‘Total shock': Singapore actress Eleanor Lee says leaked anti-China hot mic isn't her
SINGAPORE, May 12 — Singaporean actress Eleanor Lee has addressed the public backlash following a leaked audio clip that allegedly featured her making derogatory remarks about Chinese nationals.
The controversy erupted after a 30-second recording was shared on Weibo last month by a netizen claiming to be Lee's former assistant.
In the audio, a woman can be heard saying, 'I'm doing this not for fame, but for money,' and 'most people in China are idiots.'
On Saturday, Lee took to social media to clear the air and apologise for the turmoil caused.
She expressed her shock upon hearing the recording, stating, 'I'm sorry to have caused so much controversy and taken up public resources. I was very shocked when I heard the recording. This was definitely not what I said.'
The 25-year-old actress, who is the daughter of Singaporean TV host Quan Yifeng and actor Peter Yu, explained her delay in responding, saying, 'As to why I did not immediately stand up [to the allegations] is because we were still sorting out the facts, hoping to give everyone a satisfactory answer.'
She further emphasised her long-standing connection to China, having spent nearly half her life there.
'I'm now 26 and have spent close to half my life in China. Here, I've received many opportunities and have been able to shine in a career that I love. I have absolute love and gratitude towards this land,' Lee said.
The actress, who gained prominence in China after starring in an Apple China commercial in 2015, has built a successful career across Chinese TV series such as Solas Bistro (2017), My Poseidon (2019), and My Love, Enlighten Me (2020).
Her role in the 2020 film The Enchanting Phantom, a remake of the 1987 classic A Chinese Ghost Story, also garnered significant attention.
However, the recent scandal has affected her future projects.
Lee was reportedly set to star in the upcoming Chinese period drama The Journey of Legend, based on a novel by Malaysian author Woon Swee Oan.
Filming for the series wrapped up in October 2024, but following the uproar, Lee's name has allegedly been removed from the cast list.
While the official premiere date remains unannounced, fans are speculating that the controversy may have impacted the show's release.
Lee's statement concludes with a commitment to proving her character through her actions.
'I also hope to prove my attitude with my actions and I welcome everyone to examine them moving forward,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How China wins in the new propaganda war
American influencers are flooding China to show off its technology and culture — while the US has expelled the world's most-followed TikToker. A new Chinese initiative will pay for US influencers to visit and collaborate with local counterparts, according to Chinese state media, which said the program would boost cultural exchange. It's an investment in soft power and a propaganda coup: State outlets praised recent visits from Western influencers like IShowSpeed (whose six-hour YouTube video on his Shenzhen visit has nearly 9 million views) for showcasing 'authentic' life in China, Bloomberg wrote. The US' immigration crackdown, meanwhile, is pushing out influencers. The Italian citizen Khaby Lame, the world's most popular TikToker, was recently detained by US authorities and left the country after being reported by a rival influencer who is friends with President Donald Trump's son Barron.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why the Warner Bros. Discovery merger was doomed from the start
Warner Bros. Discovery's split is the latest proof that conglomerates are deeply out of fashion. Glomming diverse operations together smooths out profits through business cycles. It mutualizes economic risk. But it also mutualizes scandal, tainting a corporate empire with the real or perceived sins of one subsidiary. And with President Donald Trump looking for points of leverage, corporate sprawl is a real liability. ABC, CBS, CNN, and MSNBC are blips on the bottom lines of Warner Bros., Disney, Paramount, and Comcast. But they're lightning rods for controversy — Trump has sued two of those channels and complains constantly about the other two — and suck up executives' time and attention. News channels were never cash cows, but at least they were trophy assets that were fun to own. Not so much these days. It's not just the president: These companies' broad footprints leave no easy choices in the culture wars. Hollywood talent, middle-America cruise passengers, coders building streaming apps, and the guy installing your cable all get mad about different things. Conglomerates have lots of ways to get in trouble. This isn't entirely a new problem. In 1996, Martin Scorsese was shopping a movie about the Dalai Lama. Universal Studios, which was owned by Seagram at the time, passed. 'I don't need to have my spirits and wine business thrown out of China,' then-CEO Edgar Bronfman said. His fears were well-founded, and a preview of what we're seeing now: Disney made the movie, and landed on a Chinese blacklist that threatened the opening of its Shanghai theme park. Breakups like those announced by Warner Bros. Discovery and Comcast might be freeing for both sides. The next time Trump criticizes MSNBC, he can't threaten Comcast with (hypothetically) OSHA agents descending on Universal Orlando. Mark Lazarus, who will run Comcast's new cable spinoff, will be more exposed to political pressure without a corporate parent. But he can decide what to put on MSNBC without wondering what it will do to Harry Potter theme parks. For the second time in seven years and the third time this century, a company that bought the Warner Bros. entertainment empire wishes it had not. Failures to foresee tectonic changes — and the lure of media moguldom — has turned one of the most storied names in Hollywood into a dealmaking albatross. The split unwinds the 2022 merger of CNN and HBO owner WarnerMedia with Discovery, a jumble of cable channels offering humbler fare. It was a bet that content companies needed to be bigger to compete with Netflix, and that consumers would want to watch , Anderson Cooper's war zone dispatches, and in the same place. Its previous owner, AT&T, bought what was then called Time Warner in 2018 for about $100 billion, including debt, and almost immediately regretted it. In 2021, it struck a deal to sell it to Discovery for a package of cash and stock worth about $43 billion — a roughly $40 billion writedown (AT&T has disputed the latter number.) Go back further, and its predecessor was party to what is widely considered the worst corporate merger in history, the union of AOL and Time Warner in 2001. The M&A math is a bit hard to decipher, but a business worth around $100 billion to AT&T seven years ago is now roughly half of Warner Bros. Discovery, which trades at $24 billion today. It's not even the good half: Cable is in long-term decline, and CEO David Zaslav's parting gift to SpinCo is a 20% stake in the more valuable studio and streaming businesses that will stay behind. Why do companies keep getting this so wrong? After all, Netflix launched its streaming service in 2007, and Bob Iger first sounded the alarm about cord-cutting in 2015. AOL presaged the confluence of tech and media, but broadband killed dial-up and the dot-com bubble burst. AT&T, too, was onto something when it aimed to deliver shows directly to people's phones. But it was outmaneuvered by nimbler streamers, slowed down by a creaking debt load, culture clashes, and the Justice Department. Tech giants like Amazon have paid up for sports rights, a key part of the cable bundle. The result is a cable business melting faster than bosses expected. The winner in all this? Rupert Murdoch, who agreed to sell 21st Century Fox — a collection of cable channels plus a movie studio, more or less identical to Warner Bros. — to Disney for $71 billion in 2017, at what would prove to be the top. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dan David Prize names 9 historians as winners of 2025 award
JERUSALEM (AP) — The Dan David Prize will award nine historians, archaeologists and filmmakers from around the world with $300,000 for their research, the foundation announced Tuesday. The award winners are researching a vast array of topics, from the notebook of Isaac Newton's roommate to the history and culture of Ethiopian Jews. The academics recently received the prize during a ceremony in Italy. The prize, based at Tel Aviv University, is awarded each year to academics in the early and middle stages of their careers who are conducting 'innovative research on the human past.' 'By making groundbreaking discoveries or applying new methods to historical research, our winners constantly challenge us to think about the past while rethinking how we shed light on it,' said Ariel David, whose father, Dan David, founded the prize in 2001. One of the winners is Beth Lew-Williams of Princeton University, a historian whose work has focused on how legal discrimination impacted Chinese immigration to the US and the experience of Chinese immigrants. Another is Fred Kudjo Kuwornu of Do The Right Films, a filmmaker whose work focuses on Black representation and identity. His recent film, We Were Here: The Untold History of Black Africans in Renaissance Europe, was presented at the 2024 Biennale in Venice. Another awardee is Dmitri Levitin of the University of Utrecht and All Souls College, Oxford, a history of scholarship who is collaborating on research into the newly discovered notebook of Isaac Newton's university roommate. Other winners are Abidemi Babatunde Babalola of the British Museum, Mackenzie Cooley of Hamilton College, Bar Kribus of Tel Aviv University, Hannah Marcus, Harvard University, Alina Șerban, Founder of Untold Stories, and Caroline Sturdy Colls, University of Huddersfield. Among the ranks of past winners are Canadian author Margaret Atwood, the cellist Yo-Yo Ma and Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. infectious disease expert. The award was originally launched to focus on academic work that rewarded humanity. It has since shifted to focus specifically on those who study the past, with the idea that the prize will greatly enhance their research abilities.
