Sir Keir Starmer has 'lost control of Britain's borders' after almost 1,200 small boat migrants cross the Channel in single day
Almost 1,200 migrants have crossed the Channel to the UK in a single day - as one of Sir Keir Starmer 's ministers said control of Britain's borders had been lost.
The Prime Minister faced criticism over what was called a 'day of shame' as a surge in dinghy crossings overwhelmed French and UK border patrol vessels.
At Gravelines in northern France, more than half a dozen French police officers simply stood by yesterday morning and watched as migrants waded into the sea and scrambled on to an inflatable boat.
One officer even took pictures on his phone before the packed boat headed out to sea towards the English coast.
And today one of Sir Keir's senior cabinet ministers admitted the scenes were 'pretty shocking' as he said the UK had 'lost control of its borders over the last five years'.
Defence Secretary John Healey this morning told Sky News that the latest crossings revealed a 'really big problem' - but insisted there was pressure being put on France for better co-operation and crackdowns ahead.
Britain had agreed a deal in 2023 to pay France £480million over three years to stop the crossings, including £175million in the current financial year – more than £480,000 per day.
Speaking to The Mail on Sunday, Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp branded the latest Channel scenes 'a disgrace but sadly entirely expected'.
He added: 'It's a shameful failure by the French to discharge their duties to stop illegal migration. The French are failing to stop these crossings by illegal immigrants.'
And he condemned Sir Keir over what he called a 'day of shame for the Labour Government'.
Mr Philp added: 'Over a thousand illegal immigrants in a single day, boats flooding the Channel, Border Force stretched beyond breaking point, and even fishing vessels drafted in because our maritime rescue services are overwhelmed.'
And Richard Tice MP, deputy leader of Reform UK, said: 'It looks like we pay hundreds of millions to give French police officers photography lessons because they are certainly not providing any security.
'Frankly, the Government should be suing the French for our money back.'
At least 18 migrant boats were seen leaving the French coast yesterday, carrying more than 1,000 people - with the Telegraph today putting the figure at 1,200.
That exceeds the previous daily record of 825, set earlier last month.
Mr Healey today told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips on Sky News: 'Pretty shocking, those scenes yesterday.
'The truth is, Britain's lost control of its borders over the last five years. The last government last year left an asylum system in chaos and record levels of immigration.
'But I think that yesterday tells us a really big problem which is that you've got French police unable to intervene to intervene and intercept the boats when they are in shallow water.
'We saw the smugglers launching elsewhere and coming round like a taxi to pick them up.'
Mr Healey insisted there was 'new co-operation' with the French suggesting their officials would intervene in the water.
When asked whether he was 'hacked off' with France for not doing so now, Mr Healey said: 'They are not doing it, but we've got the agreement that they will change the way they work.
'Our concentration now is to push them to get that into operation so they can intercept these smugglers and stop these people in the boats, not just on the shore.'
British and French rescue services were yesterday forced to deploy 11 vessels and two aircraft.
And at one point the coastguard even issued an appeal for fishing boats to assist a yacht and kayaks in trouble because all lifeboats and Border Force vessels were too busy rescuing migrants.
A group of people including women and young children are seen waiting to try and catch a boat to the UK on Saturday at Gravelines in France
Yesterday's arrivals were the highest since September 29 2022, when 1,131 migrants arrived on 23 boats, according to Home Office figures.
The record number of arrivals is 1,305, set on September 3, 2022.
Two patrol aircraft, four of the five Border Force vessels and seven French vessels, including a warship and two lifeboats, were deployed yesterday morning as a string of inflatable dinghies carrying hundreds of migrants were launched from multiple beaches.
The skipper of the fishing vessel that was in the Channel for ten hours yesterday told the MoS: 'The Border Force were completely overwhelmed and they've been using the RNLI lifeboats from Dungeness and Dover all day.
'An English pleasure boat said it was taking on water and required assistance but by the time the coastguard finally had a lifeboat to spare, the boat had fixed the hole itself and was making its way back to the harbour.'
He said the French authorities used their vessels to escort inflatable boats packed with migrants into English waters.
A source even claimed a cross-Channel ferry had to alter its route to avoid two separate migrant boats, saying: 'There really seems to be absolutely no deterrent.'
Since Labour took office in July last year, 36,859 people have been detected crossing the Channel on 667 small boats.
French police stood back and watched as entire families packed themselves into an overcrowded small boat heading across the Channel to the UK this morning
In a major speech in Germany last year, Sir Keir talked of a 'new spirit of cooperation' with Europe, saying: 'We cannot smash the smuggling gangs who perpetrate this vile trade without the help of our partners.'
But it emerged last week that just 38 per cent of those trying to cross have been intercepted by French officials so far this year – down from 45 per cent last year and 46 per cent in 2023.
The UK's £480million deal with is helping pay for a new detention centre in France, new surveillance drones, a joint Anglo-French command centre and the doubling of officers patrolling beaches from 400 to 800.
A Home Office spokesman insisted the UK was 'strengthening international partnerships and boosting our ability to identify, disrupt, and dismantle criminal gangs whilst strengthening the security of our borders'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Here is the real reason River City is being axed by BBC bosses
The letter's subject was BBC Scotland cancelling River City, an act I had previously described as cultural vandalism. My correspondent had a cooler disposition and a better way with words. Summing up how the soap had been brought low in recent years, she wrote: 'Its viewing figures were adversely affected by stop/start production runs, erratic scheduling and a general lack of promotion.' Spot on. And then came this: 'I began watching River City out of loyalty to my city, but came to the view that it makes an important contribution to the culture of central Scotland.' BBC Scotland HQ at Pacific Quay Watching out of loyalty to my city. How wonderful, how generous, how Scottish is that? Of the thousands of words written and spoken about River City, all the BBC statements, the petition to save the show, the debate in the Scottish Parliament, not one sentence hits home as hard as that contribution. Watching out of loyalty to my city. There writes someone who 'gets' what River City means, and why it is not just another programme that can be binned by BBC Scotland because its face no longer fits. But what do you know, no one is listening. Not to my correspondent, not to those who have signed the petition, not to MSPs, or ministers. It seems the main arguments in favour of keeping River City - that it provides jobs and training for working-class Scots who might otherwise never get a start in TV, as well as being a pretty decent drama beloved by its audience - are not enough for BBC Scotland to change its mind. We know this because the executive who made the decision appeared before Holyrood's culture committee at the end of May and said so. Hayley Valentine, director of BBC Scotland, told MSPs that River City, with its 200,000 viewers in Scotland compared to Shetland's 700,000 'did not pass the value for money test'. But the money saved by axing River City would help to fund three new short-run dramas, she confirmed. Though these will 'absolutely cost more to make', the BBC would 'expect' them to deliver much bigger audiences than River City and 'really hope' they will. Expectations and hope. In other words, BBC Scotland is taking a punt. Making all those people redundant on a gamble. Having said that axing River City was a creative decision, it really does come down to money. As for River City being a way into TV, Ms Valentine said opportunities would still be offered across a wide range of other programmes. So that's okay then. Nothing more to see here, folks. Except it is not okay. It is very far from okay. Cancelling River City has always been about more than the end of one programme. It's about BBC Scotland fighting Scotland's corner within the corporation, and making sure the BBC represents and is reflective of all those who pay for it. Read more On the former, was London asked for more money to fund the short-run dramas? Was there ever a chance of building on the UK-wide iPlayer audience for River City by running a promotion campaign? Where are the figures showing potential job and training opportunities lost versus those created? Was there any analysis or was this simply a case of executives thinking they knew best? I understand BBC Scotland's ambition. It wants another Baby Reindeer. It wants the next Adolescence. But it doesn't have the money of a Netflix or an Apple+, which makes it all the more important to ensure that it is making decisions for the right reasons. When it comes to River City, I'm not sure it is. Just as to govern is to choose, running the BBC is all about choice. Who is out and who is in, who gets the money and who doesn't. BBC Scotland decided, ultimately, that River City was expendable. It has made the arguments about viewing figures and opportunities offered elsewhere, but I think there is another factor at work here. For my money - £174.50 licence fee - River City was vulnerable because it was a Scottish working-class soap made by working-class casts and crews. No one thought there would be the backlash there has been. It wasn't like cancelling Question Time with its well-connected panellists and audiences (now there's an idea). The class ceiling exists in the media in general - heck, in society as a whole. It's not just BBC Scotland. Indeed, BBC Scotland has done more than most to widen access and should be commended for it. Now and then, a youngster will appear who doesn't sound like your typical BBC sort. They thrive on the attention and encouragement, but then at some point they hit that class ceiling. They don't get invited into the room where it happens, so they can't shape the corporation's future, and the story of inequality rumbles on. Representation matters. As the old saying goes, if you can see it, you can be it. For many working-class Scots, River City was 'their' soap, and therefore 'their' way into TV. Doors opened that had too often been closed, and if it could happen for the guy down the road, it could happen for you. You cannot put a price on that kind of positive PR. The same goes for viewer loyalty. Fans of River City have had their patience tested to a degree that would not have happened with any other show. Yet they've kept faith with the programme. Even now, they trust executives will repay that faith and cancel the cancellation, but will they? Back to you, BBC Scotland. Alison Rowat is a senior politics and features writer on The Herald. Contact
Top Gear
41 minutes ago
- Top Gear
A mint Ferrari 458 Speciale Aperta will now cost you £1m+
A mint Ferrari 458 Speciale Aperta will now cost you £1m+ Rare mid-engined super convertible starts to reach unobtanium status. Shock horror Skip 18 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Turn on Javascript to see all the available pictures. 1 / 18 The Ferrari 458 Speciale: you see it, you hear it, you want it. The issue these days is that a near-factory-fresh 'Aperta' will set you back over a million quid, as evidenced by this 350-mile example listed at RM Sotheby's. Good lord. It does at least get the traditional 'Rosso Corsa' paint finish, and has just about every option ticked off Ferrari's list, including titanium exhausts, racing seats and heaps of Alcantara and carbon fibre trim. Advertisement - Page continues below Aside from that utterly flawless body, the reason we take a liking to the Speciale is because of its mid-mounted, naturally aspirated 'F136' 4.5-litre V8. It'll kick and scream its way to a redline of 9,000rpm, and thanks to a healthy 597bhp/398lb ft, 0-62mph is sorted in just three seconds en route to a 199mph top speed. Supplementing that sonorous engine are various other highly technical bits, such as a seven-speed DCT transmission and adaptive damping. Plus, the Speciale gets an F1-derived traction control system with a rear-biased e-diff. Add in Ferrari's now familiar and still brilliant Side Slip dynamics control unit, and there's an incredible amount of duality to the Speciale: it'll dance when you want it to and grip when you don't. Given that just 499 Apertas were ever built, it's likely this car will only appreciate with time. So you may as well grab it now while it's 'only' a million-and-a-bit pounds. Advertisement - Page continues below Top Gear Newsletter Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Success Your Email*
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Labour's defence document exposes some major cracks
However, the document itself makes no reference to it. There are important reasons for that, not least of which is the cost. But the danger and threat still lurks. It is technically credible that the UK's 30 (soon to rise to 47) F-35 multi-role fighters be fitted to carry nuclear bombs. The F-35 has that capability as does some other aircraft and there are more than 100 US-controlled gravity bombs stored in Europe stationed in several Nato countries. But the US nuclear control of the bombs would be a sticking point that deal-maker Donald Trump would not miss. Even faux British operational independence would up the cost of the F-35 option. READ MORE: Leading pro-indy figures write to Keir Starmer over referendum 'snub' An explicit endorsement of the re-introduction of tactical nuclear bombs carried aboard the F-35 multi-role fighter would signal a significant change to British nuclear policy. It would be seen by the 94 member states of the UN who support the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) as a destabilising move by the UK. That includes the 73 whose sovereign legislatures have ratified it into international law and chose to abide by its terms. Indeed, the non-nuclear nations could throw sections of the SDR back in Britain's face as the document makes much of – possibly even overhypes – global insecurity – a selling point for those arms companies that received advanced copies before even the shadow defence secretary. This was revealed when Defence Secretary John Healey finally deigned to brief parliament, late in the afternoon. To openly re-introduce British tactical nukes in a document which claims that one of its key aims is to de-escalate international tension would be the equivalent of the fire brigade claiming, with a straight face, that pouring rocket fuel on a fire would help put it out. However, the prepublicity over the weekend has ensured that notion of the reintroduction of British tactical nuclear weapons is still out there, mostly likely to test the political temperature. Indeed, within the document itself, Russia is rightly criticised for retaining the possible use of tactical nukes. Looking both ways at once is not a novel idea. But even by the standards of the Starmer administration, to do so in writing in the same document would be a bit of a stretch. The military dangers of devolving a degree of command and control of nukes from the political leadership to generals of at least four-star level is fraught with risk, though most top brass are usually near their political leadership. To devolve control three steps away further to one-star level is asking for trouble. Going even further, handing control of a nuclear weapon to a lowly pilot in a cockpit is more than a bit of a gamble. Maybe the naive LibDems had not thought that through when they briefly floated the idea of replacing the clapped-out Vanguards with nuclear-capable F-35s a few years ago. For the same reason, I find it hard to believe that a group with the ear of Keir Starmer are punting an F-35 option. But maybe it is to divert attention from the increasingly clapped-out Vanguards – something, inadvertently, that the Prime Minister made mention of in his Govan shipyard speech. However, the SDR did touch upon the increasing costs of the maintenance and potential expansion of the UK's nuclear arsenal with reference to £15 billion earmarked for the 'sovereign warhead programme'. READ MORE: 'A bit rich': Kate Forbes responds to Keir Starmer ruling out referendum That it is given a title with the word 'sovereign' in it, rather than just 'warhead programme' or 'new' or 'replacement' warhead programme, suggests that recent work by the anti-nuclear movement on the fact that President Trump actually owns the Trident missiles is impacting on public perception, or risks doing so. Starmer was surely on thin ice (and some military brass must have been nervous) when the Prime Minister mentioned that during his last visit to Scotland, he was aboard a Vanguard coming off patrol. Yesterday he said that the length of the patrol was a record breaker, implying that this was something to be proud of, when in fact it was the exact opposite. The Prime Minister did not reveal the real cause of the over-lengthy deployment, though he inadvertently revealed that the Continuous At Sea Deterrent (CASD) concept is under severe strain. The deployment of Vanguards is getting longer and longer. That's because it appears there are not four boats in various states of readiness, but three, or even less. In his widely viewed Rented Missiles And Worn Out Submarines YouTube presentation, military historian Mark Felton succinctly explains why. He even speculates that at times no Vanguard has been at sea at all. Behind the SDR lurk many questions, problems and dangers. We should not let the UK Government hide them. Bill Ramsay is secretary of SNP CND and convener of the SNP Trade Union Group
