logo
Skype hangs up after three decades, marking end to an iconic internet calling service

Skype hangs up after three decades, marking end to an iconic internet calling service

The National05-05-2025

When Skype was released to the public on August 29, 2003, internet calling was costly and limited to those with the means to access it, and VoIP – voice over internet protocol – would not have rung a bell. It did not take long before that distinctive ring from a Skype call slowly took over, changing the game for internet communications. Its popularity was such that 'Skype' became a verb, much like how 'google' was to searching the web. About 22 years later, Skype makes its final call today, May 5, as its owner Microsoft folds it into its own Teams service. Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft acknowledged Skype has been 'an integral part of shaping modern communications', and its retirement is meant to 'streamline our free consumer communications offerings so we can more easily adapt to customer needs', said Jeff Teper, president of Microsoft 365 Collaborative Apps and Platform. It is yet another sad end to a once-dominant platform, probably falling victim to a cut-throat race in the technological age. Before VoIP – also known as internet protocol telephony – mobile or cellular calls required a SIM card. VoIP and Skype eliminated the need for that, as the technology required only an internet connection. The technology had its roots all the way back in 1925, when Bell Laboratories was formed to help AT&T's global communications. Three years later, Bell created Voder, the world's first electronic voice synthesiser. The other key component of VoIP, the internet itself, had its foundations laid in 1969 with the development of Arpanet, the internet's first building block. Several developments later – including fine tuning audio over the internet and improving connectivity – the first VoIP application, Rascal, was launched in 1989, as a means for gamers to talk to each other. Between this time and Skype's launch, two notable VoIP services surfaced: Teleport, considered the first video conferencing service with basic functionality that attracted the attention of Hilton Hotels, and VocalTec, the first commercial VoIP platform. Then, in 2003, Skype rang in a new era for VoIP communications. Skype went by a few names before it became how we know it: it was derived from Skype Peer-to-Peer, then shortened to Skyper, before ultimately dropping the 'r' to utilise available domains at the time. Its parent, Skype Technologies, was founded by Swede Niklas Zennstrom and Dane Janus Friis, while its software was developed by Toivo Annus, Ahti Heinla, Priit Kasesalu and Jaan Tallinn, all from Estonia. The platform quickly became famous for offering free voice calls between Skype users and paid ones to telephone numbers. It would eventually add video calls in 2006 on Windows, further cementing its place in internet communications. Its popularity soared that users even put it in their contact details, such as those in business cards and email signatures. Skype began as a start-up, raising $76.85 million through five funding rounds from 2003 to 2010 – beginning with a humble $250,000 and peaking at $50 million – according to data from industry tracker Crunchbase. In between, Skype's first ownership change happened, with e-commerce company eBay buying it for $2.5 billion in 2005. Skype founders Mr Zennstrom and Mr Friis would eventually leave and launch a new streaming video service, the short-lived Joost. But eBay eventually soured on Skype, losing millions and dealing with unprofitability (perhaps annoying ads are not such a bad idea). California-based eBay sold 70 per cent of Skype to a group led by Silver Lake Partners, but not before a lawsuit was filed by Skype's founders over intellectual property copyrights. In 2010, Skype announced plans to go public and raise as much as $1 billion – and this is where things took a strange turn: the company delayed its initial public offering, and it was believed that the IPO plans were just a smokescreen to put the business up for sale. Facebook and Google, still in their infancies, reportedly made bids to value Skype at as much as $4 billion. But all went for naught as Microsoft swooped in and acquired Skype for $8.5 billion in 2011. At its peak, Skype boasted about 300 million users. But, just like how the internet helped propel it into the mainstream, advancements and competition in the World Wide Web also caused its slow decline. At this point, Microsoft – long the ruler of global technology – was now facing challenges from several fronts, including Apple's resurgence and Google's emergence, both of which were changing computing and consumer preferences. While Microsoft did hold its ground – it was increasing its cloud and services game – acquiring Skype would enable it to tap into the growing communications scene. In 2017, Microsoft unveiled Teams. While it was not clear yet at the time if Teams was meant to replace or knock off Skype, both platforms had their own unique propositions, at least according to Microsoft: Skype was meant for home and small business users for up to 20 people, with Skype for Business up to 250, while Teams offered as much as 10,000 and other advanced features such as enterprise-grade security. There are still a number of countries where Skype is blocked – the UAE included – owing to concerns over security and privacy, as well as licensing issues. However, VPNs, or virtual private networks, can provide access to it. In February, Microsoft finally announced that it was retiring Skype. At this point, Skype was not the force it was: at its peak, it boasted as much as 405 million users in 2008, but had since steadily declined, owing to the emergence of other platforms such as Google Meet, Apple's FaceTime, WhatsApp from Facebook that has since become Meta Platforms and other social media apps, and, most notably Zoom, which shot to popularity during the Covid-19 pandemic. Teams itself had a hand in Skype's dwindling numbers. In 2020, Microsoft said Skype had about 40 million users, and the latest figures as of 2023 showed that that was down to 36 million. Teams, in contrast, shot up to about 300 million. Microsoft says the folding of Skype was done to 'streamline our free consumer communications offerings so we can more easily adapt to customer needs'. Teams users, anyway, will still have access to many of Skype's core features, in addition to the former's more advanced services. Microsoft has pledged to make the Skype-to-Teams transition easy. But for the old heads who were able to witness what could be considered the dawn of mass video conferencing, that distinctive Skype tune will forever ring a (free call) bell.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Xi speak as trade worries mount, China says
Trump and Xi speak as trade worries mount, China says

Khaleej Times

time2 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Trump and Xi speak as trade worries mount, China says

U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke on Thursday in a phone call intended to hash out differences on tariffs that have roiled the global economy, according to China's embassy in Washington. The talks were at Trump's request, China said, without providing further details about the leaders' conversation. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The highly anticipated call comes amid accusations between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over critical minerals in a dispute that threatens to tear up a fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. Though stocks rallied, the temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. On Thursday, U.S. stocks ticked higher initially but were little changed after news of the call. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives, who say the uncertainty has made it difficult to forecast market conditions. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets continues to disrupt supplies needed by automakers, computer chip manufacturers and military contractors around the world. Beijing sees mineral exports as a source of leverage - halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican U.S. president if economic growth sags because companies cannot produce mineral-powered products. The 90-day deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions is tenuous. Trump has accused China of violating the agreement and has ordered curbs on chip design software and other shipments to China, while also doubling steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%. Beijing rejected the claim and threatened counter-measures. In recent years, the United States has identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the U.S. economically and militarily. Despite this and repeated trade threats and tariff announcements, Trump has spoken admiringly of Xi, including of the Chinese leader's toughness and ability to stay in power without the term limits imposed on U.S. presidents. Trump has long pushed for a call or a meeting with Xi, but China has rejected that as not in keeping with its traditional approach of working out agreement details before the leaders talk. The U.S. president and his aides see leader-to-leader talks as vital to sort through log-jams that have vexed lower-level officials in difficult negotiations. It's not clear when the two men last spoke. Both sides said they spoke on Jan. 17, days before Trump's inauguration and Trump has repeatedly said that he had spoken to Xi since taking office on Jan. 20. He has declined to say when any call took place or to give details of their conversation. China had said that the two leaders had not had any recent phone calls. The talks are being closely watched by investors worried that a chaotic trade war could cut into corporate earnings and disrupt supply chains in the key months before the Christmas holiday shopping season. Trump's tariffs are also the subject of ongoing litigation in U.S. courts. Trump has met Xi on several occasions, including exchange visits in 2017, but they have not met face to face since 2019 talks in Osaka, Japan. Xi last travelled to the U.S. in November 2023, for a summit with then-President Joe Biden, resulting in agreements to resume military-to-military communications and curb fentanyl production.

Elon Musk's departure proves no one lasts long in the spotlight beside Donald Trump
Elon Musk's departure proves no one lasts long in the spotlight beside Donald Trump

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

Elon Musk's departure proves no one lasts long in the spotlight beside Donald Trump

Last year, the world's richest man, Elon Musk, lavished hundreds of millions of dollars on the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald Trump, in a transparent effort to translate his vast wealth into personal political power. After Mr Trump returned to the White House, with Mr Musk in tow, it seemed that was indeed happening. Mr Musk was such a regular fixture in the White House that there was even silly talk of a co-presidency. But now the billionaire is gone, unlikely ever to return to the Washington halls of power. In truth, Mr Musk's tenure at the " Department of Government Efficiency" could have been better at its purported tax-cutting mission. Its goal, Mr Musk boasted in the lead-up to the election, was to save the federal government $2 trillion, though he later revised that figure to $1tn. Yet despite pulling out chainsaws on stage and gloating over the mass sackings of eminent, respectable and dedicated public servants, not to mention the gutting of crucial public and human service programmes, he barely made a dent in the federal budget. The most charitable calculation of the actual 'savings' incurred to date is around $175 billion, though Doge has published evidence purported to substantiate less than half of this. Mr Musk seems especially proud of the de facto shuttering of the US Agency for International Development and the elimination of many of its key humanitarian programmes. Although Secretary of State Marco Rubio spent much of last week denying that anyone has died because of the elimination of these crucial programmes, some experts think that the only real question is only whether these deaths, in only a few weeks, must be counted in the thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands. Journalists and Democratic lawmakers have pointed out specific cases, such as individually named orphaned children in rural Africa who were depending for survival on HIV medicine that was suddenly yanked away by the world's richest man. They're now verifiably and needlessly dead. Despite pulling out chainsaws on stage and gloating over the mass sackings of public servants, Mr Musk barely made a dent in the federal budget There are many other examples. But, as one Republican Senator, Joni Ernst, told constituents worried about their own health care last week: "Well, we are all going to die." That's as true of an impoverished African orphan as anyone else, from the point of view of a millionaire US senator or billionaire venture capitalist. Apart from the decimation of programmes and mass dismissal of public servants, Mr Musk's tenure provided the public with a close look at his lifestyle. It is inspiring to those who think people ought to have more children. He has been energetically promoting large families, in both theory and in practice. He has denied reports from The New York Times that he regularly consumed illegal drugs and amphetamines like Adderall. It might be unfair to speculate that as he was reshaping US government, Mr Musk was frequently in an altered state of consciousness. But we do know that Mr Musk and his crew had, with minimal oversight, access to the most sensitive data on not just public employees and the government, but taxpayers and the general public. The fate of this data is unknown. An even more troubling reality is that his activities were unsupervised, unconfirmed and unvetted. He had no security clearance, or even a security clearance investigation. Mr Musk's Washington adventure illustrates exactly why the founders of the American republic insisted the Senate needed to confirm all senior appointees. This has become an increasingly marginalised procedure, but the wisdom of this check has been amply illustrated by the Musk-Trump transactional relationship. While the two still praise each other, the actual chasm between them grows ever wider. Mr Musk has been increasingly vocal in condemning the " big, beautiful budget bill" that the Republican-dominated Senate is trying to pass at Mr Trump's behest. The billionaire says it is the antithesis of everything he was trying to do, since it may greatly increase the federal budget. He could never say any such thing if he were still connected to the White House. Mr Trump increasingly had little time for his billionaire former buddy. You could see it coming from the very outset. The administration could not contain two alpha males, and Washington was never going to be big enough for both of them. The only surprise is that Mr Musk lasted as long as he did. No one lasts too long in the spotlight next to Mr Trump.

Harnessing AI to make energy poverty history: AEW 2025 to explore role of digitization and data
Harnessing AI to make energy poverty history: AEW 2025 to explore role of digitization and data

Zawya

time3 hours ago

  • Zawya

Harnessing AI to make energy poverty history: AEW 2025 to explore role of digitization and data

CAPE TOWN, South Africa -- With over 600 million people living without access to electricity and 900 million living without access to clean cooking solutions, Africa is faced with a dilemma: how to scale-up energy capacity while reducing project timelines. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and collaboration with global partners have emerged as key solutions to addressing this dilemma, offering energy producers the chance to modernize infrastructure, accelerate energy development and create more resilient energy systems across the continent. A panel discussion at the African Energy Week (AEW): Invest in African Energies conference – taking place September 29 to October 3, 2025 – will explore the impact AI solutions are playing in Africa. The session will delve into challenges faced by African countries, including data gaps, limited local expertise and regulatory barriers, while offering insights into how context-aware AI can make technology affordable and accessible. Participating speakers include representatives from S&P Global Commodity Insights and Microsoft Energy and Resources. The conversation will explore how technology can bridge the energy divide – paving the way for a more energy-secure, innovation-driven Africa. AEW: Invest in African Energies is the platform of choice for project operators, financiers, technology providers and government, and has emerged as the official place to sign deals in African energy. Visit for more information about this exciting event. With the demand for electricity projected to more than triple in Africa by 2040, AI stands to play an instrumental role in optimizing energy production. Across traditional grid networks, AI can be leveraged to enhance the efficiency of energy systems, improve resource management while minimizing energy losses. AI also enables predictive maintenance, allowing utilities to identify equipment failures ahead of time. In addition to preventing unwarranted shutdowns, predictive maintenance significantly reduces costs. The Kenya Power and Lighting Company, for example, is utilizing AI-powered solutions and machine learning to detect power theft, optimize load distribution and manage power outages. This has resulted in a 30% reduction in energy losses. In June 2025, the company launched an Expression of Interest, inviting international firms to partner on the implementation of world-class IT solutions to further improve grid management, technology infrastructure and digitization. In South Africa, the state-utility Eskom is leveraging AI to monitor the national grid. Through the application of big data and AI in energy management, the utility seeks to optimize systems and cut unnecessary electricity use. Beyond grid management, AI is being utilized to expand energy access. Approximately 33% of Africa's population lives in rural or remote areas, and with the continent relying heavily on traditional grid systems, this has resulted in significant disparity with regards to equitable energy access. Through AI, Africa stands to address this challenge. AI-powered microgrids, for example, are playing a major part in providing access to electricity for underserved communities. Offering an alternative to grid-connected power, microgrids are context-specific, allowing access to power without the need for large-scale transmission networks. Recent projects highlight a growing commitment by international firms to expand microgrids in Africa. The Zambia Ruida Mining Microgrid Power Project was commissioned in 2025, representing the continent's largest single-unit microgrid for mining operations. SANY Silicon Energy launched Africa's largest single-unit hybrid microgrid for mining projects in South Africa in 2025, while PowerGen Renewable Energy is partnering with international investors to deploy over 120 MW of off-grid energy systems across the continent. Meanwhile, AI creates significant opportunities to propel a just energy transition in Africa, supporting renewable energy integration across grid networks. Through the deployment of smart grids and AI technology, utilities can balance fossil fuel generation with renewable integration, allowing African countries to utilize a variety of generation sources. Countries like Zimbabwe are actively integrating renewable energy into the national grid, seeking to diversify its power mix by incorporating both coal and renewable energy. Approximately 75MW of net-metered solar was added to the grid in February 2025, with goals to incorporate 2,100 MW of renewable energy by 2030. AI-powered technology and smart meters enable seamless integration, while addressing challenges associated with renewable energy intermittency. Stepping into this picture, the AEW: Invest in African Energies 2025 panel discussion will bring together experts to discuss the opportunities and challenges for AI deployment in African energy. 'Addressing energy poverty in Africa requires innovative solutions. AI is not a foreign concept: it's a powerful local opportunity. By building AI tools that are rooted in African data, culture and needs, we can create a smarter energy ecosystem that works for all Africans,' NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman, African Energy Chamber. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Energy Chamber.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store