Count Nikolai and Felix receive special honour from King Frederik X of Denmark - two years after their grandmother stripped them of their royal titles
Queen Margrethe II of Denmark's grandsons, Count Nikolai and Count Felix de Monpezat, have received a special honour since being stripped of their royal titles in 2023.
King Frederik X, who succeeded his mother in January last year, awarded Nikolai, 25, and Felix, 22, the Grand Cross of the Order of Dannebrog at a private event before his birthday celebrations at Amalienborg Palace in Copenhagen yesterday.
Taking to Instagram, the Danish Royal Family 's official account posted, 'At a private event before the family breakfast at Amalienborg, on the occasion of His Majesty the King's 57th birthday, the King yesterday awarded the Grand Cross of the Order of Dannebrog to Their Excellencies Count Nikolai and Count Felix.
'As a result of the appointment, the counts - like other Danish recipients of the Grand Cross - must have prepared a personal knight shield. When finished, it will be hung in the Knight Chapel at Frederiksborg Castle in Hillerød.'
In the post, a selection of photographs showed Frederik honouring his nephews, the sons of Prince Joachim and his first wife, Alexandra Countess of Frederiksborg, with the order.
Nikolai later reposted the images with the writing, 'Very honoured to have received the order Storkorset af Dannebrog yesterday from my uncle on his birthday.'
Nikolai and Felix were stripped of their royal titles by their paternal grandmother, Queen Margrethe, in a bombshell decision on January 1, 2023.
Margrethe, 85, announced in September 2022 that the four children of her younger son, 55-year-old Prince Joachim, would no longer be able to use the title of prince and princess after January 1.
She said the decision was intended to allow Nikolai, Felix, Henrik, 16, and Athena, 13, to live normal lives without royal obligations.
Instead of being Princes and Princesses, they are Counts or Countess and referred to as Their Excellencies.
On the Royal Family and Succession to The Throne pages of the website, the four royals, who have maintained their positions in the line of succession, are mentioned with their updated titles.
It was a tumultuous time for the Danish Royal Family after the monarch stripped Joachim's four children of their prince and princess titles - a move which he publicly spoke out against.
But speaking in a televised New Year's address, Margrethe admitted: 'That the relationship with Prince Joachim and (his wife) Princess Marie has run into difficulties hurts me.
'Difficulties and disagreements can arise in any family, including mine. The whole country has witnessed this.'
She added that she was 'sure that the family can enter the New Year together with confidence, understanding and new courage'.
Nikolai has since launched his own Instagram account to promote his modelling career - and has seldom been seen with his cousins and aunt since the announcement.
In 2022, Prince Joachim publicly spoke out against his mother's decision in the days after she stripped his children of their titles- claiming that they had been 'harmed' in the process.
Months later, the sixth-in-line to the throne admitted that 'communication was missing' within the Royal Family in the lead-up to the shock announcement.
Joachim told local news outlet B.T.: 'There is a lot to work on. Communication was what was missing. Now we have met and we are on the right track.'
Shortly after Queen Margrethe's decision was announced, Joachim claimed that he had only been given five days' notice before the news was made public.
In an interview with Danish publication Ekstra Bladet, Joachim said his four children had been 'hurt' by their grandmother's decision.
'I was given five days' notice to tell them,' he said, speaking outside the Danish embassy in Paris. 'In May, I was presented with a plan which, by and large, was that when the children each turned 25, it would happen. Now I had only five days to tell them. Athena turns 11 in January.'
Meanwhile, his ex-wife Alexandra said that her sons, Nikolai and Felix, had been left feeling 'ostracised' from the institution and the decision had come like a 'bolt out of the blue'.
In response, the Royal Household released a further statement, saying: 'As the Queen stated yesterday, the decision has been a long time coming.
'We understand that there are many emotions at stake at the moment, but we hope that the Queen's wish to future-proof the Royal Household will be respected.'
Out of title: The four grandchildren who are no longer HRHs
Nikolai of Denmark, 25: The Copenhagen Business School graduate and model regularly tops lists of the world's most eligible bachelors. He has jetted around the world to walk for designers in Paris and London. Nikolai has also appeared on the cover of Vogue Scandinavia.
Felix of Denmark, 22: Following in his brother's footsteps, Felix has also had success as a model and has starred in an advertising campaign for Georg Jensen. He had a short stint at the Royal Danish Military Academy but quit after two months because it 'wasn't for him'.
Henrik, 16, and Athena, 13, of Denmark: The youngest of Prince Joachim's four children, Henrik and Athena are the product of his second marriage to Princess Marie.
However, the Royal Family appears to have put the drama behind them in recent times as they came together to celebrate Princess Isabella of Denmark's 18th birthday.
Despite previous tensions, any feelings of resentment appeared long gone at the birthday party.
With the birthday girl's glittering ballgown, award-worthy performances, and a guest list spanning one thousand young people, Isabella's 18th bash was one to remember.
Denmark's royal family and it-girls arrived at the lavish Royal Theatre's Old Stage in Copenhagen to mark Queen Mary and King Frederik X's second child's coming of age in April.
The official event saw the country's elite gather at the venue alongside one thousand of Denmark's young people, who secured tickets their tickets via a lottery, for a series of breathtaking performances by both established artists and emerging talents.
It was the second official event held in honour of Isabella's birthday, with the first party held at Aarhus Hall on 11 April, which, according to Hello, cost a staggering £32,542, including security, catering, and entertainment, but not the cost of her £1,000 mystery birthday gift.
The birthday girl arrived in style alongside her parents and siblings, Crown Prince Christian, 19, Princess Josephine, 14, and Prince Vincent, also 14, before taking to the red carpet and posing up a storm.
While Danish royalty, including Queen Margrethe, assembled on the carpet in sparkling gowns, other invitees gathered on the theatre's steps to catch a glimpse at the star-studded arrivals.
Once inside, guests wandered through chandelier-lit corridors before finding their place at the theatre in preparation for Their Majesties and Princess Isabella's entrance.
Isabella's cousins, Count Nikolai and Count Felix of Monzepat, the sons of Prince Joachim, were in attendance, wearing velvet suit jackets with smart bow ties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The lessons Britain can learn from Denmark's migrant crackdown: How nation has cut asylum claims by 90% with its 'zero refugee' policy
Sir Keir Starmer 's warning that uncontrolled immigration risks creating an 'island of strangers' has prompted fury across much of the British left - including excitable comparisons to Enoch Powell. But head to Denmark and you'll find their fellow-wingers aren't just outspoken about the need to tackle the issue - they've put their words into action, to dramatic effect. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made tackling out-of-control immigration a key priority since coming to power in 2019, vowing to pursue a 'zero-refugee' policy that involves actively discouraging people from coming to the country. Despite this measure remaining controversial, no one can deny its success, with asylum claims dropping by almost 90 per cent over the past decade. Last year they plummeted to 2,333, while the UK total hit a record 108,138. And while Reform UK surged in this month's local elections on an anti-immigration ticket, right-wing parties with similar policies in Denmark performed poorly in the latest European elections. It's no surprise Britain's ailing Prime Minister is interested in Denmark's migration model, with Sir Keir meeting Mr Fredericksen at Downing Street in February to hear about her approach. With its impeccably liberal credentials, the Nordic country seems an unlikely source for some of the toughest migration policies in Europe. But, for Ms Frederiksen's Social Democrats, opposition to mass immigration is a sensible left-wing position, given its negative impacts mainly fall on those lower down the social ladder. 'No matter if you look at statistics on crimes or if you look at problems on the labor market, insecurity in local communities, it is the most vulnerable who experience the consequences [of uncontrolled migration],' Ms Frederiksen said in a widely-reported interview with Politico. She went on to describe mass migration into Europe as a 'threat to the daily life' of the continent, echoing comments made by US Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference. Denmark's tough approach to immigration dates back to the 2015 migration crisis, when annual asylum requests reached 21,316 in a country of only six million. The country famously banned the burka, the garment fully covering the face and body worn by devout Islamic women who'd been brought to the country by their husbands. New rules came in compelling all newcomers and their children to learn Danish or lose asylum-seeker benefits. In 2018, the country's previous government brought in the so-called 'anti-ghetto law', which aims to reduce the number of 'non-Western' residents in certain housing areas to less than 30 per cent by 2030. The rules, which were updated in 2021, give local authorities the right to set up 'prevention areas' where they can refuse to rent to those who are not originally from Denmark, the EU or EEA or Switzerland. Critics have called the policy discriminatory and they are currently being challenged in the European Court of Justice. However, they continue to receive support from cross-party MPs who urge something be done to force integration. Other policies appear to quite deliberately introduce a hostile environment for migrants. Asylum seekers refused the right to stay are denied benefits. They get food, served three times a day, at the country's two deportation camps They are sent to the camps to await removal by the Danish Returns Agency, which gets extra funds for results. As Danish immigration minister Kaare Dybvad Bek recently told the Mail: 'We stand very hard against giving migrants the right to remain here. If you're rejected as an asylum seeker, you have a very low possibility of staying in Denmark.' Controversially, Denmark's border force has powers to confiscate items such as jewellery and watches from incoming migrants to help fund the cost of their stay. Migrants who give up on Denmark and return home voluntarily are given a £4,500 sweetener to leave. And if a migrant's country of origin is deemed 'safe', such as Syria after the recent fall of President Bashar al-Assad, even a successful asylum seeker can lose Danish residency and face being returned home. Denmark also publishes league tables of criminal convictions based on the perpetrators' national origins, something the UK does not do, although Home Secretary Yvette Cooper recently agreed to publish such data by the end of this year. These tables show that offences, particularly by foreign-born gang members, became an increasing problem after 2015 - a difficult truth that has nonetheless bolstered public support for cutting migration. The latest polling shows that the Social Democrats remain by far the most popular party, with 22.9 per cent of the vote - nearly 10 points ahead of the second-biggest rival. By contrast, the Danish People's Party, which is usually described as far-Right, is on just 4.4 per cent, down from 21.1 per cent ten years ago. Considering Denmark's multi-party system, these are numbers Sir Keir could only dream of. During a visit to Albania last week, the Labour leader announced plans for a Rwanda-style scheme to deport failed asylum seekers to the Balkans while they await deportation - a policy that Denmark is advocating on the EU level using a yet to be determined 'third country'. He suggested he would be speaking with the country's PM, Edi Rama, about the idea of hosting some of these so-called 'return hubs' - only for him to immediately rule this out. Sir Keir's announcement, while botched, reflects his desperation to find a deterrent to Channel migrants following a surge in crossings since he came to power. Arrivals this year have topped 12,000 - an increase of 40 per cent on 2024. As he observes these numbers tick up - and the popularity of Reform and groups much further to the extremes rising with them - Sir Keir would do well to heed the advice of Danish immigration minister Kaare Dybvad Bek. 'There is no doubt in my mind that traditional political parties taking immigration seriously is the reason why we don't have large far-Right parties in Denmark,' he said in a recent interview. 'I think that is true for most European countries – if you take immigration back under democratic control, then you restrict how much the far-Right can grow.'
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Palace insiders reveal King Frederik and Queen Mary's shrewd political move to avoid a Prince Harry-esque disaster: 'A stroke of genius'
King Frederik and Queen Mary of Denmark have passed the one-year mark as a reigning royal couple and continue to make bold and deliberate steps towards shaping the future direction of their monarchy. And one such recent move, impacting the extended Danish royal family, may be their most astute yet.
The Guardian
17 hours ago
- The Guardian
Fancy some iconic celeriac? New Nordic cuisine, now a blockbuster exhibition
When is gastronomy about more than just recipes? When it is New Nordic cuisine: to its advocates, the most influential culinary movement of the 21st century; to its detractors, a school of foodie puritans who have spent the last two decades sucking the joy out of dining and injecting it with po-faced declarations. If a decade of breathy Netflix food programming is to be believed, you could delicately tweezer some edible petals and micro-herbs on to locally foraged mushrooms and a bed of ancient grains, serve it with a naturally fermented lemonade, and you've got yourself a cracking (if not hugely substantive) New Nordic meal. In fact, what the movement tried to bring to the table was more than that: a wider philosophy that linked your lunch with the natural world, local culture and tradition, while being evangelical about improving your relationship with all three. As Martin Braathen, the curator of a major new exhibition marking New Nordic's 20th anniversary pronounces ominously: 'A carrot is not only a carrot.' New Nordic professed a strong interest in food education, public health and nutrition, it carefully tracked ingredients from farm, fjord or forest to table, and had a substantial environmental component. It was aspirationally low waste, low impact and low intervention. At its ambitious best, its chefs took on the challenge of replacing non-native imports such as citrus fruits, by asking questions like: can we create a vinegar that is light enough to imitate lemon juice? Failing that, could we just use ants? (Ants have a lemon-like flavour.) One dish singled out in Norway's National Museum's show New Nordic: Cuisine, Aesthetics and Place is Swedish chef Daniel Berlin's 'iconic' signature celeriac dish – where the vegetable is first grilled over an open fire, then baked in foil for hours. The charred skin is used to make bread, the celeriac roots are used to make a stock, and then a sauce, and a slaw is made from the tops, bringing waste as close to zero as possible. It is also avowedly seasonal and localist. Over the past two decades, New Nordic has navigated various controversies in a bid to elevate regional identity and folk heritage, and as the Oslo exhibition shows, it extends that enthusiasm to non-culinary local arts and crafts such as decor, architecture, design, visual art, pottery and glassware. Outside, the heady smell of birch smoke drifts through the custom-built pavilion, where they are making coffee over a wood fire – very much like normal coffee, perhaps with a hint of birch smoke. The exhibition brings in tableware and artworks from some of the New Nordic scene's garlanded restaurants, as well as maps, farming and fishing tools and photographs which speak to local landscapes as much as the food they produce. 'Moss is used both as decor and as an ingredient in broths,' reads one straight-faced caption. Earth tones abound, and drying seaweed, haunches, hides and leaves hang from wooden beams. All of this began with the 10-point Manifesto for the New Nordic Kitchen, published in 2004. Some of the manifesto's 12 authors would go on to become household names in Scandinavia and beyond, like Noma's René Redzipi and Claus Meyer. The signatories were drawn not just from Denmark, Norway and Sweden, but also Greenland, the Faroe Islands and Åland; all 12 were male. Spiritually, it shared something with its Scandi predecessor from a decade earlier, the infamous Dogme 95 cinematic manifesto: ostensibly didactic and po-faced, but in practice more playful and loose (the film-makers nicknamed their manifesto 'the vow of chastity', and then proceeded to break most of their own rules). Its arrival in the mid-2000s begged the question: what was old Nordic cuisine – what was it replacing, and what was wrong with it? Meatballs, herring, potatoes, stodge, bacon and butter – but the greater complaint was of the excess of imported, unseasonal foods; it was a response to ever slicker global supply chains and culinary homogenisation, more than a protest against the Ikea lunch. In this respect, New Nordic is an heir to Italy's Slow Food movement, prompted by the arrival of Italy's first McDonald's in 1986, or French farmer and activist José Bové's elevation to national hero in 1999, when he and fellow trade unionists 'dismantled' a new branch of McDonald's in protest against American hormone-treated beef. 'New Nordic pushes back against the global food industry,' Braathen says: prior to its arrival, 'we ignored the local'. It places great emphasis on the immediate landscape the restaurant sits in, and a desire to 'capture' it in a dish – an idea now frequently cited in British food TV shows. Two decades is more than enough time in the spotlight to acquire dissenters, too. At its worst, New Nordic can seem dogmatic, chauvinistic, and elitist – little more than smug 'bro' auteur-chefs from Michelin-starred restaurants showing off to each other, and their rich diners. The backlash has grown in recent years. 'I have eaten in Michelin-starred New Nordic restaurants where presenting the menu felt more like a lecture than a treat.' wrote Petri Burtsoff in Monocle last month, in a piece that claimed the 'fiddly', 'fussy' and 'pretentious' style has fallen out of favour in Scandinavia itself, replaced by something more hearty, relaxed and simple. Copenhagen's Noma – five-time winner of Best Restaurant in the World, for those keeping score – announced they were closing in 2023, to great fanfare, although still haven't pulled the plug, with reservations filled until the end of this year, for a tasting menu that costs a cool 4,400DKK, or £500 per head. For an institution inclined to grandiose talk about sustainability, recent revelations that Noma's business model seems to have been built on legions of unpaid interns, or stages, have undermined fine dining's reputation at large. In Noma's case, the Financial Times found that up to 30 stagiaries were working in the kitchen in 2019, almost as many as their 34 paid chefs at the time. It's all very well treating your hand-foraged molluscs with care – one New Nordic legacy is the frequency with which TV chefs talk sanctimoniously about 'respecting the ingredients' – but what about respecting the sentient beings you're getting to clean them? For all of its elevation of traditional, preindustrial techniques, New Nordic always claimed to have remained a living, breathing movement. Oslo-based ceramicist Anette Krogstad, whose hand thrown stoneware appears in the exhibition, stresses that point. Like the food on the table, her plates themselves are seasonal – some designs more suited to winter, others to summer. But Krogstad is keen that these lofty ideas are not on a pedestal, or out of reach. 'I don't want people to buy my ceramics and then put them away, and save them for a nice dinner,' she says: 'I want them to be used every day.' Can the same be said about the trickle-down effect of New Nordic's fine-dining masters on local eateries? Just beyond the museum, the cheerful cafe Elias makes no mention of New Nordic principles – the head chef had not heard about the new exhibition and said he would probably be too busy to visit – but they are on display nonetheless. I ate a meltingly tender, deep-red elk carpaccio, sprinkled with tart lingonberries, bitter rocket, the crunch of pine nuts and red onion, and a salty local organic cheese, Holtefjell. For dessert, the cloudberry panna cotta was made with cream and tjukkmjølk (a soured milk) from Røros, to the north of Oslo. The meal came to £50 for two courses, a soft drink and tip, pretty affordable by Oslo standards. To pull off the trick of being sophisticated and surprising, but still accessible and unpretentious – that's the sweet spot. Walk further around the affluent Tjuvholmen neighbourhood surrounding the museum, though, and the gastronomic upheaval lauded inside its walls becomes less tangible. Among the Kapoor, Gormley and Bourgeois sculptures, and underneath the waterside apartments, the restaurant options included Eataly, Los Tacos, Entrecote, Big Horn Steakhouse, New Delhi and Yokoso sushi and ramen. The food huts outside sold macarons and gelato. This isn't to say New Nordic cuisine has proven a failure, just that its advocates are fighting an uphill battle against the Instagram-enabled appeal of the same global smorgasbord you might find in London, Melbourne, Los Angeles or Barcelona. But is New Nordic over? For Braathen, this exhibition is indeed a retrospective; but while we might be talking about it in the past tense, there is clearly a lot more work to be done – and some of its advocates are refusing to call time at the natural wine bar. 'While the Nordic food movement has been a success by any standard, the vision that guides it still holds a great deal of unrealised potential,' said last month's report from December's New Nordic Food Summit. To realise this potential, in the face of the global food and farming industries, will be a challenge. Soaring food prices have caused concern in Norway recently, as in so much of the world – with prime minister Jonas Gahr Støre promising to address them ahead of September's election. The cause of these high food prices? Extremely high tariffs on imports, to protect Norwegian farmers – it is hard to imagine easing that protectionism will do much to support New Nordic Cuisine. For Noma co-founder Meyer, the movement's legacy should be to blend into the background. 'Now we should just move on, talk less about the New Nordic cuisine and just let it become a part of our lives,' he said back in 2015. It's a noble intention – but the struggle to extol the virtues of the local against the global food industry will not be won easily. New Nordic: Cuisine, Aesthetics and Place is at the National Museum, Oslo, until 14 September
