
Asteroid Discovery Overturns Long-Held Belief
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Vesta, one of the two largest bodies in our solar system's asteroid belt, has long been thought to be more than just another asteroid.
Scientists had concluded that it sported some fundamental properties of planets—a crust, mantle and core—making it a protoplanet that never reached full size.
Given this, it was assumed that Vesta could provide a template for understanding what planets like the Earth looked like during their early development.
However, a new study led by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) has overturned this assumption—revealing that Vesta's interior is far more uniform than expected.
"The lack of a core was very surprising," said paper author and planetary scientist professor Seth Jacobson of the Michigan State University in a statement. "It's a really different way of thinking about Vesta."
Stock image of Vesta
Stock image of Vesta
NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA/MPS/DLR/ID
The reason it was thought that Vesta was "differentiated"—that is, divided up into a crust, mantle and core—is that its surface is covered in volcanic, basaltic rocks. This suggested that Vesta went through a melting process that saw its metal sink to form a core.
However, this hypothesis has been challenged by recent analyses of data from NASA's Dawn spacecraft, which orbited Vesta for 14 months back in 2011–12, both taking images of its surface and measuring its gravity field.
"For years, conflicting gravity data from Dawn's observations of Vesta created puzzles," said paper author and JPL senior research scientist Ryan Park.
However, nearly a decade of analytical refinements allowed the researchers to reconcile the different data sources and reveal Vesta's internal structure.
By looking at Vesta's gravitational field, and how it rotates, the team were able to show that the body doesn't behave like it should if it had a core.
"Our findings show Vesta's history is far more complex than previously believed," Park added.
In the light of their findings, the researchers have two hypotheses that might explain Vesta's true identity.
The first is the idea that Vesta may have begun the melting process that would have differentiated it into distinct layers—but never finished.
Alternatively, Jacobson explains, it is conceivable that Vesta is a chunk that broke off of a growing planet in our solar system as the result of a collision billions of years ago.
Materials ejected from such collisions would include, like Vesta, melting-derived rocky bodies without a core.
"This idea went from a somewhat silly suggestion to a hypothesis that we're now taking seriously due to this re-analysis of NASA Dawn mission data," Jacobson said.
Artist's impression of NASA's Dawn spacecraft.
Artist's impression of NASA's Dawn spacecraft.
NASA/JPL-Caltech
For now, neither of the researchers' hypotheses have been explored enough to rule either of them out—but both do have issues that will require explanation, the team notes.
Case in point: incomplete differentiation is hard to square with the meteorite samples originating from Vesta that researchers have collected.
"We're really confident these meteorites came from Vesta—and these don't show obvious evidence of incomplete differentiation," Jacobson said.
Meanwhile, the notion that some of the bodies in the asteroid belt are pieces ejected from the growing planets of the solar system is far from proven.
Further analyses of the Dawn mission data, and new approaches applied to the study of Vesta meteorite samples, may provide more information. Regardless, the findings of the recent study could forever change how scientists view differentiated planets.
"No longer is the Vesta meteorite collection a sample of a body in space that failed to make it as a planet," said Jacobson.
"These could be pieces of an ancient planet before it grew to full completion. We just don't know which planet that is yet."
Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about asteroids? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference
Park, R. S., Ermakov, A. I., Konopliv, A. S., Vaughan, A. T., Rambaux, N., Bills, B. G., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., Fu, R. R., Jacobson, S. A., Stewart, S. T., & Toplis, M. J. (2025). A small core in Vesta inferred from Dawn's observations. Nature Astronomy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-025-02533-7

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute
Elon Musk, the world's richest person, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's businesses. He later appeared to back down. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns. A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk's businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump said. Nasa relies on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Hours after issuing his threat, Musk appeared to take pleas from users on his social media platform X to 'cool down' and he posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Since 2008, SpaceX has received more than $20bn in government contracts, largely from Nasa and the Department of Defense. In March, two Nasa astronauts returned to Earth in a Dragon capsule after being stranded on the ISS for nearly nine months, after their Boeing Starliner capsule faced technical issues and returned to Earth without them. The next SpaceX Dragon launch is scheduled to take place on 10 June. The Dragon is expected to carry four people to and from the ISS on Axiom Mission 4. Nasa's press secretary, Bethany Stevens, in a statement on X after Musk's announcement, said the agency 'will continue to execute upon the president's vision for the future of space'. Related: Trump v Musk: 10 ways they can further hurt each other 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met,' she added. Musk's announcement came amid an escalating dispute with Trump that began after he denounced the president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' for the millions he spent to get him elected. Trump, in turn, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. The president wrote earlier on Thursday that Musk was 'wearing thin' and that the tech billionaire 'went crazy' after he was asked to depart the White House last week as head of Trump's 'department of government efficiency' .
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Week In Space podcast: Episode 164 — Goodbye NASA?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. On Episode 164 of This Week In Space, Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik discuss these concerning times for NASA with Casey Dreier, the Chief of Space Policy for The Planetary a wild week it's been for NASA. With drastic budget cuts looming — pending any action by Congress — then comes the sudden and unexpected pulling of Jared Isaacman for the role of NASA Administrator, with no replacement named. Then came the very public split between President Trump and Elon Musk, and a flurry of furious Twitter/X and Truth Social postings, aimed at each other with razor-sharp edges. And finally, the proposed and drastic cuts to NASA outreach and education budgets, slimming them to nearly nothing. These are strange and concerning times for America's space agency, a premier global brand and icon of peaceful American prowess. We turned to Dreier, who has been quite vocal in his concern, for context. These are critical times for spaceflight, so you won't want to miss this episode! Download or subscribe to this show at: episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at Musk vs Trump--THE BROMANCE HAS EXPERIENCED A R-U-D ispace strikes out 60th Anniversary First US Spacewalk Marc Garneau, First Canadian in Space, Dies at 76 Joined by Casey Dreier of the Planetary Society Smallest budget since 1961 NASA Workforce Changes Chart The Planetary Society reissues urgent call to reject disastrous budget proposal for NASA These Are All The NASA Missions That Trump Wants To Cancel Proposed NASA cuts to space science: 'Staggering' NASA FY 2026 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET REQUEST SUMMARY Proposed NASA cuts to space science: 'Staggering' Senate response to White House budget for NASA: Keep SLS, nix science After Trump pulled NASA nomination, Musk ally Jared Isaacman says stint in politics was 'thrilling' Pulled NASA nomination blindsides space community: 'Major blunder' Lieutenant General STEVEN L. KWAST SAY NO TO A DARK AGE OF NASA SCIENCE Advocacy Action Center TOP TELESCOPE PICK: Looking for a telescope to see planets and comets? We recommend the Celestron Astro Fi 102 as the top pick in our best beginner's telescope guide. Finally, did you know you can launch your own SpaceX rocket? Model rocket maker Estes' stunning scale model of a Falcon 9 rocket that you can pick up now. The launchable model is a detailed recreation of the Falcon 9 and retails for $149.99. You can save 10% by using the code IN-COLLECTSPACE at checkout, courtesy of our partners This Week in Space covers the new space age. Every Friday we take a deep dive into a fascinating topic. What's happening with the new race to the moon and other planets? When will SpaceX really send people to Mars? Join Rod Pyle and Tariq Malik from as they tackle those questions and more each week on Friday afternoons. You can subscribe today on your favorite podcatcher.