Ontario insists it will consult with First Nations on controversial mining bill
Ontario is insisting it will consult with First Nations over a proposed bill that would suspend provincial and municipal laws in areas it designates as so-called special economic zones.
But many First Nations across the province are livid with the government over the proposed law, known as Bill 5, which is being studied at committee on Thursday.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The province says it intends to declare the Ring of Fire in northern Ontario as one such zone.
Energy and Mining Minister Stephen Lecce says the province is rewriting the law's preamble to clarify and reinforce the province's constitutional duty to consult with Indigenous people.
New Democrat deputy Leader Sol Mamakwa says the province has failed in its duty to consult.
Mamakwa tabled a motion to add one day of committee hearings in Thunder Bay, Ont., to allow those from northern Ontario to give their opinions on the bill, but the Progressive Conservatives denied it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Ford government to open public clean energy fund to support nuclear power
The Ford government introduced legislation Tuesday that would open Ontario's public clean energy fund to support nuclear power — a move critics say redirects resources away from faster, cheaper renewable options such as wind and solar. The Protect Ontario by Securing Affordable Energy for Generations Act proposes expanding eligibility for the Future Clean Electricity Fund (FCEF) to include nuclear generation and transmission infrastructure. The fund was originally created to support the development of new non-fossil fuel electricity projects in Ontario, using proceeds from the sale of clean energy credits. These credits are generated by wind, solar, hydro, bioenergy and nuclear facilities and sold to businesses seeking to meet corporate sustainability targets. Revenue from those sales flows into the FCEF to help fund future clean energy projects. Until now, the fund has focused on renewable energy. But under the new legislation, the government plans to expand its eligibility to include nuclear generation and transmission infrastructure — a shift the province says is necessary to meet soaring electricity demand. Ontario's Minister of Energy and Mines, Stephen Lecce, said the legislation aims to address rising demand and economic uncertainty by prioritizing local investment and job creation amid global competition and trade tensions with the US. 'As global competition intensifies, energy demand surges, and affordability becomes more important than ever, Ontario isn't standing still — we're stepping up,' Lecce said. The province expects electricity demand to rise 75 per cent by 2050. Critics argue the province is backing the wrong solution, pointing to nuclear projects as expensive and much slower to complete. The Ford government introduced legislation Tuesday that would open Ontario's public clean energy fund to support nuclear power — a move critics say redirects resources away from faster, cheaper renewable options such as wind and solar. 'The Ford government's nuclear plans do not make sense since they will raise our electricity rates and make our industries less competitive,' said Jack Gibbons, chair of the Ontario Clean Air Alliance. 'Unfortunately, the Ford government continues to prioritize fossil fuels and nuclear energy. Their decisions don't make sense for consumers, the climate or national security.' In recent months, the Ford government has announced billions in investment for new nuclear power generation and refurbishing existing plants. The province says these investments will create tens of thousands of jobs in the sector. Early this year, the government announced plans for a 21st-century nuclear megaproject at Port Hope, aiming to establish Ontario as North America's nuclear powerhouse. Described as one of the largest nuclear plants in the world, the project is expected to generate up to 10,000 megawatts of electricity — enough to power 10 million homes. However, the government has yet to disclose the total cost or timeline. But a new report released Wednesday by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance suggests wind and solar could meet the same energy needs much sooner and at a much lower cost — potentially saving Ontario up to $19 billion annually in electricity costs. The report also highlights Ontario's potential for offshore wind development in the Great Lakes and large-scale solar at the Port Hope site. It argues that renewables, paired with energy storage and stronger grid connections with provinces like Quebec, would offer cleaner, faster and cheaper solutions than building a massive nuclear plant that may not be ready until 2045. Gibbons warned that expanding nuclear power would deepen Ontario's reliance on US nuclear technology and enriched uranium fuel, exposing the province to geopolitical risks at a time when trade tensions with the US are escalating.
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Reining in oil and gas is good for the economy
In biophysical terms, the oil and gas sector has expanded to the point of dominating the Canadian economy. The raw material extracted from nature by the oil and gas industry now outweighs all other domestic extraction of natural resources. This includes trees felled, ores mined, fish caught, gravel quarried, livestock slaughtered, coal mined and crops harvested. When burned, Canadian oil and gas emit well over a billion tonnes per year of climate-wrecking carbon dioxide. In sharp contrast to its biophysical dominance, oil and gas extraction provides only 0.4 per cent of Canadian jobs, and indeed only 16 per cent of jobs among extractive sectors. Moreover, most Canadian fossil fuel energy gets exported rather than consumed domestically. Even if domestic production of oil fell by nearly two thirds, and gas by more than a third, it would still be enough for current levels of domestic consumption. When Canada finally starts keeping, rather than breaking, its commitments to reduce fossil fuel use and thus greenhouse gas emissions, still less oil and gas will suffice for domestic consumption. Over the past 10 years, the governing Liberals promoted the biophysical takeover of the economy by oil and gas, largely through aggressive support of pipelines. They spent $50 billion buying, enlarging, and otherwise bolstering, the unmarketable Trans Mountain Pipeline. They sicced the RCMP on people defending Indigenous land against the Coastal Gas Link. And they launched a treaty dispute with the US to stifle tribal and state governments acting to shut down Enbridge Line 5. These actions have done tremendous harm to Canadian ecosystems and the global atmosphere. Liberal support for oil and gas has also hurt the Canadian economy. On average, other economic sectors sustain more than eight times more jobs per million dollars of GDP than oil and gas extraction does. Public and private investment in oil and gas crowds out investment in these other sectors, thus killing off jobs. By locking in fossil fuel, oil and gas investments lock out what we need more of, for both ecological and economic reasons. This includes solar energy, green buildings, mass transit and ecosystem restoration, all of which would create more jobs. At this week's meeting with premiers, Prime Minister Carney showed disturbing signs of caving in further to oil and gas. Instead, he must stop the industry's all-out assault on the biosphere. This means ending fossil fuel subsidies, rather than augmenting them, as the Liberals have in the past. And it means rejecting new pipelines and phasing out old ones, rather than proliferating them, as the Liberals have in the past. Humanity and nature urgently need our new government to finally set the Canadian economy on a more ethical and prosperous course away from oil and gas. Gregory M. Mikkelson, co-founder, Cross Border Organizing Working Group, As a tenured professor of environmental studies, Greg Mikkelson lectured and published in ecology, philosophy, and economics, with a focus on the nature, causes, and value of biological diversity. He also helped divest McGill University from fossil fuels. Having left academia, he now volunteers as a researcher and organizer for a growing international movement to shut down tar sands pipelines in the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence watershed.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
New Brunswick's 3% rent cap to remain through end of fiscal year: housing minister
New Brunswick's housing minister says the province's three per cent rent cap will remain throughout this fiscal year after going into effect in February. Noting its importance, Minister David Hickey said, 'we're offering that stability for renters, while at the same time committing to review the Residential Tenancies Act.' At an economic policy meeting last December, housing researchers and a tenants' advocate asked for a unit-based cap. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy At the time, Hickey said the province wouldn't have enough time to create unit-based caps before the rent cap took effect. On Wednesday, he clarified that basing the cap on the unit is not a priority at this time. 'It's largely not on the table, and not something we're considering now, as was consistent with what we had said throughout the winter,' he said. Story continues below advertisement It's something Green MLA Megan Mitton wants to see in the future. 'Linking (the rent) to the unit would be a way to again keep rents more affordable,' said Mitton. However, she's praising the continuation of the cap as it is now. 'I'm hoping that it does remain permanent because I think it's still necessary to preserve what affordable housing we do have left,' she said. For more on this story, watch the video above.
