
White House convenes meeting to brainstorm new Harvard measures
The Trump administration is escalating its campaign against Harvard University — and looking for new ways to bring the storied institution to heel.
The White House convened officials from nearly a dozen agencies on Wednesday to brainstorm additional punitive measures, according to one administration official and a second person familiar with the meeting, who were granted anonymity to share details. The administration official said that forthcoming actions are expected from the State, Treasury, Health and Human Services and Justice departments, among others, and could happen as early as next month.
The push comes as the White House regroups after a federal judge blocked its move to bar Harvard from enrolling international students, and underscores how President Donad Trump has grown increasingly invested in the battle.
Even as some in the administration privately grouse that the aggressive posture is allowing Harvard to win public sympathy, Trump has kept up the attacks, threatening in a post last week to revoke its tax exempt status and chastising Harvard again Wednesday during an unrelated press conference.
'Harvard is treating our country with great disrespect and all they're doing is getting in deeper and deeper and deeper,' Trump told reporters Wednesday.
But with the low-hanging policy options already underway, the administration knows it will need to get more creative to keep squeezing the school, according to two administration officials and another person familiar with the talks, who like others in the story were granted anonymity to share details of private conversations.
The administration would not comment on what it is considering but some options include having the Department of Justice expand its investigation into the university's admissions policies or cutting money to medical institutions affiliated with Harvard.
'The latest moves against Harvard are truly just scratching the surface,' said White House spokesperson Harrison Fields, without specifying what else the administration has to bring Harvard to heel. 'Harvard decided to litigate this on MSNBC, the now defunded NPR, and the ratings-disaster CNN instead of acting like adults like many of their competitors have done and engaging in fruitful conversations and actions that would have saved them from their self-inflicted demise.'
Harvard University declined to comment.
The relentless focus has some inside the administration worrying that the longer the fight the greater the risk that the White House overplays its hand.
'We're fighting a losing battle,' one of the administration officials said, acknowledging that the university has the narrative upper hand when it comes to the effort to revoke Harvard's student visas. 'We've taken one of the most evil institutions and made them the victim.'
The fight comes amid the Trump administration's broader efforts to reshape not just American government but the institutions that have long surrounded it. In addition to Harvard, the White House has taken on a slate of other prestigious universities, including other Ivy League schools and the University of California system, as part of a broader siege against cultural institutions it sees as out of step with the administration, from Big Law firms to the Kennedy Center.
The conflict between the Trump administration and the Ivy League university has been brewing since February, but it escalated dramatically after an April 11 letter replete with demands was mistakenly sent to Harvard at a time when a deal to avoid confrontation was a real possibility.
Until that letter was sent, it seemed possible a deal could be reached. But once it was sent communication broke down.
In the six weeks since the letter was mistakenly sent, the administration froze $2.2 billion in multiyear research grants and axed an additional $60 million in contracts; cut 500 grants from the National Institutes of Health for Harvard-affiliated institutions; barred the university from any future grants; and launched multiple investigations into Harvard's practices by the departments of Justice, Health, Education and Homeland Security and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Harvard, in response, took the administration to court, where on Thursday a federal judge in Massachusetts blocked the administration's effort to bar international students. That block will remain in place as both sides negotiate over a potential injunction that would preserve the status quo while the case moves forward.
One of the people familiar with the talks said that while the April 11 letter did inflame tensions, the university could have found a way to move on. Instead, it has refused to have any dialogue with the White House and stopped trying to appease the administration as it tries to win in the court of public opinion, the person said.
'They think their audience is the alumni, the funders and the students and the faculty,' the person said. 'But there's another audience that they're totally not working with. I just don't think that's smart long term.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon says he wouldn't count on China folding under Trump's tariffs: 'They're not scared, folks.'
Jamie Dimon spoke at the 2025 Reagan National Economic Forum on Friday. Dimon said he hoped the US could "get our own act together" amid the US-China trade war. Trump said China "violated" its trade agreement with the US this week. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said the United States needs to get its act together on trade — quickly. Dimon discussed the ongoing tension between the United States and China on Friday at the 2025 Reagan National Economic Forum, where he led a fireside chat. When asked what his biggest worry was right now, Dimon pointed to the shifting global geopolitical and economic landscape, including trade. "We have problems and we've got to deal with them," Dimon said before referring to "the enemy within." Addressing the "enemy within," he said, includes fixing how the United States approaches permitting, regulation, taxation, immigration, education, and the healthcare system. It also means maintaining important military alliances, he said. "China is a potential adversary. They're doing a lot of things well. They have a lot of problems," Dimon said. "What I'm really worried about is us. Can we get our own act together? Our own values, our own capabilities, our own management." Dimon said that if the United States is not the "preeminent military and preeminent economy in 40 years, we will not be the reserve currency. That's a fact." Although Dimon believes the United States is usually resilient, he said things are different this time around. "We have to get our act together, and we have to do it very quickly," he said. During the conversation, Dimon spoke about trade deals and encouraged US leaders to engage with China. "I just got back from China last week," Dimon said. "They're not scared, folks. This notion that they're going to come bow to America, I wouldn't count on that." Trump's decision to impose tariffs on numerous countries, including steep tariffs on China, rattled global markets earlier this year. Markets recovered after many countries, including China, began negotiating. But the possibility that tariffs could increase again at any time has investors and economists on edge. On Friday, for instance, in a Truth Social post, Trump accused China of violating the two countries' trade agreement. That same day, Trump said he planned to increase tariffs on steel imports from 25% to 50%. "We're going to bring it from 25% to 50%, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America, which will even further secure the steel industry in the United States. Nobody's going to get around that," Trump said during a rally near Pittsburgh. Representatives for JPMorgan Chase declined to comment. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up
Every president thinks they can change the world – and Donald Trump has an even greater sense of personal omnipotence than his recent predecessors. But it's not working out too well for the 47th president. Trump might intimidate tech titans to toe the line and use government power to try to bend institutions like Harvard University and judges, but some world leaders are harder to bully. He keeps being ignored and humiliated by Russian President Vladimir Putin who is defying the US effort to end the war in Ukraine. Russian media is now portraying Trump as the tough talker who always blinks and never imposes consequences. The president also thought that he could shape China to his will by facing down leader Xi Jinping in a trade war. But he misunderstood Chinese politics. The one thing an authoritarian in Beijing can never do is bow down to a US president. US officials say now they're frustrated that China hasn't followed through on commitments meant to deescalate the trade conflict. As with China, Trump backed down in his tariff war with the European Union. Then Financial Times commentator Robert Armstrong enraged the president by coining the term TACO trade — 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Everyone thought that Trump would be on the same page as Benjamin Netanyahu. After all, in his first term he offered the Israeli prime minister pretty much everything he wanted. But now that he's trying to broker peace in the Middle East, Trump is finding that prolonging the Gaza conflict is existential for Netanyahu's political career, much like Ukraine for Putin. And Trump's ambition for an Iranian nuclear deal is frustrating Israeli plans to use a moment of strategic weakness for the Islamic Republic to try to take out its reactors militarily. Powerful leaders are pursuing their own versions of the national interest that exist in a parallel reality and on different historical and actual timelines to shorter, more transactional, aspirations of American presidents. Most aren't susceptible to personal appeals with no payback. And after Trump's attempts to humiliate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office, the lure of the White House is waning. Trump spent months on the campaign trail last year boasting that his 'very good relationship' with Putin or Xi would magically solve deep geopolitical and economic problems between global powers that might be unsolvable. He's far from the first US leader to suffer from such delusions. President George W. Bush famously looked into the Kremlin tyrant's eyes and 'got a sense of his soul.' President Barack Obama disdained Russia as a decaying regional power and once dismissed Putin as the 'bored kid in the back of the classroom.' That didn't work out so well when the bored kid annexed Crimea. More broadly, the 21st century presidents have all acted as though they're men of destiny. Bush came to office determined not to act as the global policeman. But the September 11 attacks in 2001 made him exactly that. He started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — which the US won, then lost the peace. And his failed second term goal to democratize the Arab world never went anywhere. Obama tried to make amends for the global war on terror and travelled to Egypt to tell Muslims it was time for 'a new beginning.' His early presidency pulsated with a sense that his charisma and unique background would in itself be a global elixir. Joe Biden traveled the globe telling everyone that 'America is back' after ejecting Trump from the White House. But four years later, partly due to his own disastrous decision to run for a second term, America — or at least the internationalist post-World War II version – was gone again. And Trump was back. Trump's 'America First' populism relies on the premise that the US has been ripped off for decades, never mind that its alliances and shaping of global capitalism made it the most powerful nation in the planet's history. Now playing at being a strongman who everyone must obey, he is busily squandering this legacy and shattering US soft power — ie. the power to persuade — with his belligerence. The first four months of the Trump presidency, with its tariff threats, warnings of US territorial expansion in Canada and Greenland and evisceration of global humanitarian aid programs show that the rest of the world gets a say in what happens too. So far, leaders in China, Russia, Israel, Europe and Canada appear to have calculated that Trump is not as powerful as he thinks he is, that there's no price for defying him or that their own internal politics make resistance mandatory.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gabbard Wants Fox Hosts to Feed Trump Top Secret Intel: ‘Doesn't Read'
Director of National Security Tulsi Gabbard wants to turn President Donald Trump's daily intel briefings into Fox News-type broadcasts because he 'doesn't read.' Gabbard is hoping to add animations and more dynamic multimedia elements to Trump's President's Daily Briefs, or PDBs, to fit his viewing habits and hold his attention, five people with knowledge of the discussions told NBC News. Gabbard ralso eportedly consulted with current and former intelligence officials on bringing in a Fox News producer and host to reshape the PDBs—which are usually text and image-based for national security reasons—to deliver the intel in broadcast form. NBC News reported that the process could involve granting the Fox News team security clearance to access classified information. 'The problem with Trump is that he doesn't read,' one source said. 'He's on broadcast all the time.' However, in a statement to NBC, White House Spokesman Davis Ingle blasted the report as 'libelous garbage from unnamed sources.' He added, 'President Trump has assembled a world-class intelligence team who he is constantly communicating with and receiving real time updates on all pressing national security issues.' Echoing Ingle's remarks, Director of National Intelligence Press Secretary Olivia Coleman said, 'This so-called 'reporting' is laughable, absurd, and flat-out false. In true fake news fashion, NBC is publishing yet another anonymously sourced false story.' PDBs are crucial decision-making tools for sitting presidents, but Trump has only taken the briefings 14 times as of May, less than once a week on average, NBC News reported. The average is less than that of predecessors Joe Biden and Barack Obama, who took 90 and 63 PDBs, respectively, in the same timeframe. In his first term, Trump took 55 PDBs by May. In Trump's first term, his PDB also changed to a one-page outline that was presented verbally by an intelligence official twice a week, according to former CIA officer John Helgerson's book, Getting to Know the President: Intelligence Briefings of Presidential Candidates and Presidents-Elect 1952-2016. At one point, then-Vice President Mike Pence reportedly told intelligence briefers to 'lean forward on maps' to help Trump engage, according to Helgerson's book. Unclassified information released by the CIA's in-house academic center in 2021 found that intelligence officials had 'struggled' to brief Trump in his first term in 2016, with 'only limited success' in educating the president, CNN reported.