autocratic Saudi Arabia. There, and in the smaller, oil-rich Middle Eastern monarchies he also visited last month, Trump is plainly comfortable, amid the opulence and the shared language of deal-making. In fact, Trump explicitly told reporters soon after his inauguration that he'd likely travel first to Saudi Arabia — if it agreed in advance to spend about $500 billion in the United States. Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman gamely offered $600 billion over four years. Ultimately, Trump came home from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates boasting of bagging $5 trillion — that's trillion, with a T — or maybe $7 trillion, he said, along with a Qatari royal jet for his own use. What details there were suggested that the trade deals for which the president was taking credit — no surprise here — included some commitments dating to the Biden administration. In any case, Americans shouldn't necessarily count on the promised investments: Saudi Arabia's MBS similarly vowed to spend up to $600 billion in the United States back in 2017, when Trump first took office. Yet a study by the Arab Gulf States Initiative concluded that over Trump's first term, U.S. exports to Saudi Arabia totaled $92 billion — below the $110 billion in exports during the preceding four years under President Obama. But here's what you can count on: As the Wall Street Journal has reported, the Trump family business is signing more deals internationally than ever before, mostly in the Middle East but also in India and eastern Europe, for 12 projects including residential high-rises, luxe hotels and golf courses. Beyond real estate, there's the Trumps' $2-billion cryptocurrency deal with the United Arab Emirates state fund. America First? 'We're the hottest brand in the world right now,' son Eric Trump, who runs the Trump Organization, told the Journal. That's good, I guess, because the American brand under Trump has hit the skids. The other noxious sign of Trump's personalization of foreign policy: his constant references to foreign leaders in terms of his own relations with them. Trump's problem is that his supposed friends — the Saudis' MBS, Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping — have ideological and national interests that, unlike for Trump, transcend their personal feelings and stakes. And so MBS resists making peace with Israel, as Trump wants, if Israel won't support a Palestinian state. And Netanyahu vows he'll never do so. Xi has avoided taking a phone call with Trump to talk U.S.-China trade. Meanwhile, Putin plays Trump along in the U.S.-sponsored peace talks with Ukraine; he doesn't want peace, he wants all of Ukraine. Only Trump, then, was surprised by Putin's murderous air attacks in recent weeks. 'I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him,' Trump posted. 'He has gone absolutely CRAZY!' The Kremlin dismissed Trump as 'emotional.' That's what happens when you think you run the world, and the world has other ideas. @Jackiekcalmes @ @jkcalmes
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine's defence minister: aid to Ukraine under the "Danish model" will increase to €1.3 billion
Ukraine's Defence Minister Rustem Umerov has stated that defence support for Ukraine under the "Danish model" is set to increase to €1.3 billion in 2025. Source: "European Pravda", citing Ruslan Umerov's post on Facebook Details: As noted by Ukraine's defence minister, the first tranche of €428 million from Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Norway and Iceland will soon be allocated to the production of Ukrainian weapons: artillery, strike drones, missiles and anti-tank weapons. Quote: "This decision is the result of our conversation with my colleague and friend Troels Lund Poulsen, Danish Minister of Defence." Defence support for Ukraine based on the Danish model will scale up to €1.3 billion by 2025. Quote: "Part of these funds will come from income from frozen Russian assets." Ruslan Umerov also announced "new strategic decisions – both for investments by Ukrainian companies in Ramstein countries and for the deployment of European defence companies' production facilities in Ukraine." Background: At the Ramstein meeting the day before, Ukraine and its partner countries agreed to establish a defence production mechanism. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also called on partners at Ramstein to invest more in Ukraine's defence industry. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NATO prepares to approve funding for Ukraine by allies on two fronts
NATO leaders are preparing to approve a decision to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP – part of this spending will be allowed to be directed towards supporting Ukraine, which could significantly strengthen the defence capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Source: article by European Pravda Details: The new spending target is expected to be divided as follows: 3.5% of GDP for direct military needs, and another 1.5% for broader security projects, including infrastructure. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, responding to a question from European Pravda before the start of the ministerial meeting on 4 June, said that the increase in spending would not negatively affect support for Ukraine. "It would be strange and not wise if in NATO we would make decisions on spending more and then doing it in such a way that it would somehow work against Ukraine getting what it needs going forward to stay in the fight… We will design the new investment plan in such a way that it will not impact the way our allies are working with Ukraine to make sure that you have what you need to stay in the fight," Rutte said. NATO already counts part of its assistance to the Ukrainian Armed Forces as "hard security" spending, such as the purchase of equipment. This approach will continue, and the summit in The Hague will likely also officially allow countries to count Ukrainian assistance as part of the 1.5% "soft security" component. In particular, Rutte informed the governments of the allies about this in a closed letter, in which he presented them with an outline of a draft decision to increase defence spending. This letter caused disagreement among the allies – some argued that all aid to the Ukrainian Armed Forces should now be transferred from the "hard" block to the "soft" one. European Pravda's sources said that Ukraine actively persuaded its allies not to limit the accounting of aid to only the "soft" part, since 3.5% of GDP is a significantly larger resource. Currently, the consensus within NATO is to allow member countries to flexibly determine which category to classify their aid to Ukraine under, depending on its nature. A senior official involved in developing the Alliance's new goals explained to journalists in Brussels that they wanted to give their allies maximum flexibility in terms of which component they included in their aid to Ukraine. He added that this distribution would depend on the type of aid, as not everything provided to Ukraine could be classified as military support. Background: On 5 June, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said that NATO members would support US President Donald Trump's demand for a significant increase in defence spending ahead of the summit in The Hague. It is privately known that Spain is the last major NATO country that has not yet joined the Alliance's plan to announce its intention to spend 5% of GDP on defence. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
