Electoral boundary commission appointed to consider representation for Chéticamp
The nine members of a commission tasked with creating dedicated representation in the Nova Scotia Legislature for Chéticamp were announced Friday.
Despite concerns about population growth in other parts of the province creating imbalances in electoral representation, the commission's terms of reference limit members' work to focusing on the traditional Acadian region.
The all-party select committee announced that Kenneth Deveau of Comeauville will chair the commission. Joining him will be:
Mark Bannerman, Hammonds Plains.
Glenn Graham, Southside Harbour.
Gwen LeBlanc, Wedgeport.
Martin Chaisson, Cheticamp.
Armand Paul, Sydney.
Jason MacLean, Middle Sackville.
Natalie Robichaud, New Edinburgh.
Rohini Bannerjee, Halifax.
Jill Houlihan of Halifax will serve as an alternate.
The commission was struck in response to a Nova Scotia Supreme Court ruling in November that found the lack of a protected district for Chéticamp following a 2019 boundaries review was a breach of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Although most of the 55 electoral districts in Nova Scotia are drawn to reflect considerations for effective representation and voter parity, varying no more than 25 per cent above or below the estimated average number of electors, there are four exceptions to provide protected representation for reasons of history and culture.
The Nova Scotia Legislature already has protected seats to recognize the traditional Acadian districts of Argyle, Clare and Richmond, and the historic Black district of Preston. The number of electors for those seats is much lower than in the other 51 districts.
Now the commission will look at how to include Chéticamp in that list of protected areas.
The terms of reference released Friday show that that could be accomplished several ways, including through the use of non-contiguous districts.
Changes must be ready for legislation next year
The commission's interim report is due by Aug. 29, with a deadline for the final report of Jan. 20, 2026. The commission can request an extension but their work must be finished in time for the government to be able to introduce a bill in the legislature to implement the recommendations before July 15, 2026.
The group will hold public hearings before preparing each of its reports and will also accept written submissions.
The preliminary report must include boundaries for 55 districts and 56 districts. The final report can only include one recommendation for the number of seats in Province House.
Although there have been arguments for a broader look at the district boundaries and the number of seats in the legislature in order to account for the growing population in Halifax Regional Municipality, this commission will not do that work.
The group's final term of reference stipulates that it cannot recommend changes to "any electoral district not located on Cape Breton Island unless the commission considers it necessary to maintain effective representation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Wisconsin's budget talks stall. Here's how it could affect the 2026 governor's race
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A breakdown in negotiations over a tax cut and other spending measures in Wisconsin threatens to put the 2026 race for governor on hold, with the Democratic incumbent saying he won't announce his decision on seeking a third term in the swing state until after a budget deal is done. Gov. Tony Evers and Republicans who control the Legislature have been meeting in private since April trying to hammer out a deal ahead of the July 1 deadline. But those talks broke down late Wednesday, both sides said.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Wisconsin's budget talks stall. Here's how it could affect the 2026 governor's race
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A breakdown in negotiations over a tax cut and other spending measures in Wisconsin threatens to put the 2026 race for governor on hold, with the Democratic incumbent saying he won't announce his decision on seeking a third term in the swing state until after a budget deal is done. Gov. Tony Evers and Republicans who control the Legislature have been meeting in private since April trying to hammer out a deal ahead of the July 1 deadline. But those talks broke down late Wednesday, both sides said. The routine budget-writing process comes as Wisconsin is poised to be in the national political spotlight again next year with the race for governor and a fight over control of the Legislature. Evers has drawn the ire of President Donald Trump's administration and winning back the governor's office is a priority for Republicans. New legislative district maps enacted in February 2024 are more favorable for Democrats, leading them to pick up seats in the November election. They are optimistic that they can swing at least one house of the Legislature in 2026, making it easier for a Democratic governor to enact their agenda. The Wisconsin Supreme Court is also considering a pair of lawsuits that seek to redraw the state's congressional boundaries where Republicans hold six of eight seats. Two of those six seats are targets for national Democrats in 2026 and new maps would only increase their chances of victory as they try to take control of the House away from Republicans. Evers is midway through his second term as governor and has repeatedly said he won't make a decision about whether to run for a third one in 2026 until after the budget is done. That has essentially frozen the field on the Democratic side, while one Republican has already launched his candidacy and others are expected to get in. The governor's spokesman, Sam Roecker, declined to comment on whether the stalled talks will affect the timing of Evers' decision. There was optimism that the frosty relationship between Evers and Republican legislative leaders was thawing a bit as they met in secret for more than two months to work on the budget. But hopes of a quick deal seemed to evaporate late Wednesday with both sides announcing a stalemate after meeting three days straight. Evers said he supported proposals to cut income taxes for the middle class and eliminate income taxes for some retirees, but Republicans could not get behind Democratic priorities, including lowering child care costs and increasing funding for K-12 schools and the University of Wisconsin. Evers said it was Republicans who decided to stop negotiating, even though he supported tax cuts similar to ones he has vetoed in the past. 'I was ready to make that concession in order to get important things done for Wisconsin's kids,' he said in a statement. Assembly Republican leaders said they remained open to more talks with Evers, but in the meantime the Legislature's budget committee would continue its work 'with the goal of finishing on time.' The committee was scheduled to resume its work on Thursday. It has already gutted many of Evers' priorities, including legalizing marijuana. Senate GOP leaders said they were confident the Legislature would pass a budget that Evers will sign into law. Unlike in many states, the July 1 budget deadline in Wisconsin is soft because if a new plan isn't in place by then current spending levels continue. And once the Legislature passes a budget, Evers can put his mark on it through his broad veto powers that allow him to make dramatic changes in spending.
Toronto Star
18 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Bipartisan deals on voting and election changes are rare. It just happened in one swing state
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Facing a legislature dominated by Democrats, Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo stood before Nevada lawmakers earlier this year with a message that some did not expect to go far: 'Set aside partisan politics.' It was a plea that might have seemed more aspirational than realistic, given the country's deep polarization. Yet it set the stage for one of the session's most unexpected outcomes — a bipartisan agreement to bring voter ID requirements to the perennial battleground state by next year's midterm elections. In a deal that came together in the waning days of the session, the Democratic-controlled Legislature approved a bill that combined a requirement for voter ID — a conservative priority across the country and something that has been on Lombardo's legislative wish list — with a Democratic-backed measure to add more drop boxes for mailed ballots in the state's most populous counties. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Lombardo is expected to sign the bill. The compromise represents a form of bipartisan dealmaking that has been especially scarce in recent years as the country's political divisions have deepened, especially around any potential reform to voting and election laws. President Donald Trump's lies about his loss in the 2020 presidential election fueled a wave of restrictive voting laws in Republican-led states that Democrats countered with changes to make voting more accessible, while an executive order Trump signed earlier this year seeking to overhaul how elections are run was met with a wave of Democratic lawsuits. Election legislation has mostly hit a dead end in states where the parties share power, making Nevada's bill all the more remarkable. A requirement for voters to show photo identification at the polls has long been a nonstarter for Nevada Democrats, who have argued that it threatened to disenfranchise low-income voters and make it more difficult for people to vote, especially older voters, those with disabilities and those without driver's licenses. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, the Democrat who brokered the deal with Lombardo after the governor vetoed his original bill to expand drop box access, acknowledged it was a tough concession. But he said it was the best they could do with the time they had left. 'Now I understand and appreciate that this will be a particularly challenging bill for some to support, but I also believe we have a duty to move forward,' he said over the weekend when releasing details of the deal publicly for the first time. It's a stark contrast to the 2023 legislative session, the last time lawmakers met. Lombardo outlined voter ID as one of his main priorities, but Democrats in the statehouse refused to give the proposal a hearing. The governor vowed he would take the issue directly to voters. Last November, Nevada voters overwhelmingly approved the voter ID ballot initiative that Lombardo supported. Voters will have to pass it again in 2026 to amend the state constitution, and the requirement would then be in place for the 2028 presidential election. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Yeager told his colleagues over the weekend that voters seemed poised to give their final approval to the measure. He argued that passing a voter ID law now would give the state a two-year head start on implementing the requirements, to get ready before the next presidential contest. Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar, a Democrat, said he respects the will of the voters and will work with the governor and local election officials 'to continue strengthening our elections.' That includes, under the proposal, a new — and free — digital form of voter ID that his office will be in charge of rolling out. Polls have shown that most Americans support voter ID laws, and that has been consistent over the years and across party lines. A 2024 Gallup poll found 84% of Americans supported requiring all voters to provide photo ID at their voting place to cast a ballot, consistent with Gallup findings from 2022 and 2016. That includes about two-thirds of Democrats, according to the 2024 survey. 'This may not be my favorite policy to have to implement, but I think as a Legislature we have a responsibility to do this,' Yeager told his colleagues. State Sen. Carrie Ann Buck, a Republican, praised the effort, saying, 'I think this is very thoughtful and very courageous of you to bring this in a bipartisan way ... I think our common goals are that every legitimate voter gets to vote.' But not all Democrats were on board, with five voting against it when it passed the Senate. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'I recognize what you're attempting to do, to stave off something worse,' said Democratic Sen. Dina Neal. But she said she was 'wrestling with the philosophical issue with voter ID.' 'I'm not in the space where I am openly willing to disenfranchise a population who may not even understand this law as written.' If Lombardo signs the bill, Nevada will join 36 other states that either require or request voters show ID when voting in person, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Not all states require photo ID, though. Some accept documents such as a bank statement, and some allow voters without ID to vote after signing an affidavit. A few states allow poll workers to vouch for voters without an ID. Under Nevada's bill, voters will be required to show a form of photo ID when voting in person, which will include government-issued IDs and Nevada-issued university student IDs. 'Nevada has some of the most secure and accessible elections in the country,' Yeager said, 'and this bill is a set of compromises between the Legislature and the governor that I believe can ensure that tradition continues.' ___ Associated Press writers Christina A. Cassidy in Atlanta and Linley Sanders in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report. Read more on the U.S. Election at
