logo
Minorities are being blamed for failures of the UK class system

Minorities are being blamed for failures of the UK class system

The National4 days ago

Oh, there were some workers already on strike in disputes with bosses as well as government; Birmingham bin workers, for instance. Us working-class folk should be in complete solidarity with them, but they did NOT come out on strike in response to calls from fascist fans of that con man Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, who uses the alias 'Tommy Robinson'.
READ MORE: SNP call out BBC over 'unacceptable' Hamilton by-election programme
Fascists did manage to assemble in various places, but they weren't 'on strike'. The number of folk who actually went on strike in response to this ridiculous call for a 'Great British Strike' was zero.
From my point of view, it's not just Sir Kid Starver's regime that is corrupt, the entire 'United' Kingdom ruling class is a mass of corruption. There is widespread, justified anger. This was an attempt by fascists to harness that widespread anger for their own advancement. Their attempt ended in abject failure, but they will probably try again. Like all fascists, they seek to blame minorities for things that are in fact failures by the class system. The best way to defeat them is through challenging corrupt class rule with genuine working-class solidarity.
Dave Coull
Findowrie
AFTER nearly a year in office, Labour's betrayal is obvious. Like under the Tories, the poor and vulnerable are again targeted. From the winter heating debacle and failure to protect the Grangemouth refinery, to the plight of the Waspi women and the war on benefit claimants along with the fishing industry, this UK Labour Government is faltering. With fuel bills soaring, especially in Scotland, and more people going hungry, the cost of living is leaving many families unable to afford the basics.
Surely any Labour government should be targeting the billions lost each year in corporate tax avoidance and fraud. Indeed, instead of stealth taxes, a penny rise in income tax would bring in billions for the NHS, rail and roads; along with abandoning Trident, Britain's broken-down, American-owned, so-called independent nuclear deterrent.
READ MORE: Angela Rayner cancels by-election appearance amid protests
Furthermore it's actively rumoured that the UK fleet of Vanguard submarines, which carry the outdated Trident nuclear missile system only 20 minutes from Glasgow, is falling apart! These weapons of mass destruction, at huge expense, do not protect us but actually make us a target!
In truth, only a richly endowed independent Scotland (in line with happy and prosperous Nordic countries), in full control of all its assets, can progress towards a fairer, greener and prosperous nation; working with the other nations of the British Isles, Europe and the world.
Grant Frazer
Newtonmore
FOR those who have lived and practised in the 'managed decline' era of our NHS, the Auditor General of Scotland, Stephen Boyle, offered some hope this week. Against a background of continued failure of current political and senior managers to fully address excess mortality and more than half a million anxious people on waiting lists, Mr Boyle informed us this week that in order to remain 'affordable and sustainable', NHS Scotland's governance needs to be strengthened and that reform is urgently necessary.
This 'reformation' has been called for from voices in the wilderness for decades now and amounts to this. The multiple levels of a self-propagating, top-down managerialism and political interference in the goal-setting and delivery of care to the sick and the worried well by doctors and nurses has to end. In addition, the constant drain on resources by inflated and non-contributory corporate salaries on health boards and the numerous parasitic panoply of legal and consultancy gravy trains linked to 'marketisation' need to be thoroughly scrutinised by disinterested experts, namely the Scottish public!
READ MORE: Ukip plans for 'mass deportation' rally in Scotland 'pathetic'
Once again, I and my people call for an urgent national conversation in a national health convention heavily recruited from a breadth of our citizenry and not a perfunctory 'consultation' run by the politicians and so-called experts who have overseen the evolution of the present crisis.
It cannot be overstated the extent to which true national 'reformation' policies in all the domains of public services, not only the NHS, will provide a meaningful alternative to Reform UK in Scotland. In the year leading up to the Holyrood elections, I hope to see all patriotic parties provide some kind of vision for the health of the nation that heeds the Auditor General's critique of the malgovernance and mismanagement of the NHS.
The well-researched and radical work of Common Weal, the non-party-political think tank, would be a good place for policy-makers to start, and multiple freedom of information requests from individual citizens about corporate remuneration, expenses, procurement, 'time and motion' studies and legal and PR expenditure in health boards could start the 'audit' process that will begin the 'reformation' that is urgently necessary. Lives literally depend on it!
Dr Andrew Docherty
Selkirk
OUR beloved PM described the car crashing into the public in Liverpool as appalling. I've yet to hear him use that word to describe the indiscriminate bombing and starvation of a civilian population.
Jim Butchart
via email

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump attacks conservative judges, Federalist Society. Why?
Trump attacks conservative judges, Federalist Society. Why?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump attacks conservative judges, Federalist Society. Why?

"I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges," Trump said on Truth Social. "I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations." With that, Trump shifted from being a Republican president with a strong legacy of appointing conservative judges to a Republican president with a growing legacy of attacking conservative judges. That's a bad sign for any of his upcoming judicial nominations. Trump turns on conservative legal movement he helped build Trump and former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, helped deliver Republicans a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court. A significant part of that effort was The Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization that advocates for an interpretation of the Constitution that adheres to its original meaning. During his first term, Trump's judicial picks were tightly curated by adviser Leonard Leo, then the executive vice president of The Federalist Society. Most notably, all three of Trump's Supreme Court picks - Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett - all had ties to the organization. Opinion: Vance is doing his best to help Trump tear down the Supreme Court These three justices had a hand in overturning Roe v. Wade, striking down unconstitutional firearm restrictions, striking down racist affirmative action practices, curbing the power of administrative state bureaucrats and blocking much of the illegal Biden agenda. Even beyond the Supreme Court, Trump nominated 226 federal judges during his first term, many of those nominations guided by Federalist Society advisers. When did Trump start to turn on conservative judges? While the beginning of this spiral happened when the Supreme Court refused to entertain his 2020 stolen election claims, things have accelerated in his second term. Now, originalist judges have halted Trump's unconstitutional trade policy and have ruled against parts of Trump's mass deportation attempts. Even so, Trump until now was reluctant to outright condemn The Federalist Society. After all, one of the high points of his conservative agenda was his redecorating of the American courts with top-tier judges. The track record of Federalist Society judges is nothing short of a resounding victory for conservatives and the single best accomplishment of Trump's first term in office. Opinion: Elon Musk is frustrated with Republicans wasting DOGE's effort to cut. So am I. None of that matters now. Trump despises those judges because their loyalty is to the Constitution, not to him. He cannot fathom the discipline or honor required to be committed to preserving America's founding documents, rather than his own self-interest. The partnership between the conservative legal movement and Trump was always a temporary one, and Republicans in Congress had to have known that. While Republicans used Trump to reach their goals within the conservative legal movement, they made the mistake of allowing him to undermine the very accomplishments they made in his first term. Trump's future judicial nominations have judges worried Data from Notre Dame Law professor Derek Muller shows that federal judges are retiring at a record-slow pace at the beginning of Trump's second term. Just 11 vacancies have opened up since January, likely because judges are thinking twice about retiring in the face of who may replace them. Trump's first slate of judicial nominees is taking longer than it did in his first term, with confirmation hearings to take place on June 4, according to Axios. There are also fewer vacancies compared with Trump's first term, when he was handed more than 100 on Day 1 as a result of a stubborn Republican Senate majority in President Barack Obama's second term. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Trump appears to be prioritizing his supporters in his early slate of judicial picks. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, who has previously represented Trump personally, has been nominated to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Courtof Appeals and sparked some concern even among conservatives. Trump's early judicial picks will determine how comfortable more aging federal judges are with retiring under his second administration. Those committed to the Constitution are understandably worried about who may replace them, and his recent rhetoric does not help me feel better. As Trump's brand of the Republican Party drifts from most of the conservative values it once claimed to support, so too does his support for conservative legal philosophy. Now, anything that stands in the way of Trump is bad, even if it is conservative in ideology. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.

Trump tariffs are not going away amid legal battles: White House
Trump tariffs are not going away amid legal battles: White House

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump tariffs are not going away amid legal battles: White House

Lutnick predicted Trump would win on appeal. But he also referenced other tariff authorities if the higher courts agree with the trade court that Trump can't invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to bypass Congress to issue the tariffs. Trade whiplash: Appeals Court allows Trump to keep tariffs while appeal plays out "Rest assured, tariffs are not going away," Lutnick said. "He has so many other authorities that even in the weird and unusual circumstance where this was taken away, we just bring on another or another or another." In addition to the trade court's ruling, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the Trump administration from collecting tariffs from a pair of Illinois toy importers, also ruling that the same 1977 law didn't grant Trump the powers to impose tariffs as he claimed. Trump addressed the legal battles in a Sunday post on Truth Social: "If the Courts somehow rule against us on Tariffs, which is not expected, that would allow other Countries to hold our Nation hostage with their anti-American Tariffs that they would use against us. This would mean the Economic ruination of the United States of America!" Amid the tariff whiplash from the court rulings, Trump announced on May 30 that he's doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from a 25% rate to 50%. 'Nobody's going to get around that': Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50% "I think it cost us a week - maybe cost us a week," Lutnick said of the court decisions, arguing that other countries still want to make trade deals with the United States. "Everybody came right back to the table. Everybody is talking to us. You're going to see over the next couple of weeks really first-class deals for the American worker." For two months, Trump and White House officials have boasted about their prospects of using tariffs to secure trade agreements with other nations. So far, the administration has only secured a deal with the United Kingdom, in addition to a pact with China to slash massive tariffs on each other for 90 days. Trump later accused China of violating the tariff agreement on May 30, White House officials: Trump and China's Xi Jinping to speak soon, iron out trade fight Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that he expects Trump to soon talk with Chinese President Xi Jinping, expressing confidence trade issues will be "ironed out," including over critical minerals he said Beijing is refusing to open to trade. "They are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement," Bessent said. "Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman." The Chinese government said Xi has not spoken to Trump since his Jan. 20 inauguration. "I believe we'll see something very soon," Bessent said when asked whether a meeting is scheduled for Trump to talk to Xi. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

CNN poll: Americans believe neither party can get things done
CNN poll: Americans believe neither party can get things done

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

CNN poll: Americans believe neither party can get things done

Respondents held a dim view of both parties, even as 58% said that the government should do more to solve problems - a record high in over 30 years of the network's polling. The network reported that respondents were split on if either party represented the middle class, with a third saying neither did. Republicans saw a seven-point advantage over Democrats on handling the economy, the narrowest lead on the issue in the polling since 2022 and lost over half of their advantage on immigration, falling from a 14-point lead in November 2023 to a six-point lead in the new poll. The poll was conducted by SSRS online or by phone from May 5-26 among 2,539 adults across the country using a combination of online and telephone interviews. Here's what else the poll found. Neither party seen as having strong leadership, able to get things done When asked if a party had strong leaders, 40% of respondents agreed with that description for Republicans and only 36% said that they could get things done. The survey was even more pessimistic for Democrats, as only 16% of respondents said they had strong leaders and 19% said they could get things done. The response of neither won both questions with 43% and 44% respectively, despite 81% of respondents saying they saw "important differences" between the two parties. The network reported that the gap in favorability was fueled by partisan views with Republican-aligned respondents 50 points likelier than Democratic-aligned respondents to say that their party has strong leaders while the question of which party could get things done elicited a 36-point difference between partisans. Independents were particularly pessimistic about the parties, with 76% saying that neither party had strong leadership nor could get things done. Trump approval rating: Recent polls mostly steady through late May Diversity seen as positive by wide majority Just under three-quarters of respondents said that growing racial diversity does "more to enrich than threaten American culture." Objection to that view, held by 27% of respondents, was concentrated among Republican-aligned men with 45% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents calling diversity a threat - a 25% jump from 2019, according to the network. Democrats held an eight-point advantage on LGTBQ issues in the poll and a seven-point margin on race issues. Respondents saying that abortion should be legal in all circumstances hit a record high at 36% in the poll. Thirty-five percent of respondents said that abortion should be legal in "a few" circumstances while 15% said that the procedure should be legal in most circumstances.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store