logo
Mahmoud Khalil: Government argues judge's order does not require Palestinian activist's release

Mahmoud Khalil: Government argues judge's order does not require Palestinian activist's release

CNN20 hours ago

The Middle EastFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Mahmoud Khalil's hopes of being freed on bond as he continues fighting the Trump administration's efforts to deport him were dashed Friday, despite a judge saying the government could no longer hold Khalil on the premise that his presence in the country is against the national interest.
The administration was given until 9:30 a.m. Friday to file an appeal, or else the preliminary injunction would go into effect. No appeal was filed Friday, and attorneys for the Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate student demanded his release.
'The deadline has come and gone and Mahmoud Khalil must be released immediately. Anything further is an attempt to prolong his unconstitutional, arbitrary, and cruel detention,' Khalil's legal team said in a statement Friday morning.
Judge Michael Farbiarz gave the government a new deadline of 1:30 p.m. to respond to the demand of Khalil's attorneys that he be immediately released.
Farbiarz said the determination by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that Khalil's presence in the country had 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States' was likely unconstitutional. But attorneys for the Department of Justice said the judge's decision did not prevent them from continuing to hold Khalil on a second claim – that he failed to give required information in his application to become a legal permanent resident of the US, in their response letter to the judge on Friday.
Farbiarz appeared to throw cold water on that reasoning in his order earlier this week, writing, 'The evidence is that lawful permanent residents are virtually never detained pending removal for the sort of alleged omissions in a lawful-permanent-resident application that the Petitioner is charged with here.'
But the judge did not specifically strike down that charge as a reason for detaining Khalil, and the Trump administration is seizing on that distinction.
'While the Court made a factual finding that it was unlikely that Khalil would be detained on another basis … the Court never held that it would be unlawful for Respondents to detain Khalil based on another charge of removability,' the Department of Justice attorneys wrote in their response.
Khalil has not been charged with a crime.
The Syrian-born Palestinian refugee is one of several foreign nationals the Trump administration has accused of posing a national security threat due to alleged ties to terrorist organizations – a claim his attorneys have repeatedly disputed.
The administration has relied on an obscure section of US law to argue that Khalil should be deported because his presence in the United States threatens the administration's foreign policy goal of combatting antisemitism.
His lawyers, meanwhile, challenged the legality of Khalil's detention and contend he was targeted for his pro-Palestinian views in violation of his constitutional rights. They argue the government's evidence is insufficient and based solely on a letter from Secretary of State Marco Rubio that does not allege criminal activity.
CNN's Gloria Pazmino contributed to this report.
This is a developing story and will be updated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who was Melissa Hortman, Minnesota lawmaker killed in targeted shootings?
Who was Melissa Hortman, Minnesota lawmaker killed in targeted shootings?

CBS News

time12 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Who was Melissa Hortman, Minnesota lawmaker killed in targeted shootings?

A manhunt is underway for a suspect who officials say shot and killed Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband overnight. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were also injured in what Gov. Tim Walz called "politically motivated" shootings. Hortman and her husband were shot in Brooklyn Park, while Hoffman and his wife were shot in Champlin. The search for the suspect continues. A law enforcement source tells CBS News the FBI is assisting with the investigation. Who was Melissa Hortman? Hortman, 55, represented Minnesota House District 34B as a member of the Democratic Party. Her district covers Brooklyn Park, Coon Rapids and Champlin. Hortman also served as the Speaker Emerita of the Minnesota House. Hortman was elected to the Minnesota Legislature in 2004 and was in her 11th term. She is married and has two children. Last month, Hortman talked to WCCO in the lead-up to the potential special session where lawmakers finished up the budget. Melissa Hortman CBS Who is John Hoffman? Hoffman, 60, represents Minnesota Senate District 34, which covers a swath of the northwest Twin Cities suburbs, including Rogers and Champlin. He was also a member of the Democratic Party. Hoffman was first elected to serve in 2012, and was reelected three times after. He served as chair of the Human Services Committee, and also served on committees for energy, environment and health and human services. He was born in 1965. He has one child. Minnesota Sen. John Hoffman Minnesota Senate photographer's office This story will be updated.

As Trump Prepares to Celebrates Army's Founding, His Critics Take to the Streets
As Trump Prepares to Celebrates Army's Founding, His Critics Take to the Streets

New York Times

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Times

As Trump Prepares to Celebrates Army's Founding, His Critics Take to the Streets

President Trump prepared on Saturday to make a show of American military might with a parade of tanks, missiles and aircraft through the heart of the nation's capital, a celebration of the 250th anniversary of the United States Army that has already transformed into a test of wills and competing imagery, with demonstrators around the country decrying his expansion of executive power. On Saturday, central Washington was locked down, divided by a wall of tall, black crowd-control fences designed to assure that the parade, the first of its kind since American troops returned from the Gulf War in 1991, is an uninterrupted demonstration of history and American power. The event was scheduled to go on despite a forecast of thunderstorms. By design, military parades are part national celebration and part international intimidation, and Mr. Trump has wanted one in Washington since he attended a Bastille Day parade in Paris in 2017. Formally, the parade celebrates the decision by the Second Continental Congress on June 14, 1775, to raise a unified, lightly armed force of colonialists after the shock of the battles with British forces at Lexington and Concord. That army, which George Washington took command of a month later, ultimately expelled the far larger, better armed colonial force. But no celebration of history takes place in a political vacuum. And protesters in large cities and small towns from Seattle to Key West were planning to demonstrate against how Mr. Trump is making use of the modern force. His decisions over the past week to federalize the National Guard and call the Marines into the streets of Los Angeles, in support of his immigration roundups, has rekindled a debate about whether he is abusing the powers of the commander in chief. So the country was preparing for a split-screen show of force, before Mr. Trump presides over the parade and roughly 2,000 protests, under the slogan 'No Kings,' take place from Philadelphia to San Francisco to push back against what they see at authoritarian overreach. While the big-city rallies will attract attention, smaller events are being organized in rural areas, including three dozen in Indiana, a state Mr. Trump won last November by 19 points. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Washington's Last Military Parade Came at a Very Different Moment
Washington's Last Military Parade Came at a Very Different Moment

New York Times

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Washington's Last Military Parade Came at a Very Different Moment

It began with an F-117 stealth fighter flying by as thousands of U.S. troops began a 3.5-mile march from Capitol Hill. The last major military parade in the nation's capital was on June 8, 1991, just months after the end of Operation Desert Storm. It was called the National Victory Celebration, and its festivities were a celebration of American military might and technological prowess after U.S. and coalition forces had expelled the Iraqi army from Kuwait following roughly a month of airstrikes and a 100-hour ground war. Once the wedge-shaped black jet flew down the National Mall, more than a dozen Army and Navy helicopters followed, as did an OV-10 Bronco observation plane from the Marines. Hundreds of thousands of people cheered as more than 8,000 active-duty and reserve service members from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast Guard along with a civilian contingent from the Merchant Marine made their way along the route from Capitol Hill down Constitution Avenue, over the Memorial Bridge across the Potomac River to the Pentagon. Early in the route, they marched under a huge yellow ribbon suspended over the road by cranes. On Saturday, troops and military equipment were set to again roll down the streets of Washington, this time for the Army's 250th birthday celebration. President Trump has boasted about plans for the 'amazing day,' which is also his 79th birthday. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store