Anti-hate groups are pressing Meta shareholders to demand transparency on hate speech
Shareholder activists say Meta isn't doing enough to combat hate speech.
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and Jewish investor network JLens are calling on Meta investors to back a new proposal demanding greater transparency into how the company handles antisemitism, anti-LGBTQ+, and anti-disability hate speech.
The campaign comes amid rising concern over Meta's rollback of moderation policies and signals that investor scrutiny of the company's approach to safety has intensified.
The shareholder proposal, known as Proposal 8, calls on Meta to publish a public report detailing how it identifies, moderates, and addresses hate speech across its platforms. Shareholders will vote on the measure at Meta's annual meeting on May 28.
The report would include data tracking the prevalence of hate speech on Meta's platforms, broken down by the communities targeted, and an analysis of whether such content has increased or decreased under updated policy guidelines. It would also disclose any new policies or product interventions Meta has introduced or is developing to address hate targeting marginalized groups.
Still, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg controls a majority of the company's voting shares through a dual-class stock structure, effectively giving him the power to decide the outcome of any shareholder vote. Even if outside investors broadly support the proposal, it is almost certain to fail without Zuckerberg's backing.
Meta declined to comment.
Meta's board has urged shareholders to vote against the proposal, saying the company already has comprehensive content moderation systems and transparency reports and that an additional report would not provide meaningful new information.
ADL and JLens argue that forcing the issue into public view and onto the ballot is an important step toward holding Meta accountable.
"This is not a one-time effort, but part of a broader push to ensure Meta takes meaningful responsibility for the harmful content that appears on its platforms," Ari Hoffnung, managing director of JLens, told Business Insider. "Transparency is the necessary first step. Investors and the public need to understand what Meta is currently doing to combat hate on its platforms."
Both ADL and JLens say Meta's current disclosures fall short and that independent, community-specific metrics are essential to understanding the risks.
In addition to concerns about user safety, JLens also framed hate speech as a financial risk for Meta's shareholders. Hoffnung said harmful content on Meta could expose the company to legal, regulatory, and reputational risks and threaten relationships with advertisers.
"Meta is the platform where we've consistently identified as having one of the highest volumes of antisemitic and other hateful content, making it a priority for investor engagement," Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of ADL, told BI. "Meta also is a public company, and so as shareholders, we have a formal mechanism to push for transparency and accountability through resolutions like Proposal 8, which we believe is the most constructive way to drive lasting change from within the company."
The ADL, founded in 1913, is one of the most prominent civil rights organizations in the US focused on combating antisemitism and hate. In 2022, it acquired JLens, a Jewish values-based investor network, giving it a formal foothold in shareholder advocacy. JLens manages investments in major public companies, including Meta, through funds aligned with Jewish values and has stakes in most large public companies, including Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Meta.
While the ADL does not directly own Meta stock, its acquisition of JLens enables it to influence corporate governance through shareholder proposals.
"We've previously attempted to engage the company directly without success," Hoffnung said. "This year, we felt it was time to escalate our concerns through a shareholder proposal."
Shareholder proposals are a common tool during "proxy season," the period in spring when public companies hold annual meetings and shareholders vote on issues ranging from executive compensation to corporate social responsibility.
The pressure on Meta comes as the company's own Oversight Board, an independent group funded by Meta, recently raised alarms about the company's approach to hate speech enforcement. In a statement last week, the board criticized Meta's recent rollback of its moderation policies and warned that the changes could undermine user safety and brand trust.
Greenblatt said the ADL believes strongly in free expression but rejects the idea that it should come at the expense of user safety.
"We strongly believe in the importance of free expression, but it cannot come at the expense of safety," he said. "Antisemitic content and hate speech can lead to real-world harm, threats, and violence — as we've often seen — and it then crosses the line from protected expression into dangerous conduct."
Greenblatt pointed to Reddit's transparency report, which tracked incidents of Holocaust denial and other hate targeting specific groups, as a model for the kind of reporting they hope Meta will adopt if Proposal 8 is successful.
Proposal 8 is one of several measures investors will consider at Meta's annual meeting. Other shareholder proposals to be voted on include calls for greater transparency around child safety risks, oversight of Meta's use of artificial intelligence, and enhanced reporting on how the company's data collection practices affect user privacy.
JLens has been active beyond Meta this year. It has filed shareholder letters at Intel, General Dynamics, and Lockheed Martin, urging rejection of proposals it viewed as anti-Israel. During the 2024 proxy season, JLens and the ADL campaigned at dozens of companies to push for stronger action against antisemitism and other forms of hate.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Clergy join protesters to keep the peace after weekend's destruction
Priests, rabbis and other religious leaders took to the streets of Los Angeles on Monday to help keep the peace amid protests that spiraled into violence over the weekend. The protests against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown intensified with the deployment of National Guard members, something local and state officials said has worsened, not improved, the situation. Additionally, hundreds of U.S. Marines are reportedly on the way to L.A. Waymo cars were torched, businesses were ransacked and numerous injuries were reported over the weekend's chaos. On Monday, however, protests were much more peaceful, and religious leaders — some of them partnered with the organization Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice — made a point to discourage violence by both police and protesters at the intersection of Alameda and Aliso streets in downtown Los Angeles. 'We're here to peacefully ask where the families are,' the Rev. Omega Burckhardt told KTLA's Kimberly Cheng. '¿Donde están los niños? Where are the people who've been detained? We're also here peacefully to support the right to protest, and we're here to help keep a peaceful presence for folks. We understand people are very angry and very upset, and we're here to provide a non-anxious presence.' Another religious leader directly spoke with police following what appeared to be one person's frustrations with officers. 'I was saying, 'Nobody needs to get shot today, nobody needs to get harmed today,'' the Rev. Eddie Anderson told Cheng. 'We can stand here and do our First Amendment right and nonviolently protest them ripping apart our families and taking away our loved ones. This is Black-brown solidarity and all religious faiths coming together. This is our Los Angeles and everyone deserves to be free in this city.' Police and Anderson appeared to come to a common understanding, as an officer thanked the minister for his assistance in keeping that agitated crowd member from trying to break through officers, while the minister thanked police for protecting protesters as part of their duties. 'We're not going to shoot anyone,' the officer affirmed. Anderson's colleagues added that their religious beliefs require them to stand up for immigrants and others targeted by the Trump administration. Rabbi Susan Goldberg said she was defending 'the deepest values of the Jewish community,' including 'compassion,' 'love' and 'care and support for the most vulnerable.' 'It's the most-repeated command inside our Torah to take care of the widow, the orphan and the stranger, and to treat them as family and to take care of them,' she said. Another clergy member, the Rev. Stephen 'Cue' Jn-Marie, continued to make a faith-based case for the protest, calling it 'a moral obligation' to stand against the immoral crackdown. 'In Scripture and in my faith tradition, it says the two greatest commandments are to love the Lord your God with all your heart and to love your neighbor as yourself,' he said. 'They can't be separated; you have to do them together … In order to love God, I have to love you first, because you're created in the image of God in my faith tradition.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Amid the horrific rise in Jew-hatred, the US Holocaust Museum must reexamine its role
The murders of Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim in Washington and the attack on Jewish seniors, including Holocaust survivor Barbara Steinmetz, in Boulder, Colo., remind us that the lessons of the Holocaust remain unlearned. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum can help teach those lessons — if it concentrates on antisemitism as opposed to other hatreds, as it should, and goes beyond the Nazi horror. Advertisement Recall that the Holocaust occurred in European countries where ordinary citizens cooperated or stood indifferent to the mass murders of their neighbors. Today, after decades of proclaiming 'never again,' antisemitism in the US has hit a frightening new peak. The Holocaust Museum is supposed to educate about the dangers of antisemitism. Advertisement But as a proud member of its council, I know first-hand that it needs to do much more to fulfill that important role. The museum's weak connection to the Jewish people stems from its design, created when antisemitism seemed a thing of the past. Since then, it has shifted focus to combatting other forms of hate. The museum also provides no context of Jewish history before 1930 or after 1945. Advertisement And a planned multimillion-dollar renovation of the main exhibit hall could make the museum even more woke and disconnected. Frankly, the operation is in danger of becoming a liberal monument to the dangers of immigration enforcement and conservative politics. What the museum should be doing instead is teaching Americans that antisemitism is the world's oldest hatred, dating back 4,000 years when Nimrod is said to have thrown Abraham into a fiery furnace, and gaining steam with the rise of Christianity. More important, the museum needs to teach the story of Jewish survival; the founding of Israel in 1948, the wars of 1967 and 1973, and the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre. Advertisement It should cover pogroms that spurred the Zionist movement, helping make the case for the existence of a Jewish state. And it should emphasize America's cherished opportunities for Holocaust survivors and their families. Nineteen months after the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust, the museum lacks focus on the ongoing crisis. It reaches thousands of teachers and visitors but teaches broadly about hate, and not enough about antisemitism in particular. It fails, for example, to address antisemitism's recent surge, particularly at US universities. A Harvard-Harris poll in April found 51% of American 18- to 24-year-olds favored Hamas over Israel. Clearly, the museum needs to do a better job of reaching and teaching young people about Israel, Jewish history and current events. Indeed, no metric shows the museum contributing to any reduction in antisemitism. Sadly, all signs suggest it is failing in this regard. Advertisement The good news: President Donald Trump has made combatting antisemitism a priority and has begun cleaning house at the museum. Last month, he removed several Biden appointees, including Ron Klain, Doug Emhoff, Tom Perez, Susan Rice, Jon Finer and Anthony Bernal, none of whom were suited for the council. Rice had politicized Biden's National Strategy to Combat Antisemitism by excluding anti-Zionism and including Islamophobia. Advertisement Finer called members of the Israeli government 'abhorrent,' slamming it at a meeting with Arab American leaders in Dearborn, Mich., last year. Emhoff, appointed just three days before Trump took office, resisted his removal, claiming it 'dishonors the memory of 6 million Jews murdered by Nazis that this museum was created to preserve.' That's nonsense: Replacing these partisan figures has nothing to do with the 6 million murdered Jews, the Holocaust survivors or their descendants. On the other hand, the new council members appointed by President Trump will bring expertise from their careers as well as their skills and their important values. Advertisement Again, the US Holocaust Museum was created to preserve the memory of the Shoah and protect future generations from violent antisemitism. To accomplish this at a time when Jews face their biggest threats in decades requires greater oversight by the council and a broader, bolder outlook that addresses today's emerging problems. It's time to rethink the facility's role and what it is supposed to do to combat antisemitism. Advertisement It's time make the US Holocaust Museum great again. Martin Oliner, a lawyer and the son of Holocaust survivors, was mayor of Lawrence village from 2010 to 2016.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump, immigration and Israel loom large over final days of NYC mayoral primary
NEW YORK (PIX11) — With just five days remaining until early voting begins in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, candidates are focusing on President Donald Trump calling in the National Guard to deal with protests in Los Angeles. Most anticipate dealing with a similar situation in NYC if elected Mayor. More Local News Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, once considered a longshot, has seen his campaign gain a lot of momentum in the last two months. Despite his rising profile, while greeting voters in Harlem, Monday, it was clear many New Yorkers are still feeling him out, including Mamdani's skepticism over Israel and the Jewish state's actions in Gaza. Mamdani said he believes it is not Trump nor Israel that will come to define this race for the Democratic nomination, but affordability. 'We're the most expensive city in the country,' Mamdani said. 'New Yorkers care about whether they can afford rent, daycare, even their MetroCard.' Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo did not hold any public events on Monday following a busy weekend of meetings with religious groups, particularly Jewish New Yorkers. Cuomo was a guest on a Bloomberg podcast and said he believed President Trump was overplaying his hand by calling in the National Guard. 'Create chaos in L.A., create chaos in New York, create chaos in Chicago—pretty soon, you create chaos in the nation, and that's bad for the economy,' Cuomo said. Meanwhile, City Comptroller Brad Lander is among those emerging as an alternative to both Cuomo and Mamdani. On Monday, Lander held a press conference to outline his detailed plans for protecting immigrant communities and pushing back against President Trump's policies. 'We need a mayor who can do two things: stand up to Donald Trump on behalf of New York's values and govern the city more effectively,' Lander said. 'New Yorkers need both.' With early voting set to begin on Saturday, the race is expected to heat up in the coming days. In particular, analysts are watching for any formal cross-endorsements between candidates. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.