Red Alert: A refinery spilled toxic waste into the community and knew about it for months
The Atlantic Alumina, a.k.a. Atalco, bauxite refinery in Gramercy, Louisiana. (Wes Muller/Louisiana Illuminator)
This article is the first in a series on the environmental costs of America's last remaining alumina refinery.
GRAMERCY — For several months, a River Parishes refinery unlawfully discharged industrial toxic waste containing arsenic, cadmium, chromium and other toxic heavy metals into public areas and waterways, state records show.
The company, Atlantic Alumina, also known as Atalco, has so far racked up 23 violation notices from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality after inspectors first discovered the pollution in August. It involves a slurry of industrial 'red mud' byproduct that has eroded through the giant levees surrounding the facility's waste containment lakes and spilled onto public property. The toxic sludge has killed vegetation and contaminated the land along its path to a local drainage system that flows to the Blind River Swamp of Lake Maurepas, according to a 606-page LDEQ inspection report finalized in March.
The incident marks the first known case of red mud levee breaches at an American bauxite refinery. When asked for details, LDEQ spokesman Gregory Langley had little information to share about the prolonged discharge other than to say it is currently under investigation with the agency's enforcement division. The only enforcement action taken as of May 29 is a warning letter LDEQ sent to Atalco.
A review of thousands of pages of state and federal documents and interviews with scientists and area residents indicate that Atalco polluted public land and state waterways with the most toxic non-radioactive elements on the planet and allowed that pollution to continue for months — never notifying the outside community.
Atalco's refinery occupies roughly 3 square miles of land where St. James and St. John the Baptist parishes meet on the Mississippi River's east bank. The site specializes in refining bauxite, a rust-colored powder of raw metals and minerals, into aluminum oxide or 'alumina' in the form of an ultra-fine white powder. Atalco sells the alumina to metal smelters that need it to make finished aluminum. Opened in 1958 as Kaiser Aluminum, the Gramercy facility is the only remaining bauxite refinery in the United States and therefore the nation's only domestic source of a critical metal feedstock.
Atalco produced 669,261 metric tons of aluminum oxide last year, state records show. For every ton of aluminum produced from Atalco's work, bauxite refining generates an estimated 2.5 tons of waste byproduct, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
One of the main problems in refining bauxite is there are not many good options for what to do with all that waste, most of which takes the form of a thick red mud.
The waste comes from a part of the process in which bauxite is heated in a pressurized vessel with sodium hydroxide, a highly caustic chemical. The alumina compounds are then filtered out and separated, while the toxic byproduct is stored in the facility's six red mud lakes. The lakes are open-air ponds, each roughly 150-200 acres in size surrounded by large earthen levees, some as high as 50 feet, meant to contain the thick liquid waste.
Four of the lakes, including a 'surge' or overflow basin, were constructed in the early 1970s without any liners that would help prevent the heavy metals and chemicals from seeping into the soil below.
'It is very dangerous,' said Slawomir Lomnicki, an environmental scientist at LSU. 'There can be a lot of toxic metals leaching out of it and getting into the groundwater.'
Groundwater contamination from leaching is a constant risk that exists when Atalco's systems are operating normally. The public drinking water system in St. James Parish regularly monitors for that kind of contamination, according to Parish President Peter Dufresne. Officials with the St. John Parish water system did not answer multiple phone calls last week.
A greater risk to the community from bauxite refineries in general is the rare case of a levee breach at a red mud lake, which can cause toxic waste to directly contaminate public waters and soils, scientists said.
Until this reporting, the last known breach at a bauxite refinery occurred in Hungary in 2010. The failure of a red mud reservoir sent 35 million cubic feet of waste into nearby villages, killing 10 people and injuring 150 others.
In the wake of that incident, industry officials told the American public that a levee breach at Louisiana's bauxite refinery would be unlikely because the levees are 'periodically checked by state and federal regulators,' according to a news report from that time.
That unlikely event has happened at Atalco. With a caustic level higher than drain cleaner and elevated concentrations of heavy metals, Atalco's waste slurry eroded through levees in multiple locations at multiple lakes, forming canyons as deep as 10 feet that allowed the toxic waste to escape, records show.
A water sample LDEQ had tested from a public ditch outside the plant detected arsenic at a concentration nearly 1,400% higher than the level considered safe by state groundwater and EPA drinking water limits. The sample also contained cadmium at levels above those same limits.
A soil sample taken from the same ditch contained mercury, beryllium, cadmium and chromium — all at concentrations above the average background levels found in U.S. soils. The cadmium was nearly 400% higher, and the chromium was 900% higher than LDEQ's standard limits for soil. Chromium is the most toxic non-radioactive element on earth and is about three times more poisonous than arsenic, according to EPA toxicity factors.
Historic water quality data for the Blind River, recorded from 1979-99, show heavy metal concentrations nowhere near those levels.
'With this kind of facility, the worst major accident that can happen is a breach of the lake [levees],' said Corinne Gibb, a chemist who works with the environmental watchdog Louisiana Bucket Brigade. The group has monitored incidents at the alumina refinery for years.
It is unknown when the mud lake levees first began to erode, but state and federal records show the pollution lasted for months and continued even after Atalco became aware of the problem.
The company has not responded to the Illuminator's multiple requests for an interview.
Federal inspectors with the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) documented several hazards at Atalco's levees last summer and voiced concerns about the risks they posed to the workers at the plant.
'There were several mud lakes at the facility that was (sic) not being maintained,' MSHA inspector Brandon Olivier wrote in a citation dated June 25, 2024.
Trees and shrubs obscured sections of the levees, making thorough inspections impossible, Olivier added.
A few weeks later, on Aug. 14, the MSHA issued Atalco another citation after inspectors discovered caustic waste 'seeping through various locations on the east and west side of Mud Lake #4' and flowing downhill 'into the roadway and ditches.'
LDEQ later noted the Aug. 14 citation was the first formal written notice Atalco received about the levees having a breach with dangerous toxic waste escaping from its facility.
Other dangers present at the Atalco plant had already drawn regulators' attention at that time.
Just days prior, on Aug. 4, the public was reminded just how dangerous the chemicals at Atalco could be when 45-year-old Curtis Diggs, a contract worker from Waste-Pro USA, fell into a pit of sodium hydroxide at the plant because a grate that covered the pit was missing and the entire floor was flooded with several inches of the caustic cloudy liquid. The chemical, the same that is stored in the red mud lakes, left Diggs with severe burns from which he did not recover, according to LDEQ records. He died in a New Orleans hospital on Sept 2.
MSHA investigated the fatality and learned that Atalco personnel had removed the grate on July 30, 2024, to try to pump out the flooded area and failed to put anything in its place or even a warning marker, creating a dangerous pitfall left open for five days and virtually invisible. MSHA charged Atalco with three regulatory violations and charged Waste-Pro USA with two, faulting both companies for 'aggravated conduct' that involved an extraordinary pattern of negligence, though it's unclear if any fines or penalties have been issued as of May 30, according to federal records.
Atalco uses sodium hydroxide to refine bauxite into alumina. After the refinement process, it stores the used sodium hydroxide in the lakes with the other waste.
Despite the heightened scrutiny from state and federal regulators at the time, by mid-September Atalco still had not repaired the levee breaches to Red Mud Lake 4 that federal inspectors cited the month before. Nor did the company thoroughly inspect its other lakes to look for similar breaches because, as the records indicate, similar breaches were there — if only the company had looked.
On Sept. 17, MSHA inspectors found a breach in the levee around another lake, Red Mud Lake 1 East, with a stream of hazardous waste flowing freely across the roadway.
'The caustic was observed seeping through the side of the levee for approximately 50 yards across the roadway and to the ditch,' the citation states. 'The mud lake is access[ed] by the plant operators daily and contractors for service, and this condition exposes them to injuries if there is a dam failure due to the seepage.'
Based on further inspections that same day, MSHA cited Atalco for a third levee break — at Red Mud Lake 2.
On that single day, three of Atalco's six waste lakes had confirmed breaches with streams of poisonous chemicals flowing freely to areas they weren't permitted to go, including the Blind River Swamp — a popular recreational fishing spot in the Lake Maurepas backwaters.
LDEQ officials first arrived at the plant Sept. 20 to initiate a routine compliance inspection. Agency records show state officials met with Atalco managers, conducted an interview and toured parts of the facility. However, they were unable to inspect some of the lakes and levees because the plant manager told them the access roads were too wet to travel on.
LDEQ first documented the levee breaches five days later when they were contacted by the federal inspectors, according to state records. Atalco had still not officially notified LDEQ of the levee breaches — something the company should have done immediately upon learning of them in accordance with Atalco's permit requirements as well as state and federal laws.
Local officials have also been kept in the dark. When asked about the events during an impromptu meeting with a reporter Thursday at the State Capitol, St. James Parish President Peter Dufresne said he was unaware of Atalco's levee breaks that contaminated neighboring land and drainage with toxic waste. Dufresne declined an interview but asked the Illuminator for copies of LDEQ's inspection reports.
In October, the records show, state inspectors discovered erosion channels in the levee of a fourth lake, Red Mud Lake 3. They also saw for themselves the levee breaches that federal inspectors documented two months before. The erosion channels were still there, and the caustic waste was still escaping from those lakes.
So much waste had escaped that it also overwhelmed the facility's secondary containment system, which is a network of interior ditches just outside of the levees used to catch any chemical spills or leaks from the lakes. The backup ditch at one location had overflowed, sending the toxic slurry across the highway just north of the Veterans Memorial Bridge.
Atalco was also, as a matter of protocol, unlawfully using a stormwater ditch as a backup containment ditch. Three company officials, apparently unaware that they weren't permitted to use the ditch for toxic waste disposal, told LDEQ inspectors that they routinely used it for containment, according to the inspection files.
In other areas, LDEQ inspectors saw that the waste slurry had accumulated to 'nearly the height of the levee' in some of the lakes, the agency's files note. The waste level in the lakes should never be allowed to rise higher than two feet from the top of the levee.
Ultimately, in site visits over the next three months, LDEQ inspectors viewed and documented levee breaches at four of Atalco's six lakes, prompting the state agency to cite Atalco multiple times for failing to inspect and failing to repair the levees.
Erosion of the levees was a very real possibility that Atalco had long known about. In its 2010 permit renewal applications with the state, the company had addressed the topic at length, promising to prevent erosion by conducting daily inspections of the levees and keeping written logs of those inspections. The state included those as specific ongoing requirements in the final permit issued to Atalco. At that time, the company was in the process of raising its levees from 30 feet to 50 feet high, according to the permit application.
By the time state and federal officials began prodding the company last August, Atalco had not consistently inspected its lakes and levees in over three years and was missing hundreds of daily inspection records from July 30, 2021, to Dec. 18, 2024, according to LDEQ's summary of violations.
On Oct. 23, state officials noted the company was constructing a new berm to contain the breach at Red Mud Lake 4, which Atalco had known about since at least Aug. 14.
The breach at Red Mud Lake 3 continued until Dec. 4, according to the LDEQ file. On that day, Atalco managers accompanied state inspectors into the field when they noticed multiple streams emerging near an access road and traced it back to 'one erosion channel with an estimated depth of at least 10 feet.'
You would definitely get injuries and skin burns from it. The plants and any fish in the area would die from that. You can't survive that high of a pH.
– Corinne Gibb, chemist, Louisiana Bucket Brigade
During their site visits in October, the state inspectors took pH readings from various pools of standing waste that had escaped from the lakes
The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14, with water having a neutral pH of around 7. Lower values indicate acidity, while higher values indicate alkalinity. Substances at the extreme ends of the scale in either direction can eat through solid materials such as steel and concrete and are very dangerous to most life forms.
The LDEQ detected high pH at every location, with one puddle logged at a high of 12.49 — the same alkalinity as most caustic drain clog removers and ammonia-based cleaners. The inspectors also photographed dead or dying vegetation, petrochemical sheens, and white and yellow chemical residues in many of the locations where the slurry had traveled.
'Just the pH by itself is concerning … That is very high,' Gibb, the chemist, said. 'You would definitely get injuries and skin burns from it. The plants and any fish in the area would die from that. You can't survive that high of a pH.'
State inspectors had testing done on water and soil samples from off-site locations in the public drainage system and on-site locations near the erosion streams. Simultaneously, Atalco personnel collected their own batch of samples and sent them to a separate lab for independent testing.
LDEQ's soil samples contained significantly elevated levels of cadmium, chromium and nickel — all toxic carcinogens. Atalco's samples reaffirmed the LDEQ's lab results and detected even higher levels at one location. The company's sample taken from public property outside the facility contained cadmium at roughly 1,000% higher than what the state considers safe for people. Additionally, the levels of chromium and nickel measured 1,700% and 300% above their respective state standards, the lab reports show.
Gibb and Lomnicki, the LSU scientist, said these three heavy metals, along with arsenic, are among the most dangerous non-radioactive substances on the planet. Exposure to excessive levels can cause a range of serious health issues, including cancer and blood poisoning.
Ganga Hettiarachchi, a Kansas State University professor of soil and environmental chemistry, said cadmium could pose the greatest long-term risk because it spreads easily and accumulates in living organisms over time. Enough small doses during a given time period can add up to a fatal dose, she said.
Cadmium is highly toxic to humans in short- and long-term exposure settings. Small concentrations ingested or inhaled can cause gastrointestinal or respiratory illness, while higher concentrations can cause cancer, cell death, neurological damage and organ system failure, according to the National Institutes of Health.
Increasing the risk from cadmium is that it can be easily spread across far distances and transfer from soil into crops, Hettiarachchi said, posing risks to humans and animals if they eat those crops.
'It could easily end up in our food,' she said. 'That has been historically the main pathway for cadmium.'
If cadmium gets into surface water or groundwater, it can become an even bigger problem, especially if that water is used for irrigation, she added.
'The area of damage can expand further and further over time,' Hettiarachchi said.
Cadmium was present at elevated levels in two of Atalco's water samples and four of LDEQ's. The highest concentration was 400% above the level considered safe in a water sample taken from an erosion channel within the perimeter of the facility. It also had high levels of chromium and lead.
All seven water samples that LDEQ had tested contained elevated levels of arsenic. One of them taken from outside the levee of a red mud lake detected arsenic at a level 9,000% higher than state and federal safe limits, and it contained high levels of cadmium, nickel and thallium. Six out of the seven samples Atalco personnel collected contained arsenic at levels beyond what is considered safe.
LDEQ has yet to address the risks Atalco's red mud runoff could pose to the community. Langley, the agency's spokesman, said it has yet to determine what the public impact might be.
'Obviously those are things we don't want going into state waterways,' Langley said.
Part Two: For some nearby residents, the levee breaches at Atalco are just the latest incident in a familiar pattern. The second story in this series reveals why the incident at Atalco was foreseeable based on the history of the plant and the many accidents and environmental exposures to the nearby communities.
'They're turning a blind eye to it,' said Gail LeBouef, who's lived near the plant since 1999.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
21-year-old Navy sailor mysteriously goes missing in Virginia
A 21-year-old Navy sailor has mysteriously disappeared in Virginia, leaving her mother desperate for answers. Angelina "Angie" Resendiz was last seen on Thursday, May 29, at 10 a.m. at her barracks in Miller Hall at Naval Station Norfolk, according to the Virginia State Police. "This disappearance poses a credible threat to their health and safety as determined by the investigating agency," police said. Resendiz, a Texas native, is a culinary specialist assigned to the USS James E. Williams, the Navy said. MORE: Manhunt continues for father police say killed 3 young daughters near Washington campground Resendiz's mother, Esmeralda Castle, insists that her daughter "does not miss work. Sick, snow, feeling down, she shows up." Resendiz joined the Navy in 2023 after high school "because she felt it was something that called her," Castle wrote to ABC News. As a culinary specialist, "She thought that one day she might be able to cook for the president and other world leaders," Castle said. "She worked really hard on her ship." "She's fun, loving, kind, compassionate, uplifting," she added. MORE: Israel recovers bodies of 2 American-Israeli hostages from Gaza "People that care about Angie shared with me that the last person she was with was missing with her," and "that person showed up Monday but not Angie," Castle said. "There are no answers for me," she said. "I just want my kid, she doesn't deserve to be missing." The Navy told ABC News in a statement that it's "cooperating fully with the investigation." The Naval Criminal Investigative Service said, "Out of respect for the investigative process, NCIS will not comment further while the investigation remains ongoing." Anyone with information is urged to call NCIS at 877-579-3648.

Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Photos: Supporters celebrated Milford teen's release from ICE custody
A Milford High School student's hand is painted with Marcelo Gomes Da Silva's number during their Division 1 second-round playoff game against Taunton on Tuesday. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Milford volleyball players stand for the national anthem before the start of their Division 1 second-round playoff game against Taunton. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Milford's Paullo Mota prays against the volleyball net at the conclusion of their Division 1 second-round playoff game against Taunton on Tuesday. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff A Milford High School student holds a cutout of Marcelo Gomes Da Silva during their Division 1 second-round playoff game against Taunton on Tuesday. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Marcelo Gomes Da Silva's mother poses for a photo in her son's bedroom in Milford. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Students weep outside Milford High School after walking out of school to protest the detention of Marcelo Gomes Da Silva on Monday. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Students embrace outside of Milford High School after walking out of school to protest the detention of Marcelo Gomes Da Silva on Monday. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff People hold American flags as they protested outside of the Town Hall in Milford. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Milford High School graduates protest outside the Town Hall a day after Marcelo Gomes Da Silva, 18, was detained by ICE on his way to volleyball practice. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff A graduate holds his cap which reads, 'No Human Is Illegal' during a protest outside Town Hall. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff A tear runs down the cheek of an 11-year-old cousin of Marcelo Gomes Da Silva as he and other community members protested outside the Milford Town Hall. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Family members of Marcelo Gomes Da Silva, who was detained by ICE on his way to volleyball practice, break down in tears during a protest held for Marcelo outside of Town Hall in Milford on Sunday. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff Graduates embrace as they protest outside the Town Hall a day after Marcelo Gomes Da Silva was detained by ICE. Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff .image { margin-top: 100px; } .image figcaption { display: block; max-width: 750px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; font-size: 18px; caption-side: bottom; line-height: 1.5; }
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court sides with Smith & Wesson, blocks Mexico's $10B suit against gunmakers over cartel violence
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a $10 billion lawsuit Mexico filed against top firearm manufacturers in the U.S. alleging the companies' business practices have fueled tremendous cartel violence and bloodshed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely shield gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. Big-name manufacturers like Smith & Wesson — which still produces guns in Springfield, Massachusetts — had appealed to the justices after a lower court let the suit go forward under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. But the justices found that Mexico hadn't made a plausible argument that the companies had knowingly allowed guns to be trafficked into the country. 'It does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the court's opinion. Mexico had asked the justices to let the case play out, saying it was still in its early stages. Asked about the case during her daily news briefing, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum pointed to another suit the country filed in 2022 against five gun shops and distributors in Arizona. 'There are two trials,' she said. 'We're going to see what the result is, and we'll let you know.' The case the Supreme Court tossed Thursday began in 2021, when the Mexican government filed a blockbuster suit against some of the biggest gun companies, including Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Colt and Glock. Smith & Wesson moved its headquarters and much of its operations from Springfield to Tennessee, but the company retains about 1,000 employees at its plant in Western Massachusetts. Operations that remain in Springfield include its forge, metal working, machining, finishing the assembly of Colt 1911-style handguns and revolver assembly. On Thursday, Mark Smith, Smith & Wesson president and CEO, said in a statement that the court's unanimous decision 'shutting down this ridiculous lawsuit' represented 'a big win for Smith & Wesson, but our industry, American sovereignty and, most importantly, every American who wishes to exercise his or her Second Amendment rights.' 'This suit, brought by Mexico in collaboration with U.S.-based anti-Second Amendment activist groups, was an affront to our nation's sovereignty and a direct attack on the constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans,' Smith said in the statement. He called it the latest attack on the firearms industry 'in a blatant abuse of our legal system to advance their anti-constitutional agenda. 'To all American patriots — you can rest assured that Smith & Wesson will always stand and fight for your constitutional rights at every turn,' Smith said. Mexico has strict gun laws and has just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States. The lawsuit claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. The companies reject Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. The trade group National Shooting Sports Foundation applauded the ruling, adding that gunmakers work with U.S. authorities to prevent gun trafficking. 'This is a tremendous victory for the firearm industry and the rule of law,' said Lawrence Keane, senior vice president and general counsel. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings. Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in which 20 first graders and six educators were killed. The families eventually secured a landmark $73 million settlement with Remington, the maker of the rifle. The Supreme Court's ruling doesn't appear to affect similar cases, said David Pucino, legal director at the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. 'All survivors, in the United States, in Mexico, and anywhere else, deserve their day in court, and we will continue to support them in their fight for justice,' he said. Read the original article on MassLive.