Harvey Weinstein Accuser Miriam Haley Tells Jury of 2006 Assault: ‘I Just Decided to Check Out and Endure It'
Miriam Haley began to break down in tears on Wednesday as she told jurors about the moment she realized that Harvey Weinstein was about to sexually assault her.
'I just decided to check out and endure it,' she said.
More from Variety
Harvey Weinstein Accuser's Former Roommate Testifies About Alleged 2006 Sexual Assault
Can Miramax Bounce Back? Inside the Post-Weinstein Makeover That Includes Reboots, Remakes and Sydney Sweeney
Harvey Weinstein's New York Retrial Begins With Opening Statements; New Accuser Identified
The former TV production assistant is the first of three accusers to testify at Weinstein's retrial in Manhattan. Recounting testimony she gave at his first trial five years ago, she alleged that Weinstein assaulted her at his SoHo apartment on July 10, 2006.
Prior to that visit, Weinstein had invited her to attend the 'Clerks II' premiere in L.A., an invitation she accepted. He later asked her to stop by his apartment to meet, and she agreed — explaining that it felt awkward to refuse after having just accepted the invitation to the premiere.
Haley said that, after a driver sent by Weinstein dropped her off and led her to the hallway of the SoHo apartment, he left — and there was no one else inside. While she and Weinstein were sitting on a sofa, he suddenly 'lunged' at her and tried to kiss her. She rejected him, but he persisted, 'smothering me with advances.' Haley said that he used his body to push her toward a bed in a dark bedroom.
'He was grabbing me and touching me,' she said, adding that she was 'trying to get him off me.'
However, Haley recounted that Weinstein repeatedly pushed her back onto the bed. As she struggled, she started to fear that he might become violent and that her chances of escaping were slim.
'I realized that I'm getting raped,' she thought in that moment.
According to Haley, she had mentioned to Weinstein that she was on her period and had a tampon in. 'He took out my tampon and orally forced himself on me,' she continued.
Haley said she was 'mortified' and 'in disbelief' during the incident, and that she didn't want anyone to place their mouth on her vagina, as she was 'un-groomed and having her period.' 'And certainly not him,' she noted, referring to Weinstein.
Haley later told her then-roommate, Elizabeth Entin, about what occurred at Weinstein's apartment, and remembered Entin telling her 'it sounds like rape.' Haley added, 'I felt trapped in what to do about it.'
The following day, Haley did not attend the 'Clerks II' premiere, explaining that she didn't want to after the alleged assault. 'I was still trying to navigate my own feelings and my options,' she said.
Haley first took the stand Tuesday and recounted first meeting Weinstein at the London premiere of 'The Aviator' in 2004, where her friend, the late 'Rocky Horror Picture Show' producer Michael White, introduced them. She said Weinstein joked that he would name his next company after her, later clarifying that his mother's name was also Miriam. (Miramax is a combination of Weinstein's parents' names, Miriam and Max).
She also described several meetings with Weinstein prior to the alleged assault in 2006, including one that took place in a hotel room in France, after they reconnected at the Cannes Film Festival. Haley explained that she had hoped to discuss potential job opportunities in New York.
When asked earlier by the prosecutor whether she had any romantic or sexual interest in Weinstein, Haley responded, 'No, I did not.'
However, instead of focusing on professional matters, Weinstein 'quickly started talking about other things.' According to Haley, he commented on her legs and asked if she could give him a massage.
'I felt taken aback. I felt humiliated,' she said.
Despite rebuffing his advances, Haley did receive a job in 2006 as a production assistant on 'Project Runway,' which Weinstein produced.
After the third season of the reality competition series wrapped, she met Weinstein to have a conversation in the lobby bar of a Manhattan hotel in late June — just weeks before the alleged sexual assault. During the conversation, they discussed her work as a production assistant on 'Project Runway.' According to Haley, Weinstein offered to write a letter in support of extending her work visa, as she was not a U.S. citizen.
When the prosecutor asked whether Weinstein had done anything during that meeting to make her feel uncomfortable, Haley said no, describing him as 'respectful' and 'quite charming.' However, she asserted that she was not flirting with Weinstein, and the interaction did not take a romantic turn. 'I was looking for work,' Haley said.
Weinstein is charged with committing a first-degree criminal sexual act against Haley. He has pleaded not guilty.
Haley's attorney, Gloria Allred, sat in the court gallery on Tuesday to watch the testimony.
The disgraced movie mogul was convicted of sexually abusing Haley and another accuser, actor Jessica Mann, at his initial trial in 2020. Those convictions were later overturned.
Last Thursday, two women who were friends with Haley in 2006 — Entin and Christine Pressman — testified that Haley had confided in them shortly after the alleged assault by Weinstein.
'He raped my friend, and I am not happy about that,' Entin said at one point while being cross-examined by the defense.
Meanwhile, Pressman told the courtroom that, after hearing Haley's story in August or September 2006, she advised Haley not to contact the authorities. 'I said, 'Harvey Weinstein is the king of New York. He's extremely powerful; you are not. Just let it go.''
In addition to the charge related to Haley, Weinstein faces another count of committing a first-degree criminal sexual act and one count of rape in the third degree. He pleaded not guilty to those charges as well.
Best of Variety
What's Coming to Netflix in May 2025
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
What's Coming to Disney+ in May 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
‘Playground' drama in jury room threatens to derail Harvey Weinstein's NY sex crimes retrial
'Playground' drama threatened to tank Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial on Friday — when one juror asked off the case after claiming childish antics had made deliberations 'unfair and unjust.' Juror No. 7, described as a 25-year-old 'computer kid,' told the judge he'd heard other members of the panel gossiping about one of their own in an elevator at Manhattan Supreme Court after deliberations Thursday. 4 AP Advertisement 'The experience I've had in the day-and-a-half here, in good conscience, I don't think this is fair and just,' the juror told the court Friday morning when he was brought to the witness box to explain why he wanted to be dismissed. He described the chaotic scene behind closed doors as 'playground stuff,' with some on the panel of seven women and five men ignoring fellow jurors as they weighed the charges against Weinstein. 'There's a bit of shunning happening,' the young man said — before pleading for Judge Curtis Farber to dismiss him from the case. Advertisement Farber told the juror that there was no backing out, reminding him he 'took an oath' of service and that the trial would 'fall apart' if he left now. One of the 12 jurors was excused on Thursday after complaining of illness, and replaced with an alternate. The remaining three alternate panelists were then dismissed, meaning there would be no one to step in for Juror 7 if he was let off. Weinstein, 73, sat in his wheelchair and stared ahead without any visible reaction during the judge's questioning of the juror. When the court reconvened after the lunch break, Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala, asked for a mistrial claiming that the judge should have questioned the juror further and asked more in-depth queries to get to the bottom of the elevator beef and the drama inside the jury room. Advertisement 4 Weinstein's attorney Arthur Aidala moved for a mistrial after a juror complained about 'playground' drama inside the deliberation room. Michael Nagle 'He looked at me right in the eyes and said, 'What's going on in there is not fair and unjust!'' the attorney said theatrically, launching into a 10-minute monologue as the judge quietly flicked through papers. Aidala described the juror as a '25-year-old kid who lives with his grandmother who is a computer kid' — and who had the 'guts' to go to the court with his concerns, which should not be minimized. 'He looked at me right in the eyes and said, 'What's going on in there is not fair and unjust!'' Aidala railed. Advertisement Prosecutors said Weinstein's attorneys were 'grasping for straws' in their latest attempt at a mistrial, the sixteenth such bid Aidala has made so far in the case. The judge didn't even blink before he quickly shot down the bid to derail the trial. 'Nothing in his statement stated that the tensions in the jury room were abnormal tensions during deliberations,' Farber shot back at Aidala. 4 Polish model Kaja Sokola said that Harvey Weinstein molested her when she was 16. Steven Hirsch The jury began deliberating at 11:30 a.m. Thursday morning after hearing five weeks of testimony from three accusers — former TV production assistant Miriam 'Mimi' Haley, Polish model Kaja Sokola and former actress Jessica Mann — who all said that Weinstein had raped them. The panelists, so far during their deliberations, have asked for readbacks of testimony from two victims about the alleged sexual attacks. Weinstein's attorneys claim that the former Miramax boss is the 'poster boy' of cancel culture and that his relationships with the alleged victims were 'transactional,' consensual sexual encounters. Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg said during closing arguments that Weinstein — accused of sexual conduct by more than 80 women — wielded his 'power and influence' to rape the three accusers. Advertisement 4 Weinstein's attorneys' attempt of a mistrial has been denied more than a dozen times at trial. AP Weinstein, who maintains his innocence, was originally found guilty at trial in 2020 of criminal sex act and rape and given a 23-year prison sentence — but New York's highest court tossed the conviction last year. If convicted at the retrial, Weinstein would face up to 25 years in prison on two counts of first-degree criminal sexual act, and four years in prison on third-degree rape. The Hollywood creep was separately convicted in California of raping an Italian model at a film festival in 2013, where he is currently serving a 16-year prison term. He has appealed that conviction.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains
NEW YORK (AP) — A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial asked to be removed from the case Friday because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an 'unfair and unjust' way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later denied a defense request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. 'This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations,' Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. 'Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict.' The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment 'unfair and unjust' even as he described the tension as 'playground stuff' with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued that the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticized the judge's questions to the concerned juror as 'anemic at best.' 'You didn't ask him one follow-up question,' Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. Whatever the dispute is, she added, it does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested an additional readout of testimony, this time from the third accuser in the case. The Manhattan jury ended its first day of deliberations Thursday without reaching a verdict. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The panel has reheard some testimony and viewed medical records and emails. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. ___ Follow Philip Marcelo at Philip Marcelo, The Associated Press
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge says Weinstein juror complaining about jury strife cannot be excused
By Jody Godoy NEW YORK (Reuters) -The judge overseeing former Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein's rape and sexual assault trial refused on Friday to dismiss a juror who said some jurors were treating others on the 12-person panel unfairly. "I just don't think it's fair and just," the juror told New York Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber in court, referring to things other jurors were saying and doing behind another juror's back. "There is a bit of a shunning happening," the juror said. The juror asked to be dismissed but Farber said there was no legal basis to do so after the juror confirmed that no one on the jury panel was pressuring him to change his view of the case. "If any other juror feels they need to talk to me, they can," the judge said. Weinstein's lawyers said they would make a proposal on how to address the matter later on Friday. Friday was the second day of jury deliberations. No other jurors were present during the exchange. Farber dismissed alternates from the jury on Thursday. Weinstein, 73, was convicted of rape by a Manhattan jury in February 2020, but the New York Court of Appeals threw out the conviction and ordered a new trial, citing errors by the trial judge. Prosecutors say the Academy Award-winning producer raped aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013 and assaulted two other women in 2006 and 2002. Weinstein, who has denied ever having non-consensual sex or assaulting anyone, has pleaded not guilty. He faces up to 25 years in prison for two counts of criminal sexual acts and up to four years for one count of rape. Weinstein is already serving a 16-year prison sentence after being found guilty in December 2022 of rape in a separate California case. Prosecutors with the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg have portrayed Weinstein as a serial predator who promised career advancement in Hollywood to women, only to then coax them into private settings where he attacked them. Weinstein's defense lawyers have said his encounters with the women were consensual and accused them of lying about being raped after failing to make it big in Hollywood by sleeping with him.
