
Raymond J. de Souza: Time is running short for peace in the Mideast
Israel has gone to war with Iran. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided that time is growing very short — short for Iran to build a nuclear bomb, short to cut off American diplomatic efforts, short for an exhausted Israeli population and short for his own government's survival.
Article content
In recent months an emerging intelligence consensus has concluded that Iran is very close to making a nuclear bomb — perhaps weeks or months, but likely within a year. If that is to be ruled out entirely — as both Israel and the United States have declared for decades — then the military option comes into play if diplomacy fails. Whether weeks or months, the diplomatic track was running out of time.
Article content
Article content
Article content
For 20 years, going back to the George W. Bush administration, American policy has been that Iran's nuclear weapons program would be prevented by diplomatic deals and economic pressure, not military strikes. Partly this was because it was not clear that military strikes could get the job done. If after 20 months of ground forces in Gaza, Israel cannot eliminate the Hamas threat, housed in tunnels, will airstrikes disable nuclear facilities built deep into the sides of mountains?
Article content
Article content
Israel likely feels strong after its quick decimation of Hezbollah last year in Lebanon, but Iran is rather different in both degree and kind.
Article content
President Donald Trump's actual Secretary of State, his developer buddy Steve Witkoff, was scheduled to continue his Iran talks on Sunday. Real estate moguls make deals, and Trump prides himself on being the moguliest of all moguls, so the Israelis likely feared that Trump and Witkoff would have accepted a bad deal. There is ample reason to think that; the Trump-Witkoff preferred deal in Ukraine was Ukrainian capitulation; Ukraine refused and Trump's tantrum in the Oval Office indicated how keenly he had wanted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to surrender.
Article content
Netanyahu's declaration of war is maximum defiance of Trump. Trump makes deals — or at least claims that he does — and proudly claims that he does not make war. Netanyahu's Iran war scuttles American deal-making and threatens to pull the United States into war-making. If Netanyahu forces Trump into the art of war rather than the art of the deal, it will make manifest that Trump's second term is as confused and weak in foreign affairs as he is in trade policy.
Article content
Article content
There is another consideration, too, rather darker but not to be excluded. Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states share Israeli opposition to Iran's nuclear program and have been largely supportive of Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. A blow against Iran helps them on long-term strategic and security matters — and generates a fortune in the short term as oil prices spike.
Article content
Is it not possible that Israel and its Gulf allies may have concluded that any opposition from Trump could be handled simply by funnelling more money to the Trump family? The extra profits from oil in the next weeks alone would provide more than enough to take care of Trump, who can be bought rather cheaply in Gulf terms. Having just completed his grift tour of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, Trump has demonstrated that a few hundred million here and there can work wonders.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Inside Israel's nighttime attack on Iran's nuclear program
Israel launched an air attack across Iran in the largest escalation between the two powers in decades — targeting critical military assets, senior military officials and key nuclear facilities. Andrew Chang breaks down Israel's operation and how this strike is changing the state of play in the region. Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Israel launches new airstrikes after Iran fired back
Watch Col. Richard Kemp, who is in Tel Aviv, speaks about the situation in the region and what prompted Israel to attack Iran.
Montreal Gazette
an hour ago
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: U.S. vaccine funding cancellation is disastrous
With Donald Trump's second administration, disruptive news seems to arise on a daily basis. Most concerning for clinicians and health scientists in Canada and around the world was Trump's appointment of anti-vaccination advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the enormously influential position of secretary of health and human services. Kennedy's ideological dismantling of the U.S.'s vaunted health research apparatus has been at a speed that's surprising even to his most ardent critics. But his recent decision to cancel a nearly US$600-million contract with vaccine manufacturer Moderna may be among his most short-sighted and destructive moves, with ripple effects globally. The contract with the mRNA pioneer, signed under the Joe Biden administration, was meant to fund the development, testing and licensing of vaccines targeting particular flu strains, including the strain responsible for the dreaded avian flu, H5N1. Many scientists fear H5N1 could become the next world-stopping infectious disease pandemic. The main reason cited for the cancellation was concern for the safety and testing of mRNA vaccine technology. But the company's mRNA COVID vaccines are among the most tested and scrutinized medical products in human history. The withdrawal of the U.S. from efforts to produce an mRNA vaccine against H5N1 is indeed troubling. When it infects humans, H5N1 kills about 50 per cent of the time. Canada's only known domestically acquired human case of H5N1 to date was discovered in November. The current outbreak among dairy herds in the U.S. has spread to at least 17 states and more than 1,000 herds. The increasing number of domestic and wild animals found to be infected is worrying, suggesting that the dreaded mutation allowing easy human-to-human transmission is becoming more likely by the day. When that happens, many people will die, and many more will clamour for a vaccine. Luckily, we already have more than one licensed H5N1 vaccine based on older, non-mRNA technology. But their efficacy is largely unknown, and many of them are manufactured via incubating the virus inside live eggs. In the event of an avian flu pandemic, finding enough uninfected eggs to produce doses at scale could be problematic. More challenging is the lead time for manufacturing these traditional vaccines. At the very least, many months are needed, which is why the seasonal flu vaccine is often a poor match to circulating strains, resulting in middling efficacy. If an H5N1 pandemic is in our near future, it will not be possible to manufacture sufficient doses of the currently licensed vaccines quickly enough to protect everyone. The only proven vaccine technology capable of the kind of rapid production needed to quell a sudden pandemic is the mRNA platform. Five years of refinement over the course of the COVID era has afforded Moderna and Pfizer a kind of confident fluency in their development and deployment acumen. Other companies have since adopted the technology as well. Another consideration is viral mutation. If H5N1 makes the mutational leap to sustained human-to-human transmission, it will be because its genetic makeup will have changed enough to make that happen. In other words, the virus will be measurably different from that used to create the currently licensed formulations. The mRNA platform will be needed to quickly pivot to targeting the new viral formulation. It can do so with much more adeptness and fluidity than the lumbering egg- and cell-incubated vaccines currently stockpiled. Remember: the first COVID mRNA vaccine was finalized just 48 hours after scientists sequenced the genetic code of the virus that causes COVID. RFK Jr.'s decision to cancel this funding is short-sighted and seemingly driven by skewed and nonsensical anti-vax perceptions. It comes at a time when early clinical trials had already demonstrated the safety of Moderna's investigational pandemic influenza vaccine, called mRNA-1018. Perhaps this is an opportunity for other countries — such as Canada — to fill the funding void and claim the financial and societal benefits of this transformational technology.