Trump's latest order targeting trans people makes little sense
President Donald Trump's whirlwind first few weeks have included a series of orders targeting transgender people, which the administration alleges are designed to protect women and girls. On Feb. 5, Trump signed an executive order banning trans women and girls from competing in female sports. The NCAA quickly moved to change its policy in compliance, instituting a new rule affirming the executive order.
Then on Wednesday, a new mandate came down from Trump's Education Department. This one says that Title IX will not apply to name, image and likeness deals. The directive winds back guidance from then-President Joe Biden's administration, which stated that schools must equitably distribute image and likeness (NIL) payments between male and female athletes.
Under the guise of a word salad that included phrases such as 'financial aid' and 'gender equity,' Craig Trainor, Trump's acting assistant secretary for civil rights, argued that the Biden White House had no authority to force schools to split NIL funds this way.
There are words, and then there are actions. The executive order banning trans women was expected, given how conservatives focused on the issue during the 2024 election. But the measure, called the 'No Men in Women's Sports Executive Order,' was couched in language about 'protecting' athletic opportunities for women and girls.
And yet, with its new NIL guidance, the Trump White House is sending the opposite message.
While the decision from the Education Department has no teeth, the symbolism is hard to miss. The guidance states that women's sports are important — but not important enough that they deserve equal funding. Women's athletic opportunities are important, the administration claims — but not necessarily as important as the opportunities afforded to men.
If men's sports drive more dollars via TV rights and fans in the stands, that's where the lion's share of the NIL money should go. This is the same attitude that drove business decisions — and funding decisions — 10 to 20 years ago, before the rise of successful professional women's leagues such as the WNBA, NSWL and PWHL. And well before women became a massive draw in college athletics. The Trump administration may prefer that era, but women certainly won't.
While women's hoops coaches such as UConn's Geno Auriemma and UCLA's Cori Close have spoken out regarding the recent orders from the Trump administration, it is a bit perplexing to have heard nothing thus far from some of the collegiate stars and up-and-coming pros who relied so heavily on their success in women's college athletics.
But of course, this move sends an even more unsettling message to the transgender community in America. The efforts to erase and remove trans women from women's athletics feel less like protecting women and more like villainizing an already marginalized community for political gain. The Education Department has also asked the NCAA to reverse transgender athletes' records; yet another measure of invalidating the trans community.
Crafting policies for trans athletes is complicated and everyone agrees that safety and fairness must be prioritized. But conservatives don't appear very interested in the complexities of this topic. Keep in mind that out of the almost 500,000 student-athletes who make up the NCAA, a minuscule fraction are transgender. Depending on your source, anywhere from roughly 10 to 40 athletes identify as transgender.
I'm currently friends with a trans athlete who has competed at the highest levels of professional bowling. The United States Bowling Congress has a very rigorous set of rules and guidelines trans athletes must follow if they want to compete. It isn't easy. But not every sport is the same. And that is exactly why this topic requires nuance.
The Trump administration's messaging, on the other hand, is not nuanced. And neither is it about protecting opportunities for women.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bilderberg group meets in Sweden amid US-Europe tensions
STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -The annual Bilderberg Meeting kicks off in Sweden on Thursday, providing a private forum for discussion at a time when President Donald Trump has upended security and economic ties between the U.S. and Europe. The high-level networking event was formed in 1954 to foster dialogue between the U.S. and Europe. It does not invite media and delegates rarely speak about what has been discussed, triggering numerous conspiracy theories about their aims. NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Christopher Donahue, Commander of the U.S. Army Europe and Africa are among those on this year's delegate list, published by the organisers just ahead of the meeting. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson will give a speech "on Sweden's and the EU's competitiveness and Sweden's support for Ukraine," his spokesperson told Reuters. Transatlantic relations top the agenda, with Ukraine, critical raw materials and AI also on the list, the organisers who also publish the names of the participants, said. Other than that, information is scarce. The organisers say the secrecy is to allow participants to be able to speak freely in an environment of trust. "There is no desired outcome, there is no closing statement, there are no resolutions proposed or votes taken, and the Meeting does not support any political party or viewpoint," the official website says. How much impact groups like Bilderberg actually have is hard to judge, according to Christina Garsten, professor at the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study, who studies transnational think tanks. They aim to shape the broad political and corporate agenda. But if they are seen as having too much influence, they can be accused of being anti-democratic. "It's there that conspiracy theories can flower," she said. She dismissed the belief held by some that groups like Bilderberg make up a shadowy world government. "I think it's very much exaggerated," she said.
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
ICE ramps up immigrant arrests in courthouses across U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents — often dressed in plainclothes — are now arresting immigrants at courthouses nationwide, sometimes moments after their hearings end. Why it matters: The courthouse crackdown is part of a sweeping Trump administration effort to fast-track removals and increase the number of deportations this year — a strategy that's dramatically expanding who gets targeted and how. The big picture: The recent ramp-up follows a January policy shift that authorizes ICE to target courthouses for the first time in years — a move advocates say is quietly upending the legal process for immigrants. Under the Biden administration, ICE was not allowed to conduct enforcement operations at or near courthouses. What they're saying: "ICE is now following the law" and placing immigrants in expedited removal, "as they always should have been," a senior Homeland Security spokesperson told Axios. Immigrant activists describe it as a trap, warning that courthouses are becoming enforcement zones where due process rights are eroding. How it works: An immigration court that dismisses the case — often because the Department of Homeland Security withdraws the charges or because the applicant has no active relief from removal — opens the door for ICE to swoop in post-dismissal, no longer restrained by a pending court case. These immigrants, if they've been in the U.S. for less than two years, are then arrested on-site and fast-tracked for deportation. Failure to appear at court results in a removal order called an "in absentia" deportation order. Driving the news: Under a February executive order from President Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is now defaulting to issuing Notices to Appear (NTAs) for anyone denied an immigration benefit — including asylum, green cards and work permits. The policy change increased the number of NTAs issued by the agency compared to under the Biden administration. ICE and Customs and Border Protection also issue NTAs. Someone denied a visa extension can now be swept into removal proceedings, even without a criminal record. NTAs are also being issued to immigrants who commit fraud, including giving false information to an employer. State of play: The policy shift has supercharged the deportation pipeline and contributed to a surge of courthouse arrests across the country. By the numbers: Federal immigration authorities have launched deportation proceedings against more than 22,100 immigrants since late February, according to new USCIS data out Thursday. USCIS is now issuing about 1,840 NTAs every week, including hundreds tied to asylum and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) cases, per new agency figures. Zoom in: In recent weeks, ICE officers have ramped up arrests in immigration courts in numerous cities, from Seattle and Phoenix to San Antonio and New York City. At Denver's immigration court, for example, at least eight immigrants — including two young children — have been detained by ICE in the last two weeks, according to local organizers. What they're saying: Denver activists say the arrests are fueling fear and signal a collapse of due process. "The truth here is that the jack boots of ICE are terrorizing immigrant communities that are trying to take advantage of the due process of law that they are entitled to," Denver immigration attorney Hans Meyer said at a press conference last week. Now immigrants are "questioning if the legal way is really the right way," Jennifer Piper, the American Friends Service Committee's Denver program director, added.
20 minutes ago
Coinbase adds former top Obama and Harris adviser Plouffe as it broadens its political reach
WASHINGTON -- A senior adviser to Kamala Harris' 2024 presidential campaign is joining Coinbase's global advisory council, which already includes several former U.S. senators and Donald Trump's ex-campaign manager, as the cryptocurrency exchange broadens its political reach. David Plouffe, a top Democratic strategist best known as an architect of Barack Obama's successful 2008 presidential campaign, is the latest addition to the council, joining as the cryptocurrency industry plays an increasingly prominent role in shaping fast-moving legislation in Congress. The legislation aims to create a comprehensive framework for the regulation of digital assets and comes amid a shift in Washington. President Trump, a Republican, has pledged to make the U.S. the global capital of cryptocurrency, contrasting with what industry leaders viewed as a stifling regulatory approach under the previous Democratic administration. Trump and his family have also been aggressively expanding their personal business into almost every part of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, including raising billions of dollars to buy bitcoin, creating a new stablecoin and launching and promoting a Trump-themed meme coin. Chris LaCivita, the former co-campaign manager of Trump's successful 2024 presidential bid, joined Coinbase's advisory council in January. Former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent from Arizona, also joined the council, which consists of a number of other high-profile figures from both major political parties. Plouffe previously served on the global advisory board for Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, before joining Harris' presidential campaign as a senior adviser in August. Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase's chief policy officer, described the role of the advisers as being a 'sound board' to discuss policy efforts and business strategy. In Congress, legislation is advancing far more quickly than usual for a new industry — a pace that some involved in shaping the bills say comes amid an all-out pressure campaign from the cryptocurrency sector. On Wednesday, a group of Democrats joined the Republican majority to advance legislation regulating stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. Final passage through the Senate could come next week. Meanwhile, a more sweeping bill to implement cryptocurrency market structure has begun moving through House committees.
