logo
Losing Carleton: Poilievre's defeat in rural Ottawa was years in the making

Losing Carleton: Poilievre's defeat in rural Ottawa was years in the making

Ottawa Citizen08-05-2025

'We have much to celebrate tonight,' he told cheering supporters, vowing to continue to fight on as party leader.
Poilievre thanked volunteers, the Conservative team, members of caucus, staff and others. But there was no mention of Carleton, the Ottawa-area riding Poilievre had represented for more than 20 years.
That might not be surprising. As he spoke, early votes were just being counted in Carleton, but the trend was not going Poilievre's way. The Conservative party leader continued to trail his Liberal opponent, Bruce Fanjoy, as each new vote tally was reported. It is unlikely the Conservative team was completely surprised by what they were seeing. They had sent extra resources into the riding in the final weeks of the campaign amid reports that Poilievre's seat was at risk.
In Fanjoy's Manotick home, meanwhile, close supporters and family members watched election coverage with bated breath as the Carleton votes slowly trickled in. When the first poll was reported decisively in Fanjoy's favour – with 265 polls yet to come – he briefly teared up. 'It was a big moment for me. It told me that what we had done had landed,' Fanjoy later told an interviewer.
It would be hours before the final outcome in Carleton was known. Fanjoy went to bed and was woken a few hours later with a congratulatory phone call from his team telling him he had done what he vowed to do — defeat Poilievre to win the riding. Fanjoy won the riding by more than 4,500 votes.
He did not hear from Poilievre until a week after the election when the two had a polite conversation, according to Liberal staffers. It would also be a week before Poilievre thanked the people of Carleton 'who gave me two decades as an MP' as he headed to his first post-election meeting with his caucus.
By then, Poilievre had his eyes, quite literally, on other horizons, meeting residents in the Alberta riding of Battle River-Crowfoot where newly elected MP Damien Kurek had agreed to step aside so that a byelection could be held.
Poilievre has emerged from the roller coaster federal election with the strong support of his caucus (although they retain the power to review his leadership) and 25 more seats. But Carleton was not one of them, and that is a significant loss for a party leader.
Fanjoy was the right candidate at the right time, but Poilievre had been losing Carleton for a while.
It did not happen overnight – or even over the course of an election campaign.
The largely rural riding had a huge shift in demographics as suburban neighbourhoods grew and more people moved out of central Ottawa during the COVID-19 pandemic. Local voters were increasingly uneasy about the direction of some of the Conservative party's positions and Poilievre's often angry approach to politics. Not to mention there was a growing sense among voters that the riding was being taken for granted by Poilievre.
But the one issue that gets frequently mentioned by Carleton residents was Poilievre's support of members of the convoy protest that occupied downtown Ottawa in early 2022.
Mix all that with a Liberal candidate who wore through multiple pairs of shoes while knocking on tens of thousands of doors in his more than two-year quest to defeat Poilievre, and Conservatives had all the ingredients for a disaster in Carleton. Fanjoy, who is known as optimistic, good-natured and a good listener, offered a positive approach that many in the riding have said they were looking for, especially given the threats coming from the U.S.
Paul Robillard, the chair of the Carleton Federal Liberal Association, calls the flip of the longtime Conservative riding an evolution.
As far back as 2015, Robillard and others became convinced Poilievre could be beaten when Liberal candidate Chris Rogers came within 1,700 votes of him during a federal Liberal sweep to power. Rogers 'worked his buns off', said Robillard, and the team built a solid base and learned lessons it could use to build on those numbers. It would be a decade before the conditions were right for that to happen.
When Fanjoy expressed interest in running, he began to build on what Robillard and others saw was possible, in no small part, by being who he was – a hard worker, a good listener, a naturally warm person with a gift for connecting with people.
Fanjoy said he faced headwinds at first as the Liberal government's popularity plummeted and the Conservatives seemed certain to lead the next government, but that began to change after Justin Trudeau stepped down to be replaced by former governor of the Bank of Canada Mark Carney and, crucially, U.S. President Donald Trump began talking about Canada becoming the 51st state.
But Poilievre's personality also gave the Liberals an edge, according to Fanjoy. The Conservative leader was a polarizing figure in the riding with a fierce base of support, but there were growing numbers of people who were uncomfortable with his style – especially women, both nationally and at the riding level. Critics complained about the 'Trumpiness' of some of his language – the use of woke, for example.
Marjory LeBreton, a former adviser to Stephen Harper and former Conservative Senator, lives in the Carleton riding and gave an early warning about some of those concerns. In June of 2022, she publicly expressed worries about the direction of the Conservative party, noting the embrace by some of its members of the convoy blockade. She resigned from Carleton's Conservative board.
Carleton resident Mélanie Chrétien, a high school teacher, is a longtime Liberal voter who says she would have voted Conservative if the party had a different leader. She was looking for a conservative approach to financial stability and was not happy with the approach of the Trudeau Liberals.
Carney's leadership, she said, came as a relief and made it easy for her to vote Liberal.
As for Poilievre, Chrétien said his performative approach to politics, along with his divisiveness and 'contempt for others', is not what she wants to see in a leader.
'They should change leadership.'
Poilievre still has a strong base of support, in Carleton and across the country. The day after the election, one woman in Carleton was in tears when asked about Poilievre losing his seat. Another woman just shook her head when asked for an interview. 'I am in mourning,' she said.
But that base has eroded.
Mark Towhey, a broadcaster and former chief of staff to Toronto mayor Rob Ford, agreed that Poilievre's attack dog persona and likeability issues were factors in him losing his seat. Poilievre took steps to change his tone, which won him kudos during debates, but that likely came too late, said Towhey.
Meanwhile, Towhey said the Conservatives' plans to reduce the size of the federal public service likely lost him votes in the riding, even if Poilievre was careful to say it would be done through attrition.
Sixteen per cent of the riding is made up of government employees. 'All of whom might have heard: 'there goes my job,'' Towhey says.
That message, he said, is a hard sell in a government town.
'He is one of those politicians that you love him or hate him. He is a very good pitbull… but he probably would not have been somebody I would have voted for as leader,' Towhey added. A key for Poilievre, he said, will be successfully making the transition from attack dog to leader.
'If Pierre can learn to adapt – he has adapted a lot since he became leader – if he can keep doing that, he should stay as the leader.'
Towhey says Poilievre has a future as a leader, and maybe even as prime minister one day.
Just not likely as the MP for Carleton.
Bruce Fanjoy turned out to be the right person at the right time to run against Poilievre, says Lori Turnbull, a political scientist at Dalhousie University.
'I give Fanjoy a lot of credit.'
But Poilievre also lost the riding, in part because, as leader, he was no longer making micro-decisions about the campaign in Carleton, she says. Significantly, Poilievre's decision to show public support for the convoy cost him votes in Carleton.
'The convoy definitely cost him a lot. He should have stayed the hell away from it,' Turnbull says.
She noted that Poilievre was torn between building alliances with political movements that would likely be inclined to vote Conservative across the country and defending the interests of his constituents, many of whom were public servants.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PBO estimates tax rebate on new homes would save typical first-time buyer $27K
PBO estimates tax rebate on new homes would save typical first-time buyer $27K

National Observer

time21 minutes ago

  • National Observer

PBO estimates tax rebate on new homes would save typical first-time buyer $27K

An eligible first-time homebuyer could save an average of $26,832 in sales tax on the price of a newly built home under Ottawa's latest housing proposal, the parliamentary budget officer said in a new report on Wednesday. But the PBO's estimate of the plan's total cost is substantially lower than the federal government's estimate, and ministers responsible for the file have not offered an explanation for the gap. In a new analysis released Wednesday, the federal fiscal watchdog predicts that 71,711 new builds would qualify for GST relief over the lifetime of the program. The proposal would see the federal portion of the sales tax eliminated on a new home worth up to $1 million if it's bought by a qualifying first-time homebuyer. The GST rebate would be phased down as the price of the home approaches $1.5 million. Homes bought from May 27 through to 2031 can qualify for the rebate, as long as construction starts before 2031 and finishes by 2036. With some exceptions, Canadians who have owned a home already are not eligible for the GST relief. Neither are investors. The PBO forecasts the program will cost $1.9 billion over six years, about $100 million lower than the estimate it presented during the spring federal election campaign. It attributes that gap to a later implementation date and a different definition used for first-time homebuyers. The federal government, meanwhile, estimated the "tax savings" for Canadians at $3.9 billion over five years when the legislation was tabled on May 27. The Liberals' spring election platform costed the GST rebate at around $1.6 billion over four years. A PBO spokesperson said in an email that any difference in figures is likely due to assumptions about the share of homes ultimately bought by first-time buyers, but deferred to Finance Canada for questions about the government's figures. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne did not stop for questions about the cost discrepancy on his way out of the Liberal caucus meeting Wednesday. His office did not respond to a request for clarification. Housing Minister Gregor Robertson also did not comment about the PBO report when asked Wednesday. He told reporters he would answer questions "tomorrow." A Desjardins Economics analysis of the proposal released Monday offered one explanation for the discrepancy between the PBO's cost estimate and the government's figure: Ottawa might think its program will be more popular than the PBO does. A higher cost estimate suggests more first-time homebuyers purchasing qualifying new builds, in other words. The GST rebate, which is not yet law, was included in the Liberals' spring election platform as a way to help Canadians break into the housing market. A home priced at $1 million would receive the maximum rebate of $50,000. Homes priced below that amount would still get the full rebate — but since the sales tax is a taken off a lower overall cost, the size of the rebate would be reduced accordingly. The rebate also would be lower than $50,000 for homes sold above $1 million because the rebate gradually ramps down until it zeros out at a purchase price of $1.5 million. The Desjardins report by economist Kari Norman said that if the program proves popular with first-time buyers, it could spur additional housing construction to meet higher demand. The PBO said it does not include possible behavioural responses to the program in its analysis. Norman noted in her report that it's also possible increased demand from homebuyers will push up home prices in the near-term. She estimated that 85 per cent of new homes built in Canada over the program time frame will be eligible for the full GST break of up to $50,000. In cases where the GST portion of a new home sale is rolled into the mortgage principal, the typical owner could expect to save $240 per month on mortgage payments, she said. The savings are more direct when a developer charges the GST upfront. The measure is packaged in legislation that also includes the Liberals' promised income tax cut, which is set to take effect July 1.

GOLDSTEIN: Ignoring contracting rules costs taxpayers billions: auditor general
GOLDSTEIN: Ignoring contracting rules costs taxpayers billions: auditor general

Toronto Sun

time32 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

GOLDSTEIN: Ignoring contracting rules costs taxpayers billions: auditor general

Auditor General of Canada, Karen Hogan, holds a press conference at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS Federal auditor general Karen Hogan on Tuesday reported widespread incompetence in the awarding of government contracts by the public service, resulting in billions of dollars of taxpayers' money being wasted. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account What's even more alarming is that everyone in the system knows it and no one is doing anything about it. Given that, what is the point of having an auditor general if every time she exposes incompetence and waste, the government pays lip service to implementing her recommendations and then goes back to doing the same things that led to the issue being investigated by the auditor general in the first place? In her latest report, this concern arises from Hogan's deep dive into federal contracts awarded to Ottawa-based GCStrategies Inc. a two-person Ottawa-based IT staffing firm — meaning it doesn't do the work but contracts it out to other companies — to develop the infamous ArriveCan app. That was supposed to cost $80,000. As far as Hogan could determine — because the record keeping was so bad — it ended up costing almost $60 million. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. This time Hogan, at the request of the House of Commons, examined a near-decade of 106 professional services contracts awarded to GCStrategies from 2015 to 2024 by 29 federal departments and agencies, one Crown corporation and one agent of Parliament, valued at up to $92.7 million with $64.5 million actually paid out. Among her findings: — in 58% of the contracts examined that were awarded without tendering, federal departments failed to assess whether doing so would have resulted in lower costs to taxpayers. –in more than 80% of the contracts examined that were awarded without competition or with only one valid bid, government departments failed to verify that the fees paid did not exceed market rates. — in almost 50% of the contracts examined, federal departments couldn't show the work was delivered, even though payments were made. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. — in 33% of the contracts examined, federal departments couldn't show the firms contracted were capable of completing the work. –in 21% of the contracts examined, federal departments lacked documentation showing valid security clearances for contractors working on government networks containing sensitive information. The most alarming conclusion by Hogan was her observation that she has no reason to believe these government failures were confined to this one vendor. She noted the same thing happened last year when she examined 97 contracts awarded by 10 federal departments and agencies and 10 Crown corporations valued at $209 million with $200 million paid out, to McKinsey & Company for consulting services from 2011 to 2023. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Hogan — who didn't make any recommendations to improve procurement policies saying the problem isn't a lack of policies but failure to follow them — said she believes the same thing is happening throughout the federal government. Writ large, that's why, to cite just one of countless examples, the estimated cost to taxpayers for Canada acquiring 88 F-35 fighter jets — another issue Hogan examined in her report — increased by almost 50% from $19 billion in 2022 to $27.7 billion in 2024, with at least another $5.5 billion needed to make the purchases fully operational. Read More Without drawing conclusions from these specific examples, the fact the same failures keep happening over and over again year after year across the federal government, raises the question of whether beyond incompetence, political corruption is involved, which is beyond the auditor general's purview. Whether, for example, political pressure is being put on public servants to ignore procurement rules in favour of handing contracts to favoured companies and if so, why? RECOMMENDED VIDEO Celebrity NHL Editorial Cartoons Columnists Toronto Maple Leafs

Liberals won't split internal trade, major projects bill despite Bloc call
Liberals won't split internal trade, major projects bill despite Bloc call

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

Liberals won't split internal trade, major projects bill despite Bloc call

The Liberal government is rejecting a call from the Bloc Québécois to split its marquee legislation in two and allow part of it to speed through the House of Commons this summer. The bill — known as Bill C-5, or the free trade and labour mobility in Canada act —was introduced last Friday. It has two parts. The first portion addresses internal trade barriers the Liberals have promised to tackle by July 1. The second part proposes to make sweeping changes to speed up approvals of major projects. The Bloc argued the internal trade portion of the legislation could be passed relatively quickly with broad support from the House of Commons, but called for a separate study of the changes to major project reviews. 'The bill as it is now would be sent to the transport committee, whereas if it were to be split it could be sent to two different committees, the second one being environment,' Bloc deputy leader Christie Normandin said at a press conference on Monday. Story continues below advertisement Government House leader Steven MacKinnon said Wednesday the Liberals won't split the legislation, even if that would ensure the government meets its self-imposed deadline to tackle interprovincial trade barriers. 'This is a bill that responds to economic conditions caused by the tariff war, among other things, and mobilizes premiers, mobilizes Canadians from coast to coast to coast behind projects of national significance,' MacKinnon said on his way into a Liberal caucus meeting. 1:46 Can the Liberal government's trade bill unify Canada's economy? The legislation would give the federal government sweeping new powers to push forward projects that have been deemed to be in the national interest. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy It sets out five criteria to determine if a project is the national interest, including its likelihood of success, whether it would strengthen the country's resiliency and advance the interests of Indigenous peoples, and whether it would contribute to economic growth in an environmentally responsible way. Story continues below advertisement The government intends to create a list of such projects and then fast-track the approval system with a goal of issuing approvals within two years, instead of the current five-year timeline. The bill would create a new federal office to take the lead on streamlining approvals and task the intergovernmental affairs minister with overseeing the final permitting decision. It's meant to send a signal to build investor confidence, the government said. The proposed legislation has been criticized already by groups like Greenpeace Canada, and some have warned that there are risks in trying to shortcut environmental interests. 4:58 Carney looking to pass legislation 'before summer' to remove trade barriers in Canada The minority Liberal government needs the support of at least four MPs from another party to pass the bill. It does not have a formal or informal agreement with any opposition party to pass legislation, as was the case with the NDP in the last Parliament. Story continues below advertisement Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has said his party will support legislation that gets new projects built — but he also said he wants the current bill amended to go even further. On Friday, Poilievre said he wanted to meet with his caucus before saying whether Conservative MPs will vote in favour of the legislation. After Wednesday's caucus meeting, his office said there was no update to provide. Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested last week he would consider extending the House sitting into July to get the legislation passed. The House of Commons is scheduled to take a summer break beginning June 21. MacKinnon said Wednesday that he has not tried to get consensus from the other parties to extend the sitting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store