logo
Alex Jones Accused of Trying to Shield Assets as Sandy Hook Families Seek Payment on $1B Judgment

Alex Jones Accused of Trying to Shield Assets as Sandy Hook Families Seek Payment on $1B Judgment

Al Arabiya4 hours ago

The trustee overseeing Infowars host Alex Jones's personal bankruptcy case is accusing the far-right conspiracy theorist of trying to shield more than $5 million from creditors, including relatives of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut.
Three new lawsuits filed by the trustee on Friday alleging fraudulent asset transfers are the latest developments in Jones's long-running bankruptcy case, which has been pending in federal court in Houston for more than two years. In financial statements filed in bankruptcy court last year, Jones listed his net worth at $8.4 million. The Sandy Hook families won nearly $1.5 billion in judgments in 2022 in lawsuits filed in Connecticut and Texas accusing Jones of defamation and emotional distress for saying the school shooting that killed 20 first-graders and six educators was a hoax. Victims' relatives testified in court about being terrorized by Jones's supporters. Attempts to liquidate Jones's Infowars broadcasting and product-selling platforms and give the proceeds to the families and other creditors have been hindered by a failed auction and legal wrangling. Jones, meanwhile, continues to appeal the Sandy Hook judgments.
Here's what to know about the status of Jones's bankruptcy case: Trustee sues Jones alleging improper money and property transfers. The trustee, Christopher Murray, alleges that Jones tried to shield the money through a complex series of money and property transfers among family members, various trusts, and limited liability companies. Other named defendants include Jones's wife, Erika; his father, David Jones; and companies and trusts.
Murray alleges that a trust run by Jones and his father fraudulently transferred nearly $1.5 million to various other Jones-associated entities in the months leading up to the bankruptcy. Jones is also accused of fraudulently transferring $1.5 million to his wife, more than $800,000 in cash and property to his father, and trying to hide ownership of two condominiums in Austin, Texas, with a combined value of more than $1.5 million. Murray is trying to recoup that money and property for creditors. Jones's bankruptcy lawyers did not return email messages seeking comment. In an email to The Associated Press, Erika Wulff Jones called the lawsuits 'pure harassment' and said she already had sat for a deposition. She said the accounting has been done but did not elaborate. A lawyer for David Jones did not immediately return an email seeking comment.
Jones railed against the new allegations on his show on Saturday. He has repeatedly said Democratic activists and the Justice Department are behind the Sandy Hook defamation lawsuits and bankruptcy proceedings and claimed they were now trying to get to him by suing his father, who he says is seriously ill. The fraud allegations are similar to those in a lawsuit in a Texas state court filed by Sandy Hook families. Jones also denied those claims. That lawsuit was put on hold because of the bankruptcy.
Sandy Hook families still haven't received money from Jones. Jones says the fact that the Sandy Hook families haven't received any money from him yet should be expected because he is appealing the $1.5 billion in judgments. Infowars assets continue to be tied up in the legal processes. Those assets and some of Jones's personal assets are being held by Murray for eventual distribution to creditors.
An effort to sell Infowars assets was derailed when US Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez rejected the results of a November auction in which The Onion satirical news outlet was named the winning bidder over only one other proposal by a company affiliated with Jones. The Onion had planned to turn the Infowars platforms into parody sites. Lopez had several concerns about the auction, including a lack of transparency and murky details about the actual value of The Onion's bid and whether it was better than the other offer. The judge rejected holding another auction and said the families could pursue liquidation of Jones's assets in the state courts where the defamation judgments were awarded.
In a financial statement last year, Infowars' parent company, Free Speech Systems, listed $18 million in assets, including merchandise and studio equipment.
What's next? Lawyers for the Sandy Hook families said they will soon move their effort to sell Infowars assets to a Texas state court in Austin, where they expect a receiver to be appointed to take possession of the platforms' possessions and sell them to provide money to creditors. A court schedule has not been set. 'The families we represent are as determined as ever to enforce the jury's verdict, and he will never outrun it,' Christopher Mattei, a lawyer for the Sandy Hook families in the Connecticut lawsuit, said Tuesday.
Jones's appeals, meanwhile, continue in the courts. He said he plans to appeal the Connecticut lawsuit judgment to the US Supreme Court after the Connecticut Supreme Court declined to hear his challenge. A lower state appeals court upheld all but $150 million of the original $1.4 billion judgment. The $49 million judgment in the Texas lawsuit is before a state appeals court. He said in 2022 that he believes the shootings were '100 percent real.' Because Infowars assets are still tied up in the courts, Jones has been allowed to continue broadcasting his shows and hawking merchandise from Infowars' Austin studio.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Civil Rights Agency's Acting Chief to Face Questions on Anti-DEI, Transgender Stances
Civil Rights Agency's Acting Chief to Face Questions on Anti-DEI, Transgender Stances

Al Arabiya

time2 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Civil Rights Agency's Acting Chief to Face Questions on Anti-DEI, Transgender Stances

The acting chief of the country's top agency for enforcing worker rights faced questions at a Senate committee hearing Wednesday over her efforts to prioritize anti-diversity investigations while sidelining certain racial and gender discrimination cases and quashing protections for transgender workers. Andrea Lucas, who was first appointed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2020 and elevated to acting chief in January, is one of four Labor Department nominees to appear before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Her nomination to serve another five-year term as an EEOC commissioner requires Senate confirmation, though whether she stays on as chief will be up to President Donald Trump. Lucas, an outspoken critic of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices and promoter of the idea that there are only two immutable sexes, has moved swiftly to enact Trump's civil rights agenda after he abruptly fired two of the EEOC's Democratic commissioners before the end of their five-year terms – an unprecedented move in the agency's 60-year history that has been challenged in a lawsuit. Lucas is prioritizing worker rights that conservatives argue have been ignored by the EEOC. That includes investigating company DEI practices, defending the rights of women to same-sex spaces, and fighting anti-Christian bias in the workplace. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, chairman of the Senate committee holding the hearing, has championed many of those causes. He accused the EEOC under the Biden administration of injecting its 'far-left agenda' into the workplace, including by updating sexual harassment guidelines to warn against misgendering transgender workers and including abortion as a pregnancy-related condition under regulations for the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. Questioning the EEOC's independence, Democrats on the committee are likely to grill Lucas over criticism that she overstepped her authority by profoundly shifting the EEOC's direction to the whims of the president in the absence of a quorum, which commission has lacked since Trump fired the two commissioners. Sen. Patty Murray, a member of the committee, said she will oppose any EEOC nominations unless Trump reinstates the two fired Democratic commissioners, which she and more than 200 other Democratic senators and Congress members condemned in a letter to the president as an 'abuse of power.' 'President Trump is weaponizing the independent EEOC to serve his personal political agenda, firing commissioners without cause and warping the mission of the EEOC beyond recognition,' Murray said in a statement ahead of the hearing. 'Commissioner Lucas is a right-wing extremist who has been in lockstep behind Trump's pro-discrimination agenda.' Lucas has made clear her views of the limitations of the EEOC's autonomy. In a recent memo to employers, Lucas declared that the EEOC is 'an executive branch agency, not an independent agency,' that will 'fully and robustly comply with all executive orders.' That includes two orders that Trump signed in January: one directing federal agencies to eliminate their own DEI activities and end any equity-related grants or contracts, and the other imposing a certification provision on all companies and institutions with government contracts or grant dollars to demonstrate that they don't operate DEI programs. The EEOC's new approach alarmed more than 30 civil rights groups, which sent a letter to the Senate committee demanding that Lucas face a hearing. The groups argued that the EEOC was created by Congress under 1964 Civil Rights Act to be a bipartisan agency that would function independently from the executive branch. The EEOC, the only federal agency empowered to investigate employment discrimination in the private sector, received more than 88,000 charges of workplace discrimination in fiscal year 2024. Its commissioners are appointed by the president to staggered terms, and no more than three can be from the same party. Much of the EEOC's authority is granted by Congress, including the obligation to investigate all complaints and enact regulations for implementing some laws. Under Lucas, the EEOC dropped seven of its own lawsuits on behalf of transgender or nonbinary workers. It also moved to drop a racial discrimination case on behalf of Black, Native American, and multiracial job applicants after Trump ordered federal agencies to stop pursuing discrimination that falls under 'disparate impact' liability, which aims to identify practices that systematically exclude certain demographic groups. Instead, Lucas has turned the EEOC's attention to investigating company DEI practices. In her most high-profile move, she sent letters to 20 law firms demanding information about diversity fellowships and other programs she claimed could be evidence of discriminatory practices. Lucas has also repeatedly encouraged workers nationwide to come forward with DEI complaints. She launched a hotline for whistleblowers and said workers should be encouraged to report 'bad DEI practices' after a Supreme Court decision made it easier for white and other non-minority workers to bring reverse-discrimination lawsuits.

Had a belly full. Could Chinese swimmers have eaten 5 kilos of food en route to failed doping test?
Had a belly full. Could Chinese swimmers have eaten 5 kilos of food en route to failed doping test?

Al Arabiya

time2 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Had a belly full. Could Chinese swimmers have eaten 5 kilos of food en route to failed doping test?

The head of the US Anti-Doping Agency told senators that Chinese swimmers would have had to eat around 11 pounds (5 kilograms) of food to test for the amounts of the performance enhancer that resulted in the much-debated positive drug tests from 2021 that were later disregarded. 'It's unbelievable to think that Tinkerbell just showed up and sprinkled it all over the kitchen,' Travis Tygart said in a Senate hearing Tuesday focused on the World Anti-Doping Agency's response to the doping case. A key part of that case was WADA's acceptance of the explanation from Chinese authorities that the swimmers had been contaminated by traces of the drug Trimetazidine (TMZ) in a hotel kitchen. USADA scientists analyzed data from a report commissioned by WADA to come up with the amount of food (5 kilos) or liquid (4.9 liters) the athletes would have had to have consumed to test positive at the levels they did. For all the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app. WADA officials declined to participate in the hearing, which spokesperson James Fitzgerald called 'another political effort led by Travis Tygart … to leverage the Senate and the media in a desperate effort to relitigate the Chinese swimming cases and misinform athletes and other stakeholders.' Also testifying was former US drug czar Rahul Gupta, whose decision at the start of this year to withhold $3.6 million in funding–the biggest single chunk that WADA receives on an annual basis–furthered a long-running feud between US and WADA authorities. The Senate subcommittee holding the hearing is considering a bill that would give the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy–the so-called drug czar–permanent authority to withhold those funds without needing year-to-year permission from Congress. In his prepared testimony, Gupta compared WADA's governance challenges to a used car. 'You expect that the car has been thoroughly inspected, that it's safe and roadworthy,' he said. 'But as soon as you drive it off the lot, the brakes fail and the engine sputters–and only then do you learn that the dealership has a history of skipping inspections altogether.' Gupta and Tygart recommended a host of reforms for WADA, most of which revolve around ensuring independence, which they say cannot be accomplished under the current model that calls on the International Olympic Committee to supply half of WADA's money. Gupta also pressed for the United States to regain a seat on WADA's executive committee that it lost in the aftermath of the dues flareup. Also testifying was Katie McLaughlin, a member of the US 4x200 freestyle team that won a silver medal at the 2021 Olympics. The Americans finished second to a Chinese team that had two swimmers whose positives were erased after WADA declined to look further into the contamination case. 'It was devastating, honestly,' McLaughlin said of hearing the news about the doping case. 'I was taken aback and heartbroken. I spent a lot of my career trusting in the powers that be, and it was really sad to find out that's someone who could not be trusted,' meaning WADA. The investigator WADA hired to look into the Chinese doping case ruled that WADA had acted reasonably in not pursuing the Chinese case but still called it 'curious' that the agency did not further pursue facts that didn't line up with the normal handling of contamination cases. Fitzgerald, the WADA spokesperson, said the agency did in fact address some of the concerns in the report, especially about the way contaminations cases are handled. 'As highlighted by the Chinese cases and many others, the issue of contamination is real and growing, and it is crucial that WADA and its partners address it head on,' he said. Tygart led off his testimony claiming the Chinese case had potentially impacted ninety-six medals from the 2021 and 2024 Olympics. WADA argued with that, with Fitzgerald reiterating the agency's long-held legal position that, given the complexities of the evidence, had it taken appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, it would have lost all of them.

Oil prices up, pressures mount; Will Fed lower rates?
Oil prices up, pressures mount; Will Fed lower rates?

Argaam

time2 hours ago

  • Argaam

Oil prices up, pressures mount; Will Fed lower rates?

The US Federal Reserve began its fourth meeting this year on June 17, having kept interest rates unchanged in its January, March, and May meetings despite mounting pressure from President Donald Trump to lower borrowing costs. But will the central bank finally respond to his repeated calls amid rising trade and military tensions? A Pause... But a Long One After cutting interest rates by 100 basis points (bps) in Q4 2024, the Fed decided to hold steady for a while, especially as inflation remained well above its 2% target — a stance that has not been appreciated by President Trump. Trump Turns Up the Heat Since taking office in January, Trump has seized every opportunity to sharply criticize the Fed and its Chairman, Jerome Powell, for not cutting rates. He even called Powell a 'fool' and demanded a 200 basis-point cut, which he claims would save the country $600 billion annually. Federal Reserve Meeting Schedule – 2025 Meeting Date Decision / Expectations Notes Jan. 28–29 Hold --- March 18–19 Hold Policymakers projected two rate cuts this year in their quarterly report May 6–7 Hold --- June 17–18 Hold Official projections report to be released after meeting July 29–30 -- --- Sept. 16–17 -- Official projections report to be released after meeting Oct. 28–29 -- --- Dec. 9–10 -- Official projections report to be released after meeting Poll What to expect from Fed in the next meeting? A 25-basis point cut A bigger cut Unchanged

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store