I'm not interested in mulling over north-east Reform defections, Kemi Badenoch says
UK Tory chief Kemi Badenoch warned north-east councillors who have switched to Reform are not true conservatives and she is 'not interested' in worrying about Nigel Farage's party.
The Conservative chief took aim at the seven ex-Tory defectors across Aberdeenshire and Aberdeen in an exclusive interview with The Press and Journal.
'There are some people who just want to be politicians, and are doing it for themselves,' she said.
'I think we need to start asking why are we talking about people who clearly don't care about values and policies, but just care about winning?'
Ms Badenoch spoke to the P&J after her speech to Tory members at the party's conference in Edinburgh on Friday.
'We can't have a party of people who believe different things,' she told us.
'We need to be very clear about who we are and what we stand for.'
The Tory leader told journalists she was happy with Mr Farage picking off councillors who want to defect.
'If Nigel Farage is taking out of the Conservative Party people who are not conservatives, then I'm quite fine with that,' she said.
Earlier this week Russell Findlay exclusively told the P&J that Reform defectors were 'opportunistic' and would come to regret their decision.
Ms Badenoch told the P&J: 'Many of the people who go in there don't like what they see, and come out of it, and that's a warning for them.
'It's not my warning – it's just clearly what's going on.'
The Tory leader referenced former Reform MP Rupert Lowe, who has since quit the party and heavily criticised leader Mr Farage.
She added: 'I'm not really that interested in talking about Reform.
'I know it might be an interesting media story, I'm really worried about what's happening to all of those people out there losing their jobs.'
Six Aberdeenshire Tories have joined Reform, while Aberdeen councillor Duncan Massey switched allegiance last week during Mr Farage's visit to the city.
The most recent defector, Huntly councillor Lauren Knight, jumped ship on Thursday.
Ms Badenoch's speech to Tory members was heavily focused on the north-east as she called for Labour to scrap the oil and gas windfall tax.
The levy was originally introduced by the Conservatives in 2022, when Rishi Sunak was chancellor.
But Ms Badenoch said she was looking to the future.
'I said I disagreed with it, but I wasn't the prime minister,' she told the P&J.
'I can't go back into the past and be the prime minister.
'I can only tell people what I can do under new leadership.
'The north-east of Scotland is an area that is suffering particularly right now.
'That's why we're talking about it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Churchill won the war but lost the peace - was that inevitable?
Plus ca change. The popular history of the Second World War - as pushed by newspapers and the media in general - is usually the story of Churchill. He is the Second World War in the popular imagination. The fact that he was a much more divisive figure back then is often written out of the story, as is the fact that he was leading a coalition government which included many of those who would be part of the radical Labour government of 1945; a government that would essentially create the world we have been living in for the last 80 years; the NHS, the welfare state, nationalised industry (now largely gone, of course) and the postwar consensus that has been fraying since the Thatcher era and is now in the age of Trump perhaps about to disappear. Read more The 1945 election is the subject of historian David Runciman's new 20-part Radio 4 series Postwar which has been stripped across the week from Monday to Friday and continues over the coming weeks (though as I write this many of the episodes are already available on BBC Sounds). These short, sharp historical nuggets paint a more detailed picture than the broad sweep, romanticised history that we get in VE anniversary broadcasts. And it explains why the newspapers got it so wrong. In 1945, Churchill may have been respected and admired, but the British people didn't want him any more. They wanted change. Labour embodied that change. And so ushered in the most radical government of the 20th century (whatever Thatcher fanboys might tell you). 'Why did the man who won the war, the hero of the hour and a hero for the ages, find himself so decisively rejected by the electorate?' Runciman asked in the first episode on Monday. His argument was that Britain had already changed because of the war. It was being run by a coalition government which had taken control of employment, prices, health, education, food. In other words, it was not very Tory, despite the man leading it. 'The new world was already here,' Runciman pointed out. 'It had been created during the war, the question was … who could be trusted with it.' Not Churchill. His reputation in 1945 was less black and white than it is now. He was seen as a man of war, not of peace. And a gambler who was willing to take risks. Many still remembered his gamble at Gallipoli in the First World War that had led to the death of thousands of British soldiers. Perversely, his opponent, Clement Atlee was seen as more conservative and therefore more reliable. (Atlee had fought at Gallipoli and actually approved of Churchill's gamble.) The country was still at war when the election was held. The previous election was in 1935. That meant that in 1945 no one under the age of 30 had voted in a British election (the voting age was still 21). But many of them had fired a gun. The Labour manifesto of 1945 was that rare thing in politics, a genuine bestseller. Voters were hungry for postwar Britain to begin. Kenny Logan (Image: Royal & Awesome) The problems were hardly over, of course. The dismantling of empire and the construction of a postwar peace both loomed large. And the new Britain that emerged was very far from perfect. But it aspired to make a better world for its citizens. However flawed the result, there's a heroism in that. But that's a story we rarely tell ourselves. Postwar deserves credit for doing so. Over on Radio 2 Kenny Logan - of Scottish rugby and Strictly Come Dancing fame - was guest on Vernon Kay's Tracks of My Years slot this week. In between his record choices he spoke about his dyslexia, his prostate cancer diagnosis, farming and Strictly (natch). But the most moving part of the conversation came at the end of the week when he talked about the late, great Doddie Weir, his team mate who battled motor neurone disease in his later years. You could hear the catch in Logan's voice as he spoke about Weir. But the joy too as he recalled a day out with Weir bouncing over a hayfield in the car singing along to Amy MacDonald's This is the Life. In the end we are the memories we leave behind. Listen Out For: Private Passions, Radio 3, Sunday, June 15, noon Singer-songwriter Suzanne Vega is Michael Berkeley's guest on this Sunday's edition of Private Passions. Given that The Divine Comedy's Neil Hannon was also a recent guest I can hear a few Radio 3 refuseniks seeing this as another sign of the station dumbing down. But listening to Vega is always worth your time and her musical choices do include Debussy, Bartok and Philip Glass.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour ministers have no grasp of even the most basic facts on migration
That this Labour Government has no useful ideas for resolving the migrant crisis can be taken as a given. What has been harder to explain has been its lack of enthusiasm for finding viable solutions beyond simply repeating a vague pledge to 'smash the criminal gangs'. A curious statement from Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, has offered a potential explanation: it may simply be that nobody in the party has bothered looking at who is actually crossing the Channel. Appearing on Question Time, Mr Jones claimed that ' the majority of the people in these boats are children, babies and women '. This is wrong. In the latest 12 months of data, 74 per cent of those arriving in small boats have been adult men over the age of 18. Given that the British state's ability to assess the age of arrivals is not entirely uncontested, and the advantages to asylum claimants who fall just below that critical threshold, this may well be an understatement. If senior figures in the Government believe the inflow to consist of vulnerable women and babes in arms, a great deal of policy decisions begin to make more sense; the lack of concern at distributing unvetted arrivals throughout the country, the apparent confusion that locals may feel threatened or unsafe as a result, and the apparent refusal to countenance any policy that might realistically see arrivals removed. When challenged on his claim by Reform's Zia Yusuf, Mr Jones doubled down. His Government may wish to do some research before doing so with its current, failed approach.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Need we bow to Trump and massively ramp up defence spending?
Not only is an arms race a financial bonanza for the grotesquely rich, but it is paid for by society's poor. The pretext is the war in Ukraine and fear of Russia. Anyone who has paid attention to this three-year-old war could not help notice the abysmal military performance of Russia. Supposedly the world's second most powerful military power, Russia has reportedly sustained casualty figures of one million troops killed or wounded in Ukraine and has worked through most of its ground military hardware, all to little effect on the battlefield. The war has revealed huge inadequacies in the Russian military who have resorted to the use of foreign troops and prisoners led from the rear by leaders tainted by corruption and incompetence. It is understandable that ex-Soviet satellite states are rearming, but the combined strength of Western states far outweighs Russia in weapons and population. Are we to obey President Trump and hugely increase arms spending or make a reasoned assessment of the risks we face and act accordingly? Should we consider the effect on Russian people of the threat of NATO, especially if introduced into Ukraine? Would a change of stance on the part of the west calm fears in Russia? For years UK has spent a greater proportion of GDP on defence than other European countries but whether it has spent wisely is another question. Two giant aircraft carriers, costing many billions, raise the questions, 'what for? and 'could the money be spent more effectively?' We need to dispense with Cold War thinking, make rational decisions about the level of threat and make defence provision accordingly. Generals and military experts are not always our best advisors. John Inglis, Arran. Neil Mackay ('The BBC is helping Reform – and has become a danger to demcoracy', June 12) should look at the actual output of the BBC for evidence of bias towards Reform UK rather than second-guessing BBC policy papers. There's virtually nothing to support BBC approval of Reform UK, rather the contrary. His article is a projection of his dislike of Reform rather than an acknowledgement of reality. Mackay says the BBC gives too much time to Reform UK. You'd think that he did not notice the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, where Labour, the SNP and Reform were in a tight group miles ahead of the other parties. Mackay mentions the LibDems. Should the BBC puff up 2% parties, for that's what they got in Hamilton? Elsewhere Mackay has evidently missed the Reform UK win in Runcorn and their decisive victories in English council and other elections. Does he really think that Scotland will be completely different? As for all the opinion polls UK-wide which show a clear Reform lead, the BBC should ignore them in the Mackay universe. Having ignored Reform, next year he and 'his' BBC will be completely confused about where the 2026 Reform MSPs came from. Perhaps from decent and thoughtful Scottish voters predictably and ignorantly labelled by Mackay as 'hard right'. John Burton, Gatelawbridge, Thornhill. Education needs radical change I read what some might find controversial views on Scottish education by Eric Melvin in which he extols the virtues of the Japanese system of teamwork in schools (Letters, June 13). What Mr Melvin does not seem to elaborate on the comparatively very disciplined approach employed in Japanese schools. Additionally, I suggest that it cannot be wholly unrelated to the fact that last year 2024, was the worst on record for pupil suicides in Japan. The number who killed themselves while a pupil at Elementary, Junior High and Senior High was 529. However I do agree with Mr Melvin that things must change, perhaps radically, if Scottish education is to improve. It may be that like the NHS we should now take a more national view. The system of local authorities having responsibility for education may seem a democratic solution but it has one obvious issue. If you agree that parenting skills are the key to providing young people with the best start in their education then attempting to enforce parental responsibilities becomes influenced by the fact that the enforcers only got their authority by the votes of the public, including said parents. I see any attempt to take politicians out of the equation must be a good thing. Bill Brown, Milngavie, Glasgow. Unionist parties can't be trusted Am I missing something? Voters put Labour into power at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. Labour is the party that stood by and did nothing while Grangemouth oil refinery went under, with the initial loss of 400 jobs. Labour is the party that moved the marine boundaries in the Scottish North Sea, so that they could secure key Scottish oil fields and put them in English waters, instead of Scottish waters. Labour is the party obsessed with fantasy net zero, which will cost the taxpayer billions of pounds. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Tories, stated that if Scotland became independent, it would be poorer for it because it would lose the Union Dividend. This is coded language for saying that England would go bust when it lost Scottish oil revenues. The message is plain – do not trust the Unionist Parties. Or are some Scots just turkeys voting for an early Christmas? William C McLaughlin, Thankerton, Biggar. Aggressive interviewers It is good to know that Walter Paul (letters, June 12) and so many friends rise early on a Sunday morning and also read the Herald. That's certainly good for democracy. It seems strange that they failed to notice numerous interviewers who frequently interrupt politicians of all shades of opinion, giving them no chance to answer their questions. I have already expressed this view in your columns. The idea that Anas Sarwar, as suggested by Mr Paul, is at all 'arrogant' in private or in public, apart from those who are prejudiced, is for the birds. Sir Tom Clarke, former MP for Coatbridge. Scotland and the Brexit vote Martin Redfern makes a valiant effort (letters, June 12) to defend Scotland's expulsion from the EU in 2016 by stressing that Brussels had made the consequences clear before the vote. The simple fact that neither Mr Redfern nor Brussels can dispute is that our Scottish nation voted emphatically to remain in the EU and the results show that even if every vote cast in Scotland to Leave had instead been cast to Remain, the outcome for Scotland would have been unchanged. If Mr Redfern is content to entrust Scotland's destiny perpetually to the wishes of our English neighbours, whom I have no wish to denigrate in any way, that is his undeniable right. But I prefer to trust and respect my fellow Scots and will never be content to accept the colonial status we have had to endure since being annexed by England in 1907. Willie Maclean, Milngavie. No football gods and precious few heroes The Herald Sport seems to consider the fate of the Scotland football manager as the most important issue to come out of the SFA AGM. It is not. It is the ludicrous situation where the manager of the Scotland team has so few Scottish players to choose from. Unless the SFA can force or coax clubs in Scotland to adopt a quota system where Scotland-eligible players eventually form the on-field majority of teams, we may as well just pack in international football as being too embarrassing for us Scots to watch. No football gods and precious few heroes: that's us, the country which likes to think we invented the game. There should be zero public funding for professional football in Scotland, and clubs should be charged for every cost the public incurs (policing, transport disruption et al) until things change. GR Weir, Ochiltree. Seeing the real, paid-entry Fringe I read with interest Brian Ferguson's account of the street shows at the Fringe having to be cancelled or cut back due to the ubiquitous 'funding crisis' ('Edinburgh Festival Fringe street theatre shows under threat', June 11). When I was the Director of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe Society in the 1980s it cost next to nothing to organise these shows, which were plentiful even then, so I shudder to think why the EFFS needs £250,000 to put on these street events now. I could point out that the performers, especially the professional UK and European-based street entertainers, 'pass the hat' and therefore could pay something towards the cost, but I get annoyed when the street events get spoken of as the real Fringe. The Fringe is made up of hundreds of performances, usually indoors somewhere and this is what your readers need to support given the horrific state of Edinburgh's accommodation costs. I get sad when people tell me they have 'been to the Fringe' when all they saw were crowds in the closed-off High Street and some guy juggling knives before they had a drink or a meal. Spare a thought for the many other performers that I would prefer the public paid to see. They actually make up the Fringe. Michael Dale, Glasgow. An alliterative alternative I share David Miller's admiration for Jody Harrison's humdinger Herald headline of 'Summer solstice sees searches spike for Scottish standing stones' (June 12). In my musings this morning, the intrusive 'for' has been eliminated and words realigned to produce 'Summer solstice sees Scottish standing stones searches spike'. And all fuelled by bran flakes, as opposed to David's cornflakes....... Colin C MacKean, Kilmacolm. The King's sense of humour I am not a great fan of the Royal Family, but I believe that credit should be extended to it when due. I refer to the picture which accompanied your story ('King's starry celebration', June 13). In the picture the King is shown in conversation with Meryl Streep and Kate Winslet, as you do. Both of the ladies are smiling, as is the King. He clearly has a sense of humour and likes to share it with others when their paths cross. This is not a rare occurrence, because often, when out and about, he seems to be smiling and encourages others to see the humorous side of life. This behaviour may help to reduce the apprehension felt by many about meeting up with the King. Good to know that he encourages humour and is happy to share it. I think, incidentally, we all know why David Beckham, also in the photograph, is smiling now . Ian W Thomson, Lenzie.
