
Fearing Trump ire, corporate America ditches Pride month
In the United States, every June is Pride month – commemorating the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer culture and community.
This period allows for a wide range of events, parades, marches, and discussions to take place, providing opportunities for LGBTQ individuals and their allies to come together and make their voices heard.
This year, expect fewer rainbow logos and less corporate celebration.
Despite a long track record of supporting the LGBTQ community, many companies said they would no longer participate in 'external events' such as Pride parades and are pulling their sponsorships.
This is a major pivot for the once proud corporate America who until now considered DEI efforts as essential for business success.
It comes as Donald Trump's administration cracks down on DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) programmes, transgender rights emerge as a culture-war flashpoint and Trump's tariff policy has ushered in a period of considerable economic uncertainty for companies and consumers.
Around two in five corporations have scaled back their financial contributions to Pride month, according to Gravity Research, which advises companies on social, political and reputational risks.
Examples? Mastercard isn't renewing its sponsorship of NYC Pride but said it would still participate in the event. Other traditional New York sponsors like soda and snacks maker PepsiCo and car manufacturer Nissan are not returning this year.
Banking giant Citi is not returning to sponsor NYC Pride, but plans to march there as well as in at least 30 pride events globally.
Other Pride events have also lost key sponsors including brewing and spirits groups Anheuser-Bush in St. Louis and Diageo in San Francisco.
The loss of big-name sponsors has forced Pride organisers to find alternative funding to ensure the parades take place without a hitch.
Despite corporate intentions to keep a low profile without angering customers, the Pride community is not discouraged.
'This is concerning for the LGBTQI+ community in the short term, but some companies are even doubling down on their sponsorship and support. So, I don't think this will be a long-term phenomenon,' Caleb Smith, director of LGBTQI+ Policy at the Center of American Progress, a liberal Washington-based think tank, told Euronews.
'We need to see how many of these temporary pullbacks are here to stay. I think that, in reality, the consequences will be rather limited,' she added.
57% of federal contractors plan to dial back 'external engagement' because they do not want to be caught in a publicity battle with the government, according to Gravity Research.
For example, defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, which shuttered its DEI department, dropped sponsorship of Washington's WorldPride 2025.
The star-studded festival in the American capital is one of the biggest Pride events in the country. Organizers are expecting the more than 2 million visitors to spend almost $800 million, making it a lucrative showcase for corporate sponsors.
WorldPride says the annual purchasing power of the LGBTQ community in the United States is about $1.4 trillion, and it claims global buying power three times that much. And the typical LGBTQ household's disposable income is nearly double the national average.
No wonder that what some call 'rainbow capitalism' will continue to attract dozens of blue-chip sponsors and partners to Washington's Pride event, ranging from Amazon and Hilton to Verizon and McDonald's.
'Hopefully, we can still educate consumers' on which companies to support and which not, Caleb Smith said.
A recent survey suggests that Americans broadly support the Pride marches.
A GLAAD-Ipsos poll found 70% of Americans say that knowing a company offers LGBTQ Pride merchandise either positively affects or does not impact their purchasing decisions negatively.
Slightly more – 71% – believed companies should be free to support Pride month if they choose.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
44 minutes ago
- France 24
Five Alawites found dead after being detained by Syrian security forces, war monitor says
Five men from Syria's Alawite minority were found dead in hospital two days after being detained by security forces, a war monitor said Wednesday, alleging they had been ' summarily executed '. Since the fall of longtime Syrian ruler Bashar al-Assad, the Alawite community, which he hails from, has been the target of many attacks, including sectarian massacres which killed more than 1,700 people in March. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor said the five men were going home from work in Damascus on Sunday when their bus was stopped at a checkpoint. Neighbours were initially told the men were detained by security forces and 'in good health', said the Britain-based Observatory. 'The bodies of five members of the Alawite community were found' at Al-Mujtahid hospital in Damascus, the Observatory said, adding they had been 'summarily executed' by shooting. It did not elaborate. The driver was also being treated at the hospital, the monitor said. A seventh person from the bus remains missing. The treatment of Syria's minorities is one of the biggest challenges for the Islamist-led forces that overthrew Assad in December. The international community has demanded that all components of Syrian society be included in the transition process. According to witnesses and international organisations, the March massacres saw the killings of entire families, with armed men entering homes in Syria's coast and asking residents for their religion before deciding whether to kill or spare them. While the government blamed remnants of the former regime for instigating the clashes, the presidency formed a fact-finding committee to investigate the incidents.


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
How to survive a visit to the Oval Office - a guide for leaders
The infamous meeting of Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy in February uptilted the diplomatic world. Leaders and their advisors across the globe are considering different options before visiting the Oval Office in Washington, DC. On February 28, Ukraine's president Zelenksyy had a heated argument with President Trump and Vice President JD Vance at the White House, ending with leaders raising their voices while confronting each other in an unprecedented diplomatic row in front of the television cameras. The meeting sent shockwaves across the world as diplomats attempted to work on different strategies for dealing with Trump, when it comes to bilateral meetings at the Oval Office. Now it's German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's turn for a moment in the Oval office, here are some options for him to consider when dealing with the US president. Primary advice for leaders is to bear in mind they will not have much private time with Trump: most of the discussions will be live on air, in front of the cameras. "The first thing is to be prepared for everything. I think one of the biggest challenges that we saw with President Zelenskyy was that no one in their wildest imagination could have imagined that Donald Trump would want to discuss very controversial national security issues with a rolling camera," Bruegel institute analyst Jacob Kirkegaard told Euronews. During their confrontation, Vance accused Zelenksyy of being disrespectful, while Trump reminded him he had no cards in the game. The meeting ended without signing the long-awaited mineral deal between the two sides. Another incident where the talks went south was Trump's meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in May, which saw the US president rolling suspect news footage while alleging white genocide in the country. Trump said people are fleeing the country because of violence against white farmers, played television videos and handed over a pile of newspaper articles to his counterpart. The claim was rejected by President Ramaphosa, who said the majority of victims of violence in the country are black, adding that there is no genocide in South Africa. President Ramaphosa did manage to hit back at Trump afterwards, when he lamented not having a plane to give Trump, a reference to Qatar's offer of a $400 million aeroplane to the US president. In May the US officially accepted a Boeing 747 airliner from Qatar to serve the famous Air Force One fleet of the president. The presence of cameras inevitably shift the nature of any diplomacy on display. "One of the characteristics of Donald Trump is that he's always unfiltered. He says whatever he thinks at the moment, for good or bad, right, and that obviously is not the way diplomacy between countries is normally conducted," said Kirkegaard. Mostly such conversations are kept well away from media scrutiny, according to Kirkegaard, who added: "Perhaps he feels that having a camera throws other leaders off balance." The next advice for those braving the Oval office is to shower Trump with gifts and gestures - such as that Qatari plane. The gift sparked debates and legal concerns in the US, but the Trump administration never backed down from accepting the gift. Brett Bruen, the president of the Global Situation Room and a former US diplomat told Euronews that European leaders should keep in mind that Trump is out for a prize, something that he can hold up. "It can be a flashy object and say, look, I got the biggest, the best deal, the substance doesn't really matter. Quite frankly, the strategy doesn't seem to matter very much. So this is ultimately like, how do you deal with a toddler? A toddler is constantly going to come back and say I want more, I want this new toy. Well, if I were advising European leaders, I would say have a bunch of small, shiny objects lined up and every time Trump comes and says, well, I want something else, you dole out that next shiny object to him," Bruen said. Bruegel's Kirkegaard agreed that Trump should sometimes be treated like a child. "I think you have to certainly deal with him, expecting a possible tantrum. He can be very unpredictable in a way that a child is. You clearly know he is a narcissist. So you have, if you want, to play to his ego," said Kirkegaard. Witness Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the Oval office handing the president a cartoon-sized invitation for a state visit to the UK from King Charles. "This is really special, this is unprecedented, this has never happened before," Starmer told Trump in an attempt to charm him. A strategy that can pay off, according to the expert. "Obviously, if you are the British Prime Minister, you know that Donald Trump likes the royal family, has a fondness of the UK in general, of course, you would want to exploit that. In the same way that, for instance, a former Japanese Prime Minister who was a pretty keen golfer exploited that with Donald Trump as well, who's well known for his fondness for golf," Kirkegaard said. After the disastrous Trump-Zelenskyy meeting back in February, many foreign dignitaries decided not see Trump. Asian leaders are particularly keen to avoid any nasty surprises that might spring from an encounter with the US president. Trump's temper might cause China to think twice about accepting a bilateral meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping anytime soon. "In the case of Asia, political cultures or systems have a low tolerance for the unexpected, which requires a certain formality around their political leaders. One example is China. There's no doubt that the possibility of a Xi Jinping-Trump meeting is close to zero, or probably is zero under these circumstances. Because there's simply no chance that the Chinese government will risk putting Xi Jinping in this position where something not scripted could happen. I think that applies similarly to many other Asian countries," Jacob Kirkegaard said. An exception to this rule is Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba, who had a fruitful meeting with Trump back in February, where they talked about a possible trade deal and more LNG transfer from the US to Japan. But the expert recalls that even those positive meetings will not bring results, questioning the necessity of those highly risky visits. "The reality is that there has been no breakthrough on trade deals with Japan. So the question is, why would anybody want to come? Whatever Trump agrees to, maybe or maybe not, in a bilateral meeting in the White House, might be forgotten the next day," according to Kirkegaard. "Again, go back to what happened to Keir Starmer. He thought he had a trade agreement with Donald Trump that exempted British steel exports to the US. Well, clearly he didn't have that. So, you know, it's very much for, especially countries like that in Asia, it is very high risk and essentially maybe no reward," Kirkegaard said. Visits of President Macron and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte went relatively well. In the case of Rutte this is because the US is main force in the alliance. "De facto Rutte works for Donald Trump, let's not forget that. He came, and he's basically done everything that the president would want him to do. They're working towards a 5% target for NATO defence expenditure for example," according to the Bruegel analyst. For Merz's visit on Thursday, the stakes are high. The Trump administration is highly critical of Germany. Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk supported the far-right Alternative für Deutschland in the German election campaign, and accused Germany of suppressing free speech. And Trump is also critical of the record German trade surplus. So far its not clear which attitude Merz will take towards Trump. But standing up to him might be popular in Germany. "If you're the German Chancellor, you go to the Oval Office and you hold your ground. You take a public confrontation with Donald Trump over issues, it might play well for Friedrich Merz domestically, to stand up to Donald Trump's bullying or perhaps refuting his fake news," said Kirkegaard. He said that when Macron interrupted Trump back in February, correcting the US president over European funding to Ukraine, it did him no political damage. And in the case of Zelenskyy, he even benefited domestically for not backing down. This could also be working on Friedrich Merz's mind. Competing narratives have emerged following a series of deadly incidents which reportedly took place in the vicinity of the US-Israeli backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's (GHF) food aid distribution sites in south-west Gaza. According to accounts from local Hamas-run authorities, as well as eyewitnesses and medical professionals, troops from the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) shot at and killed a number of Palestinians who were seeking to access the GHF sites in recent days. While shootings were reported near all three GHF hubs in southern Gaza, the heaviest occurred on Sunday and Tuesday at the Flag Roundabout, which is situated on a designated access route to a hub in the Tel al-Sultan district of Rafah. The UN has called for an independent investigation into the incidents, reminding Israel that it is required to facilitate humanitarian aid under international law. EuroVerify takes a look at the facts in order to build up a timeline of what we know. On Sunday, 31 Palestinians were reportedly killed by IDF shots as they attempted to access GHF distribution sites, said local Hamas-run authorities. To reach the GHF's sites in Rafah, Palestinians must walk for kilometres along a designated route, which the GHF says the Israeli military keeps secure. In statements to the public, the GHF has warned that people should stay on the road, stating that leaving it "represents a great danger." Before dawn on Sunday, thousands of Palestinians massed at the Flag Roundabout, approximately one kilometre northwest of GHF's site. By 3am, thousands had gathered and according to Palestinian witnesses, it is around this time that Israeli troops started firing at the crowd with guns, tanks and drones. NGO Médecins sans Frontières has stated that patients — who said they had been shot by Israeli forces near GHF distribution sites — began to stream into Khan Younis' Nasser hospital on Sunday morning. Another international organisation, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), declared that on Sunday, 179 adults and children bearing shrapnel and gunshot wounds arrived at the organisation's field hospital in Rafah. According to the ICRC, its medical teams declared 21 individuals dead upon arrival. Israel has denied allegations its forces opened fire on locals queuing for aid in Rafah. On Sunday the IDF branded such reports "false" in a post shared on X, stating that an initial inquiry found that its forces "did not fire at civilians while they were near or within the humanitarian aid distribution site." The GHF told EuroVerify that no incidents occurred at or in the surrounding vicinity of their distribution site on Sunday, adding that there were "no injuries, no fatalities." On Tuesday, Gaza's health ministry said Israeli forces had shot and killed at least 27 people near the GHF distribution centre. Civilians were fired at by tanks, drones and helicopters near the Flag Roundabout close to the distribution hub. Israel denies that such an incident happened and claims that it only fired warning shots at people it suspected were deviating from designated access routes to the GHF centre. "The troops carried out warning fire and after the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near individual suspects who advanced toward the troops," the IDF said in a post on X. It added that it was aware of reported casualties and that it was investigating the incident. "IDF troops are not preventing the arrival of Gazan civilians to the humanitarian aid distribution sites," the IDF said. "The warning shots were fired approximately half a kilometre away from the humanitarian aid distribution site toward several suspects who advanced toward the troops in such a way that posed a threat to them." The GHF itself said that the distribution of food was carried out without any issues within its perimeter and that it was aware of the Israeli investigation into the reported injured civilians. On Wednesday, the GHF said it had paused aid distribution and discussing measures to improve civilian safety with the Israeli military, including changes to traffic management and troop training. The body began distributing aid on 26 May, after a three-month Israeli blockade on aid entering Gaza pushed the population of more than 2 million to the brink of famine. The GHF system limits food distribution to hubs guarded by armed contractors. Of the three hubs that are open, one is in central Gaza and two are in the far south on the outskirts of the mostly uninhabited southern city of Rafah. Israel's ban on international media access to Gaza — which means that journalists must partake in an organised army press tour to enter the territory — has fuelled online speculation and renders independent on the ground verification a major challenge.


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Italian eyewear group Safilo renews contract with Kering Eyewear until 2029
Italy-based eyewear manufacturer Safilo has renewed its supply agreement with Kering Eyewear ahead of schedule. According to a company statement, the new term is set to run until 2029. See catwalk Safilo recorded sales of 285.8 million euros in the first quarter of the year, marking a 2.2% increase at constant exchange rates and a 3.1% rise at current exchange rates compared to the same period last year. 'The year 2025 got off to an encouraging start, especially in January, when North America confirmed the good signs of recovery seen at the end of 2024,' said Angelo Trocchia, Safilo's CEO.