Three committees complain of ‘inadequate consultation' over welfare reforms
A letter to Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall also said there had been a 'lack of robust data' to allow parliamentarians in the three areas to 'effectively scrutinise' the potential impact of the changes.
The letter, sent by the Scottish Parliament's Social Justice and Social Security Committee together with the Equality and Social Justice Committee of the Welsh Senedd and the Northern Ireland Assembly's Committee for Communities, comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is facing a rebellion from Labour MPs against the proposed changes.
We, alongside @nia_communities & @seneddequality, have jointly written to @leicesterliz, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, to share our concerns about a lack of meaningful engagement on proposed changes to the UK benefits system.
Read the letter: https://t.co/IKT4qGa4cy pic.twitter.com/EtDHwTU5Hw
— Social Justice and Social Security Committee (@SP_SJSS) June 25, 2025
A Commons vote on the plans to squeeze sickness and incapacity benefits is due to go ahead on Tuesday, despite 120 Labour MPs having publicly backed a move to block the legislation.
Meanwhile, the Work and Pensions Secretary was told there are 'significant concerns' about the Government's changes.
The letter from the three committees told how the 'economic backdrop' for many of those claiming disability benefits is 'already extremely challenging'.
And the committees added that the payments people receive 'are not symptomatic of a 'broken' system, but make a significant contribution to their health and wellbeing'.
They told Ms Kendall they were 'agreed that inadequate consultation and engagement by the UK Government with stakeholders and the devolved institutions has contributed to this sense of concern'.
Representatives from the committees added: 'In addition, the lack of robust data and jurisdiction-specific impact assessments presents significant challenges for our three committees to effectively scrutinise potential impacts.'
Here they insisted they have been 'constrained by the lack of quality information'.
They added: 'Our committees fully support the stated ambition that 'no-one should be consigned to a life on benefits just because they have a health condition or a disability, especially when they're able to and want to work with the right support in place'.
'However, in order to contribute meaningfully to the reform process, committees and citizens must be fully informed and offered every opportunity for meaningful engagement.'
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Sarwar dodges question on potential welfare reform revolt
Around 120 Labour MPs – including a reported 12 from Scotland – have put their names to an amendment which would block the welfare reform Bill. But on Wednesday, Mr Sarwar refused to say if he supported the reforms or the rebellion against them. When asked if he supports the Scottish MPs seeking to block the Bill at a live taping of the Holyrood Sources podcast in Edinburgh, the Scottish Labour leader said: 'My position has been quite consistent on the welfare reforms, which is I support the principle of reform. 'We have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system, even with the changes currently being proposed.' Mr Sarwar said there were 'many positives' in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, but added that there were 'still conversations to be had' about potential changes. Pushed again on whether he supports the rebellion, Mr Sarwar said: 'Conversations are ongoing, as you would expect. 'People are legitimately voicing their concerns, having those conversations.' Pressed again on his view on the potential revolt, Mr Sarwar added: 'We have to support the principle of reform. 'What those reforms look like has to be balanced and has to be fair.' Mr Sarwar stressed that he believed the best way out of poverty was through work, but said those who cannot work should be supported. The most controversial part of the plans will see the eligibility of the personal independence payment (Pip) in England and Wales be reduced in a bid to save £5 billion. Earlier on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner suggested that ministers were considering potential concessions to Labour MPs to stave off a rebellion. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable,' she said in an interview with ITV's Peston programme.
The Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Sun
How Keir Starmer will use persuasion, arm-twisting & dark arts to save Labour as he goes into crisis mode
IT was only last July that Sir Keir Starmer cruised to a landslide victory. Yet, not even a full 12 months later, he looks haunted. A man under real pressure. 2 2 No PM this early in their tenure should have to use an international summit to insist they are ' very confident ' of still being in post at the next election. Yet such is the scale of the revolt over the Government's modest package of welfare savings that No10 has gone into crisis mode. Ministers may be keeping calm in public but, like a duck's feet furiously paddling below the surface, in private they are panicking. I can reveal that Sir Keir 's diary was being rejigged last night so he can personally lead the ring-round of Labour rebels upon his return from his Nato dash to Holland. It is therefore perhaps a happy coincidence that his aides recently discovered the Downing Street vending machine has started stocking Red Bull. They are going to need all their energy for a fraught few days that could decide the fate of Labour's entire premiership. The golden rule in politics is knowing how to count — so some numbers: Around 120 Labour backbenchers are threatening to torpedo the government's £5billion package in benefit cuts. They say the squeeze on Personal Independence Payments specifically could push 250,000 claimants into poverty. Combined with the opposition parties, they have marshalled enough troops to easily wipe out Sir Keir's 156 majority when the vote happens in just five days' time. Defeat would strike a humiliating blow to Sir Keir's authority and throw into doubt his ability to push through any serious reform. National inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal finally ordered by Keir Starmer in another Labour U-turn If he cannot even convince his troops to get behind £5billion in welfare cuts, what hope does he have of reining in a sickness benefits bill set to balloon to £100billion within five years? Downing Street has been left with two options: Postpone the vote and buy time to redraw their proposals in a way that satisfies the rebels, despite the stench of weakness. Or roll the dice, stand firm, and try to peel off as many mutineers as possible. For now, Starmer has chosen to call their bluff, with both him and his deputy Angela Rayner publicly stressing the vote on Tuesday will happen. Over the next few days the PM, his ministers and his whips will use a mix of persuasion, arm-twisting, and downright dark arts to smash the revolt. A 'bleeding stumps' pitch has seen rebels told that popular policies — like more cash for hospitals and school breakfast clubs — could all be at risk without welfare savings. Meanwhile the more career-driven MPs are being gently warned that their hopes of a government job will evaporate if they walk through the wrong voting lobby. The name of one ambitious newbie who has been excitably telling colleagues he wants 'regime change' has worked its way back to No10. He can kiss goodbye to a ministerial red box . . . 'EMBARRASSING U-TURNS' But even MPs loyal to Starmer — and there are still a lot of them — are not convinced anything other than serious concessions will pull the rebels back from the brink. One member of the government tells me: 'It's hard to see how they can get this over the line on the current voting timeline without some concessions to get some of the heavy hitters to change course. 'But it is unclear if that reality has yet fully landed with No10.' Another supportive MP reckons a commitment on the floor of the House of Commons to soften the package later down the line is 'the only way to keep the show on the road'. One senior rebel insists they 'can find a compromise' but Downing Street 'need to take their fingers out of their ears'. And the rebellion is not just contained to the backbenches. One MP swears that as many as five Parliamentary Private Secretaries — the first rung on the ministerial ladder — are willing to abstain in protest. Many see this whole mess as symptomatic of a deeper problem running through his premiership: a growing sense he is not in control. A string of embarrassing u-turns — from winter fuel cuts to the grooming gangs national inquiry — are a dangerous smoke signal to his MPs that he can be pushed around. And worryingly to the Government — much like the Brexit Spartans who hamstrung Theresa May 's government — the new Labour rebels are organised. Experienced committee chairs on the soft left of the party have developed a sophisticated shadow whipping operation to marshall their troops. That No10 was totally blindsided by the ambush on Monday night — to the alarm of those in Starmer's inner circle — is testament to their tactics. Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway Labour insider Or as one Labour MP put it: 'The amendment landed like a Viet Cong ambush from the soft-left — swift, unexpected, and overwhelming in its force.' Terrified of party whips getting wind, the ringleaders recruited disgruntled MPs to their cause through snatched conversations in corridors and on the Commons terrace. As one MP warns: 'They have spreadsheets and they can count. This whole saga has given them intel on how to whip'. And you can bet that fighting benefits cuts will not be their only rallying cause over the next four years. Axing the two-child benefit cap — on which the PM has already shown ankle at the mere flickers of backbench grumblings — will be next. The danger for Sir Keir now is spiralling into a doom loop of chaos, which breeds unpopularity, which breeds more chaos, which breeds more unpopularity. For some MPs watching endless polls predicting their seats falling to Reform, they are resigned to being one-term wonders. 'Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway?', says one party insider. Almost one year ago our beaming PM walked into Downing Street with the most seats since Tony Blair. Next week's benefits vote will be a test of whether he is the master of that majority - or a mere passenger in his own government . . .
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Babcock boss hails new era for defence: Footsie giant's shares surge to 10-year high
Babcock shares yesterday surged to their highest level in a decade as the military contractor hailed a 'new era for defence' and bumped up its profit outlook. Chief executive David Lockwood said governments were sweeping aside concerns about costs as they seek to ramp up defence capability as quickly as possible amid growing threats. He told the Mail: 'When the very values that we cherish are under threat, then you're driven by capability, you're driven by time, you're driven by other things.' It came as world leaders gathered in The Hague, Netherlands, for a Nato summit amid escalating global tensions, including war in Ukraine and conflict in the Middle East. Europe is ramping up defence spending under pressure from US President Donald Trump. The Government this week warned that Britain should 'actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario,' and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Britain will buy 12 F-35A fighter planes with nuclear capabilities. Lockwood said governments were now asking companies: 'Can you go faster?', not 'Can you be cheaper?' He said: 'Those are not questions you would have been asked five years ago. It would have been, 'What's your best price?'' Investors have started to shift from an anti-defence stance, he said, adding: 'I've never understood how you could exclude defence stocks from environmental, social and governance funds. 'We defend societal values, we're one of the most governed industries in the world, we defend countries that take the environment more seriously than our adversaries. 'There's a whole bunch of things that a generation have taken for granted and they've suddenly realised they can't.' The UK has pledged to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035. Lockwood said: 'The commitments in this Parliament and where the money comes from are clear... it involves governments making difficult choices, whoever is in charge.' Shares in Babcock, which is best known for maintaining Britain's nuclear submarines, rose 14pc to their highest in a decade before closing 10.8 per cent, or 111p, up at 1144p. The company said profit before tax jumped 51 per cent from £216.7million to £329.1million in the 12 months to the end of March. Sales were up 10 per cent from £4.3billion to £4.8billion. In its first share buyback in 134 years, it will return £200million to investors. And it hiked its medium-term operating margin forecast, which is a measure of profitability, from 8 per cent to 9 per cent as it reaps rewards from a rise in military spending. The FTSE 100 firm said it has a contract backlog of £10.4billion.
