logo
DLF to Tata Realty: Real estate majors begin checking in digital ratings

DLF to Tata Realty: Real estate majors begin checking in digital ratings

Multinational tenants demand ratings based on digital connectivity, readiness of buildings
New Delhi
Listen to This Article
Real estate majors like DLF, House of Hiranandani, Tata Realty and others have begun digital rating of their commercial properties, with multinational tenants demanding ratings based on digital connectivity and readiness of buildings so as to meet their ESG compliance and sustainability goals.
'We realised that some of the larger American tenants wanted to know our WiredScore, which is a score on the digital connectivity of the buildings. So, three buildings have now got a WiredScore 'Platinum' rating and now we have asked the institute to rate all our buildings across our portfolio,' said Sriram Khattar, vice-chairman and managing director,

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China to send Vice Premier He Lifeng to UK for trade talks
China to send Vice Premier He Lifeng to UK for trade talks

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

China to send Vice Premier He Lifeng to UK for trade talks

China's foreign ministry said on Saturday that Chinese vice premier He Lifeng will visit the United Kingdom between June 8 and June 13. read more China's foreign ministry announced on Saturday that Vice Premier He Lifeng will travel to the United Kingdom from June 8 to June 13. During this visit, He will also participate in the inaugural meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism, according to the ministry. He Lifeng previously led the Chinese delegation in the initial round of trade negotiations held in May. On Friday, US President Donald Trump confirmed that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will lead the American side in the upcoming discussions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ongoing friction between the United States and China continues to simmer amid a prolonged trade conflict that has weighed heavily on both economies. Although the two sides temporarily rolled back most tariffs following breakthrough trade discussions in Geneva last month, tensions have reignited. The two nations, whose bilateral trade in goods exceeded $582 billion last year, now face renewed setbacks. Beijing has accused Washington of eroding the limited progress made, particularly after the US Commerce Department issued a warning to the chip industry against sourcing semiconductors from China. Additionally, China voiced strong opposition to the Trump administration's recent move to revoke visas for several Chinese students enrolled at American universities. In turn, the US has criticised China for allegedly dragging its feet on a commitment made during the Geneva talks, specifically, a pledge to increase exports of rare earth minerals critical to American industries. With inputs from agencies

Andhra Pradesh and Nvidia sign MoU to advance growth of AI ecosystem
Andhra Pradesh and Nvidia sign MoU to advance growth of AI ecosystem

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Andhra Pradesh and Nvidia sign MoU to advance growth of AI ecosystem

Andhra Pradesh has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with American Technology company, Nvidia Corp to advance growth of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) ecosystem in the state, said Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on part of the MoU signed between both the sides, the tech giant will privide support to the state in preparing curriculum and training over next two years. In a post on X, Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu said, "Andhra Pradesh is welcoming bold initiatives to lead India's AI revolution. Under the leadership of Hon'ble IT Minister @naralokesh Garu, we have entered into an MoU with @nvidia to build a strong and inclusive AI ecosystem in the state." "With support from NVIDIA for curriculum and training, 10,000 engineering students will receive skill training over the next two years, while 500 AI startups from AP will gain access to its Inception Program for global exposure and key resources," CM added. CM Naidu further added that plans are underway to establish India's first AI University in collaboration with NVIDIA to shape the infrastructure and research capabilities. "From education and skilling to research and innovation, this initiative is laying the foundation for a Swarna Andhra Pradesh," he added. Andhra Pradesh is actively working towards developing the state's AI ecosystem. The state government has announced the development of India's first Quantum Computing Village. The 50-acre facility in Amaravati, which the state government previously announced, is envisioned as a pioneering ecosystem for quantum computing research and collaboration. The facility is envisioned as a collaborative ecosystem where institutions and companies can access and share advanced quantum computing resources. It will also include a dedicated on-site data centre to support high-performance computing needs. IBM and TCS will jointly finalise the infrastructure specifications, with the initial setup set to host the IBM Quantum System Two.

Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts -- but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain
Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts -- but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts -- but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain

The tax cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would likely gouge a hole in the federal budget. The president has a patch handy, though: his sweeping import taxes - tariffs. The Congressional Budget Office, the government's nonpartisan arbiter of tax and spending matters, says the One Big Beautiful Bill, passed by the House last month and now under consideration in the Senate, would increase federal budget deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. That is because its tax cuts would drain the government's coffers faster than its spending cuts would save money. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kardioloog: Buikvet na je 50e? Stop dit in je schoenen Gezondheidstip By bringing in revenue for the Treasury, on the other hand, the tariffs that Trump announced through May 13 - including his so-called reciprocal levies of up to 50% on countries with which the United States has a trade deficit - would offset the budget impact of the tax-cut bill and reduce deficits over the next decade by $2.5 trillion. So it's basically a wash. Live Events That's the budget math anyway. The real answer is more complicated. Actually using tariffs to finance a big chunk of the federal government would be a painful and perilous undertaking, budget wonks say. "It's a very dangerous way to try to raise revenue," said Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model, who served in President George W. Bush's Treasury Department. Trump has long advocated tariffs as an economic elixir. He says they can protect American industries, bring factories back to the United States, give him leverage to win concessions over foreign governments - and raise a lot of money. He's even suggested that they could replace the federal income tax, which now brings in about half of federal revenue. "It's possible we'll do a complete tax cut,'' he told reporters in April. "I think the tariffs will be enough to cut all of the income tax.'' Economists and budget analysts do not share the president's enthusiasm for using tariffs to finance the government or to replace other taxes. "It's a really bad trade,'' said Erica York, the Tax Foundation's vice president of federal tax policy. "It's perhaps the dumbest tax reform you could design.'' For one thing, Trump's tariffs are an unstable source of revenue. He bypassed Congress and imposed his biggest import tax hikes through executive orders. That means a future president could simply reverse them. "Or political whims in Congress could change, and they could decide, 'Hey, we're going revoke this authority because we don't think it's a good thing that the president can just unilaterally impose a $2 trillion tax hike,' '' York said. Or the courts could kill his tariffs before Congress or future presidents do. A federal court in New York has already struck down the centerpiece of his tariff program - the reciprocal and other levies he announced on what he called "Liberation Day'' April 2 - saying he'd overstepped his authority. An appeals court has allowed the government to keep collecting the levies while the legal challenge winds its way through the court system. Economists also say that tariffs damage the economy. They are a tax on foreign products, paid by importers in the United States and usually passed along to their customers via higher prices. They raise costs for U.S. manufacturers that rely on imported raw materials, components and equipment, making them less competitive than foreign rivals that don't have to pay Trump's tariffs. Tariffs also invite retaliatory taxes on U.S. exports by foreign countries. Indeed, the European Union this week threatened "countermeasures'' against Trump's unexpected move to raise his tariff on foreign steel and aluminum to 50%. "You're not just getting the effect of a tax on the U.S. economy," York said. "You're also getting the effect of foreign taxes on U.S. exports.'' She said the tariffs will basically wipe out all economic benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts. Smetters at the Penn Wharton Budget Model said that tariffs also isolate the United States and discourage foreigners from investing in its economy. Foreigners see U.S. Treasurys as a super-safe investment and now own about 30% of the federal government's debt. If they cut back, the federal government would have to pay higher interest rates on Treasury debt to attract a smaller number of potential investors domestically. Higher borrowing costs and reduced investment would wallop the economy, making tariffs the most economically destructive tax available, Smetters said - more than twice as costly in reduced economic growth and wages as what he sees as the next-most damaging: the tax on corporate earnings. Tariffs also hit the poor hardest. They end up being a tax on consumers, and the poor spend more of their income than wealthier people do. Even without the tariffs, the One Big Beautiful Bill slams the poorest because it makes deep cuts to federal food programs and to Medicaid, which provides health care to low-income Americans. After the bill's tax and spending cuts, an analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model found, the poorest fifth of American households earning less than $17,000 a year would see their incomes drop by $820 next year. The richest 0.1% earning more than $4.3 million a year would come out ahead by $390,070 in 2026. "If you layer a regressive tax increase like tariffs on top of that, you make a lot of low- and middle-income households substantially worse off,'' said the Tax Foundation's York. Overall, she said, tariffs are "a very unreliable source of revenue for the legal reasons, the political reasons as well as the economic reasons. They're a very, very inefficient way to raise revenue. If you raise a dollar of a revenue with tariffs, that's going to cause a lot more economic harm than raising revenue any other way.''

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store