Umbrella clue & eerie final CCTV – how woman's killer was finally snared but why he may NEVER reveal darkest secret
SUZANNA Pilley's day started like any other - she took the bus to work, then popped into Sainsburys next to her office.
But the 38-year-old bookkeeper was never seen again after being brutally murdered by her lover - and her body has never been found.
10
10
10
While cops initially treated the horrifying case as a missing persons inquiry, it later became a murder investigation after police began to unravel Suzanne's complicated life.
They found her former lover, David Gilroy, had killed Suzanne in May 2010 after a furious argument when she tried to end their affair.
Having moved back in with his wife following the split, he tampered with Suzanne's emails and bombarded her with more than 400 messages, which suddenly stopped when she vanished.
Cops believe Suzanne was murdered in the basement of her office block on Thistle Street, Edinburgh where they both worked, before her body was hidden in an alcove while Gilroy returned home to collect his Vauxhall Astra.
The callous dad-of-two even kept Suzanne's remains in his car while attending a school play and going for dinner with his family.
He is then believed to have driven to Lochgilphead to dump her body - his car was found to have suffered extensive damage from travelling over rough ground that he was unable to explain to police.
Despite no body ever being found, Gilroy was convicted in March 2012. He is currently serving a life sentence with a minimum of 18 years.
But the monster, now aged 62, continues to maintain his innocence while rotting in jail.
Twisted Gilroy previously told a crime podcast he would 'fight until my dying breath' to clear his name.
He added: 'I think I've been denied justice.
'I do believe that I have more than enough to prove my innocence beyond any doubt.'
In a final insult, Gilroy has never revealed where Suzanne's body is - leading to 15 years of agony for her family.
Cops suspect Suzanne's body was buried in Argyll Forest, around 40 miles from Glasgow, but several searches of the area have so far turned up nothing.
Judge Lord Bracadale previously told Gilroy he had shown 'quite chilling calmness' when he disposed of his ex-lover's remains.
Caging the fiend in 2012, he continued: 'It seems that you are the only person who knows where her body is.'
Now, a criminologist has told The Sun Online why the evil killer may never divulge the grisly secret.
Nicole Nyamwiza, Senior Lecturer in Criminology at The University of Law said: "Refusing to reveal the location of a body is a pattern we've seen in several high-profile cases. It's often about control.
"Even after conviction, the offender can still dictate the terms of closure.
"In the case of David Gilroy, the continued silence keeps the family in a state of suspended grief, and that in itself is a form of harm. This is not unique.
10
10
10
10
"Ian Simms, who was convicted of murdering Helen McCourt in 1988, never revealed where he left her body. That refusal went on for decades. Despite forensic evidence, despite a conviction, he held on to that final piece of power.
"For some individuals, particularly those with controlling or narcissistic tendencies, keeping that information back is deliberate. It sustains attention, preserves denial, or simply continues the exercise of control."
Murder convictions where no body is found are rare, and the Pilley case is one of a handful in the UK where the decision has relied on circumstantial evidence.
Despite their torment, Suzanne's family have refused to give up and launched Suzanne's Law in her name to stop killers who refuse to disclose the location of a victim's body from getting parole.
Nicole added: "There is also a wider issue here about what justice really means. If someone can serve a sentence without ever disclosing what happened to a victim's remains, we have to question how we assess accountability or rehabilitation.
"Proposals like Suzanne's Law are an important step. They recognise that justice involves more than time served. For many families, justice starts with being able to bring their loved one home."
Chilling CCTV
Suzanne and Gilroy had begun their affair in the spring of 2009 and he'd moved into her former council flat just a few streets away from her parents.
Speaking during the court case, Suzanne's mother says the pair had a turbulent relationship and that her daughter had struggled to cope with his jealous behaviour.
Two days before Suzanne vanished, the bookkeeper and Gilroy were seen on CCTV food shopping near her flat.
Police Scotland also tracked the bookkeeper's last movements on the day of her disappearance through CCTV after she was reported missing by her parents.
She boarded the No 2 bus near her home in Stenhouse, Edinburgh. at 8.20am, before changing to a No 4 bus.
She entered a Sainsbury's at 8.48am and was seen walking into her office at 8.55am. Suzanne was never seen again.
Early on, a person of interest was her married colleague and ex-Royal Navy engineer, Gilroy, due to their tumultuous relationship and his refusal to accept that their love affair was over.
During his trial, it was heard that Gilroy met Suzanne when she arrived at work the day she went missing.
They went to the basement garage and an argument ensued, after which the jury was told there had been a struggle and he had killed the bookkeeper.
10
10
The court heard he hid her body while he bought air fresheners, put her body in his car and then drove home.
Disturbingly, he attended a school play and went out for dinner with his family as her remains lay in the boot of his car on the driveway.
The day after Suzanne vanished, Gilroy went on an unplanned trip to Lochgilphead, Argyllshire, 130 miles away, where he had taken his lover for days out in the past.
On the way back, police called him in for questioning and spotted scratches on his hand that he tried to cover up with makeup.
From then on, he became a prime suspect.
Dirt and vegetation on his car wheels suggested he had recently visited a forest - and Gilroy couldn't explain it away.
Detectives worked out that he took five hours to drive what should have been a 36 minute journey to Lochgilphead.
Cops scoured CCTV once again, tracking Gilroy's movements, and watched as he bought bin bags from a shop.
Umbrella clue
Street cameras also tracked his car making its way to Lochgilphead, and an umbrella was spotted on the parcel shelf in the boot of the vehicle.
On his return journey, the umbrella was no longer there - and cops theorised it had been put back in the boot when the remains were taken out.
A dog trained to smell blood and human remains also identified three areas of interest - the basement, and two spots in the boot of Gilroy's car.
The evidence was enough for the jury to make a majority verdict after almost three days of deliberation.
But nearly 13 years on, one thing remains unsolved - the location of Suzanne's body.
Gail Fairgrieve, Suzanne's sister, said in 2019: "For the past decade we have lived in a state of limbo, waiting for the news that Suzanne's body had been found, but we've never been able to get that closure.
"We accept that Suzanne was murdered and believe that the person responsible is in prison, but we feel we cannot say a proper goodbye until her body is found.
"Both my mother and I want to again thank the public who have continued to contact the police, which has always given us hope that Suzanne has not been forgotten.
"We understand that only one person can tell us where Suzanne is but has refused to do so. Police Scotland will respond to any information and are committed to bringing us some form of closure.
"Their investigation can only conclude when Suzanne is found and so I would plead with anyone who knows something but hasn't come forward to search their conscience and get in touch.
"Not for our sake, but for Suzanne's. Please let us give her the burial and send-off she deserves."
Police Scotland said: "We remain committed to finding these answers for Suzanne's mother, Sylvia and sister, Gail."
In another brutal blow for the family, Suzanne's dad tragically died in 2019 without ever knowing what happened to his daughter.
Time is ticking to finally bring Suzanne home to her remaining loved ones - but it seems certain that her callous killer will look to take his secret to the grave.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
15 minutes ago
- Sky News
'Britain's darkest secret': Grooming survivor calls for apology from Starmer
A rape survivor who was abused by dozens of men has called on the prime minister to apologise for the delay in calling for a national inquiry into the grooming scandal. "Elizabeth", whose name we have changed to protect her identity, was abused by a gang of men in Rotherham from the age of 14. She was also trafficked to other cities and says she was raped by so many men over the course of more than three years she doesn't know the exact number. She says all her abusers were of Pakistani heritage. After Louise Casey's explosive report revealed the ethnicity of perpetrators had been shied away from by the authorities, Elizabeth says Sir Keir Starmer owes survivors an apology "not just for holding back on the inquiry, because he could have done this six months ago, but also for the insults that followed". She says it was incorrect of the prime minister to accuse people of jumping on a "far-right bandwagon". "Survivors and families have not done that. You have whistleblowers, you know, it's concerned people wanting justice for child abuse," she says. She also believes that had the authorities been prepared to confront concerns about the ethnicity of offenders and investigate communities more closely, she could have been spared the abuse she suffered. "Going back, the intelligence, everything, I should never have been a victim," she says. Many are angry it has taken 11 years for politicians to accept the issue Shockingly, in Rotherham, the truth has been known for more than a decade. In 2014 a report by Alexis Jay, who went on to chair a national inquiry into the wider issue of child sexual exploitation, found there were at least 1,400 victims of grooming in the town, with the perpetrators predominantly of Pakistani heritage. 4:18 Many here, including Elizabeth, are angry it has taken 11 years for politicians to accept the issue, despite scandals emerging in a number of towns and cities across Britain. "It's a question still that needs to be answered. I do think it was because they wanted to be politically correct," she says. 'They silenced the wrong people' She's disappointed but unsurprised by the revelation that Whitehall officials wanted to help the authorities in Rotherham cover up the scandal: "It does explain a lot because I've always thought that how organised Rotherham was - how possibly could they have pulled it off themselves?" She believes the result of years of denial by the authorities has meant perpetrators were protected. She describes the survivors of grooming as "Britain's darkest secret", adding, "they silenced the wrong people and we need the truth. Why did they do it?". Sir Keir 'frustrated' with politicians who 'shout and scream but do nothing' Sir Keir said he gets "frustrated" with politicians who "shout and scream but do nothing" as he defended past comments about a grooming gangs inquiry. 7:56 Speaking to Sky News's political editor Beth Rigby, the prime minister was asked if he regretted saying in January that those calling for a national probe into paedophile rings were "jumping on a far-right bandwagon" - given he has now agreed to one. Sir Keir said he was "really clear" he was talking about the Tories, who were demanding an inquiry they never set up when they were in government. He said: "I was calling out those politicians. I am frustrated with politics when people shout and scream a lot and do nothing when they've got the opportunity to do it. It's one of the worst aspects of politics, in my view."
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Man who was 'tortured to death' in his own home was discovered naked in his hallway with ankles bound with duct tape, court hears
Man who was 'tortured to death' in his own home was discovered naked in his hallway with ankles bound with duct tape, court hears A man who was allegedly tortured to death in a brutal attack at his own home was found naked and bound in his hallway, a court has heard. Thomas Campbell, 38, was discovered by shocked neighbours the morning after he was subjected to a harrowing and violent assault in Mossley, Tameside. Jurors at Manchester Crown Court were told the father-of-two was ambushed by a gang of three men as he arrived home late on the evening of Saturday, July 2, 2022. One of the men, John Belfield, 31, is accused of being the ringleader behind the plot. He denies being at the scene and has pleaded not guilty to murder and conspiracy to rob. Another attacker, Reece Steven, has already been convicted of murder, while the third man involved has never been identified. The court heard the 'horrific' killing was the result of 'very careful planning by a team of highly organised criminals' who used a tracking device placed on Mr Campbell's car and carried out reconnaissance on his home in the days before the assault. Prosecutors claim Belfield had a personal motive for targeting Mr Campbell, including a desire to steal 'items of value' and jealousy over a relationship between Mr Campbell and Belfield's ex-girlfriend. Thomas dealt cocaine and was prosecuted for money laundering offences Coleen (pictured) broke up with Thomas after he cheated on her with a friend Pictured is Reece Steven, who was convicted of murder and was jailed for life with a minimum of 37 years Pictured is Stephen Cleworth, one of the killers. He was was found guilty of manslaughter and jailed for 12 years The court was told that Mr Campbell's ex-wife, Coleen Campbell, was among those previously convicted in connection to his death. During a 2023 trial, she was found guilty of sharing crucial details about her former husband's movements — including information passed on by their children — with Belfield. Stephen Cleworth, from Heywood, who acted as a driver for Belfield, was also convicted of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob. He was responsible for planting the tracker on Mr Campbell's vehicle and assisting with surveillance though he was not present during the murder. Steven, described by prosecutors as Belfield's 'right-hand man', was convicted of murder and conspiracy to rob following the same trial. As Belfield's trial continued this week, the jury heard from forensic pathologist Dr Philip Lumb, who carried out the post-mortem examination on Mr Campbell's body. Dr Lumb described the chilling scene where he found the 38-year-old victim lying dead in the hallway of his home. Campbell is pictured outside Manchester Crown Court during an earlier hearing relating to her husband's death Thomas Campbell, 38, was ambushed by three men as he opened his front door in Mossley, Greater Manchester Thomas Campbell, 38, (pictured with Coleen on holiday) was ambushed by three men as he opened his front door in Mossley, Greater Manchester The expert said Mr Campbell had sustained injuries consistent with 'restraint' and 'asphyxia', and had suffered a 'sustained blunt sharp force physical assault' to the head and neck. Jurors also heard Mr Campbell had suffered burn injuries to his thigh and buttocks, believed to have been caused by 'a hot liquid such as hot water'. A large stab wound to his upper arm had bled heavily, and a makeshift tourniquet had been found on the limb. Dr Lumb concluded that the medical cause of death was a combination of multiple sharp force injuries, blunt force head injuries, and pressure to the neck. Belfield, of no fixed address, continues to deny murder and conspiracy to rob as the trial proceeds.
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I paid £83.50 for just an HOUR of parking after firm fined me for a 'stupid reason'
A mental health support worker paid £83.50 for just an hour of parking - after a firm fined him for not buying a ticket, even though their machine was out of order. Lenny Samms, 63, of Eastbourne, told MailOnline he received an £85 charge in early January for the totally accidental breach in October last year. He parked at Iceland - but with the payment machine not working, he could not buy a ticket: 'I thought, "There's other cars here, I'll just get on with my day".' Mr Samms was only away from his car for an hour, which normally costs £1.50 - so with an £85 charge, he essentially paid £83.50 more than he should have had to. That comes in at a pricey £1.40 per minute - nearly the normal hourly rate, thanks to the fine issued by Horizon Parking. He explained the machine was out of order when he received the charge - but with no proof, he ended up just paying it: 'I didn't want to go to court and try to explain it. 'I didn't take a photograph of the machine saying out of order when I should have.' But he said: 'I felt sort of isolated, I'm sure that other people have gone through it but I had no support or a witness or anyone else I knew that had gone through it. Lenny Samms (pictured), 63, of Eastbourne, told MailOnline he received an £85 charge in early January for the totally accidental breach in October last year He parked at Iceland (pictured) - but with the payment machine not working, he could not buy a ticket: 'I thought, "There's other cars here, I'll just get on with my day"' Mr Samms was only away from his car for an hour, which normally costs £1.50 - so with an £85 charge, he essentially paid £83.50 more than he should have had to 'That's why I was thinking, "Should I reach out to anyone on Facebook who had gone through a similar thing?" 'Because it's a local town, Eastbourne is not that big and I wondered if anyone had gone through it but then you feel quite isolated really. And it's annoying really.' He continued: 'When you're getting a parking charge like this, it can be quite intimidating, threatening you with court procedures and all this. 'I just wish I had the proof but I know next time to get proof, you need evidence. 'It was a hard lesson to learn, really, then I probably wouldn't have had to pay it.' But Mr Samms never thought he would have to go on to prove the machine was not working - with CCTV cameras in the car park to already show that was the case. The 63-year-old continued: 'I just naively thought that the machine and the camera sort of liaise together. I didn't expect a ticket to come through the post.' And it was only after paying the charge and discussing it with an Iceland employee that he discovered there is a second payment machine in the car park. But Mr Samms never thought he would have to go on to prove the machine was not working - with CCTV cameras in the car park (pictured, a sign in the Iceland car park) to already show that was the case But it is not visible unless you are entering the supermarket - which he was not - and there is no notice in the car park informing customers it is there. Drivers facing trouble with unexpected charges from parking firms has become an increasingly well-documented issue in recent times. In fact, analysis by MailOnline has shown 'cowboy' parking firms are now doling out a record number of tickets. Government figures suggest private operators issued 12.8million fines in 2023/24 – one every two seconds. This is up nearly 90 per cent in just five years, despite the Government repeatedly vowing to stop predatory operators. With 2024/25 on track to be even worse, ministers are facing renewed calls to get tough on the ruthless firms causing misery for millions of motorists. Simon Williams, head of policy at the RAC, said it was 'scandalous' how motorists were being stung by broken technology and firms deploying sneaky signs to take 'advantage of law-abiding citizens'. He revealed he was working with parliamentarians to stop parking firms 'marking their own homework' by overhauling the current complaints process. Mr Samms said: 'When you're getting a parking charge like this, it can be quite intimidating, threatening you with court procedures and all this'. Pictured: The machine in the Iceland car park Mr Williams said: 'We want a truly independent single appeals service that only the Government backed private parking code of practice will deliver. 'We also want a scrutiny board which will ensure private parking operators conform to the rules and will face consequences if they do not.' Mr Samms echoed this sentiment too: 'The parking companies are known to be quite greedy and misleading, aren't they? So, it's no surprise, it's all about money... 'When you work hard for your money and you've got a mortgage to pay and bills to pay and the cost of living is going up, the last thing you want is to have to find £85.' The support worker, who has lived in Eastbourne all his life, has said parking in the town has become noticeably more expensive in recent years. He said: 'I've seen Eastbourne changed, like most towns are getting bigger, whereas years ago, you used be able to park in town without paying.' Payment has only come in the last ten or 15 years he said: 'Before, you could just park freely, but now, in and around the town, the radius, where you can't park for free anymore, you've got to park way outside of town if you want to park for free.' He also often visits Brighton, only a 20-minute drive away - but finds it very expensive to park there too. He continued: 'I just wish I had the proof but I know next time to get proof, you need evidence'. Pictured: A sign in the Iceland car park Your browser does not support iframes. Mr Samms said: 'It was the Green Party that made Brighton expensive to park to encourage tourists to use public transport but in fact what it was doing was keeping people away from Brighton. 'The parking was so expensive, you could spend £30 for a few hours. So, you do your shopping and things and you have a £35 bill.' Private parking firms are on course to issue a record 14.5million tickets to drivers in Britain in a year – with just five companies responsible for nearly half of them. And the firm behind Mr Samms' charge, Horizon Parking, is one of them. The RAC found car park management firms' requests to the DVLA (Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency) reached 7.2million in the six months to the end of last September. That is up 12 per cent from the same period a year earlier and represents an average of 41,000 requests per day. The RAC added if the rate continued for the following six months, 14.5million tickets will have been issued over a year. The five parking companies which issued 45 per cent of tickets between April and September last year were ParkingEye (1,129,000), Euro Car Parks (892,000), Horizon Parking (440,000), Smart Parking (424,000) and APCOA Parking (367,000). Your browser does not support iframes. Your browser does not support iframes. Private companies chase vehicle owners for alleged infringements in private car parks, such as at shopping centres, leisure facilities and motorway service areas. Each ticket can be up to £100, meaning the daily total cost to drivers may be near £4.1million at the current rate. But private parking firms have been accused of using misleading and confusing signs, aggressive debt collection and unreasonable fees. An investigation by the PA news agency earlier this year found drivers across England say they are being sent parking charge notices (PCNs) because of faulty machines, which one campaigner claiming the devices are 'set up to trap people'. A Bill to enable the introduction of a Government-backed code for private parking companies received royal assent under the Conservative government in March 2019. The code was withdrawn in June 2022 after a legal challenge by parking companies. Horizon Parking told MailOnline: 'We manage the car park on behalf of the landowner to ensure that their customers are able to park and utilise the facilities as required. This helps prevent abuse including ensuring disabled bays are kept free for those who need them. 'There is a clearly set out appeals process which motorists can follow if they feel that they should not have received a Charge. We are members of the British Parking Association and adhere to the Private Parking Sector Single Code of Practice. 'Without further information such as Parking Charge reference or vehicle registration we are unable to investigate this matter or comment any further. 'If a motorist receives a Parking Charge in these circumstances it is possible to investigate any issues with the payment machines from the back-office system, however without a specific date it is not possible to do so. 'Please note that payment on arrival is required and payment at the machine would not be possible if a motorist had remained in the car park for longer than the permitted maximum stay of 1 hour which is why it may have appeared not to be working. There is also the option to pay via our Horizon Parking app or website at by entering the location code advertised in the car park.'
