LA County's 'Half-cent sales' tax to combat homeless crisis takes effect Apr. 1
The Brief
Los Angeles County voters approved Measure A, a half-cent sales tax to fund homelessness solutions, replacing the expiring Measure H quarter-cent tax.
Measure A allocates funds for homelessness services, affordable housing, and mandates oversight, while the county seeks direct control over funds from LAHSA due to mismanagement concerns.
LAHSA reports a decrease in unsheltered homelessness and aims to continue reducing it, despite disputes over audit findings and efforts to improve transparency.
LOS ANGELES (CNS) - A revamped anti-homelessness funding measure approved by Los Angeles County voters in November is set to take effect Tuesday, meaning the county's sales tax will rise by a quarter-cent.
Los Angeles County voters approved Measure A -- a half-cent sales tax - - to help maintain existing programs and provide more revenue to address the homelessness crisis in the region. The measure will replace a quarter-cent county sales tax approved by voters in 2017, under then-Measure H. That sales tax had a 10-year lifespan, and it was set to expire in 2027.
Measure A -- the Affordable Housing, Homelessness Solutions and Prevention Now measure -- will remain in perpetuity unless it is repealed by voters.
According to the written language of the measure, about 60% of revenue generated by the sales tax will cover costs for homelessness services and 15% of that will be distributed to cities based on the annual point-in-time count of homeless people. Another 35.75% will support the L.A. County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency, which was created in 2023 by the state Legislature to oversee homeless solutions.
The measure also mandates regular oversight and reporting on the following outcomes:
Increase the number of people moving from encampments on the streets into permanent housing;
Reduce the number of people with mental illness or substance use disorders who are experiencing homelessness;
Increase the number of people permanently leaving homelessness;
Prevent people falling into homelessness; and
Increase the number of affordable housing units in L.A. County.
The measure requires elected officials and related agencies to establish goals every five years and to track that progress.
Last week, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved its homeless funding plan, which allocated $656 million from Measure A, $209 million in unspent Measure H funding and $42.6 million in state grants.
The Board of Supervisors is expected to vote on a proposal Tuesday that, if approved, would give the county direct control over funds it currently sends to the Los Angeles Homeless Service Authority, also known as LAHSA, a city-county joint agency.
The Los Angeles City Council approved a similar motion, calling for a study to bypass LAHSA and manage contracts directly with homeless service providers.
Both bodies have taken serious steps to limit LAHSA's power over funding following scathing reports that alleged the agency misused or mismanaged funds, among other issues.
The homeless agency was created in 1993 to address homelessness in Los Angeles County. It is the lead entity that coordinates and manages federal, state, county and city funds for shelter, housing and services to people experiencing homelessness throughout the L.A. Continuum of Care, which encompasses all cities in the region -- with the exceptions of Long Beach, Pasadena and Glendale.
LAHSA officials have disputed some of the findings of the audits and urged officials to continue their partnership. The homeless agency has begun efforts to bolster transparency through the creation of accessible databases, which better track available shelter beds and outcomes of services.
Officials at the agency said they anticipate a 5% to 10% decrease in unsheltered homelessness in the region, which would mark the second consecutive year of such a decline.
The preliminary results are in line with last year's outcome, which showed a 10.7% and 5.1% decrease in unsheltered homelessness within the city and the county of Los Angeles, respectively. The final results of the 2025 count are expected to be released in late spring or early summer.
"When I first came to LAHSA, I publicly stated that we wanted to reduce unsheltered homelessness within three years," LAHSA CEO Va Lecia Adams Kellum said in a statement earlier in March. "We've done it in two."
The agency hailed the early results, which officials say show the region is on the right track to "solving" homelessness.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Panama Canal Chief Warns $23B Port Deal Poses Risks to its Neutrality
The Panama Canal Authority's lead official is the latest stakeholder to express his doubts about the sale of two ports on both sides of the waterway. Ricaurte Vásquez Morales, administrator at the Panama Canal Authority (ACP), told the Financial Times the $23 billion deal that would shift the ports into the hands of Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and BlackRock could potentially put the canal's own neutrality at risk. More from Sourcing Journal Panama Canal Sees Post-Drought Spike in Container Shipping Transits Staud Said to Bring On a New Investor Panama Ports Buyers Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place 'There is a potential risk of capacity concentration if the deal comes the way it is structured as we understand right now,' Vásquez said. 'If there is a significant level of concentration on terminal operators belonging to an integrated or one single shipping company, it will be at the expense of Panama's competitiveness in the market and inconsistent with neutrality.' The Panama Canal operates as a neutral passage for ships representing all countries. Treaties signed during the Carter administration in 1977 established its neutrality, and ensured that the then-U.S.-controlled waterway would gradually be returned to Panama by Dec. 31, 1999. President Donald Trump has made overtures challenging the canal's neutrality, with claims that he wants the U.S. to 'take back' the trade artery on the grounds that it is allegedly under Chinese control. While China does not control the canal, Washington had wider concerns about the country's influence on the waterway. The sale of the Balboa and Cristobal ports by owner Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings was considered a win for the Trump administration, since the port operator's ownership of the ports was classified as a national security risk. But that deal has been scrutinized left and right, and has yet to get approval from the Panamanian government. The Chinese government, as well as state-owned media in the country, had spoken out against the deal, with reports saying President Xi Jinping was furious that CK Hutchison went forward with the sale. Following those reports, China's antitrust regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), opened a probe into the deal. That investigation has resulted in the parties deciding to amend several parts of the initial deal to try and appease both Trump and Xi, an FT report said. Hutchison, which would be selling off more than 40 non-Panama ports to MSC and BlackRock in the deal, floated the idea of potentially selling off some or all of its 10 remaining ports in China in a separate sale. The regulator had already warned Hutchison against splitting the Panama ports from the original deal altogether as a means to circumvent antitrust review. Along with government regulators, supply chain stakeholders have shown their displeasure with the potential acquisition in that it would give MSC, already the world's largest ocean carrier, a leading market share in port terminal operations. Vásquez noted that the deal has essentially pitted container shipping operators further against each other for space. 'This has become a significant battleground on transshipment capacity,' Vásquez said, noting that some at the ACP were worried the $23 billion transaction would cost it some container traffic if Hutchison's customers moved elsewhere. Vásquez added that the canal should use the ports deal as an opportunity to become a terminal operator itself by reactivating a project to build a terminal in the Port of Corozal at the Pacific end of the canal, according to FT. As Vásquez and the ACP keep an eye on the situation, the authority will itself be on the radar of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) in the U.S. as it plans its infrastructure projects. 'They're doing a very efficient job. What we're watching there is what's going to happen when they have a drought and they have reduced slots to go through there and then how those slots are allocated,' said FMC chairman Louis Sola, in a Monday briefing with the Port of Long Beach, calling it the agency's 'number one priority' at the canal. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which helped build and maintain the canal, is currently assisting the ACP on water management practices, according to Sola. The record drought throughout the second half of 2023 prompted the ACP's decision to build a new reservoir in the Indio River watershed to mitigate impacts from future climate conditions. To diversify its business lines, Vásquez also said the authority was considering building a pipeline along the length of the canal to carry up to 1 million barrels per day of liquefied petroleum gas.

Wall Street Journal
3 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Housing Lobby's Tax Boondoggle
Hard to believe, but Republicans in Congress want to expand a tax subsidy for real-estate developers under the guise of promoting affordable housing. It will do the opposite while larding up the tax code. The low-income housing tax credit has become an entitlement for home builders. Congress enacted the credit as part of the 1986 tax reform to mitigate the blow from extending the write-off period for apartment buildings. But evidence over 40 years shows the credit has failed to stimulate more construction while increasing building costs.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Four Senior Biden Officials to Testify in Probe on His Health: Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Four senior officials in former President Joe Biden's administration are set to testify in a House probe into Biden's health while in office. Newsweek reached out to Jill and Joe Biden's office via online form Tuesday for comment. Why It Matters Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race in late July following a disastrous debate performance against then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. Biden repeatedly stared at Trump and made halting statements where he appeared to lose his train of thought. Biden later said he had "a bad, bad night." Questions swirled about his mental acuity and possible decline as the White House and then Vice President Kamala Harris fielded questions about his cognitive ability in the final months of his presidency. Biden also faced harsh feedback as excerpts from CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson's book Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again were published. What To Know According to Politico, citing a House Oversight Committee aid, former deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini, former deputy director of Oval Office operations Ashley Williams, former director of the Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden, and Anthony Bernal, former senior adviser to the then first lady, are all set to testify in either June or July. Committee Chair James Comer requested their cooperation with the probe in May and also sent Biden's physician, Kevin O'Connor, a subpoena last week, Politico reports. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Comer said that he requested O'Connor appear for a deposition on June 27, 2025. Trump has pushed White House lawyers to look into whether Biden's aides covered up his alleged health decline, Reuters reports. Biden also revealed last month that he had been diagnosed with an "aggressive" form of prostate cancer that had metastasized to the bone. Former President Joe Biden can be seen posing at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Bruce Glikas/WireImage) Former President Joe Biden can be seen posing at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Bruce Glikas/WireImage) What People Are Saying House Oversight Committee on X over the weekend: "Even Obama's doctor admits the truth. This is precisely why Chairman @RepJamesComer subpoenaed Dr. Kevin O'Connor, Biden's physician. This is a scandal of historical proportions, and we will investigate it thoroughly!" Trump on Truth Social in May after Biden's diagnosis: "Melania and I are saddened to hear about Joe Biden's recent medical diagnosis. We extend our warmest and best wishes to Jill and the family, and we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery." Biden in a statement last week: "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false," Biden said. "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations."