logo
Who Could Be Losing Medicaid Access? What to Know About Proposed Cuts

Who Could Be Losing Medicaid Access? What to Know About Proposed Cuts

Newsweek14-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Millions of Americans could lose their Medicaid coverage under Republican plans to vastly cut federal spending.
Lawmakers on the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, are mulling over changes to the health care insurance program that benefits more than 70 million Americans nationwide.
Committee Republicans have found at least $880 billion in spending cuts, largely to Medicaid, to help cover the cost of $4.5 trillion in tax breaks wanted by President Donald Trump.
Why It Matters
Millions of Americans—particularly low-income individuals, the elderly, and immigrants living in the country without legal status—are at risk of losing access to Medicaid under the proposed legislation. According to estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the bill in its current form would lead to 10.3 million people losing some coverage and 7.6 million people going uninsured.
What To Know
A slew of changes are on the way if the current proposed bill is successful. Not all of these changes would come into force immediately upon the bill's passage, but all changes would be implemented within the coming decade.
Low-Income Adults
One of the main reforms is introducing new work requirements. Able-bodied adults aged under 65 without dependents will be required to engage in a minimum of 80 hours of paid work or 80 hours of "community engagement"—such as voluntary work. Exceptions will be made for pregnant women and in cases of short-term hardship. This could particularly impact those who have irregular employment.
There will also be new co-pays for those earning over a certain threshold. Medicaid recipients who make more than 100 percent of the federal poverty level—which is around $32,000 a year for a family of four—would be required to pay an out-of-pocket cost of $35 for some services. Fees would not apply to emergency room visits, prenatal care, pediatric visits or primary care checkups.
Illegal Immigrants
The proposed bill also includes provisions aimed at immigrants without legal status. Contained in the bill is a 10-percentage point reduction in the federal funding allocated to states—such as New York or California—that permit illegal immigrants to enroll in Medicaid.
Stricter immigration checks would also be implemented if the bill passes.
Protesters wearing "Hands Off Medicad" shirts line up outside of the Energy And Commerce Committee Markup Of Budget Reconciliation Hearing on May 13, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Protesters wearing "Hands Off Medicad" shirts line up outside of the Energy And Commerce Committee Markup Of Budget Reconciliation Hearing on May 13, 2025 in Washington, DC.for Protect Our Care
Abortion and Gender Care
Medicaid funds will also be prohibited from being paid to Planned Parenthood, while federal matching funds will also be prohibited for "gender transition procedures"—including puberty blockers, hormone treatments and surgeries—for individuals under the age of 18 enrolled in the program.
Eligibility Checks
The bill also mandates states to conduct Medicaid eligibility redeterminations at least every six months for adults covered under the Medicaid expansion, up from the current annual check. Such administrative burdens could cause people to lose coverage simply due to paperwork delays or logistical obstacles, critics have argued.
What People Are Saying
Representative Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, the GOP chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, said: "Savings like these allow us to use this bill to renew the Trump tax cuts and keep Republicans' promise to hardworking middle-class families."
House Speaker Mike Johnson said: "Medicaid is intended, remember, as a safety net for young pregnant mothers and the elderly and disabled and vulnerable populations, not for young able-bodied men without dependents. Those are the kinds of people we're taking off the program."
Representative Frank Pallone of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the panel, said: "In no uncertain terms, millions of Americans will lose their health care coverage.
"Hospitals will close, seniors will not be able to access the care they need, and premiums will rise for millions of people if this bill passes."
Darbin Wofford, deputy director of health care at Third Way, a center-left think tank, previously told Newsweek in an emailed statement: " No matter how Republicans try to spin it, this bill means major cuts to the Medicaid program.
"This package will mean millions of people losing their coverage and exploding our medical debt crisis, all to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy."
What Happens Next
The bill needs to win over nearly every Republican on the floor of the narrowly divided House. If it passes, it will then be considered in the Senate.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AOC Scrambles New York City Mayoral Race With Endorsement
AOC Scrambles New York City Mayoral Race With Endorsement

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

AOC Scrambles New York City Mayoral Race With Endorsement

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made her endorsement in New York City's mayoral race as more progressive Democrats in the city work to consolidate support against front-running former Governor Andrew Cuomo. Why It Matters Ocasio-Cortez remains popular with younger, more progressive voters in New York City, so her support could convince some of those voters to head to the polls for the June 24 primary. Whoever prevails in the primary would become the favorite to win in November, as the city remains a Democratic stronghold. What To Know The progressive congresswoman announced in The New York Times that she is ranking Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, who has polled second behind Cuomo and emerged as a favorite among many left-leaning voters, first in the Democratic primary. New York City uses ranked choice voting in their local elections. She said she will be ranking New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams second, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander third, former Comptroller Scott Stringer fourth and state Senator Zellnor Myrie fifth in her endorsement, the Times reported. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York speaks during a rally in Denver on March 21, 2025. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York speaks during a rally in Denver on March 21, 2025. JASON CONNOLLY/AFP via Getty Images "Assemblymember Mamdani has demonstrated a real ability on the ground to put together a coalition of working-class New Yorkers that is strongest to lead the pack," Ocasio-Cortez told the newspaper. "In the final stretch of the race, we need to get very real about that." Newsweek reached out to the Mamdani and Cuomo campaigns, as well as Ocasio-Cortez's office, for comment via email. Cuomo has established a polling lead over other candidates and is viewed as the leader with less than a month until the primary, as progressives seek to rally behind other candidates to prevent him from becoming the party's nominee because of his more moderate policy positions. A recent Emerson College poll found Cuomo and Mamdani as the top two Democratic candidates. On the first round of voting, 35 percent of respondents said they'd vote for Cuomo, while 23 percent would back Mamdani. By the final round, however, Cuomo had support from 54 percent of respondents, while Mamdani had 46 percent. The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters from May 23-26 with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Cuomo resigned as governor in 2021 after a report from Attorney General Letitia James' office alleged that he sexually harassed multiple female employees and created a toxic working environment, allegations Cuomo has denied. In May, he accused the Trump administration of "election interference" after The New York Times reported it launched a criminal investigation into whether Cuomo lied to Congress about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mamdani has engaged more progressive voters with a more left-leaning platform, emphasizing issues like a rent freeze to deal with rising rent and housing in the city and the establishment of a network of city-owned grocery stores intended to combat rising grocery costs for New Yorkers. Ocasio-Cortez's endorsement comes just one day after the Democratic candidates faced off in their first debate, during which each sought to portray themselves as the strongest to lead the city of more than 8 million people. "I am Donald Trump's worst nightmare, as a progressive Muslim immigrant who actually fights for the things that I believe in and the difference between myself and Andrew Cuomo," Mamdani said during the debate. What People Are Saying New York City mayoral candidate and Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, in a post on X, formerly Twitter: "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a once-in-a-generation leader who has led the fight for working people in Congress. In 2018, she shocked the world and transformed our politics. On June 24, with @AOC's support and this movement behind us, we will do the same." Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told The New York Times: "Even if the entire left coalesced around any one candidate, an ideological coalition is still insufficient for us to win. We have to have a true working-class coalition." What Happens Next The New York City mayoral primary is set for Tuesday June 24. The winner will face off against a Republican, as well as Mayor Eric Adams, who is seeking reelection as an independent, in November.

Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'
Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'

Fox News

time20 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Merz says US in 'strong position' to stop Putin, Trump says 'let them fight for a little while'

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told President Donald Trump he is in a "strong position" to stop Russia's war in Ukraine, to which the president suggested maybe the world needs to "let them fight for a little while." "America is again in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war," Merz said, while also referencing the U.S.'s role in ending World War II on the eve of the anniversary of D-Day, which marked the turn of events that led to the defeat of Nazi Germany. "So let's talk about what we can do jointly, and we are ready to do what we can." Merz called for more pressure to be placed on Russia in coordination with European allies. Trump responded by providing an analogy of two kids fighting, and suggested perhaps it was "too early" to break up the fight between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy – they hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart, they don't want to be pulled," Trump said. "Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart." Trump said he gave that analogy to Putin in his call with him on Wednesday and said he told the Kremlin chief "maybe you're going to have to keep fighting and suffering a lot." Reporters asked Merz, who has been an ardent supporter of Ukraine and recently lifted Germany's existing strike bans, if he agrees with Trump that "fighting it out" was the way to proceed. "I think we both agree on this war and how terrible this war is. And we are both looking for ways to stop it very soon," Merz said. "I told the president before we came in that he is the key person in the world who can really do that now by putting pressure on Russia, and we will have this debate later on again, how we can proceed jointly between the Europeans and the Americans. "I think we are all… having the duty to do something on that now, to stop it after three and a half years, which is really terrible," he added, making it clear without directly contradicting the president that he did not agree with Trump. "We are on the side of Ukraine, and we are trying to get them stronger and stronger just to make Putin stop this war. This is our approach," Merz added.

Is Official US Economic Data Getting Less Reliable?
Is Official US Economic Data Getting Less Reliable?

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Official US Economic Data Getting Less Reliable?

President Donald Trump's federal hiring freeze has forced the Bureau of Labor Statistics to cut back on collecting consumer price information. Economists have raised concerns that key data on inflation and other important measures of the economy will become less accurate because of Trump's policies. Earlier, the Trump administration disbanded expert panels that advised the BLS, raising further concerns about the quality of economic data.A key government agency has cut back on the amount of data it collects, raising concerns among experts about the accuracy of the information used to track inflation, unemployment, and other facets of the Bureau of Labor Statistics said this week it had cut back on the price surveys it uses to determine the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The agency said it cut back sample collection across the country and stopped data collection entirely in Buffalo, New York, Lincoln, Nebraska, and Provo, Utah. "These actions have minimal impact on the overall all-items CPI, but they may increase the volatility of subnational or item-specific indexes," the BLS said in a statement. "BLS makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort." Any problems with the inflation data could be widely felt across the economy. The inflation rate is closely watched by policymakers at the Federal Reserve who set the nation's monetary policy; by bond traders who determine the price of 10-year treasurys; and by major companies who use the information to make business decisions. Many federal benefits, including SNAP food aid and Social Security payments, are directly tied to the Consumer Price BLS is one of the federal agencies affected by President Donald Trump's freeze on hiring federal employees, which was instituted shortly after he took office. An internal BLS report said staffing shortages were the reason for cutting back data collection, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday, citing an email the agency sent to economists. Trump has requested further cuts to the agency. His budget proposal would cut the BLS budget by 8% in 2026 from 2025 levels, if approved by Congress. 'The CPI temporarily reduced the number of outlets and quotes it attempted to collect due to a staffing shortage in certain CPI cities,' beginning in April, the email read, according to the Journal. 'These procedures will be kept in place until the hiring freeze is lifted, and additional staff can be hired and trained.'The cutbacks forced the BLS to use less hard data and more guesswork to produce the inflation data for April, the Journal reported. To measure the inflation rate, the BLS collects about 100,000 prices each month, with employees across the country visiting stores, making phone calls, or going online to check prices. About two-thirds of the data in the survey comes from in-person visits. Experts look to the BLS's massive surveys as the "gold standard" of economic addition to cutting back on its consumer price survey, the BLS said it will stop monitoring wholesale prices in 34 different industries including cookware, greeting cards, toys, and power tools. That data is used to create the Producer Price cutbacks raised alarms about the reliability of BLS data, according to a report by Bloomberg.'The reduced number of price quotes will likely reduce the reliability of the CPI as a measure of inflation and increase the volatility in the monthly CPI prints,' UBS economists led by Alan Detmeister said in a report obtained by Bloomberg. The cutback on data collection is just the latest red flag about the accuracy of the Trump administration's economic statistics. Jed Kolko, former Under Secretary for Economic Affairs at the Department of Commerce, wrote a blog post in April detailing several major threats to public trust in government statistics, including budget cuts. In March, Trump disbanded two outside advisory panels that helped the BLS produce its statistics. Kolko noted that expertise will be hard to replace.A survey of academic economists in March by the Chicago Booth School of Business showed that experts overwhelmingly believed the staff cutbacks at statistical agencies and the elimination of the advisory panels would lead to a "substantial reduction in the reliability of government economic data." Read the original article on Investopedia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store