
True cost of Britain's pothole crisis revealed: Here's the typical repair bill to fix battered vehicles
Failing to avoid one of the millions of potholes on Britain's roads can be a costly affair, according to a new study revealing the value of garage bills to fix damaged vehicles.
For those unable to steer around craters last year, the average associated repair bill rang in at £320, according to IAM RoadSmart.
However, other drivers were forced to stump up more than three times that amount to repair or replaced damaged tyres, suspension components and steering parts.
Some 5 per cent say they paid more than £1,000 getting their motors fixed after driving through a pothole during the 12-month period.
The road safety charity said they are not just a 'danger to motorists and cyclists alike' but they have become a 'substantial financial burden' on drivers.
The RAC estimates there are over one million potholes on our roads, though the actual number varies by season and council maintenance schedules.
The poll of almost 2,000 motorists found that a fifth had been left no option but to pay for pothole repairs in 2024.
A quarter got away relatively lightly with garage receipts amounting to up to £200, while another quarter spent between £300 and £600 on having their motors rectified.
For one in five drivers, the cost of colliding with a pothole isn't a rare occurrence.
Some 22 per cent of those surveyed said they are having to splash out of crater-related garage bills at least once a year, with many discovering retrospective issues during annual servicing and MOTs.
And it's not just costs that are surging as motorists told the charity that they are increasingly having to take evasive action - sometimes dangerously - to dodge damaging craters.
The study also highlighted that three quarters of drivers have slammed on the brakes to avoid potholes on journeys in the last 12 months, while almost all motorists (99 per cent) admitted to driving or riding in the middle of the road to avoid them.
The same proportion were found to have swerved at the last minute to dodge potholes, and more than nine in ten confessed to being distracted scanning for potholes up ahead rather than concentrating on what's going on immediately around them on the road.
The poll revealed 52 per cent of motorists think the roads have deteriorated in the past 12 months.
Earlier this year, the Government announced a £1.6billion investment to improve road conditions and repair seven million potholes by 2026.
However, research published earlier this year by the Asphalt Industry Alliance (AIA) revealed a one-off cost of £16.8billion was needed just to bring UK roads up to an adequate condition, while half of our local roads have less than 15 years of useable life left in them.
Nicholas Lyes, of IAM RoadSmart, said: 'Potholes are not just a costly inconvenience; they pose a danger to motorists and cyclists alike.
'The financial burden on motorists due to pothole damage can be substantial, with many facing unexpected repair bills of hundreds of pounds.
'In 2023, there was a 12 percent year-on-year increase in the number of casualties where defective road surfaces where identified as a contributory factor.
'Addressing this issue is crucial to ensuring the safety of our roads and reducing the economic impact on motorists and businesses alike.'
Are road conditions getting worse? The Government says so...
The nations motorists are having to contend with worsening road conditions, the Government has admitted.
The Department for Transport's Road conditions in England to March 2024 report highlights a growing proportion of busy 'A' roads falling into a poor state of disrepair.
The report categorises road condition by a traffic light coding system.
While the volume of 'red' roads - those that should be investigated fully over concerns about the condition - have remained static, the report uncovered that the number of A roads moving from 'green' condition (no work is needed) to 'amber' status (maintenance may be required soon) has jumped in the last two years.
Since 2022, the proportion of 'green' A roads decreased by four percentage points from 72 per cent to 68 per cent in 2024, while 'amber' roads increased by three percentage points from 24 per cent to 27 per cent in 2024.
The report also shows that the number of 'B' and 'C' roads – which together account for 29 per cent of local authority managed roads in England – now classified as 'amber' has increased by 3 per cent, from 28 per cent in 2022 to 31 per cent in 2024.
The percentage of red road has risen from 6 per cent in 2022 to 7 per cent in 2024.
While this represents just a fraction of the country's road network, it is equivalent to approximately 500 miles of local and rural 'B' and 'C' roads.
Our five-step guide to making pothole compensation claims
1. Collect the evidence
If you're a motorist looking to make a claim for a repair bill for pothole-related damage, or a cyclist putting in a damage or personal injury claim after hitting one in the road, the first port of call is to make a note of where the pothole is located, the time and date of the incident, and take a photo of the pothole.
A pothole needs to be at least 2 inches deep to be deemed a pothole in the eyes of councils.
And it's not just the depth and size of the pothole that councils will try to use to refuse paying out compensation.
Local authorities may defend a claim if they successfully argue that the pothole was not an obvious hazard - or if they were unaware of it, despite having in place a reasonable system of inspection and repair.
To improve your chances of a successful claim, it will help to demonstrate whether the pothole was an obvious danger or not.
Where possible, take photos at the scene, just in case the council repairs the pothole before you can return to take them.
If you didn't do this at the time of the incident, you can return to the scene to take pictures.
You should also take a photos of the damage the pothole has caused to your vehicle (or person, if you have been injured).
If possible, take your car to a garage and ask for a mechanic's report in writing for the projected cost to fix the issue caused – or if your motor isn't drivable, phone a reputable repair centre and request a quote.
2. Work out who is to blame
To make a claim for compensation, first you need to know who should pay out.
If the pothole is on a motorway or main trunk road, the chances are it is a National Highways (formerly Highways England) problem.
For local roads, you will need to research which council is responsible.
Once you've identified the party you need to contact, request a copy of highway maintenance schedules and number of reported incidents on the particular road for the previous 14 days as evidence that the road hasn't been properly maintained or a reported pothole hasn't been addressed.
3. Make the claim
You'll need to issue a formal claim to the local authority or National Highways and most responsible parties will have a template you can request from them.
4. What to do if you do - or don't - get a compensation offer
After making the claim, you should be notified if compensation is being granted.
Though you can still reject the value of the offer if you believe it isn't sufficient, especially if you have evidence that the pothole had already been reported but the responsible party had not acted to rectify it.
If the council refuses compensation, you can seek legal advice or make a case through the courts.
However, a word of warning that this could be a time-consuming process and is likely to be worthwhile only if the repair bill is considerable.
5. Final option: Make a claim through your insurance
If you have comprehensive cover, you can claim for pothole damage on your insurance policy.
However, it's worth considering the cost of the damage as well as your excess payments and if this action will affect your No Claims Bonus.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘He's going to call it a day' – Ex-Red Bull mechanic claims Max Verstappen will quit F1 THIS YEAR
MAX VERSTAPPEN has been sensationally tipped to QUIT Red Bull at the end of the season by a former team mechanic. The Dutchman has won four drivers' titles in a row and is hunting for a fifth this year - which would see him match a feat only achieved by Michael Schumacher in Formula One history. 2 2 However, Verstappen has fallen 49 points behind championship leader Oscar Piastri amid huge performance struggles with the Red Bull machinery this season. Verstappen has continued winning races despite the issues and even the power struggle which hit the team last year. He has been linked with an exit from the Racing Bulls, with a team transfer to the likes of Mercedes or Aston Martin. But ex-Red Bull mechanic Calum Nicholas believes Verstappen - who became a dad for the first time last month - could QUIT F1 entirely, if he wins a fifth World Drivers Championship. Speaking on Lucas Stewart's YouTube channel as he played a round of golf, Nicholas was asked how many titles Verstappen would win in his career. He gave his answer before revealing what he thought lay ahead for the 27-year-old. Nicolas said: "Five. I think Max is going to win the Drivers' this year, and then I think he's going to call it a day." Despite his answer, the mechanic insisted he didn't "know anything" extra about Verstappen's career plans. Nicholas added: "To not back Max is just like lunacy, I think. The guy is just really really good. "Not in terms of just his technical skill and his talent, but I've watched Max grow into this guy that can do everything. "He does everything well now." Verstappen's last race win this season came at the Imola Grand Prix on May 18. He finished fourth at the Monaco Grand Prix a week later before inexplicably ramming his car into George Russell at the Spanish Grand Prix. That earned him a 10-second penalty - demoting him from P5 to P10 - and three penalty points on his licence to put him on the brink of a race ban. Verstappen has 11 out of 12 points needed to earn a race ban across the 12-month rolling system for the penalty points. He will need to be on his best behaviour at the Canadian and Austrian Grand Prix to avoid a ban in the following race before he sees two penalty points expire on June 30.


Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Skoda Enyaq Coupe Driving, Engines & Performance
Driving What is it like to drive? Few cars are easier to drive than this. Settle yourself in, pop it into Drive or B mode (you don't even need to press a Start button), and off you go. The steering is well weighted, the accelerator and brake pedals progressively smooth, and pitch and roll well contained. Lovely jubbly. The ride is on the firm side, with bumps and lumps a little jarring in the cabin. But the same could be said for any two-tonne-plus electric SUV. Dynamic Chassis Control is a fairly expensive option that we probably wouldn't bother with. Still, it breezes along nicely at motorway speed, with minimal wind and road noise. Advertisement - Page continues below Sportline models and above get paddles on the steering wheel to adjust the amount of brake regeneration, though we mostly stuck it in its strongest 'B' mode setting. But even then the regen isn't particularly strong – this isn't one of those cars that you can drive using just the accelerator pedal. Is it quick? Zero to 62mph takes 6.7 seconds in all but the vRS model. That car gets there in 5.4s. Whatever Enyaq Coupe you go for you won't be short of torque, with two-wheel drive models sending 402lb ft through the rear wheels and four-wheel drive adding another 99lb ft through the fronts for extra traction. Most of that torque is found low down, too, which means it's pleasingly nippy around town, despite its heft. So it's quick. But not raucously so. Aim it at a corner and the lack of steering feel means you'll struggle to pick a consistent line. At least the accelerator and brake pedals are well judged. Advertisement - Page continues below If it's dynamism you want from an electric car like this, give the Ford Mustang Mach-E a go. The Jaguar I-Pace was brilliant too... note the past tense, because Jag doesn't make it any more. Is there much difference in efficiency? The SUV should achieve marginally less than the Coupe, but don't expect a drastic difference. The Coupe is officially rated at up to 4.2 mi/kWh in the rear-wheel drive 85, and up to 3.9 mi/kWh in the all-wheel drive 85x and vRS. As ever though, those figures are in laboratory conditions and should be taken with a pinch of salt. Still, we got very close averaging 4.1mi/kWh in warm spring weather in the rear-wheel drive 85, which works out at 315 miles real world range – well down on the claim of 365, but actually a very good return. Expect less in colder conditions, mind. Variants We Have Tested 6 Skoda Enyaq Coupe iV vRS review: wannabe hot hatch gets more power... that it didn't need


Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Buy Skoda Enyaq Coupe Price, PPC or HP
Buying What should I be paying? Prices start from £46,200 for the entry-level 2WD Edition 85, rising to £50,650 for the 4WD 85x SportLine and £53,560 for the vRS. Yeah, Skoda operates north of fifty grand now and has done for a while. On lease, you're looking at around £445 for the 85-badged car and £505 for the 85x, on a four-year agreement with a £10k deposit through Skoda's own finance scheme. Shop around and you might do better. Advertisement - Page continues below Worth noting that the entry-level Enyaq SUV is available with a 58kWh battery and lesser SE L trim, meaning a starting price of £39,000, whereas the Enyaq Coupe jumps straight in with the 77kWh battery and Edition trim. Like-for-like, you're looking at a premium of about £2k for that fashion statement roofline. In terms of its VW Group rivals, the VW ID.5 also gets a smaller battery option meaning it starts significantly cheaper. Like-for-like it's a couple of hundred quid cheaper too. Shows you how much VW has dropped the ball with its supposedly more upmarket brand... An Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a couple of grand more than both. What are the trims like? The entry Enyaq Coupe comes very well equipped, purely because it's not really a base level at all. Included are 19in alloys, LED matrix headlights, a full length fixed glass roof, massaging drivers' seat, tri-zone climate control, wireless charging with cooling function, front and rear parking sensors plus rear camera, adaptive cruise control, keyless entry, and… we need a breather. Sportline throws in 20in alloys, sports bumpers, illuminated 'Tech-Deck' face (read lights in the grille), gloss black detailing, sports suspension (which lowers the body by 15mm at the front and 10mm at the rear), three-spoke steering wheel with adjustable brake regen paddles, aluminium pedals, posher interior trim, head-up display, an upgraded CANTON sound system and an area view camera. Advertisement - Page continues below The range-topping vRS car gets an even fancier bodykit and vRS badging including exclusive alloy wheels, plus more powerful brakes to deal with the added power, as well as the love-it-or-loathe-it signature Hyper Green paintjob. Skoda's latest wheeze is that you can pick your specification and then you have a choice of optional 'Lounge trims' to upgrade the inside of the car (apart from on the SportLine model). There are various other extras you can go for, though it's a bit strange that a heat pump is another £1,100 on a car this expensive. Adaptive dampers too are a pricey option (£1,700-£3,950). Avoid. What's the best spec? The entry-level single motor Edition 85 is the pick of the bunch here, thanks to its price, perfectly adequate performance figures, and superior range (365 miles). But unless you're truly hankering after that coupe shape, don't bother and stick with the regular SUV. Final thing: the warranty is three years/60,000 miles and the battery eight years/100,000 miles. That's a bit stingy when you think Kia and Hyundai have been offering seven years for yonks...