logo
Rapid treatment prevents need for life-changing surgery for rectal cancer

Rapid treatment prevents need for life-changing surgery for rectal cancer

Yahoo28-02-2025

People with rectal cancer could be spared the need for life-changing surgery thanks to a rapid treatment that preserves healthy tissue, a clinical trial has found.
Experts at the NHS Clatterbridge Cancer Centre on the Wirral discovered that people with early-stage rectal cancer can avoid the need for a stoma and may be cured if they have a type of specialist internal radiotherapy.
The final-stage results of the global clinical trial Opera followed 141 patients for five years and found a rise in preservation rates for the rectum, from 56% with standard treatment to 79% in those given the therapy.
The technique uses contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB), combined with chemo-radiotherapy, to deliver radiation directly onto the tumour.
Each treatment application kills cancer cells layer by layer, while preventing damage to the normal, healthy bowel around the tumour.
Clatterbridge consultant Professor Sun Myint, who led the UK arm of the research, said: 'This study is a significant milestone in rectal cancer management.
'The ability to preserve organs in nearly 80% of cases without compromising bowel function or long-term quality of life is a game-changer for patients.'
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust is one of the world's leading centres for this type of treatment for rectal cancer.
Prof Myint said the treatment meant patients could avoid a colostomy – an operation to bring part of the bowel through an opening in the stomach to form a stoma, which collects the body's waste in a bag.
He said: 'For many patients, the prospect of a permanent colostomy is life-changing.
'This technique not only spares the organ but also preserves dignity and quality of life.'
He said the study findings showed that bowel function was not worsened by the CXB boost, showing it is a safe and effective treatment option.
He said: 'These results should encourage wider adoption of contact X-ray brachytherapy as part of standard care for eligible patients.
'It's a beacon of hope for those battling rectal cancer.'
Prof Myint said he hopes CXB can also be used in other cancers.
Sharon Price, 51, who works in the NHS caring for lung cancer patients, was 45 and recently married when she was given the devastating news that she had rectal cancer. She was given the all-clear after the study.
She said: 'I was faced with the possibility of surgery, which would mean that I'd have to live with a stoma for the rest of my life.
'That was devastating – I was just too young to have to go through that and live with the consequences of how it can change what you're able to do.
'Many people do live with a stoma but for me, there would be no reversal of it, and I found it very difficult to contemplate that.
'I was offered the chance to join the clinical trial and I decided to do it immediately.
'It gave me the chance not to have invasive surgery, but if it did not work, I could still have that standard treatment.'
Mrs Price, who lives in Newcastle-under-Lyme in Staffordshire, had three rounds of CXB before 25 sessions of standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
This eradicated her cancer and it was followed up with intensive monitoring for three years before she was given the all-clear.
She said: 'I'm so glad I went for it. The Opera trial has meant I have had a normal, healthy life after being diagnosed with cancer.
'It has had no lasting impact on my life – and I wonder if that would have been the case if I had not joined the research.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should people be paid to donate blood? Yahoo readers have their say
Should people be paid to donate blood? Yahoo readers have their say

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Should people be paid to donate blood? Yahoo readers have their say

Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers. The NHS is urging people to come forward as blood donors, saying there is a "critical" need for certain blood types. On Monday this week, officials said 200,000 more donors were needed in England to maintain the blood supply. Low blood stocks prompted officials to issue an 'amber alert' over supply for hospitals last year and NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said more must be done to avoid a 'red alert'. The blood type most in demand is the so-called universal blood type — O negative blood — needed for treatment in emergencies. There is also a need for more Black donors, who are more likely to have specific blood types that can help treat people with sickle cell disease. In our poll earlier this week, we asked Yahoo readers if they thought an incentive could attract more donors and posed the question: Should people be paid for donating blood? Two thirds of respondents to our poll (66%) thought no, blood donations should be voluntary. Some 29% thought yes, people should be paid, while a further 5% were undecided. We also asked, 'How much would prompt you to donate blood?' The vast majority of respondents (70%) said they were happy to do it for free. Of those who stated an amount, the most popular options were smaller sums, 8% said a value up to £20 would tempt them, while a further 8% cited a payment between £21 and £40. Only 5% said an amount of £100 or more would prompt them to donate. The poll's Have Your Say feature attracted some passionate comments, with a number of readers citing safety concerns as one of the reasons they didn't agree with payment for donations. Stephen A from Westbury, said: "I don't think it is a good idea to pay people for blood donations because we could have a similar situation to the blood scandal in the seventies. People who had all sorts of illnesses and drug-related problems sold their blood and created an unnecessary health problem for otherwise healthy individuals." Richard S from the Highlands agreed, saying: "Payment for blood will attract many short of money because they have taken drugs." Some readers even said payment would prevent them from donating. "I decided to become a blood donor when my wife was admitted to hospital in the last month of pregnancy," said Ian H from Hinckley. "I have now completed 104 donations … If I was told at that first donation that I would be paid, I would not have continued." However, some including Lenny T from Kent, said they agreed with payments for donation. "If it means more people will donate blood, it will help hospitals and doctors," they explained. Others said there were better ways to attract more donors, such as making the opening times and locations of donor centres more convenient, as well as increasing the age limit for giving blood, which currently stands at 65. "Those who donate do so for the best of reasons, to help others. it is a privilege to be able to help those in desperate need, and I was glad to be able to do so," said HMW from the Scottish Highlands. "I wish they would take blood from older folk – I'm late 60s – even if they have some health issues. If their iron is okay and you are not on life-saving meds, and are a universal donor – group O – it would help in crisis situations. I would love to be able to do something so useful beyond retirement." Denise D who lives in Italy said that convenience was an issue. "My daughter tried to give blood, she's donated for a long time. She tried to get another appointment, the first available appointment was three months later and 30 miles away," she said. "There need to be more collection points and nearer city centres." N Anderson from Worcestershire agreed saying: "Maybe the service should come to local villages, as they used to, asking people to travel to main towns with transport and parking charges is not on." Read more of Yahoo UK's Poll of the Week articles

Left Waiting and Losing Hope – How One Patient Found Relief Through Releaf UK When the NHS Couldn't Help
Left Waiting and Losing Hope – How One Patient Found Relief Through Releaf UK When the NHS Couldn't Help

Time Business News

time4 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Left Waiting and Losing Hope – How One Patient Found Relief Through Releaf UK When the NHS Couldn't Help

Every weekday, almost 13,000 new mental-health referrals land on NHS desks across the United Kingdom—far more than stretched community teams can absorb. For the people behind those forms the delay is not abstract: it means panic attacks unchecked, sleep lost, jobs at risk and, in the worst cases, lives cut short. This article follows one such patient and examines why catching psychiatric illness early is not only humane but also a hard-nosed economic imperative. Britain's Growing Mental-Health Backlog NHS England processed a record 4.6 million mental-health referrals last year, with typical waits of 12 weeks for an assessment and, in some counties, up to 18 months for specialist talking therapies. The Royal College of Psychiatrists warns that one in three people referred for depression will spiral into crisis if left untreated for more than three months. Behind every statistic is a household coping with sleepless nights, cancelled plans and mounting uncertainty. The Cost of Delay: Survival Rates Under Pressure Timely care can be the difference between recovery and tragedy. A Lancet meta-analysis tracking 34,000 adults found that evidence-based treatment within six weeks of diagnosis cut suicide attempts by 45 percent over two years. For first-episode psychosis, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence reports a 50 percent improvement in five-year survival when therapy begins within 14 days of referral. These findings highlight how crucial timeliness is to well-being in healthcare, as every extra week on the waiting list chips away at a patient's odds of staying alive. Productivity on the Line: Why Business Leaders Should Care Delays also drain the balance sheet. Deloitte's 2024 UK Mental-Health Report calculated that poor mental health cost employers £59 billion in absenteeism, presenteeism and staff turnover—nearly £1,800 per employee. Organisations that installed early intervention programmes, such as on-site counselling or rapid referral partnerships, saw an average 5:1 return on investment. In manufacturing alone, stress-related absences translate to 12.7 million lost working days each year—enough to halt the entire aerospace sector for four straight weeks. Emma's Story: Fourteen Months in Limbo Emma Hughes, a 29-year-old graphic designer from Leicester, illustrates the human toll. After a sudden bereavement she developed severe anxiety, intrusive thoughts and chronic insomnia. Her GP referred her for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), but the confirmation letter warned of a '40–60-week wait.' Deadlines slipped; sick notes piled up; her self-confidence collapsed. 'Each morning started with a panic attack,' she remembers. By month ten she had exhausted paid leave and faced redundancy. 'I felt invisible—like no one believed how bad it was.' Discovering an Alternate Route Searching for private options, Emma found Releaf's psychiatric care pathway ( a Care Quality Commission-registered clinic offering multidisciplinary assessments within days. Unlike many self-pay services that focus narrowly on prescriptions, Releaf pairs consultant psychiatrists with therapists, nutritionists and sleep specialists. Emma's team designed a stepped-care plan: CBT delivered over secure video, structured sleep-hygiene coaching and, when conventional anxiolytics caused intolerable side-effects, a physician-supervised trial of adjunctive cannabis therapy—a form of cannabinoid treatment tailored to her needs. Six weeks later her sleep stabilised at seven hours a night; by week twelve she had returned to 80 percent of her billable workload. Data on Early Intervention and Workplace Recovery Emma's rapid turnaround echoes wider research. The Centre for Mental Health shows that people receiving comprehensive care within two months of diagnosis are twice as likely to hold a full-time job a year later compared with those who wait more than six months. Replacement costs compound the burden: the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development pegs the expense of replacing a professional-level employee at £30,600, excluding lost expertise. Early psychiatric care therefore functions as a productivity safeguard, not merely a welfare spend. The Emerging Role of Complementary Therapies Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) remain first-line for many disorders, yet growing evidence supports multimodal strategies that include exercise, nutrition and—in specialist settings—medical cannabis for mental health. NICE already endorses cannabinoid medicines for refractory epilepsy and chemotherapy-induced nausea, and pilot studies are exploring benefits for anxiety-related insomnia. For patients like Emma, whose genetics or side-effects rule out standard pharmacology, these adjuncts can mean the difference between chronic disability and daily function. What Swift Access Could Mean for the UK Economy If the NHS achieved its own 28-day referral-to-treatment goal for common mental disorders, economists at the Institute for Public Policy Research estimate a productivity gain of £7.4 billion annually—enough to fund 35,000 additional psychiatric nurses. Meeting that benchmark will require a mixed-economy model in which accredited private providers, including specialized facilities like an addiction treatment center, absorb overflow demand and employers view mental-health budgets as investments. Releaf's rapid-access pathway shows how nimble, multidisciplinary care can slot into that ecosystem, sparing patients the agony of delay and easing pressure on public services alike. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Entrepreneur UK's London 100: DrDoctor
Entrepreneur UK's London 100: DrDoctor

Entrepreneur

time5 hours ago

  • Entrepreneur

Entrepreneur UK's London 100: DrDoctor

DrDoctor has become one of the most trusted healthtech partners to the NHS, transforming how millions of patients access and manage their care. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Industry: Healthcare Tom Whicher, CEO and founder of DrDoctor, is driving the shift to hybrid healthcare across the NHS – blending technology with human care. Under Tom's leadership, DrDoctor has become one of the most trusted healthtech partners to the NHS, transforming how millions of patients access and manage their care. Founded in 2012, the company connects fragmented systems across hospitals, community services, and patients to power a hybrid model. Today, DrDoctor manages over 140m appointments for 36m patients and is trusted by more than 70 NHS organisations, covering 64% of the country. It has delivered £100m of value to the health system in the UK. In 2024, Tom launched DrDoctor's Smart Centre, powered by AI – a set of pioneering products that predict which patients are most at risk of missing appointments and dynamically optimises clinic capacity through targeted, automated interventions. Early results have shown that Smart Centre reduces missed appointments by 30%. The team has grown by 45% over the past year to 146 people, fuelled by a £10m investment round led by YFM Equity Partners. With 2023 revenues exceeding £10m and a current valuation of £80m, DrDoctor is delivering both commercial success and system-level change against a backdrop of NHS reform.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store