Phantom cows and missing millions spark financial scandal in Uruguay
By Lucinda Elliott
ARTIGAS, Uruguay (Reuters) - Sandra Palleiro is on the hunt for her lost cows. The 60-year-old accountant is standing in a muddy field at the end of a farm track in Uruguay's remote border region with Brazil.
She has traveled 600 kilometers (370 miles) from the capital, Montevideo, to find 61 cattle she owns, at least on paper. The missing bovines were part of a "cow bond" scheme that has collapsed, causing one of Uruguay's biggest ever financial scandals.
The co-owner of one Uruguayan firm that took money from savers to invest in cows has died by suicide. Three companies have gone bust and are under investigation for fraud.
"Hello moo-moo! Could one of you be mine?" Palleiro called out hopefully into a paddock in the border region of Artigas, her jeans caked in mud as she approached a wire fence to get a closer look at the cows.
Palleiro - like hundreds of other investors - is unable to find the animals she owns or prove they even exist, making them part of a herd of "phantom cows" that could number over 700,000 head of cattle.
So far, the losses have mounted to some $350 million, roiling the stable farming nation, home to just 3.4 million people - but 12 million cows. It has also sent shockwaves through bigger ranching neighbors Argentina and Brazil, which looked to Uruguay's cattle-tracking system as a model and where similar livestock investment schemes operate.
In March 2024, Palleiro put her life savings of over $50,000 into the livestock investment scheme offered by a local firm named Conexión Ganadera, lured by promises of fixed 7-10% dollar returns and investment materials with bucolic pictures of brown-and-white Hereford cattle.
Savers could own cows directly that would be reared and sold for profit by livestock firms, or take an investment stake in the overall scheme. Palleiro, an urban professional, liked the idea of owning a tangible asset. It seemed a safe bet.
She could track the cows via a state-backed online portal - for years an example globally for cattle tracking - which set out breed, age and location. Each cow was supposed to be branded with a symbol assigned by the government and documents listing her assets carried the crest of the agriculture ministry, which oversees the cattle registry.
Uruguay's national cattle registry declined to comment on the cases.
When she went in search of her cows, Palleiro carried print copies from the cattle registry to see if she could match the 53 tracking numbers linked to this ranch with the tags of the cows staring at her on the opposite side of the fence.
Using her smartphone camera, she zoomed in on the tracking numbers pinned to their ears. It soon became clear few of the numbers matched. Then the cows started backing away. She couldn't get close enough. The exercise felt hopeless.
"It feels like falling into a nightmare," said Palleiro.
TESLA CRASH
Three of the biggest firms under investigation for fraud are Conexión Ganadera, República Ganadera and Grupo Larrarte, which between them persuaded nearly 6,000 people or investor pools to buy into the program, investing millions of dollars.
Similar investment schemes exist throughout South America, in Argentina, Brazil and Colombia. Many are legitimate.
Martín Fablet, a local radio presenter in Montevideo, said he invested several times in Conexión Ganadera and other livestock schemes in Uruguay over the past 12 years: "This system of receiving fixed dollar returns worked fantastically well for at least 11 years. They paid me on time."
The first hint of the scandal at Conexión Ganadera came on November 28 last year, when a Tesla Model 3 car crashed at 211 kilometers per hour in the small central Uruguayan city of Florida. Behind the wheel was Gustavo Basso, one of the co-owners of Conexión Ganadera, which had boomed since opening in 1999.
Weeks after he drove his car into a parked construction vehicle, investors started reporting their payments from the cattle scheme were late, and by January the company confirmed it was short of nearly $250 million. A coroner concluded in April that Basso had died by suicide.
Conexión Ganadera was one of the three funds that started to warn late last year that they were unable to fulfill obligations to investors. They were short of cash, which they blamed on adverse weather (there had been a drought in 2022-23) and tough market conditions.
By late January, investors were scrambling to withdraw savings amid reports of fraud. Some filed suits for fraud, leading to bankruptcy proceedings and an official investigation by Uruguay's Prosecutor's Office for Money Laundering Crimes, which remains ongoing. The prosecutor declined to comment to Reuters.
Pablo Carrasco of Conexión Ganadera denies fraud allegations. Lawyers representing Conexión Ganadera said they were unable to comment on legal proceedings until testimony was given in court. Grupo Larrarte's lawyer said the firm was fully cooperating with the authorities. República Ganadera did not respond to a Reuters request for comment.
'MAYBE THE COWS WERE FAKES'
Politicians, radio hosts, pensioners and even priests are among the thousands now attempting to recover their savings - and their missing 'phantom' cattle, the number of which is proving hard to pin down.
An inventory of the biggest firm, Conexión Ganadera, carried out by a bankruptcy trustee estimated that as few as 70,000-80,000 of the 804,604 cattle the company claimed to manage actually existed.
In another court case into fraud allegations, Uruguay's Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MGAP) said in March that one of Conexión Ganadera's main cattle holding firms, Pasfer, had only 49 of the 3,740 cows that it put up as collateral to secure a loan.
"We don't know if the cows were ever bought, whether they're alive or dead," Palleiro said during a drive along country lanes to the Artigas ranch. "Maybe the cows were fakes, or sold, moved somewhere or their tags were changed."
Victims want to know how authorities failed to spot the problems despite the cattle registry.
Three lawyers for victims said it was possible that the government-issued tags were never attached to the animals because the animals were never purchased, and the investments were used for other purposes. Two other lawyers representing investors in bankruptcy and fraud cases alleged that cows owned by investors were sold off illegally, without their consent.
Each company was responsible for applying the tags and in-putting data to the national registry. "The registry reflects what the company provided. The problem is that there was no control over what the company provided," said one of the lawyers, Nicolás Hornes, who represents 98 victims.
Hornes said he went to several farms and found that the number of cattle did not match the registry. Two other investors Reuters spoke to told similar stories of trying to find their cows.
Uruguay's livestock ministry did not respond to Reuters questions about whether the registry system failed.
COMPANIES UNDER INVESTIGATION
An executive from Grupo Larrarte, the first firm to receive formal complaints from investors, is already in prison as part of an ongoing criminal investigation, which is separate from bankruptcy proceedings. Jairo Larrarte was placed in preventive detention by a judge in April for alleged crimes of misappropriation, fraud and issuing bad checks.
In a response to Reuters, his lawyer Enrique Möller said that his client had fully cooperated with the authorities and that cattle had already been returned to some investors.
República Ganadera filed for voluntary bankruptcy in November, which the courts rejected in March because authorities opened an investigation into the company's accounts. Negotiations with creditors continue and the firm said in a March 25 statement that it was "prioritizing the best possible solution" for those affected. The company did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
There are several open investigations into Conexión Ganadera, the biggest of the three. The company's co-owner, Pablo Carrasco, his wife Ana Iewdiukow and Basso's widow, Daniela Cabral, are being investigated for fraud and embezzlement. In February all three were temporarily barred from leaving Uruguay without court authorization and their passports confiscated. Carrasco's lawyer Jorge Barrera said there would be no comment to the media.
SNAKE CHARMER
Basso, whose high-speed crash presaged the company's downfall, lived in grand style in the city of Florida, which has a small-town feel, home to 30,000 people surrounded by farmland.
Fablet, the local radio presenter, said he met Basso some 50 times over the course of a decade, socially and while covering agriculture events for radio.
"(Basso) was a snake charmer," said Fablet, a longtime investor in Conexión Ganadera. "He could never simply lose $250 million... he could've made a loss, but that money must be somewhere."
Back at the Artigas farm, Reuters drone footage showed around 80 animals compared to what should have been several hundred belonging to Palleiro and other investors.
Farmhands at the ranch explained that more animals were out in other fields. Several mentioned delays to salary payments since the scandal broke and they said there was no easy way of checking which, if any, belonged to Palleiro.
Palleiro herself was angered at the way the case was hurting so many hard-working Uruguayans. She had at times taken on three jobs to put together a nest egg for her retirement.
"We put in all our savings that cost us a lot of effort," she said with emotion. "Now we want justice."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
3 Trust-Centric Strategies For Today's Leaders
Trust is given—until it's not. That's true in many industries, from real estate to restaurants to SaaS. An organization's ecosystem of customers, partners, and end-users often inherently trusts that organization to safeguard data and maintain security. However, as cybercriminals become increasingly sophisticated, leaders have their work cut out for them to maintain that trust. And once trust is lost, it can be very difficult to earn it back. Within real estate, concerns around fraud and security are top of mind. The majority of property managers have seen an increase in fraudulent renter applications, payments fraud and data security issues in the last year, according to AppFolio's survey of 2,000 property management professionals. As a result, 40% of property managers are more concerned than they were one year ago about online fraud incidents and 37% are more concerned about data security. This mirrors broader fraud and security trends that every business leader should be paying attention to. Seventy-nine percent of organizations experienced payment fraud attacks in 2024, while data breaches continue to increase. In the current environment, leaders must work across their ecosystem to foster trust and prioritize security. Here are three key areas to focus on. Prioritizing trust starts with your own internal company culture and employees. It's important to create an environment where employees feel comfortable raising concerns and asking questions. One way to do this is by taking a rewards-based approach to employee cybersecurity training, versus a punitive approach. The goal is for employees to speak up if they, for example, spot a phishing attempt—and especially if they think they've fallen for one. Rather than shaming employees, leaders should positively recognize those who bring attention to security or fraud issues. I've seen everything from thank-you emails to a paid lunch used as positive incentives. Thumbs Up Another important part of this strategy is creating channels for employees to report issues quickly and effectively. Anonymous reporting channels can make employees more likely to report concerns and enable security teams to identify potential issues before they turn into major breaches. What's more, this type of channel supports a wider culture of trust and transparency. Many trust practices are nearly invisible when they're done right. This means customers often only think about cybersecurity and fraud protection once something's gone wrong. One thing the AppFolio team has been working on recently is more outward-facing trust initiatives that allow our customers to 'see' and 'feel' our security measures. This is especially important in real estate. We're supporting high-stakes processes like payments, insurance and resident applications every day. Small steps can go a long way here, like enabling two-factor authentication for sign-in so users feel that extra layer of security. On a larger scale, we also proactively communicate around our responsible AI practices, including how we keep customer data private and secure. Concerns around data privacy and security continue to grow amid the rise in generative AI tools, according to Deloitte. We take our responsibility to our customers seriously and follow a strict framework of Responsible AI Principles to evaluate innovation for Fairness, Reliability, Privacy and Security, Transparency, and Accountability. We make this framework available to our customers on our website. Organizations don't just have a responsibility to protect their customers, but to protect their customers' customers as well. Trust and user experience intersect in ways many leaders might not be thinking about. Protecting end-user data is always crucial. Within real estate, residents expect the software they interact with to be secure. Applying for a rental home, signing a lease and moving into a new home can be stressful and overwhelming. Residents deserve an experience they can trust, especially when providing personal and financial information. Here's the tricky part. While end-users expect a secure experience, they also expect a seamless one. Sometimes, fraud prevention and cybersecurity measures can get in the way of that. We've all felt the frustration of being locked out of an account after forgetting a password. In real estate, clunky verification processes can slow down residents' journey of finding a new home. It's important to undergo proper UX testing and take steps to balance security with convenience. Make sure security and fraud prevention tactics are paired with an efficient, frictionless experience for end-users. The Trust Chain The stakes are high for organizations that want to protect their customers, their end-users and their reputation. Fortunately, there are numerous tools and strategies leaders can use to establish trust throughout their chain of impact, from internal culture to customers to end-users. When in doubt, focus on transparent and open communication with all key stakeholders. Make sure employees can bring up potential fraud concerns without fear of reprimand, share clear and straightforward messaging with customers, and build secure end-user experiences without sacrificing usability. With these tactics in mind, leaders will be well equipped to maintain trust throughout their ecosystem and take on ever-evolving fraud and cybersecurity threats.
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Managing Fraud Does Not Have To Mean Increasing Friction In CX
Rodney Drake, Chief Strategy Officer at Valid Systems, advocates AI-powered risk and fraud solutions for FI's and fintechs. The digital acceleration of banking has delivered on its promise: faster, more convenient financial experiences. But convenience without control is a false victory. When speed introduces risk, it creates a silent churn in customer trust—and an explosion in fraud exposure. We're long past the point where customer experience and fraud mitigation can operate on separate tracks. The real innovation opportunity now lies in redesigning how we think about and manage the trade-offs between the two. The most progressive banks aren't just reducing fraud; they're rebalancing the system. Too often, financial institutions split their loyalties. Fraud-focused leaders are measured by loss reduction. Product and CX teams are measured by adoption, retention and digital migration. One wants to apply more friction; the other wants less. What we've created are internal factions chasing KPIs that are inherently at odds. My company recently worked with a national bank that decreased its rising check fraud by increasing an already high hold rate and applying friction to its new accounts. Their fraud team was ecstatic. Their CX team? They were drowning in complaints, dealing with lower-than-desired mobile usage and falling behind peer benchmarks for app adoption. That kind of friction might reduce fraud losses, but it also erodes growth and leaves the customer stranded in the middle. Banks don't need to choose between growth and safety. But they do need to unify the metrics that govern both. Here's a radical idea: Treat fraud friction as a customer experience problem, not just a risk. I've been advocating for a new metric—one that evaluates fraud strategies not only by what they save but also by what they cost. That equation looks like this: (loss reduction + customer growth + CX impact) – (development or vendor spend) = net value Without this lens, banks risk celebrating 'wins' that undermine long-term health. If fraud mitigation leads to a 5% drop in losses but drives a 10% rise in account churn, that's not progress—it's a strategic error. Customer expectations have shifted. Most people won't tolerate three-day check holds or inconsistent deposit availability when other apps offer funds in minutes. The old logic of simply 'holding to be safe' is collapsing under the weight of digital expectations. At the same time, fraud rings are operating at a professional scale, leveraging bot farms, VPNs and social media to execute playbook-driven attacks, particularly through faceless digital channels like mobile deposit and ATM. And here's the kicker: Mobile, what I've seen as the most scalable and cost-efficient channel, is often the most restrictive from a check deposit perspective. Many banks still lack robust risk tools in mobile environments. That gap, combined with tighter thresholds and limited availability, drives more than 70% of high-risk volume back into physical branches, where servicing costs are five times higher, based on what I've seen at my company. Across the $4 trillion in checks we process annually at VALID Systems, we see 74% of check items deposited in-branch and 89% of dollars. It's a self-defeating cycle. What breaks this cycle is a shift from static, rule-based detection to adaptive behavioral modeling. Behavioral AI systems don't rely on what a check looks like. They assess how a customer behaves—how they've historically transacted, including where and under what patterns. That context allows institutions to make smarter decisions in real time, rather than defaulting to blunt-force hold treatments or rejections. But here's what many leaders still misunderstand: AI is not a shortcut. It's a framework for continuous learning. When treated like a plug-and-play 'set it and forget it' tool, it fails. The most effective systems are those that self-adjust to shifting patterns and are paired with humans who analyze trends, test outcomes and retrain when needed. To understand the urgency of modernizing a fraud strategy, look at what's happened since the pandemic. In 2020, government stimulus efforts overwhelmed financial systems, and fraud rings used that window to organize, fund and scale. The result? A sharp decline in traditional fraud but a surge in professionally executed, digitally coordinated attacks. Check fraud, in particular, has ballooned. Even as overall check volume declines, the sophistication and velocity of check-related fraud have accelerated. Social media now hosts entire playbooks, organized by bank. Leveraging intelligent risk strategies to create better customer outcomes drives outsized value for financial institutions. We've witnessed this firsthand. By applying real-time risk decisioning to check deposits, institutions can confidently offer instant access to funds for a small convenience fee. One major national bank my company worked with that implemented this capability for mobile deposits saw an 80% increase in deposit activity within the mobile channel among users of the instant deposit feature, compared to non-users. The lesson? The best risk strategies manage fraud and enhance customer experience. Managing for a fraud loss goal at the expense of customer friction is simply protecting a line item on someone else's bonus plan. If you're in the C-suite, here's the real takeaway: Demand unified metrics. Track fraud loss reduction and customer behavior in the same dashboard. Measure digital migration, call center volume and churn alongside fraud trends. Ask how many of your holds were false positives. Ask how many fraud decisions correlate with NPS drops. Ask how much was saved, but also how much was lost in trust. If your fraud and CX leaders aren't aligned, you're not running a risk program. You're running a blame game. Managing fraud doesn't have to mean increasing customer friction, and secure doesn't have to mean slow. The future of fraud strategy isn't about choosing sides—it's about building smarter systems that serve both. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
At least $379k lost since May to scammers impersonating MOM, govt officials
SINGAPORE – At least $379,000 has been lost since May to scammers impersonating officers from the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) and, in some cases, other government officials. The police said on June 3 that the losses were linked to at least six cases. The scam would see victims receiving unsolicited calls from a scammer impersonating an MOM officer. They were told that they employed workers who were involved in criminal activities or immigration-related issues. These include money laundering, an expired work permit or visa, and overstaying in the country. When victims denied knowledge of employing such workers, the call was transferred to another person claiming to be an officer from, for example, the police or the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority. This second scammer would accuse victims of being involved in criminal activities. Victims were asked to do bank transfers or hand over cash to the scammers for 'investigation' and 'safekeeping'. Or they were instructed to declare their financial assets, report to the scammers daily, and avoid speaking to anyone about what was happening. The ruse came to light after the scammers became uncontactable or when victims verified their situation with the police through official channels. There are also reports of scammers telling victims that they could go online and use the Singapore Government Directory (SGDI) to verify the identity of public officers. However, the SGDI is not a means to do so, the police said. Government officials will never ask people to transfer money, disclose banking details or install mobile apps from unofficial app stores, or transfer calls to the police, they added. For more information about such crimes, or if in doubt, call the police hotline on 1800-255-0000. For urgent police assistance, dial 999. An official form can be submitted online at Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction Discover how to enjoy other premium articles here
