US and Israel dealt ‘colossal damage' to UN nuclear watchdog
The US and Israel have undermined the credibility of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) by using the agency's information to plan attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.
Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure on June 13, a day after the IAEA's Board of Governors passed a resolution declaring Iran to be in breach of its Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) obligations – an accusation Tehran denies. Last week, the US carried out extensive airstrikes targeting three Iranian nuclear facilities.
'The fact that Iranian nuclear facilities under the control of the IAEA have become targets for American and Israeli missiles is an open challenge to the NPT,' Zakharova said in a press briefing on Wednesday. The UN nuclear watchdog's own resolutions declare attacks on nuclear sites illegal under international law.
The attacks posed 'real obstacles' to implementing agreements between the IAEA and Tehran, she added.
The credibility of the agency's global verification system, which was used as a source of information for planning the bombing, is in question.
Therefore, the US and Israel are 'responsible for colossal damage to the IAEA's activities, no matter how hard they try to blame Tehran,' Zakharova said.
According to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, European leaders pressured IAEA chief Rafael Grossi into publishing a negative report on Iran, which was later used to justify an IAEA Board of Governors resolution accusing the Islamic Republic of breaking the NPT. The West 'exerts very serious influence on international organizations,' and most of these bodies are no longer unbiased, he said on Tuesday.
Grossi admitted just last week that the agency had found no evidence that Iran had a 'systematic plan' to build a nuclear weapon but expressed concern about Tehran enriching uranium to 60% purity. The fissile material needs to be enriched to 90% to be considered weapons grade.
The Iranian Parliament has voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the Islamic Republic is given security guarantees for its nuclear facilities. The bill currently awaits ratification by the Supreme National Security Council to be made law.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Tehran will also need to reconsider its NPT cooperation. 'Twenty years of transparency and trust-building regarding Iran's peaceful nuclear program' have not yielded results, and this issue will be addressed, he told New Arab on Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Is Berlin planning a strike on Moscow? Merz wrote the justification
Forget the fog of war. Even in war, and sometimes especially in war, some things are exceedingly clear. Regarding the so-called 'Hamas-Israel War', for instance, it is obvious that in reality it is not a war at all but a genocide, namely the Gaza Genocide, carried out by Israel against the Palestinians whose unbroken resistance will be the stuff of legends, and of history too. Likewise, in the case of Israel's current assault on Iran – really, of course, a combined US-Israeli attack from the get-go – there is no room for doubt that it is criminal and a 'blatant act of aggression,' as multiple experts in international law agree. That's because in essence, Israel is not acting with a UN mandate – which it would not have received – or in self-defense. The legal basis for this compelling assessment is not complex and there is no room for good-faith debate: Israel's attack violates Article 2 (4) of the foundational UN Charter, which is recognized universally as jus cogens, that is, a binding norm: no pick and choose. The few generally accepted, narrowly defined potential exceptions to this article's comprehensive prohibition on the use of force, such as an erroneous incursion, certain operations at sea, or a rescue of nationals, clearly do not apply. The Israeli onslaught also does not have the blessing of the UN Security Council, and it cannot possibly count as lawful self-defense under Article 51. So far, so simple. If anyone tries to make this look complicated by flagrantly misapplying and abusing the notion of a 'preemptive strike', you are dealing with Israeli or Israel-Lobby disinformation and propaganda. That too is anything but surprising. Yet what is more puzzling than the above is the response of the governments, and often the mainstream media of the West, to this clearly criminal Israeli attack. After years of invoking international law to go after Russia, it turns out that the same leaders and talking heads will tie themselves into 5-D pretzels to let Israel get away with whatever Israel feels like doing on any given day. This is not really news either, of course: Western 'elites', with Washington always in the lead, have behaved no better when serving as accomplices in Israel's Gaza Genocide. But there is something peculiar and noteworthy about how exactly some important Western politicians and their media and 'think tank' experts spin the attack on Iran. Take, for instance, Germany. Its chancellor Friedrich Merz has gone out of his way to loudly endorse the assault on Iran. He has even exposed himself to ridicule and some – if far too little – criticism by employing revoltingly indecent language. Calling Israel's actions 'dirty work' (it sounds even worse in the original German: 'Drecksarbeit') that must be done and for which we all should be grateful, Merz has revealed his double racism: As a German and a historian, I can only say that a German leader praising Jews for doing 'our' dirty work is, to put it very mildly, extremely boorish. Defining the criminal killing of Iranians as that 'dirty work' adds a very nasty 'colonial' flavor reminiscent of say, Kaiser Wilhelm II gloating over massacring Chinese during the so-called Boxer Rebellion. While Merz has been clumsy enough to couch his obnoxious ideas in equally obnoxious language, he has by no means been alone. All too many prestigious German publications, such as the staid Frankfurter Zeitung or the also important Merkur newspaper, have hurried to either simply agree with Merz or at least to excuse and relativize his vile statement. In addition, rather overworked all-purpose 'experts', such as the reliably conformist and rarara-russophobic Christian Mölling, have used their perma-perk in Germany's streamlined talk shows to cynically diminish international law and help dress up Israel's newest crime as so necessary that it trumps all law anyhow. Mölling was self-unaware enough to openly argue that some countries (read: Israel) can't afford the 'luxury' of accepting 'normative limits' and that international law, anyhow, might be 'protecting the wrong ones' (read: Iran). It's breathtakingly brazen and intellectually primitive, and also historically speaking, very German in the worst sense: If we or our friends (read: Israel) feel constrained by international law, then that's a problem not for us or our friends but for international law. And now, let's take a step back and think for a moment like a German who was not a conformist intellectual mediocrity: Enlightenment giant Immanuel Kant. For those with ears to hear and brains to process, Kant has taught us that reason and ethics demand that the justifications for our actions ought to be generalizable in good conscience. In short, when we act, we should be able to show that we are acting according to a fair and reasonable rule. Let's generalize into such a rule, then, what German leader Friedrich Merz has just said and what all too many German mainstream representatives agree with: A country (here: Israel) that feels sufficiently afraid (as judged by that country) of another country (here: Iran) has a right (that trumps international law) to attack that other country without provocation and even during ongoing negotiations. Interesting. Consider that German elites have been fanning war hysteria relentlessly. Not a day seems to go by without some German general, spy, or politician warning their fellow Germans that Russia is at least likely, really almost certain, to attack within the next five years or so. Evidence: zero. Indeed? So, if we are all supposed to be so afraid of Russia in Germany, does that now mean that according to Merzian logic we may as well one day launch a preemptive strike on Moscow? After all, we could then say we felt threatened and our military and the intelligence services were telling us that the Russians were coming. And moreover, we'd probably claim that we, the Germans, were proudly doing the 'Drecksarbeit' for all of NATO (minus, most likely, the US). And isn't doing the 'Drecksarbeit' now officially a good thing in Germany, again? Absurd, you say? Yes, absolutely. Exactly as absurd as Israel's pretexts for attacking Iran. And yet those have been officially endorsed by a German chancellor, including self-revealing dirty language. Let's hope that Moscow does not take seriously what Merz says. Because if Moscow did take it seriously, then by Merzian logic, it should feel very threatened indeed by Berlin – and again by Merzian logic, who knows where that might lead.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Chinese journalist injured in Ukrainian strike on Russian region
Chinese journalist Lu Yuguang was injured in a Ukrainian drone strike in Russia's western Kursk Region, officials have said. The reporter told TASS that a UAV struck while the Phoenix TV crew was filming an interview with local residents. According to Governor Aleksandr Khinshtein, Lu was taken to hospital with head injuries. He added that Ukrainian forces targeted the village of Korenevo, located less than 30 kilometers from the border. The journalist told TASS he refused hospitalization because his injuries were 'light' and he 'had a lot of work here.' The Russian news agency published a video of Lu with a bandaged head. Lu expressed 'deep gratitude' to Russian combat medics, who treated him at the scene and stitched his wounds. 'There was a lot of blood,' he said, adding that the medics initially feared the injuries were more serious. According to Lu, a first-person view (FPV) kamikaze drone hit the crew as they were speaking to locals outside their homes. 'We were recording a standup when an FPV drone flew by. And that was it,' he told TASS, noting that he was wearing a press vest. 'They did not care.'Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova condemned the attack as a 'terrorist act.' 'The targeted strike on a Chinese news crew shows Kiev's intent to silence and effectively eliminate any media workers seeking objective coverage of the conflict,' she wrote on Telegram. Lu, 63, is a veteran military correspondent who has worked in Russia since the early 2000s. He covered the 2004 terrorist attack on a school in Beslan and has received numerous awards for his work. Since 2022, he has been reporting on the Ukraine conflict, including from the front lines. This is not the first time journalists have been targeted by Ukrainian forces. In March, a Russian Izvestia newspaper crew was hit by artillery fire, killing a journalist, cameraman, and driver, and severely injuring another reporter. Two days later, a Channel One correspondent was killed while on assignment in Russia's Belgorod Region bordering Ukraine.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
US ramps up arrests of Iranians
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has arrested 130 Iranian nationals over the past week, as Washington grows concerned about possible retaliation on American soil following last week's bombing campaign against Iran, Fox News reported. Less than a week ago, the US joined Israel's military campaign and struck three major nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic. Earlier this week, Tehran responded with a missile barrage targeting a US military base in Qatar, shortly before a ceasefire was announced. The White House has reportedly expressed concern about potential 'sleeper cells' being activated inside the US, Fox said on Thursday. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a bulletin warning of a 'heightened threat environment' shortly after the US strikes. Some of the arrested Iranians reportedly have criminal records, and at least one had recently served in Iran's military, according to ICE sources cited by the outlet. At least 670 Iranian nationals are currently in ICE custody pending immigration proceedings. According to DHS, former Iranian serviceman Ribvar Karimi immigrated to the US last year under a visa granted to foreigners engaged to American citizens. However, after marrying his partner, he failed to update his immigration status and was arrested in Alabama the day after the strikes on Iran. Karimi supported US President Donald Trump and his immigration policies, according to his pregnant wife, Morgan Karimi, who spoke to Newsweek on Wednesday. ICE Director Tom Homan said Trump's immigration stance is especially important 'now, during this Iran conflict.' Speaking on the Pod Force One podcast on Wednesday, he said the administration of former President Joe Biden 'created the biggest national security vulnerability I've ever seen.' On Monday, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of allowing the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries, despite earlier legal challenges to the policy.
