logo
Save Loch Lomond campaign protests at Scottish Parliament over 'shameful' Flamingo Land plan

Save Loch Lomond campaign protests at Scottish Parliament over 'shameful' Flamingo Land plan

Daily Record2 days ago

Ross Greer said the Flamingo Land development would be a "scar" on the Loch Lomond landscape if it is allowed to go ahead.
Protesters have gathered at Holyrood to demand the SNP Government overturns a decision to allow a "mega resort" to be built on the banks of Loch Lomond.
Ross Greer said today it was "shameful" that Nationalist ministers have so far refused to overturn a decision by its officials to give the green light to Flamingo Land to construct a £40m tourist destination close to Balloch town centre.

The long-running planning application was initially rejected by the Loch Lomond National Park authority in September last year after thousands of public objections were received.

But that decision was overturned by the Scottish Government Reporter, subject to a legal agreement between Flamingo Land and park bosses.
Flanked by protesters outside the Scottish Parliament, the Green MSP said: "There are simply no reasons to accept this application. It would be a scar on the natural landscape of Loch Lomond, it would be devastating for the local community, and for 10 years we have successfully made that case.
"For 10 years, we have built our movement to protect Loch Lomond. At every step of the way we were succesful because the argument and the evidence were on our side.

"And now, at the very end of this process, we have a Government official overturning local democracy, overturning a decision made on an incredible weight of evidence against the application.
"We now have ministers of a Scottish Government that claims to stand up for Scotland deciding that, in this case, they simply will not do so, they will allow this destructive mega resort to go ahead.
"We say, absolutely not. We can still save Loch Lomond, Government ministers still have the opportunity to recall and reject that decision."

He added: "Appallingly, when I asked the Scottish Government planning minister if they would do that, they emphatically said no. Absolutely shameful. Scottish Government ministers not willing to stand up for Scotland's world famous natural environment."
Greer, who has led protests against the development, called on SNP ministers to intervene on the matter - following a precedent established in 2008 when Trump was permitted to build a golf course in Aberdeenshire despite being initially refused permission by the local council.

Flamingo Land have attempted to gain planning permission for their resort at Balloch for the past decade, with their first application failing in 2019.
Their latest bid was unanimously rejected by the board of Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park at a public hearing in September of last year.
This followed a campaign led by Ross Greer which collected over 155,000 individual objections to the plans, as well as objections from the National Trust for Scotland, Woodland Trust, Scottish Environment Protection Agency, the local community council and the Park's own expert planning officers.

Flamingo Land lodged an appeal against this decision shortly before Christmas, seeking to have the rejection overturned by the Scottish Government and secure consent for their plans, which include two hotels, a waterpark, over 370 car parking spaces, a hundred woodland lodges, monorail, and more.
Jim Paterson, development director for Lomond Banks, previously described the planning victory a "real milestone moment for the Lomond Banks vision, and has been a long time in the making".
He added: "Our proposals have been informed by more than two years of positive engagement with the local community and key stakeholders.
"At the heart of our plans is a commitment to sustainable investment, local jobs, and a long-term partnership with the area, backed by our legally binding Lomond Promise to ensure the future prosperity of Balloch and beyond."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No more planning applications needed for EV charging point installations
No more planning applications needed for EV charging point installations

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

No more planning applications needed for EV charging point installations

The Government has cut planning red tape to make it easier for EV drivers and businesses to install electric car chargepoints. Future of Roads Minister, Lilian Greenwood, announced drivers and businesses will no longer need to submit a planning application to install public or private EV sockets. EV owners will be able to unlock savings of up to £1,100 a year compared to running a petrol or diesel car thanks to the streamlined new process, the Government says. By cutting down on paperwork, more EV owners with a driveway will find it easier to install a home charger and power up their EVs at home. Crucially, the planning changes also apply to workplace and public chargepoints meaning businesses will be able to install new sockets faster and for less money, increasing the number of public chargepoints. Lilian Greenwood said: 'We're cutting down on paperwork to power up the EV revolution, so that drivers, businesses and those looking to make the switch will have more chargepoints to power from, and less red tape to deal with.' Department for Transport (DfT) statistics show a record of nearly 3,000 public charging devices were added in April – with one popping up every 29 minutes. Overall there are nearly 80,000 public chargepoints across the UK, with the Government helping to install 18,600 sockets in workplace carparks last year. Today's relaxation of planning process comes on top of the discounts the Government offers to drivers wanting to install chargepoints outside their house; currently people renting or owning a flat, or those with on-street parking can receive up to £350 off the cost of installing a home charger. The red tape relaxation is part of Labour's 'Plan for Change' which will see £2.3billion invested to help the switch to EVs, secure global trade deals to back British carmakers, and create jobs and drive investment. Reacting to the news, industry leaders called it a 'positive' step but pushed for more to be done to help those without driveways. Vicky Edmonds, chief executive of EVA England, embraced the 'welcome step forward' saying: 'Making it easier to install both public and private charging infrastructure is essential to helping more drivers switch to electric.' However she warned 'further action is needed' as 'drivers without driveways still face barriers to affordable, convenient charging', adding: 'We urge the Government to increase its support of the rollout of cross-pavement charging and extend legal rights to tenants and leaseholders, so all drivers can access and benefit from cheaper and more convenient charging.' Jack Cousens, head of roads policy for The AA, believes 'removing the planning rules' will help 'accelerate installations' but is concerned about grid connection. He commented: 'The crucial element is ensuring grid connection in a timely manner. This is especially important in rural locations and areas where there is no dedicated off-street parking.' Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at consumer group Which? said any measures which remove the hassle and red tape preventing homeowners and companies from installing new electric vehicle chargers is 'an important step in the right direction'. How much does charging your EV at home save you? Zapmap's price index shows that those using public charging points are paying a hefty premium to charge compared to drivers with off-street parking and home chargers. Motorists using public charge points pay up to 10 times more than home off-peak charging rates. Ultra-rapid chargers cost around £0.80 per kWh compared to just £0.08 per kWh for home off-peak charging. At the same time it was revealed that 80 per cent of EV drivers now charge at home, up from 76 per cent last year, while public charging hub usage has decreased to 29 per cent, down eight per cent from 2024.

Labour has 'given up' on Hamilton by-election, says John Swinney
Labour has 'given up' on Hamilton by-election, says John Swinney

The National

time34 minutes ago

  • The National

Labour has 'given up' on Hamilton by-election, says John Swinney

Scotland's First Minister was speaking as the campaign for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse vote entered its final weekend. With the 'crucial' vote taking place on Thursday, June 5, Swinney said backing the SNP candidate means people in the area will 'elect an MSP who will deliver on their priorities'. Labour however, insisted that the by-election – taking place after the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie – is a 'chance to call time on SNP failure and choose a new direction'. READ MORE: Police investigating 'antisemitic graffiti' in Scottish city as hate crime Jackie Baillie, the Scottish Labour deputy leader, insisted only her party can defeat the SNP despite her party's candidate's abysmally poor campaign. She said Reform UK 'can't win' the seat, while adding that she believes that the SNP 'don't deserve' to do so. Baillie (below) said: 'We can see the consequences of SNP incompetence right across this community – people languishing on NHS waiting lists, high street shops struggling to stay open, and kids not getting the education they deserve. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) 'It's clear the SNP does not deserve to win this by-election and only Scottish Labour can beat them.' She added that Reform UK, led by Farage, 'can't win here' – declaring: 'This is a direct fight between Scottish Labour and the SNP, no matter how much Reform and the SNP want to pretend otherwise.' Swinney said, 'things are really tough right now for many people, with the cost of living a real issue'. But the First Minister insisted that 'while others shout, the SNP is acting'. He pointed to the action his party is taking at Holyrood to scrap peak rate rail fares, to pay winter fuel payments to pensioners, and to end the two-child cap on some benefits – a move expected to come in next year. Swinney continued: 'Labour have let people across Scotland down, and they have quite clearly given up on this by-election. 'Thursday's vote is now a straight contest between the SNP and Nigel Farage – and I am urging people to reject the ugly, divisive politics of Nigel Farage and to unite behind the SNP.' Katy Loudon, the SNP's candidate for the seat, meanwhile, declared that if she is voted into Holyrood, she will 'get on with the job from day one'. She said: 'This by-election is an opportunity to put the priorities of people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse first, and my promise to local people is this – I will always stand with you, fight for you and deliver for you.'

£1.5bn in extra funding for military homes as part of defence review
£1.5bn in extra funding for military homes as part of defence review

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

£1.5bn in extra funding for military homes as part of defence review

The review, expected soon, will set out the money, which will be put towards work to improve housing and unlock further development. Cash will be used on urgent repairs such as fixing boilers and roofs, and other issues including tackling damp, the MoD said. Speaking on a visit to some military homes in Cambridgeshire, Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'I'm announcing through the strategic defence review a record increase – £1.5 billion in the next five years – to upgrade military family homes. 'Our forces make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe and to serve this country and yet for years, we've forced their families to live in substandard homes that you or I … just wouldn't tolerate.' He also said the review will 'recognise the fact that the world is changing, threats are increasing'. 'In this new era of threat we need a new era for defence.' It will be 'the vision and direction for the way that we've got to strengthen our armed forces to make us more secure at home, stronger abroad', he said. The strategic defence review was launched by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last year, as the Government looks to overhaul Britain's military in the face of rising global tensions. Ahead of the review, the UK has already committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product – a measure of the size of the economy – on defence from April 2027, rising to 3% during the next Parliament. Last month, the Government launched a consumer charter aimed at improving the living conditions for service personnel and their families. It commits to higher move-in standards, more reliable repairs and a named housing officer for every family. It also pledges a shorter complaints process and more freedom for families to be able to make improvements to their service homes. Liberal Democrat defence spokeswoman Helen Maguire called on the Government to go further in its pledge, by bringing military accommodation up to the decent homes standard – the minimum standards that social homes should meet. She said she was 'glad to see this Government has finally come to their senses and listened', and added: 'Those bravely defending our country deserve proper housing without leaks, mould, floods and freezing temperatures. 'But it's disappointing to see the Government refuse to commit to bring all military homes under the decent homes standard – a change the Lib Dems will continue to champion, so no military family has to suffer in a second-rate home.' Ms Maguire previously told the PA news agency that military families were 'struggling over the 80th anniversary of VE (Victory in Europe) Day', after the Government revealed it had logged 442 urgent repair requests for service family accommodation during the week which began on May 5.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store