Quebec dials back emissions projections due to global uncertainty
MONTREAL – The Quebec government is scaling back its projections for cutting greenhouse-gas emissions due to the arrival of the Trump administration.
An annual report published today says actions being taken by the province to reduce emissions should account for 65 per cent of the cuts needed to reach the government's 2030 emissions target.
That's down two points from an estimated 67 per cent last year.
The report says the change is due to the Trump administration's decision to impose tariffs, which has had the effect of slowing investment in decarbonization, and its attempts to challenge carbon pricing mechanisms of various U.S. states.
It also says the Canadian government's decision to scrap the federal consumer carbon price could harm the competitiveness of Quebec businesses.
Still, it says that greenhouse-gas emissions dropped in Quebec between 2022 and 2023, and that Quebec reported record sales of electric vehicles in 2024.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
12 minutes ago
- CBC
Should Canada loosen rules around foreign ownership of its airlines?
The Competition Bureau is calling for changes to improve the competitive landscape in Canada's airline industry, including loosening rules that limit foreign ownership of Canadian airlines. But would it work? We speak with two aviation experts with differing opinions on the issue.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Appeals court lets Trump keep control National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles during protests
LOS ANGELES (AP) — An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. The ruling comes from a panel of three judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, two of whom were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which only allows presidents can take control during times of 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.
Edmonton Journal
2 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Canada won't pause digital services tax despite pressure from U.S., finance minister says
Article content OTTAWA — Canada won't put a hold on the digital services tax on big tech companies set to take effect on June 30, the finance minister said Thursday. Pressure has mounted on Ottawa to pause the tax ahead of trade discussions with the U.S. Article content Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said Thursday the legislation was passed by Parliament and Canada is 'going ahead' with the tax. Article content 'The (digital services tax) is in force and it's going to be applied,' he told reporters before a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill. The digital services tax will hit companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a three per cent tax on revenue from Canadian users. It will apply retroactively, leaving U.S. companies with a $2 billion US bill due at the end of the month. A June 11 letter signed by 21 members of Congress said U.S. companies will pay 90 per cent of the revenue Canada will collect from the tax. Canadian and U.S. business groups, organizations representing U.S. tech giants and American members of Congress have all signed letters in recent weeks calling for the tax to be eliminated or paused. It's set to take effect just weeks before a deadline Canada and the U.S. have set for coming up with a new trade deal, following months of trade conflict between the two countries. Article content Rick Tachuk, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Canada, said the plan to go ahead with the tax 'undercuts those talks and risks derailing the agreement.' 'A retroactive tax like the DST, weeks before a new deal is supposed to be done, isn't a bargaining chip. It would likely be viewed as a provocation,' he said in an emailed statement. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce and other organizations have warned retaliatory measures in a U.S. spending and tax bill could hit Canadians' pension funds and investments. Champagne said Canada isn't the only country that could be affected by those retaliatory measures. 'These are discussions at the global level,' he said in French. Champagne said there's a wider discussion going on among G7 nations about tax regimes. David Pierce, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce's vice-president of government relations, said in an earlier interview his organization fears Canada could 'aggravate an already very tricky trade discussion with the Americans' if it goes ahead with the tax and the retroactive payment requirement. Article content Latest National Stories
