If your female boss emasculates you, maybe it's time to look in the mirror
Lucia Mabasa is Chief Executive Officer of pinpoint one human resources.
Image: supplied
By LUCIA MABASA
One of the saddest and silent, yet salient, failures of our 30-year journey to transform this country, has been our inability to rid our workplaces and our boardrooms of deep-rooted misogyny.
Far too many women executives must bear the brunt of having to break through the glass ceiling and then continue to justify themselves for getting where there are.
There are too many stories of women managers and executives being gaslit by their underlings and actively undermined by having their every decision or instruction retro validated by male peers.
It's an issue that is difficult to deal with because it doesn't always happen out in the open but instead lurks in different spaces that women are excluded from. But even when it presents as outright misogyny it isn't any easier to manage.
It's difficult for a South African woman of colour to have to listen to men justifying their prejudice on the grounds of culture, ethnicity or even religion, when women have been carrying more than their fair share of discrimination for decades, if not centuries, in this country.
Prime Minister JG Strijdom made the same mistake in 1956 when 10 000 women marched to the Union Buildings to fight the repressive pass laws. He was told in no uncertain terms :'Wathint'Abafazi, Wathint'imbokodo (you strike a woman, you strike a rock).
That spirit burns fiercely in South African women, especially those in executive positions today. It's a mistake for anyone to think that women leaders cannot rise to the top by keeping their femininity – and their innate humanity - intact. In the world we live in now especially, that's not a weakness to be able to lead with empathy and kindness, on the contrary it is a vital antidote to the selfishness and populist nationalism that is threatening humanity's continued existence.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Not all women leaders are kind and empathetic. Some have adopted the worst attributes of the jock culture to fit in, with all the intrigue and backstabbing that goes with it.
It's not something we need in this country. We do not need to create corporate lives that fuse TV shows and dramas like Survivor and Succession in a battle for survival and the corner office, instead we need to create inclusive environments where merit will always be recognised and rewarded – irrespective of the gender, colour, creed or orientation of the candidate. We need to create a culture where a rising tide lifts all boats.
It makes business sense to do this, but we – as the heirs to the Mandela legacy – have a special debt to the founding parents of this nation and the Constitution that they bequeathed us to continue their work to create a country which belongs to all who live in it and because of that allows everyone the opportunity to unlock their potential.
Anyone who finds fault with this, needs to look within themselves rather and address their own frailties. Culture or religion can never justify bigotry.
People who feel threatened by women leaders need to lean into their vulnerabilities and insecurities and work on them. The path to the C-Suite is predicated on self-improvement and that can only happen when people take a long hard look at themselves and identify their weaknesses and intentionally set about strengthening them.
The buck doesn't stop there, but right at the top. If we are to have any chance of smashing this last silent barrier, misogyny and sexism must be actively and unequivocally outlawed by the CEOs themselves. There must be consequences for sexism and misogyny, just as there are penalties for racism and homophobia and any other institutionalised intolerance.
South Africa has made incredible strides addressing the gender imbalances on shop floors, in the professions and the managerial classes. We have broken glass ceilings in the boardrooms too, but to paraphrase Madiba, it's still a long walk to freedom.
Women are engineers, soldiers, sailors, pilots, doctors, surgeons, advocates and attorneys. They drive trains, fly fighter jets and command infantry battalions.
But to do their jobs to their utmost ability they need to be properly respected too, not just given lip service, to be properly empowered.
I am confident that we can, as a nation, do just that.
*Lucia Mabasa is Chief Executive Officer of pinpoint one human resources, a proudly South African black women owned executive search firm. pinpoint one human resources provides executive search solutions in the demand for C suite, specialist and critical skills across industries and functional disciplines, in South Africa and across Africa. Visit www.pinpointone.co.za to find out more or read her previous columns on leadership; avoiding the pitfalls of the boardroom and becoming the best C-suite executive you can be.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Downgrading of Israeli embassy ‘right thing to do'
Lamola confirms Israel's embassy will remain downgraded due to Gaza conflict. A member of the South African Communist Party (SACP) protests outside the Embassy of Isreal in solidarity with Palestine and condemn the ongoing airstrikes in Gaza, 20 May 2021, Pretoria. Picture: Jacques Nelles There was not much happening at the Israeli embassy after International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola confirmed it would remain downgraded, following the ongoing attacks on Hamas. The downgrade was implemented as a direct response to Israel's continued occupation of Palestinian territories, Lamola said during his address to the National Council of Provinces on Tuesday. Lamola said the downgraded embassy only facilitated the normal processes of visa applications and travelling of civilians between the two countries. Downgrading Israeli embassy the right thing to do – analyst Political analyst Piet Croucamp said downgrading the embassy was the right thing to do. 'Whether we will make new enemies and reiterate old enemies like [US President] Donald Trump, [remains to be seen],' he said. ALSO READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy 'It might not be the right time now but, politically, it was the right thing to do.' Another political analyst, Rene Oosthuizen, said the South African government's decision to downgrade the embassy was complex and reflects 'our nation's historical solidarity with the oppressed and the profound moral dilemmas of our present societies'. Issue complex and reflects SA's 'historical solidarity with the oppressed' Oosthuizen said while 'one cannot ignore the suffering of innocent civilians in any conflict, the breaking of diplomatic ties can close off avenues for mediation and humanitarian engagement'. Senior political lecturer at North-West University Benjamin Rapanyane said the move to downgrade the embassy in 2023 marked a shift in foreign policy aimed at conveying solidarity with the Palestinian people.
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA Water Polo has the right to exist, judge rules in a blow to Swimming SA's interdict bid
South African Water Polo could very well become the governing body of the sport after a vital court ruling. The breakaway South African Water Polo (SAWP) organisation has won the legal right to exist and could even evolve into the sport's national federation, according to a judgment handed down by the Western Cape Division of the High Court against Swimming South Africa (SSA). In a strong ruling after an urgent application brought by SSA for a final interdict against SAWP, Judge Judith Cloete found that SSA 'does not have an exclusive right in perpetuity to govern or administer the sport of water polo in South Africa'. It's a huge blow for SSA, whose years of well-documented poor governance could be coming to an end – in water polo at least. The court ruling will also come with a heavy bill, estimated to be around R1-million after SSA was ordered to pay costs. SSA, as the currently recognised national federation for aquatic disciplines including water polo, by both the National Sport and Recreation Act (NSRA) and World Aquatics, sought to prevent SAWP from attempting to administer or govern water polo in South Africa and from interfering in SSA's affairs. Judge Cloete found this to be against both the framework established in (or by) the NSRA and against South Africa's Constitution. 'The definition of 'national federation' in the NSRA makes no mention of only one national governing body being permitted to qualify as such in South Africa,' Judge Cloete said in her judgment. 'Although the definition refers to 'a national governing body' it does not necessarily follow that there can be only one such body for all aquatic disciplines in this country. 'The applicant (SSA) cannot seriously suggest that the respondents (SAWP) do not have the constitutionally entrenched right to freedom of association contained in section 18 of the Bill of Rights, and that the same applies to any individual water polo player wishing to join the respondents. 'The Constitutional Court has made clear that freedom of association is a fundamental right which protects against coercion, enables individuals to organise around particular areas of concern, and to hold both public and private bodies to account. 'The right has dual content in that it allows for a person to freely associate (the positive element) as well as to decide not to associate at all (the negative element). 'In addition, section 16 of the Bill of Rights entrenches the right to freedom of expression subject to certain exclusions, none of which are applicable in the present matter.' SAWP's mandate SAWP was established on simple principles to grow and improve the sport of water polo in the country. SSA applied to the court for an urgent interdict against SAWP to prevent it from 'interfering' in its mandate to govern and administer water polo in SA. SAWP was formed in early 2025, after many senior coaches, referees, administrators and players, including Olympians and world champions from around South Africa, lost faith in SSA to represent the interests of the sport. They decided to join under the banner of a new body, which would be built on the principles of transparency and sporting excellence. SSA argued this was illegal on several grounds and initially sought broad interdictory relief, including preventing SAWP from 'passing off' as having the authority to govern water polo. That line of argument was abandoned owing to lack of evidence. The remaining accusations forming the basis for the interdict were that SAWP was: Purporting to carry out the administration or governance of water polo in South Africa. SSA argued that SAWP's name ('South African Water Polo NPC') implied it was the responsible entity and that an open letter from SAWP outlined steps relating to administration and governance, which SSA claimed fell solely under its authority since 1992; Interfering with the affairs of SSA, specifically by directing or encouraging persons or entities to boycott or avoid participating in events held under SSA's auspices; Dissuading or discouraging people from participating in local or international water polo events organised by SSA; Interfering with SSA's communications to its water polo membership (by encouraging members to ignore communications or fail to pass them on); and Securing sponsorships or raising funds ostensibly to fund the administration of water polo and teams organised by SAWP to represent South Africa abroad. In its responding papers, SAWP argued that the SSA 'has no right to suppress criticism and stand in the way of SAWP (and its members) from acting lawfully, in the interests of its members, and with the utmost good faith'. SAWP argued that 'in response to Swimming South Africa's systematic and well-documented failures over the last three decades, SA Water Polo seeks, in the short term, to organise and unite clubs, players, coaches and referees, and to develop high-performance programmes for its members; and in the longer-term, to apply for membership with World Aquatics in order to ensure that SA Water Polo teams can compete at the highest international level'. 'Misconceived right' SSA's accusations were dismissed by Judge Cloete as she sided with SAWP in that it has the legal right to exist. 'The applicant's case is that it has a clear statutory right worthy of protection because in South Africa there are currently no separate bodies governing various disciplines of aquatic sports,' the judge noted. 'In its words, the South African regulation of sports exists within an international framework and not within a vacuum. 'To my mind the applicant has misconceived the nature of its right. It is correct that at present it is the only national federation for aquatic disciplines recognised by World Aquatics. 'However, SAWP is not purporting to hold itself out as a national federation. That is the only right which the applicant has which is worthy of protection. 'I agree with the respondents that the applicant does not have an exclusive right in perpetuity to govern or administer the sport of water polo in South Africa. 'Accordingly, it has no right to prevent the respondents from taking steps to legally acquire that right in due course (including by establishing its legitimacy in the wider stakeholder community by creating the appropriate organisational structures in the interim). 'This may ultimately result in the applicant having the authority to govern or administer water polo in South Africa in future, but this is nothing more than an incidence of our constitutionally entrenched democracy. 'It does not confer with it a legal right of the applicant worthy of interdictory protection.' Following the judgment, SAWP interim CEO Robbie Taylor said: 'This win is important validation of the local water polo community's mission to restore purpose and world-class excellence to the sport we love so much. 'For the first time in a long time, the polo community is truly excited about the future again. We're ready to put South Africa back on the map as a water polo-playing country with teams that are well prepared and are given every possible opportunity to succeed. 'Our first major event will be a highly competitive and exciting Winter League to be held in August 2025 in Nelson Mandela Bay.' SSA claims a victory of sorts? In an emailed response to Daily Maverick requesting reaction to the outcome, SSA sent a statement, which was not attributed to any leadership figure at SSA. 'Swimming South Africa (SSA) acknowledges the judgment handed down on 18 June 2025 by Judge Cloete in the matter concerning the governance of aquatic sports in South Africa,' the statement read. 'As the officially recognised national federation responsible for swimming, water polo, artistic swimming, diving and open water swimming, SSA is currently reviewing the full implications of the ruling in consultation with our legal team. The federation will determine its next steps after due deliberation at board level. 'The judgment affirms the constitutional right to freedom of association, a principle embedded in the Bill of Rights. At the same time, the court unequivocally confirmed that Swimming South Africa remains the authoritative governing body for aquatic sports in the country. 'Importantly, the ruling recognises that Water Polo South Africa (WPSA) [sic], a private entity, does not seek nor hold any formal recognition from the South African government, Sascoc, or the international governing body, World Aquatics. 'While we respect the outcome of the judicial process, we are disappointed that our application to interdict activities which we believe compromise the structure, order, and integrity of the sport was not granted. Nonetheless, SSA remains steadfast in our mandate to regulate and grow aquatics responsibly and inclusively. 'To be absolutely clear: Water Polo South Africa [sic] is not affiliated to Swimming South Africa, nor is it authorised to organise competitions under our name. Claims that it may issue provincial or national colours, or facilitate international representation, are both misleading and unfounded. 'This responsibility lies exclusively with Swimming South Africa and is governed by our constitution and operational protocols, which do not provide for dual membership at any level of the sport.' Interestingly, SSA's post-judgment statement infers that SAWP (whom they misname as WPSA despite clear wording in the judgment, finding affidavits and other correspondence, adding to the general sense of incompetence) are passing themselves off as the governing body. It's an accusation that SSA themselves withdrew and that Judge Cloete found baseless. DM
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA's new labour migration policy — critics doubt its effectiveness, say it does not strike a balance
In a new policy white paper, the government makes several far-reaching proposals to restrict the employment of foreign citizens. Critics warn that instead of protecting jobs, the policy will do damage. South Africa has finally put forward a coherent plan to manage labour migration. The White Paper on National Labour Migrant Policy, which the Cabinet approved on 29 May, marks the government's first comprehensive attempt to define who gets to work here, and under what conditions they will be allowed to do so. It arrives as the unemployment rate remained stubbornly high at 32.9% in the first quarter of 2025. In this climate, political pressure to prioritise South African jobs has grown, as evidenced by rising xenophobia and misinformation about migrant numbers, the white paper states. Immigrants made up 8.9% of employed workers in 2022, largely in sectors where local participation is low, such as construction, agriculture, logistics and informal trade. The proposed policy is trying to prioritise South African workers while acknowledging regional and sectoral reliance on foreign labour. Whether it succeeds is another matter. 'What might create South African jobs in the short term may ultimately harm the country's ability to recruit skilled workers, attract investment and promote trade,' said Professor Loren Landau, a migration researcher based at Oxford University and the University of the Witwatersrand. The policy is designed to inform proposed amendments to the Employment Services Act (ESA), with the aim of imposing stricter control on how foreign nationals are hired in South Africa. The crux of the reform is sector-specific quotas that will cap the number of foreign nationals employers can hire in certain industries and occupations once the amendments have been passed by Parliament. 'Internationally, the practice of reserving the right of occupational choice is not uncommon in democracies,' said Sashin Naidoo, employment law lawyer at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. Employers will also need to prove that no suitably qualified South African was available for the job, submit a skills transfer plan and pay foreign and local workers on par. The ESA did not set out the practical requirements for these skills transfer plans, said Taryn York, senior associate employment lawyer at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. 'However, it does say the minister may make regulations setting out these requirements.' Failure to comply could result in fines of up to R100,000, a prospect that has employers on edge. 'Although a drive to increase employment of local workers is admirable, the task of skills transfer and upskilling of employees should not also be placed at the feet of the private sector,' said Jaco Swart, national manager of the National Employers' Association of South Africa. The proposed changes will introduce more uncertainty for migrant workers. Mandla Masuku, president of the Migrant Workers Union of South Africa (Miwusa), said most migrants were not in the country by choice but because of unforeseen circumstances in their home countries. 'Some have been here for many years,' Masuku said. 'They've got families, they've got properties. If they are going to be affected by these policies, it is not going to affect them alone.' He also raised concerns that migrants might not fully grasp how the policy would be enforced or what their rights would be under a new system. When quotas clash A legal showdown may be brewing between the Employment Equity Act and the ESA. Although recent proposed amendments to the former included sectoral transformation targets, the ESA's amendments go a step further, granting the minister of labour the authority to impose hard quotas on the hiring of foreign nationals. 'We've got these two pieces of legislation, one having a quota and one having a sector target,' said Imraan Mahomed, director of employment law at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. 'There is already existing authority in the Constitutional Court that has found that the imposition of quotas is unconstitutional. 'The minister distances himself from any consideration that sectoral targets are quotas. It's not going to be a sectoral target in relation to foreigners, it's going to be a quota. I suspect there's going to be a legal challenge when it comes to these quotas.' The policy is presented as a dual-purpose tool: to promote local employment and safeguard migrant rights. As with most of the government's ambitions, the execution is where reality starts to wobble. 'The government has typically based its policies on a relatively poor reading of the true economy or the impact of immigration on it,' Landau said. 'While dramatically underestimating the positive impacts of immigration, it dramatically overpromises on its capacity to regulate labour conditions and migration.' Masuku, too, was sceptical of the policy's effectiveness. 'I suspect that it will be just another policy that is there, maybe for the purpose of proving a point to citizens. But, in terms of practicality, I don't think it will have a huge impact.' Swart echoed these doubts: 'The issue is not that employers are unwilling to appoint South African citizens, it is simply that the skills are not locally available, a consequence of a failed education system. 'The current proposal does not strike a balance, nor will it assist the unemployment crisis or ensure a skills transfer in the country.' A regional vision One of the policy's more progressive features is its regional outlook. It aligns with AU and Southern African Development Community frameworks and proposes the introduction of SADC visas, which are intended to ease cross-border work and allow for portable social protections. Lee Masuku, senior associate lawyer in employment law at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, said these would include a special work visa in the SADC region, special traders' visas and SADC small and medium enterprise visas. The policy also calls for updated labour agreements with neighbouring states like Zimbabwe, Lesotho and Mozambique, but Landau views these gestures as superficial. 'The existing policies may or may not reshape the labour market, but they do send a clear message to the region that South Africa is now more unilateral than ever. Given how much of its market is regional… this will likely hurt business and job creation,' he said. The policy also largely ignores where most migrant workers actually operate: in the informal sector, undocumented and unprotected. Asked whether the policy protected informal migrant workers, Landau answered: 'Simply put, no.' He added that it lacked mechanisms that recognise or protect the humanity and labour rights of migrant workers outside formal employment. Masuku warned further that employers might exploit undocumented migrants more if fewer legal work routes existed. For all its talk of order and oversight, the white paper admits that the policy is based on sparse and outdated data, and promises a better information system. The scattering of administrative data, the policy's lack of alignment to international standards, missing indicators and minimal use of both administrative and statistical data by policymakers are some of the key challenges the white paper identifies. 'A more robust reading of the regional economy which includes informal trade, fast fashion, small and unregistered business development in and through South Africa might suggest that national employment and regional obligations are complementary, not at odds,' Landau said. York gave a warning to employers operating in the agriculture, hospitality, tourism and construction sectors, saying they should prepare for the introduction of quotas on hiring foreign nationals. According to Masuku, Miwusa has a close relationship with the labour union federation Cosatu and consulted with it to better understand the policy. 'We must work together to ensure that workers, regardless of their nationality, are not [negatively] affected by these kinds of policies,' he said. DM This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
