French MPs back law to allow assisted dying
French MPs have voted to allow some people in the last stages of a terminal illness the right to assisted dying.The National Assembly approved the bill, which is backed by President Emmanuel Macron, by 305 votes to 199. It will now go to the upper house, the Senate, before a second reading in the National Assembly. Supporters hope it will become law by 2027.It would make France the eighth country in the European Union to allow a version of assisted dying.As currently framed, the French version would be not as permissive as in the Netherlands or neighbouring Belgium which were the first countries in Europe to legalise assisted dying.
A separate bill creating a right to palliative care went through unopposed. It is estimated that 48% of French patients who require palliative care do not get it.Much of the two-week debate in the Assembly had focused on the conditions under which a patient could qualify for assisted dying.The approved formula is for "people struck by a serious and incurable disease" that is "life-threatening and in its advanced or terminal phases", who are in "constant physical or psychological suffering".The patient would have to be able to "freely manifest his or her intention". They would have to wait 48 hours and then confirm it.Once authorised, the lethal dose would be self-administered by the patient; or by a medical assistant if the patient were incapable.Authorisation would be provided by a doctor, but only after consultation with peers.MPs were allowed a free vote on the bill – a reflection of how differences of opinion on the matter defy party lines. Broadly though, the measure was backed by the centre and left and opposed on the right and populist right.Conservative critics – echoing views of the once-dominant Catholic Church – were concerned that definitions in the bill were too broad, opening the way for assisted dying for patients who might have years to live.As in other countries where the ethical issues have been hotly debated, opponents fear that vulnerable elderly people could feel under pressure to die in order to remove a burden from their families.In a demonstration against the bill outside the National Assembly on Saturday, one 44-year-old woman suffering from Parkinson's disease said it would be like a "loaded pistol left on my bedside table".Some left-wingers wanted to toughen the government's bill by widening access to assisted dying to minors, non-French nationals and patients who leave instructions before going into a coma.Under the bill, medical staff who oppose assisted dying would not be obliged to carry it out. However, it would be a crime punishable by two years in jail to try to block an act of assisted dying.Conservatives wanted to create another crime – of incitement to assisted dying. But this amendment was rejected by MPs.Prime Minister François Bayrou, who is a practising Catholic, said that if he had a vote on the bill he would abstain. As he is not an MP, he did not have a vote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How the hasty planning of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson's calamitous wedding made it so miserable - marked by the 'sad' looks in the wedding photos
Throughout British history, royal weddings have been extravagant affairs full of pomp and grandeur, but there has been one major exception to this tradition. Hundreds of miles away from the Royal Family, King Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson were married in a low-key wedding ceremony 88 years ago today. It was highly unusual, taking place in the shadow of Edward's abdication crisis, less than a month after the coronation of King George VI. The wedding was hastily planned, taking place a month and a day after Wallis's divorce from Ernest Simpson was finalised. Straying further from tradition, Wallis opted for a long, finger-hugging white wedding dress in the style of the period while Edward wore a civilian suit instead of a military uniform. Despite the opulent setting of the wedding in the Chateau de Cande in France, the couple looked far from happy in their official pictures. Royal photographer Cecil Beaton, who was behind the camera for the event, remarked that Edward had an 'essentially sad' look in his eyes. Meanwhile, royal author Jane Marguerite Tippett, in The Lost Memoir Of Edward VIII, wrote that Wallis and Edward looked back on the wedding without much fondness. The Duke and Duchess are seen on their wedding day alongside Edward's best man, Edward 'Fruity' Metcalfe (right) and businessman Hermann Rogers, whom Wallis later had an affair with In the memoir it was revealed that Wallis said that preparations for the wedding 'were not very gay'. Which is unsurprising considering the royal wedding was in stark contrast to those before it, taking place in a small ceremony with no one from the Royal Family present. Among the guests were Edward's best man, Major Edward 'Fruity' Metcalfe, along with his chauffeur and equerry. Businessman Hermann Rogers, whom Wallis fell in love with and had hoped to marry, also attended. Reverend J.A. Jardine officiated in defiance of Church of England rules surrounding divorcees with living former spouses. He was later defrocked and would go on to open the tacky 'Windsor Cathedral' in Hollywood. Edward had also been left furious by King George's refusal to grant Wallis the status of Her Royal Highness. He bitterly joked that it was a 'nice wedding present'. When his mother, Queen Mary, did not send him an actual gift, he told her that he was 'bitterly hurt and disappointed that you virtually ignored the most important event in my life.' The royal wedding was in stark contrast to those before it, consisting of a small ceremony with no one from the Royal Family present A Faberge box that was sent as a gift by his younger brother Prince George, the Duke of Kent, was rejected by Edward, on the basis that his sibling had not shown any desire to deviate from the family's official stance towards him. Edward and Wallis's wedding venue was owned by millionaire Charles Bedaux, who was later frowned upon by the British and French intelligence services. The chateau boasted modern comforts that included a pipe organ costing $40,000 and a $15,000 telephone system. On the day itself, Wallis wore a blue wedding gown which she twinned with silk gloves made from the same material and a straw hat. She also wore an impressive diamond and sapphire brooch alongside a glittering sapphire wristband and earrings. Her second divorce - from shipbroker Ernest Aldrich Simpson - had been finalised only a month earlier. The Duke had originally wanted a royal chaplain to officiate at his wedding, but this desire was rapidly torpedoed by his brother, the King. His second choice had been the Reverend Martin Andrews, who presided over a parish in the Duchy of Cornwall. The couple looked less than jolly in the official photos that were taken to mark their wedding In the end he had little choice but to go with Reverend Jardine, who was described as 'turbulent' by Edward's biographer Philip Ziegler and later stripped of his duties. Archbishop of Canterbury Cosmo Lang - who had been instrumental in sealing Edward's abdication - described Jardine as a 'seeker of notoriety'. He questioned how Edward - who had been King of England just months before - could have 'lost his dignity' to the extent that he asked 'a man of this sort to celebrate his marriage'. Jardine officiated in defiance of the Church of England, which until 2002 would not perform weddings of rulers to divorcees who had living former spouses. While Edward believed that in Jardine he had chosen well, this idea was somewhat punctured by the priest's subsequent tour of the United States, where he revealed all about the ceremony. The altar was what Ziegler described as a 'bogus renaissance chest adorned with plum caryatids'. Beaton took official photographs of the couple after they tied the knot. In his diary he described Edward's expression when his photo was taken as 'essentially sad, tragic eyes belied by impertinent tilt of nose.' He added that the former King had 'common hands - like a mechanic - weather-beaten and rather scaly and one thumbnail is disfigured.' Beaton had talked to Wallis at length and decided that she was a 'strong force', and 'intelligent within her vast limitations'. 'She has obviously a tremendous admiration for the Duke and considers him one of the greatest brains… of our times. 'She admires his character, his vitality and is determined to love him, though I feel she is not in love with him.' As well as his best man, chauffeur and equerry, guests also included the Duke's hairdresser Charles Topper and Mrs Buchanan Merryman, Wallis's aunt. The service itself was composed of a French civil ceremony and then an Anglican counterpart conducted by Reverend Jardine was carried out ten minutes later. In both versions, Wallis promised to obey her husband. Incredibly, the Duke failed to kiss his bride in either the civil or religious ceremony, although there were tears in his eyes when he put Wallis's ring on her finger. Despite the controversy that surrounded the wedding at the time, the Duke and Duchess received more than 3,000 telegrams and 30,000 letters of good wishes after their wedding. In a statement, the Duke said: 'The Duchess and I would like to thank all those who have so kindly sent us presents and good wishes on the occasion of our wedding. 'We shall never forget their friendly messages, which mean so much to us on this day.' Following their wedding the couple eventually settled in France in the so-called Villa Windsor on the outskirts of Paris. Here they led the life of the idle rich, attending parties in France and America and going on lavish holidays with close friends. Though she lacked the status of an actual queen, it was the kind of high life that American Duchess had always sought. But when the Duke died aged 77 in 1972, Wallis was left alone, bereft of the man who had worshipped her. The Queen, with whom she had had minimal contact in the decades since her husband's abdication, hosted her at Buckingham Palace when she arrived for his funeral. The two had previously met when Queen Elizabeth and her husband Prince Philip visited the Duke in Paris in his final days. Wallis was buried next to her husband at the Royal Burial Ground, Frogmore. The burial was attended by only the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Charles and Princess Diana and eight of Wallis's aides and friends It was a sign of the Queen's willingness to put differences to one side for the sake of the greater good. When Wallis died over a decade later, her funeral service at Windsor's St George's Chapel was attended by senior royals including the Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother. Her name was not mentioned during the service. The service lasted for less than half an hour and, in scenes strikingly similar to her wedding, it was stripped of nearly all the pomp and ceremony that usually marks a royal death.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reform's attack on public sector pensions doesn't go far enough
Richard Tice has announced that new employees in the 10 councils now controlled by Reform UK will not be allowed to join the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS), and that existing staff already in the LGPS will get lower pay rises to compensate for their generous pensions. This change is all part and parcel of cutting costs for local council taxpayers. If Mr Tice really does believe in cutting taxpayer costs, then shouldn't all five Reform UK MPs withdraw from the MPs' generous, and expensive, defined benefit (DB) pension scheme? Each year MPs earn a pension of 1/51 th of their salary, increased in line with inflation, with a retirement age from the state pension age, if they are no longer MPs. After just one five-year parliamentary term, an MP on the current salary of £93,904 would be entitled to a pension of £9,206 a year in today's money, fully inflation-linked, and with a 3/8 widow/widower pension. Twenty years as an MP means a £36,000 pension – higher if they served as a minister. The MPs' pension scheme annual report shows the cost of new pension entitlements for 2024 was 28.8 pc of salary, with MPs themselves paying 11.1pc, leaving taxpayers to pay the balance of 17.7pc. This means total pay and pensions for an MP is over £110,000; £93,000 salary and £16,600 pension. And because the annual cash contribution paid by today's taxpayers is only 10.5pc of salary, a big chunk of the cost is being passed on to future taxpayers. Nigel Farage is no stranger to controversies over his pension. In 2017, following Brexit, he said he wouldn't be giving up any of his £73,000 MEP pension, so don't expect him rushing to leave the MPs' pension scheme. Meanwhile, Chancellor Rachel Reeves – who as an MP for 15 years has a pension of at least £26,000 a year – is trying to push pension schemes to invest more in UK equities and infrastructure. Unlike other 'unfunded' public sector pension schemes – the NHS, teachers, civil servants and armed forces – which pay pensions from annual taxation, the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund holds assets, like private sector schemes. And it seems to be setting a good example on UK investment At March 2024 it had £866m of assets, with 40pc held in UK equities, much higher than private sector DB schemes or the LGPS, and with another 9pc in UK property. It also has a 10pc target for 'renewable infrastructure' and 'energy infrastructure', which it's close to meeting. But before the trustees get too smug they should explain what they think they are doing holding 10pc of assets – £90m – in high-risk 'junk bonds' rated BB and below, not just a bit higher than the average, but spectacularly higher. The trustees should also give taxpayers a full breakdown of the annual fees and costs of running its Byzantine investment mandate, with umpteen managers. MPs want their cake and to eat it, too The published figures show £1.2m in investment management costs, just 0.14 pc of assets, impressively low. But astonishingly, this doesn't include the costs for 'pooled investment vehicles' – making up 80pc of assets. The trustees say, with a straight face, that these costs are 'not separately provided'. Dame Meg Hillier (Labour) and Dame Harriet Baldwin (Conservative), the current and former chairman of the influential Treasury Select Committee are both trustees. Can they use their reputation for asking awkward questions and demanding transparency when grilling reluctant ministers, to get the fund managers to provide the total costs (a multiple of the modest fees quoted)? In 2013 Dame Harriett argued in her response to a consultation that MPs should move from DB to DC pensions like 'the majority of private sector pension schemes'. She was right in 2013, and is still right today. The current pension should be stopped, and MPs moved to a DC pension, with taxpayers putting in 10.5pc of salary, the current cash contribution, still much more generous that the average in the private sector. As well as reducing cost and risk for taxpayers, this would help to kick-start the reform of other public sector pensions, where staff are still earning DB pensions that are more generous than those in private sector ever were.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Jack Draper admits he is a ‘long way behind' Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner after French Open exit
Jack Draper is in his early 20s, just like Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz, and his run to the US Open semi-finals last year caught the eye, but the Briton feels he has a lot of catching up to do to compete at the dominant duo's level. World No 5 Draper exited the French Open in the fourth round with a 5-7 6-3 6-2 6-4 defeat against Kazakh Alexander Bublik, missing out on a potential quarter-final clash with the top-ranked Sinner. "I'm incredibly disappointed with the result," the 23-year-old Draper told a press conference. "You know, obviously I'm coming into the clay court season having barely won any matches on the clay before. I keep that in mind, obviously, but I felt good. "I felt good coming into this tournament. I felt like my level was building. Then today, it's a really, really tough loss to take for me." Draper has beaten French Open champion and world No 2 Alcaraz twice in six encounters and has a 1-1 win-loss record against Sinner but feels he does not belong in the same league. "I still think I'm a long way behind those boys a little bit. I still have lots to learn," Draper said. "If you look at how many matches they've played, they've probably played double the amount that I've played. They're probably a year, two years ahead of me. "I do have a lot to do to catch up with them, in all honesty. My level is getting better all the time, but it's not just the tennis. It's the consistency. "Even though I've been more consistent, it's doing it when it matters, and these are the tournaments that matter."
