
Defying Grim Prognosis to Celebrate a 20th ‘Cancerversary'
In 2005, Roy Brosgole, then 38, was a busy working parent. He commuted about an hour each way to a teaching job in New York City and took care of his children — then 4 years and almost 2 years — in the evenings. His lifestyle then kept him sitting in the car for hours daily, so it didn't surprise him that his back often ached.
One morning Brosgole got up, went to the bathroom, coughed, and then found himself lying flat on the floor in blinding pain. After he tried and failed to stand, his wife Lori called 9-1-1.
In the emergency room, Brosgole was triaged and — without any imaging — diagnosed with back spasms. He recalled that the attending physician ordered a strong steroid and pain meds, but neither of these treatments helped relieve the intense discomfort.
'The doctor said, 'Wow that's really strange. You should be able to get up and walk around now.' I said, 'Well, I can't.' The doctor's exact words — I will never forget them: 'Don't worry about it. It's not like you have back cancer or anything,' Brosgole recalled, in an interview.
A few days later, an MRI ordered by Brosgole's orthopedist would prove the emergency room physician's statement wrong. The imaging of Brosgole's back showed a plasmacytoma on his sacrum, which doctors told him could be a precursor to multiple myeloma or lymphoma.
'The tumor was growing into the sacrum like Swiss cheese,' Brosgole said.
He then consulted Patrick Boland, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in New York City. His appointment fell on a Tuesday, he was admitted immediately, and his tumor was removed the next day. Brosgole was diagnosed with IgG kappa multiple myeloma, International Staging System stage II.
His myeloma carried two chromosomal abnormalities, deletion 13 and deletion 17p, both associated with aggressive disease and poorer long-term prognosis. Brosgole's condition was designated as high risk, so he was told he might have only a few years to live.
Fast forward to 2025, as Brosgole is celebrating his 20-year 'cancerversary.' He credits his survival to clinical trials and new standards of care for myeloma.
Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Transplants: Finding a Balance
Multiple myeloma was fairly uncommon in 2005, when Brosgole was diagnosed. Today, the disease is more prevalent but still rare. About 36,000 people will be diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2025— 20,030 men and 16,080 women. The disease currently has a 62% 5-year survival rate. When Brosgole was diagnosed, the 5-year survival rate was 56% for patients younger than 65 years and significantly lower for people with chromosomal deletions, like him.
Once the tumor was excised, Brosgole was put on a regimen of dexamethasone and thalidomide, alternating 4 days on and 4 days off. The treatments brought his cancer markers down significantly, but his doctors, noting that he was young and otherwise healthy, offered him the chance to participate in a clinical trial of tandem stem cell transplants. The study would assess if such treatment could improve long-term survival as compared with a single autologous stem cell transplant.
The first transplant took place in November 2005, with Brosgole's doctor harvesting his stem cells. Next, he underwent high-dose chemotherapy. Just 3 months later, in February 2006, he went through the entire process again. That treatment was successful for 18 months, he said.
'Then all of a sudden, my numbers — M spike protein levels, immunoglobulins, protein electrophoresis — started to climb,' Brosgole said.
When his MSKCC oncologist agreed that he had relapsed, Brosgole was started on a new intravenous chemotherapy cocktail of Velcade (bortezomib) and Revlimid (lenalidomide) with dexamethasone. That treatment worked for a while, too. His tumor markers stayed stable for nearly a year, but his MSKCC care team wanted to add another treatment: Allogenic bone marrow transplant. That procedure took place in May 2011.
In the years since then, Brosgole's cancer has often recurred, but donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) have brought him back into remission.
'I had 10 DLIs: December 2011, April 2012, September 2012, March 2013, November 2013, January 2014, August 2015, September 2015, and November 2015,' Brosgole noted. He was also given an immunomodulatory agent, lenalidomide, which he took until March 2021. Then he transitioned to a different immunotherapy drug, Pomalyst.
Today Brosgole has no detectible levels of multiple myeloma in his body. 'If you do a blood test, there's no way you could tell that I ever had multiple myeloma,' he said.
Treatment for Multiple Myeloma: 2025
When you look back at Brosgole's earlier treatments, they differ significantly from today's standard of care, said Hamza Hashmi, MD, a hematologist-oncologist at MSKCC. Hashmi, Brosgole's current doctor, said that allogenic bone marrow transplant comes with the risk for graph-vs-host disease.
'The mortality rate of allogeneic transplant procedures is somewhere around 30-40%,' Hashmi explained. 'Back in 2011, we were pursuing heroic measures for patients like Roy in their 40s, hoping to put myeloma into a deep and durable remission. Someone who is diagnosed today with multiple myeloma would start with a four-drug cocktail of chemotherapy — combinations of chemo and immunotherapies that target the cancer in a very intuitive way that can actually lead to very deep, durable remissions.'
If patients relapse, they move on to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, which was first FDA-approved in 2017 for treatment of acute childhood lymphoblastic leukemia. 'It has shown very promising efficacy, with very tolerable or minimal toxicity or side effects, in comparison to the allogenic transplant, which can be very difficult to go through, especially if a patient is elderly, frail, or has many different comorbidities,' Hashmi explained.
Other drugs on the horizon may push the needle even further. One new drug, teclistamab, is already helping patients who have stopped responding to three previous therapies or treatments. A phase 2 clinical trial, published in The New England Journal of Medicine in June 2022, found that nearly 40% of study patients saw complete eradication of their disease.
In addition, monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab are added to the standard-of-care drug combinations. Finally, bispecific antibody drug treatments, which recognize antigens on both the patient's T-cells and the myeloma cells, are shrinking tumors for people who stop responding to other treatments. Unlike CAR T-cell therapy, which requires removal and manipulation of the patient's T cells, bispecific antibody treatments are available immediately.
These innovative treatments have transformed life expectancy, Hashmi said. 'In 2025 we are saying that average survival for a myeloma patient is beyond 15-20 years. And when I say survival, I mean a 70-year-old man, so you can imagine if someone is 40 years old when they get diagnosed, they may actually be able to live another 30-plus years of their life with their cancer in control and remission,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Euthanasia activist arrested over 'suicide pod' dies
A pro-euthanasia activist who was arrested following the death of a woman using the world's first so-called suicide pod has died. Dr Florian Willet, 47, was reportedly the only other person present when a 64-year-old American woman took her own life using the device in a forest in Switzerland last September. The pod's inventor Philip Nitschke told BBC News that Dr Willet died by assisted suicide in Germany. In a separate statement, Mr Nitschke said Dr Willet had suffered psychological trauma following his arrest and detention in connection with the Switzerland death. If you are experiencing any of the issues mentioned in this story you can visit BBC Action Line for a list of websites and helplines that can offer direct help at any time. "In the final months of his life, Dr Florian Willet shouldered more than any man should," he said. The Last Resort - an assisted dying organisation founded by Dr Willet to facilitate the use of the pod - said the arrest had left him "broken". The activist was held in pre-trial detention for 70 days while police investigated whether he had intentionally killed the woman - an allegation he was not charged with. Prior to his death on 5 May, Dr Willet fell from a third-floor window, the group said, leaving him requiring surgery and needing to be "cared for by a full psychiatric team". While assisted dying is legally protected in some circumstances in Switzerland, it is strictly regulated, and the pod has encountered opposition. Advocates say the device - manufactured by Sarco - provides an assisted dying option which is not reliant on drugs or doctors and expands potential access. Critics fear the device's modern design glamorises suicide, and that the fact that it can be operated without medical oversight is concerning. Assisted dying is illegal in the UK and in most other European countries, but thousands have travelled to Switzerland over the years to end their own lives. BBC News has contacted the Swiss prosecutor's office for comment.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
He Helped a Woman Die in a 'Suicide Pod' — Now the Controversial Advocate Has Died by Suicide Himself
Florian Willet was arrested after a 64-year-old American woman died using the 3D-printed Sarco suicide pod in Switzerland Prosecutors briefly suspected Willet of strangulation, but the allegation was later dropped and he was released without charges Willet died by assisted suicide in May 2025 following months of legal scrutiny and reported psychological trauma from the caseMonths after an American woman's family sued over her controversial death inside a 3D-printed "suicide pod," the Swiss euthanasia activist who helped make it possible has taken his own life. Florian Willet, the 47-year-old president of Swiss right-to-die organization The Last Resort, died on May 5 in Cologne, Germany with the help of a specialized organization, according to The Times UK, SwissInfo and The New York Post. Willet's death comes months after he was arrested and held in pre-trial detention for 70 days in connection with the controversial suicide of a 64-year-old American woman in Switzerland, according to the outlets. The woman, whose name has not been released, died in a remote forest cabin in Merishausen after entering the "Sarco pod" — a sleek-futuristic nitrogen filled capsule that had been promoted by Willet's organization as a "peaceful" way to die. The woman's family later filed a lawsuit against Willet and his organization, questioning the circumstances surrounding her death and the legal and ethical oversight — or lack thereof — in her use of the pod, per the outlets. Swiss prosecutors eventually declined to press international homicide charges, but initially accused Willet of assisting in the woman's suicide without proper authorization and subjected him to months of investigation and public scrutiny, the outlets reported. They initially suspected Willet of intentional homicide after discovering marks on the woman's neck, which led to his arrest, per the outlets. However, the strangulation allegation was later dismissed, and Willet was released from detention in December 2024. After his release, the Schaffhausen public prosecutor's office announced that there was no suspicion of homicide in the case. However, they said that there was a "strong suspicion of inciting and assisting suicide." It is illegal to encourage a person to take their own life for "selfish motives," such as financial gain, in Sweden. Self-publicity could also be considered a selfish motive, lawyers told The Times. Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases. Philip Nitschke, the Australian activist and founder of Exit International who invented the pod, said in a statement on The Last Resort's website that Willet was "broken" after his time behind bars: "When Florian was released suddenly and unexpectedly from pre-trial detention in early December 2024, he was a changed man. Gone was his warm smile and self-confidence," Nitschke said. 'In its place was a man who was deeply traumatized by the experience of incarceration and the wrongful accusation of strangulation.' The statement said that Willet had been suffering from "acute polymorphic psychotic disorder" — according to the National Institute of Health, the disorder is characterized by a mixture of sudden-onset symptoms, including hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized behavior. Switzerland is among few countries where foreigners can travel to legally end their lives via assisted suicide, but Swiss officials have not yet approved the Sarco pod for the original article on People


Scientific American
6 hours ago
- Scientific American
Government Layoffs Could Make It Easier to Scrap Heat Safety Rules
CLIMATEWIRE | When federal regulators were crafting a first-ever proposal to protect workers from extreme heat, they relied on government health experts who had been working on the deadly effects of high temperatures for years. Now that entire team is gone due to President Donald Trump's personnel purges. It comes ahead of summertime heat waves that are intensifying because of climate change, raising the stakes for the 2024 draft heat rule that took decades to propose and whose fate now rests in the hands of an administration that is eviscerating climate programs. Extreme heat kills more U.S. residents annually than all other disasters. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The heat experts have been fired, placed on leave or forced out at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, an agency within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The agency, called NIOSH, was the first one to sound the alarm on the dangers that heat poses to workers. It recommended safety regulations in 1975, decades before the Occupational Safety and Health Administration proposed the nation's first heat rule last year. The entire heat team at NIOSH was pushed out of the agency this spring, along with hundreds of experts who were studying other issues, as part of a massive reorganization at the Department of Health and Human Services under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The layoffs, which take effect this week, come as climate change supercharges temperatures, blanketing the nation in suffocating heat every summer. The personnel purge could also hamstring OSHA at the Department of Labor, as the agency considers whether to move forward with finalizing the heat rule under Trump or ditch it. Preserving it promises to be harder without the heat experts. 'The ability to reach out to experts and work together and solve problems and keep people safe in an efficient manner — that's not going to be possible when you have an agency turned into Swiss cheese,' said Doug Parker, who led OSHA during the Biden administration. Lawsuits have brought back some NIOSH staffers who work mostly on coal mining and firefighting projects, or who test respirators and other personal protective equipment. Some of them have heat expertise in those industries. But most NIOSH heat experts — including those who work with the farming and construction sectors, which see the most heat-related deaths, and those who specifically examine heat as a hazard — have not returned to their jobs. The agency has also stopped all public communications on heat, just before summer threatens to bring suffocating temperatures. In the past, the agency would use social media campaigns and in-person presentations with employers to raise awareness about the dangers of heat. None of that has happened. Its social media accounts have been silent since April 1, when HHS told its workforce of the layoffs. 'If it stays the way it is right now, no one is going to be doing heat,' said one NIOSH worker who came back to the agency after being laid off and was granted anonymity to speak frankly. 'Very open line of communication' Congress created NIOSH in 1970 — by passing the same law that enacted OSHA — to 'develop and establish' safety standard recommendations for regulators. NIOSH had the experts, and OSHA had the regulators. In the 50 years since the agency initially advocated for a heat safety standard, it has made similar recommendations two other times, most recently in 2016. Because NIOSH has been at the forefront of identifying heat as a danger to workers, its experts have also been the preeminent researchers on the issue. The agency has conducted research into how electrolyte drinks compare to water when rehydrating workers and how protective equipment can make workers hotter than if they were only exposed to ambient air. It has also helped determine how to measure what heat truly feels like in work environments. When OSHA finally proposed national heat protections last summer, it cited its sister agency's work more than 250 times. The regulation would require employers to provide water and rest breaks to workers when heat rises above 80 degrees and paid rest breaks when temperatures exceed 90 degrees. 'We had a very open line of communication to discuss any questions they had while working on the regulation,' said one NIOSH worker who was laid off and was granted anonymity to speak frankly. Almost every aspect of the proposed rule has a citation that leads back to NIOSH, from the definitions of heat stress, to the explanation of how heat affects the human body, to a description about how hydration helps prevent heat-related dangers. 'We really fostered a strong relationship with NIOSH and it was at a peak level, so it is a tragedy what has happened,' said Parker, the former OSHA leader. As the layoffs take effect this week, it could complicate OSHA's consideration of the heat rule. In mid-June, the agency is scheduled to hold a weekslong hearing to let the public weigh in on the draft regulation. Normally, when worker advocates and industry representatives testify at OSHA hearings, agency staff is able to ask follow-up questions that can help shape the outcome. It's unclear if NIOSH experts — those who still have jobs — will testify at the hearing. Neither HHS nor the CDC responded to questions about expert testimony. HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said Kennedy "has been working hard to ensure that the critical functions under NIOSH remain intact." "The Trump administration is committed to supporting coal miners and firefighters, and under the secretary's leadership, NIOSH's essential services will continue as HHS streamlines its operations," she said. "Ensuring the health and safety of our workforce remains a top priority for the department." 'They are neutral' Parker said holding a public hearing, and continuing the heat rulemaking, without NIOSH experts would be like prosecutors trying to convict a murderer without having the testimony of a medical examiner. 'It's like going to trial without your expert witness,' he said. 'They are neutral; they help review not only the content of the rule, but the comments of other advocates and industries. It's a well you can go to again and again.' Jordan Barab, former deputy assistant secretary of OSHA during the Obama administration, said NIOSH is a helpful resource when industry and worker groups provide conflicting information. The laws governing OSHA say it can only issue rules to protect workers that are also practical and cost-effective for employers, which means the agency has to be able to justify every aspect of a regulation. Most end up in court. 'If they have two opposing opinions and their rule is agreeing with one, they need to carefully explain why they chose what they did, and they spend an enormous amount of time justifying their rules, often with the help of NIOSH expertise and research,' Barab said. Rebecca Reindel, safety and health director at the AFL-CIO, said she is worried that without NIOSH testimony OSHA will be more likely to kill the heat rule. The agency has been under pressure from industry groups to stop work on the rule or water down its protections. The oil and gas industry has said moving forward on the rule would jeopardize Trump's vision of achieving 'energy dominance.' NIOSH's testimony, she said, would be important to counteract that narrative. 'When you have industry groups saying 'we don't want this' or 'it's too expensive,' you want that neutral party that has actually done the research into what interventions work and that knows of how they have been successfully deployed in other workplaces,' Reindel said. 'Without NIOSH experts at this hearing, we lose a very critical part of the testimony and a part of the record we need to ensure that OSHA does regulate this hazard and uses the best available evidence and information.'