logo
22 artists who have spoken out against Donald Trump playing their music at his events

22 artists who have spoken out against Donald Trump playing their music at his events

Yahoo18-03-2025

Musicians and their families have spoken out against Donald Trump using their music for his events.
Rihanna reportedly had her team issue cease-and-desist notices to the Trump campaign.
Elton John and Adele have spoken about not wanting Trump to use their music for his events.
Throughout his presidential campaigns and his presidencies, Donald Trump has received disapproval from many musicians who don't want their music played at his events.
A number of artists and their teams have even sent cease-and-desist notices, which are essentially warnings that demand a specific action be stopped or else legal action will be pursued.
From Neil Young to Rihanna, here are the artists — or their representatives — who have spoken out against Trump using their music at his events and rallies.
Johnny Marr of The Smiths posted his displeasure on X.
In 2024, The Smiths' song "Please, Please, Please, Let Me Get What I Want" was reportedly playing for crowds at some of Trump's rallies.
The Smiths' guitarist Johnny Marr, who cowrote the song with front man Morrissey, expressed his displeasure in an X post.
In the post, Marr reacted to a video from political reporter Soorin Kim that appeared to show the song playing during a Trump rally in South Dakota in September.
"Ahh…right…OK. I never in a million years would've thought this could come to pass. Consider this shit shut right down right now," the musician wrote.
Tom Petty's family issued a complaint to the Trump campaign after one of the musician's songs was played at a 2020 rally.
The family of the late Tom Petty has condemned the apparent use of the musician's song "I Won't Back Down" at Trump's 2020 campaign rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
In a statement released on X, Tom Petty's daughters Adria and Annakim, widow Dana, and ex-wife Jane Petty wrote that they'd "issued an official cease and desist notice to the Trump campaign."
"Trump was in no way authorized to use this song to further a campaign that leaves too many Americans and common sense behind," the family wrote in their statement.
This isn't the first time Tom Petty's music has been used in political campaigns without permission — in 2000, George W. Bush used one of the musician's songs on his campaign trail, according to Time.
Tom Petty threatened legal action against Bush, saying the use of his song falsely implied that he was endorsing Bush.
John Fogerty said more than once that he doesn't want Trump using his song "Fortunate Son."
In October 2020, former Creedence Clearwater Revival member John Fogerty posted on X that he was issuing a cease-and-desist order to the Trump campaign to stop his music from being played at the president's events.
"I object to the President using my song 'Fortunate Son' in any way for his campaign," the singer wrote in his statement. "He is using my words and my voice to portray a message that I do not endorse."
Fogerty said he wrote the song because, as a veteran of the Vietnam War, he was "disgusted that some people were allowed to be excluded from serving our country because they had access to political and financial privilege."
The singer said Trump is a "prime example of both of these issues."
In September 2020, Fogerty spoke out about the Trump campaign using his song at a Freeland, Michigan Rally, where the president walked off Air Force One to the Creedence Clearwater Revival song.
Phil Collins' team has told the Trump campaign to stop playing "In the Air Tonight."
After the Trump campaign played Phil Collins' song "In the Air Tonight" during an Iowa rally on October 14, 2020, Collins and his team served them a cease-and-desist order, according to Billboard.
TMZ obtained a copy of the cease-and-desist letter, in which Collins' attorney, David A. Steinberg, wrote that the campaign's playing of the song was "apparently intended as a satirical reference to Covid-19," which can spread by airborne transmission.
He also wrote, "Mr. Collins has serious concerns that the manner in which the Trump campaign has used 'In the Air Tonight' has caused, and will cause, damage to Mr. Collins' reputation and popularity with the public."
At the time, a representative for the singer told Consequence of Sound, "Yes we are well aware of the Trump campaign's use of this song and we have already issued a 'cease and desist' letter via our lawyers who continue to monitor the situation."
Consequences of Sound reported that Collins' team previously sent the Trump campaign a cease and desist in June after they played "In the Air Tonight" at an event in Tulsa.
Brendon Urie of Panic! At The Disco told Trump's campaign to stop playing one of his songs.
On X, the Panic! At The Disco front man told Trump's campaign to stop playing his song "High Hopes," which played as the president walked onstage at a 2020 rally in Phoenix, per USA Today.
"Dear Trump Campaign, Fuck you. You're not invited. Stop playing my song. No thanks, Brendon Urie, Panic! At The Disco & company," the musician wrote on X.
Neil Young was one of the first musicians to tell Trump to stop playing his music.
In 2015, Neil Young began his battle with Trump over the usage of his hit song, "Rockin' in the Free World."
Trump was using his song during his official presidential campaign announcement. Rolling Stone obtained the statement from Young's representatives, which stated:
"Donald Trump was not authorized to use 'Rockin' in the Free World' in his presidential candidacy announcement. Neil Young, a Canadian citizen, is a supporter of Bernie Sanders for President of the United States of America."
But despite disapproval from the artist, a representative for Trump's campaign told Rolling Stone that the song was being used legally.
Per The Hollywood Reporter, in August 2020, Young filed a copyright-infringement lawsuit against the Trump campaign for playing his songs, including "Rockin' in the Free World" and "Devil's Sidewalk," at campaign rallies.
Rihanna's team sent a cease-and-desist notice to the White House.
In 2018, Rhianna discovered her music was being played during one of his rallies via X.
In response to a post on X from The Washington Post reporter Philip Rucker about her music being used, she posted, "Not for much longer…me nor my people would ever be at or around one of those tragic rallies, so thanks for the heads up philip!"
Shortly after Rihanna posted on X in regards to her disapproval, her team sent out a cease-and-desist notice, Rolling Stone reported.
Elton John said he doesn't want his music used in American election campaigns.
While running for president, Trump used Elton John's songs "Rocket Man" and "Tiny Dancer" as warm-up music for his campaign rallies.
But the iconic singer has made it clear his views are different from Trump's and he doesn't want his music involved in American politics.
"I don't really want my music to be involved in anything to do with an American election campaign. I'm British. I've met Donald Trump, he was very nice to me, it's nothing personal, his political views are his own, mine are very different, I'm not a Republican in a million years," John told The Guardian in 2016.
R.E.M. said they've sent a cease-and-desist notice to Trump.
In 2016, when the band's frontrunner Michael Stipe found out that Trump was frequently using R.E.M.'s hit song, "It's the End of the World," at his campaign rallies, the entire band sent him a cease-and-desist notice.
According to Vulture, they later confirmed the legal matter in a Facebook statement and also told the media and American voters to focus on the "bigger picture."
Adele spoke out against Trump once he started using her music at rallies.
In 2016, upon finding out that Trump was playing her music at his events, Adele's spokesperson announced that Adele never gave then-candidate Trump permission to use her music.
According to Vulture, the singer went on to endorse Hillary Clinton during a concert on the US leg of her tour.
"Don't vote for him," she said of Trump, per Vulture. "I am English, but what happens in America affects me, too. I am 100% for Hillary Clinton. I love her, she's amazing."
The Rolling Stones have sent out multiple statements against Trump's use of their music.
Since 2016, the band has sent out multiple statements calling for Trump to "cease all use" of their music, Vulture reported.
But Trump continued using the band's song "You Can't Always Get What You Want" anyway.
In June 2020, representatives for the group — working with BMI, a performing-rights organization — released a statement saying that if Trump continued to use the band's music in his campaigning efforts, he may be sued.
"The BMI have notified the Trump campaign on behalf of the Stones that the unauthorized use of their songs will constitute a breach of its licensing agreement," the statement read, per Rolling Stone. "If Donald Trump disregards the exclusion and persists then he would face a lawsuit for breaking the embargo and playing music that has not been licensed."
Axl Rose of Guns N' Roses said he didn't want the band's music played at Trump rallies.
In 2018, the Guns N' Roses singer found out the band's hit song "Sweet Child O' Mine" was playing during an event for Trump.
He said his band has formally requested that Trump not use their music at his events and posted on X that "... the Trump campaign is using loopholes in the various venues' blanket performance licenses which were not intended for such craven political purposes, without the songwriters' consent."
Pharrell Williams had his lawyer send Trump a cease-and-desist notice.
After finding out that Trump played his song "Happy" at a rally just a few hours after the October 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, Williams had his lawyer send the White House a cease-and-desist notice pertaining to the hit song and any of his other tunes, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
"There was nothing 'happy' about the tragedy inflicted upon our country on Saturday and no permission was granted for your use of this song for this purpose," the letter stated.
It also said Williams "has not and will not" give Trump permission to use his music.
Queen also asked Trump to stop using "We Are The Champions."
The Queen classic "We Are the Champions" played during the 2016 Republican National Convention as then-Republican nominee Trump introduced his wife, Melania.
Queen then shared a post on X, saying the use was against their wishes.
Sony/ATV Music Publishing, which controls Queen's copyrights, released a statement regarding the use too, stating that they had previously asked Trump to stop playing the song.
"Sony/ATV Music Publishing has never been asked by Mr. Trump, the Trump campaign or the Trump Organization for permission to use 'We are the Champions' by Queen," the statement read, according to Forbes. "On behalf of the band, we are frustrated by the repeated unauthorized use of the song after a previous request to desist, which has obviously been ignored by Mr. Trump and his campaign."
"Queen does not want its music associated with any mainstream or political debate in any country," the statement continued. "Nor does Queen want 'We are the Champions' to be used as an endorsement of Mr. Trump and the political views of the Republican Party. We trust, hope and expect that Mr. Trump and his campaign will respect these wishes moving forward."
But if Trump's campaign paid to license the song, Queen has no control over the usage, according to Forbes.
Earth, Wind & Fire said their song "September" was played at the 2016 Republican Convention against their wishes.
Another song played at the 2016 Republican Convention was "September" by Earth Wind & Fire.
After the song was played, the band's X account quoted Queen's post about "We Are the Champions" and added, "Another unauthorized use (September) at the Republican Convention, against our wishes — Earth, Wind & Fire."
Eddie Levert of The O'Jays took issue with Trump playing one of their songs.
The O'Jays' song "For The Love Of Money" was used for Trump's reality show "The Apprentice."
But the band's cofounder Eddie Levert told Billboard in 2016 that when the Trump campaign used the song "Love Train" at his rallies, he took issue with it — and he said the Trump campaign wasn't too happy about his speaking up.
"They got on me about it, said I got enough money from him so now I can kick dirt in his face," Levert told Billboard.
He continued, "... I wish him the best, but I don't think he's the man to run our country. So when he started using 'Love Train,' I called him up and told them, 'Listen, man, I don't believe in what you're doing. I'm not with you. I don't want you to use my voice. I'm not condoning what you're doing."
Paul Rodgers of the band Free got his lawyer involved.
When Trump's campaign used the song "All Right Now" by the band Free during the 2016 RNC, member and co-writer Paul Rodgers took to X to express his issue with it.
"Permission to use 'All Right Now' was never sought for or granted by me. My lawyer is dealing with this matter. - Paul," the post read.
Members of George Harrison's estate said the use of "Here Comes the Sun" went against their wishes.
At the same 2016 RNC, The Beatles classic "Here Comes the Sun," written by George Harrison, was played. Members of his estate posted on X saying that the use of the song was against their wishes.
But they also were sure to get a dig in. "If it had been Beware of Darkness, then we MAY have approved it! #TrumpYourself," the X post read.
Luciano Pavarotti's family said his values don't match Trump's.
Luciano Pavarotti's family asked Trump's campaign to stop playing his rendition of Giacomo Puccini's aria "Nessun Dorma" during campaign events.
His widow, Nicoletta Mantovani Pavarotti, and three daughters told The New York Times in 2016 that "the values of brotherhood and solidarity which Luciano Pavarotti expressed throughout the course of his artistic career are entirely incompatible with the worldview offered by the candidate Donald Trump."
In 2017, Trump also called Pavarotti a "great friend," which many took to mean Trump thought he was still alive, despite the fact that he's been dead since 2007.
Prince's half-brother requested that the Trump campaign stop using "Purple Rain."
Trump was apparently using one of the late singer Prince's most iconic songs, "Purple Rain," at his pre-Midterm rallies in 2018.
Omarr Baker, Prince's half-brother, released a statement on behalf of the family asking Trump to stop playing the song.
"The Prince Estate has never given permission to President Trump or The White House to use Prince's songs and have requested that they cease all use immediately," the statement read.
It was unclear at the time if a formal cease-and-desist had been filed, according to Entertainment Weekly.
Steven Tyler sent a cease-and-desist notice concerning Aerosmith's music.
Since 2015, Steven Tyler has been requesting that Trump not use Aerosmith's music during his campaign. But in August 2018, Trump played the Aerosmith hit "Livin' on the Edge" at a rally.
Tyler's team then sent out a formal cease-and-desist notice.
"By using 'Livin' On The Edge' without our client's permission, Mr. Trump is falsely implying that our client, once again, endorses his campaign and/or his presidency, as evidenced by actual confusion seen from the reactions of our client's fans all over social media," the letter reads, according to CBS News.
He later clarified on X that his decision was not about Democrats versus Republicans, he just does not want his music being used without permission for political purposes.
Twisted Sister's Dee Snider ended his musical relationship with Trump over conflicting political views.
Dee Snider originally granted Trump permission to use "We're Not Gonna Take It" during his campaign trail, saying, "The song 'We're Not Gonna Take It' is a song about rebellion, and there's nothing more rebellious than what Donald Trump is doing right now."
But Snider said he changed his mind once he heard more about Trump's ideologies and political positions.
"It's very upsetting to me 'cause I strongly don't agree with his extremist positions," Snider said in an interview with Loudwire in 2015.
"I have to call Donald. I have to speak to him as a friend. He was respectful enough to call me and say, 'How do you feel about me using this?' And I've gotta be — as a friend — respectful enough to call him and say, 'Listen, man, this has gotten wildly out of control, and I really have a problem with it.' It's really gotten ugly."
In a 2020 interview with the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, Snider said Trump stopped using his music the same night that he asked him to do so.
This story was originally published on November 12, 2018, and most recently updated on March 18, 2025.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges
Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges

Politico

time22 minutes ago

  • Politico

Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges

At least nine people are facing federal charges for their involvement in protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Monday. Demonstrators face charges for attacking police with Molotov cocktails, looting and spitting on law enforcement, Bondi said in a TV interview. 'We are going to prosecute them federally,' she said in an interview on Fox News. 'If California won't protect their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there.' Sporadic but at times raucous protests broke out in several parts of the Los Angeles area in recent days, prompting President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines despite the fact that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the additional forces were not needed. Bondi said the Trump administration planned to take a hard line against demonstrators. 'You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more,' she said. 'As President Trump said, you spit. we hit. Get ready. If you spit on a federal law enforcement officer, we are going to charge you with a crime federally. You are looking at up to five years maximum in prison.' Those charged already include David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, who was injured and arrested while protesting the arrest of workers in downtown Los Angeles. He was released Monday from federal custody on a $50,000 bond. The Trump administration's decisive treatment of demonstrators — and the president's focus on punishing those who assault police officers — stands in contrast to his sweeping pardons for roughly 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, seeking to overturn the election. Trump has deployed up to 4,000 soldiers from the California National Guard to help quell the demonstrations over the protests of Newsom and Bass — who say the moves are worsening tensions. The state has sued to reverse the deployments. The White House also ordered 700 Marines to join the National Guard, though it's unclear exactly what role they will play. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Monday evening that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct military forces to arrest 'lawbreakers.' DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment from POLITICO, and the Department of Defense declined to comment on the story. 'You can run, you can't hide,' Bondi told Fox. 'We are coming after you federally. If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store, if you loot, if you spit on a police officer, we are coming after you.'

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.

Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director
Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director

The Smithsonian Institution asserted its independence Monday evening in a statement that could be read as a rejection of President Trump's late-May firing of National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet. The Smithsonian's statement said the organization's secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch, "has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian." The statement suggested that all personnel decisions will be made by Bunch, not Trump. The announcement came after a much-anticipated Board of Regents meeting to discuss the fate of Sajet. The Washington Post had reported that Sajet quietly continued to show up for work each day after Trump's social media post, which said he was firing Sajet for being 'a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI.' The Smithsonian's statement Monday did not explicitly state that Sajet would remain in her position, and the institution did not respond to a Times question on that subject. But the text of the statement is clear in its intent, beginning: "In 1846, the Smithsonian was established by Congress as an independent entity." It continues: "Throughout its history, the Smithsonian has been governed and administered by a Board of Regents and a Secretary. The board is entrusted with the governance and independence of the Institution, and the board appoints a Secretary to manage the Institution." The Smithsonian's move comes shortly after the White House proposed a 12% reduction in funding to the Smithsonian in the 2026 budget — including the elimination of funding for the National Museum of the American Latino, which is in the development stages and aims to open on or near the National Mall; and the Anacostia Community Museum, which opened in 1967 and honors Black culture. The Smithsonian became a target for Trump beginning March 27, when he issued an executive order titled "Restoring truth and sanity to American history." That order demanded an end to federal funding for exhibitions and programs based on racial themes that 'divide Americans.' "Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology," the order read. It also instructed Vice President JD Vance to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian's 21 museums and the National Zoo in Washington. The order followed Trump's ongoing attempts to reshape federal cultural institutions, including his February takeover of the Kennedy Center. One major difference between the Kennedy Center and the Smithsonian: The Kennedy Center's board is appointed by the president, but the Smithsonian's board consists of officials representing all three branches of government. Vance is on the Smithsonian's Board of Regents, as is Chief Justice John G. Roberts. "Since its inception, the Smithsonian has set out to be a nonpartisan institution," the statement Monday read. "As the nation's museum, the Smithsonian must be a welcoming place of knowledge and discovery for all Americans. The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values. "To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes." Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. Sign up for L.A. Times entertainment alerts. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store