Sheffield's Local Plan: What it means for you
Campaigners gathered outside Sheffield Town Hall earlier this month to protest against plans to build on 14 green belt sites in the city.
Inside the Town Hall, councillors were voting to give the go-ahead to the proposals, which are a part of what is known as the Local Plan - a blueprint for the development of the city in the next decade and beyond.
Since details of the Local Plan first emerged, thousands of residents across Sheffield have joined together to campaign against it.
But why has the Local Plan become such a contentious and controversial issue - and what will it actually mean for communities in the city?
The Local Plan examines how a town or city will develop over the next 15 years. In it, a council designates land to be used for housing, industry or green space.
Currently, Sheffield does not have a Local Plan. The last one was in 2009, based on documents produced in 1998, and the new plan has been repeatedly postponed for many years.
On 14 May, councillors voted for the first stage of a new Local Plan which, in total, could see nearly 40,000 new homes constructed in Sheffield by 2039.
No single party is in overall control of the authority, so Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party all worked together to choose the sites.
Councillor Douglas Johnson, chairman of the housing committee, said: "Sheffield's current Local Plan is extremely out of date and this leaves lots of loopholes open for developers to exploit.
"Without a new one, ultimately the government could step in and set its own plan, which would be much worse for the city."
As total of 3,539 new houses, as well as schools, cemeteries and industrial units, have now been approved by councillors for 14 green belt sites.
Campaigners have said they are worried not just about the loss of green space, but the new infrastructure needed for hundreds of homes and schools.
Deborah Nutbrown, a campaigner from Chapeltown, said there had been very little information.
"It's extremely frustrating. It feels as if it's totally been forced upon us," she said.
Sheffield City Council has said it had exhausted all its brownfield sites, but even after building on the 14 proposed sites, 96% of the green belt would remain untouched and protected.
Several of the earmarked sites are in areas which are key election battlegrounds, such as Woodhouse, where the Lib Dems won by just 10 votes in a recent by-election, while in West Ecclesfield the Lib Dems won by only 78 votes in 2024.
The majority of the sites which have been given the go-ahead are in the S35 and S13 postcodes, which has angered some residents who have said the developments should be more spread out across the city.
Residents in Handsworth have collected a 3,700-signature petition, and protest groups have also been formed in Wharncliffe Side, Ecclesfield and Chapeltown.
More than 1,730 homes are planned in Handsworth, and Sheffield South East Labour MP Clive Betts has written to the Planning Inspectorate asking for a fairer distribution.
Betts said: "Handsworth currently faces over 40% of the new allocation of housing on green belt. I am not convinced these proposals are fair."
Sheffield City Council has said it would look at whether other areas of the city could be brought forward so there was a fairer distribution of houses.
The government has said it wanted to see 1.5 million new homes built across the country by 2029 in a bid to solve the housing crisis and boost economic growth.
In total, Sheffield is expected to see the construction of 38,000 new homes and 655 acres (265 hectares) of employment land, with Sheffield City Council saying tens of thousands of new jobs would be created up to 2039.
Council leader Tom Hunt said: "Sheffield has not been building enough homes for a long time, and to tackle the housing crisis you need a plan.
"We don't want to build tiny box homes that are no good for families - and the golden rule is sites must have affordable homes."
A public consultation has been launched by Sheffield City Council and will run until the middle of July.
The responses will be reviewed by government inspectors.
There will then be a series of public hearings in the autumn.
Inspectors will then publish a preliminary report with further public consultation early in 2026.
Inspectors are expected to issue a final report and the council will decide whether to adopt the Local Plan in July 2026.
Each individual development would then need to go through the normal planning process.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Thousands of homes approved for green belt sites
Plans to build on 14 green belt sites criticised
Some councils ordered to increase home building by 400%, new BBC tracker shows
Sheffield Council's Local Plan
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reform UK to win majority of seats in Cumbria says poll
Reform UK could win a majority of seats in Cumbria at the next election according to the latest poll. The party, led by former UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, won 5 seats at last year's general election but picked up votes across the country in both rural seats and Labour's industrial heartlands. The latest poll would see the party win in Barrow, Carlisle, Penrith and the Solway and Workington and Whitehaven according to online analyst, Election Maps UK. Nowcast Update: Reform just shy of a Majority, Tories fall to 5th. RFM: 319 (+314), 29.6% - [7 Short] LAB: 134 (-277), 22.3% LDM: 80 (+8), 14.4% SNP: 44 (+35), 2.8% CON: 33 (-88), 17.9% PLC: 7 (+3), 1.1% GRN: 6 (+2), 9.3% Oth: 8 (+3), 2.7% — Election Maps UK (@ElectionMapsUK) May 25, 2025 In the 2024 general election, Reform beat the Tories into second place in Whitehaven and Workington whilst pushing them close in Penrith and the Solway and Carlisle. READ MORE: Warning issued after scam emails sent to musical organisations | News and Star Labour has had a difficult time in the polls since winning their historic election as they forced through some controversial legislation on cancelling winter fuel payments for pensioners and keeping the two-child benefit cap. According to Election Maps UK, the party would fall just short of a majority on 318 seats with Labour next on 134 seats.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Calls to legally require supermarkets to reveal ‘shrinkflation' to customers
Supermarkets would be forced to tell their customers if they want them to 'pay more for less' under proposals designed to tackle 'shrinkflation'. The Liberal Democrats want government legislation amended to legally require large supermarkets to inform shoppers when the quantity of goods within a pre-packaged product has decreased thereby increasing the price per unit of measurement. Details of the changes would need to be attached or placed alongside the product for a 60-day period, according to the amendment tabled to the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill. Digestive biscuits, butter, crisps and chocolate bars were among the items found to have decreased in size while their unit cost increased, according to 2024 research by Compare the Market. MPs could be asked to vote on the Lib Dem proposal on Wednesday when the Bill returns to the Commons for its report stage. Lib Dem trade spokesman Clive Jones said: 'The scourge of shrinkflation needs to be exposed. 'Shoppers have been hammered during a cost-of-living crisis all while massive companies and big supermarket chains are forcing them to pay more for less to protect their bottom lines. 'They need to be called out on it and for shoppers to know when they are at risk of being ripped off. 'The Government should accept this Liberal Democrat amendment so that we can help protect shoppers and their already stretched household budgets from another round of shrinkflation.' The Bill as a whole gives powers to ministers to regulate the marketing and use of goods in the UK after Brexit. It was previously amended in the House of Lords to provide protections to the imperial pint measure to ease fears over its future. The changes accepted by the Government would bar ministers from preventing or restricting the use of the pint in relation to draught beer, cider or milk in returnable containers. It also provides a definition of a pint as 0.56826125 cubic decimetres. A Department for Business and Trade spokesman said: 'We're committed to protecting consumers from unfair commercial practices and making sure they have all the information they need to make informed decisions on purchases. 'That's why we're bringing in strict new laws next year to make sure businesses use clearer labelling for prices on supermarket shelves, and retailers show all unit prices in either kilograms or litres to improve clarity for shoppers.'
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines
The UK will build up to 12 new attack submarines, the prime minister will announce as the government unveils its major defence review on Monday. The review is expected to recommend the armed forces move to "warfighting readiness" to deter growing threats faced by the UK. Sir Keir Starmer will say up to 12 conventionally-armed nuclear-powered submarines will replace the UK's current fleet from the late 2030s onwards. The prime minister is also expected to confirm the UK will spend £15bn on its nuclear warhead programme. Sir Keir will say that, alongside the UK's nuclear-armed submarines, the new vessels would keep "Britain and Nato safe for decades". The Strategic Defence Review, commissioned by Labour, will shape the UK's armed forces for years to come. Led by ex-Labour defence secretary Lord Robertson it will make 62 recommendations, which the government is expected to accept in full. Defence review to send 'message to Moscow', says Healey Healey expects UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence by 2034 Other announcements in the review will include: Commitment to £1.5bn to build six new factories to enable an "always on" munitions production capacity Building up to 7,000 long-range weapons including missiles or drones in the UK, to be used by British forces Pledge to set up a "cyber and electromagnetic command" to boost the military's defensive and offensive capabilities in cyberspace Extra £1.5bn to 2029 to fund repairs to military housing £1bn on technology to speed up delivery of targeting information to soldiers Defence Secretary John Healey has signalled he is not aiming to increase the overall size of the Army before the next general election. On Sunday, he said his "first job" was to reverse a decline in numbers with a target to return to a strength of 73,000 full-time soldiers "in the next Parliament". Building the new submarines will support 30,000 jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said. Healey said: "Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression." The Astute class is the Royal Navy's current fleet of attack submarines, which have nuclear-powered engines and are armed with conventional torpedoes and missiles. As well as protecting maritime task groups and gathering intelligence, they protect the Vanguard class of submarines that carry the UK's trident nuclear missiles. In the Astute series, HMS Agamemnon, was launched last October and Agincourt is under construction. The next generation of attack submarines that will replace them, SSN-AUKUS, have been developed with the Australian Navy under a deal agreed in 2023 by the Conservative government. Meanwhile work on modernising the warheads carried by Trident Missiles is already under way. The £15bn investment into the warhead programme will back the government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent. In his announcement on Monday, Sir Keir is to repeat a Labour manifesto commitment to deliver the Dreadnought class of nuclear-armed submarines, which are due to replace the ageing Vanguard fleet from the early 2030s onwards. The MoD's Defence Nuclear Enterprise accounts for 20% of its budget and includes the cost of building four Dreadnought class submarines. Commitments on military spending come against the background of the government's wider review of departmental spending due later this month and have also taken on renewed importance given the Ukraine war, and pressure from Nato and US President Donald Trump for European countries to step up defence spending. Sir Keir has committed the government to spending 2.5% of the UK's national income on defence by 2027, up from 2.3%, but has faced pressure to commit to 3%. Healey said the target will be hit by 2034 but the Conservatives say the threshold should be hit earlier. The Liberal Democrats have also argued for a 3% spending target. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said Labour's review should be "taken with a pinch of salt" unless the government showed there would be enough money to pay for it. Head of NATO, Mark Rutte has called on allies to spend 3.5% of its GDP on defence, with a further 1.5% on defence related expenditure. The government has said it wants Britain to be the leading European nation within the NATO alliance but that might prove difficult when a significant number of allies exceed the UK's military spending. It says its review will reverse decades of underinvestment in Britain's armed forces. But it remains to be seen if the investment will be enough. The ambitions of past defence reviews have rarely been matched by resources.
