logo
Delays in federal health funding

Delays in federal health funding

Politico07-02-2025

With help from Mackenzie Wilkes
A Note to Our Readers from POLITICO's CEO and Editor-in-Chief
POLITICO has been the subject of debate on X this week. Some of it has been misinformed, and some of it has been flat-out false. Let's set the record straight
POLITICO is a privately owned company. We have never received any government funding — no subsidies, no grants, no handouts. Not one dime, ever, in 18 years.
Millions of people around the world read our journalism on POLITICO.com, POLITICO.EU and in newsletters like this one. It is supported by advertising and sponsorships.
POLITICO Pro is different. It is a professional subscription service used by companies, organizations, and, yes, some government agencies. They subscribe because it makes them better at their jobs — helping them track policy, legislation and regulations in real-time with news, intelligence and a suite of data products. At its core, POLITICO Pro is about transparency and accountability: Shining a light on the work of the agencies, regulators and policymakers throughout our vast federal government. Businesses and entities within the government find it useful as they navigate the chaotic regulatory and legislative landscape. It's that simple.
Most POLITICO Pro subscribers are in the private sector. They come from across the ideological spectrum and subscribe for one reason: value. And 90 percent renew every year because they rely on our reporting, data and insights.
Government agencies that subscribe do so through standard public procurement processes — just like any other tool they buy to work smarter and be more efficient. This is not funding. It is a transaction — just as the government buys research, equipment, software and industry reports.
Some online voices are deliberately spreading falsehoods. Let's be clear: POLITICO has no financial dependence on the government and no hidden agenda. We cover politics and policy — that's our job.
We are so proud of our journalists and so proud of the connection we have with you, our readers.
We stand by our work, our values and our commitment to transparency, accountability and efficiency — the same principles that drive great journalism and great business.
Now, back to work.
Goli Sheikholeslami and John Harris
Driving The Day
FUNDING FREEZE HAVOC — Providers and lawmakers fear that payments for some federally funded health programs aren't being dispersed amid confusing federal guidance stemming from President Donald Trump's executive orders on gender and diversity.
That includes funding for community health centers; Head Start, a school readiness program for low-income families; and other so-called safety-net programs.
Background: A flurry of orders from the White House in recent weeks has caused delays to federal funding, including January executive orders targeting 'the use of Federal resources to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies,' calling that 'a waste of taxpayer dollars that does not improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve.'
Last week, federal officials ordered a blanket freeze on most federal funding before rolling the order back on Monday. At least two judges have also ordered a suspension of the blanket freeze. At the same time, state Medicaid payment portals experienced an outage, causing confusion nationwide.
The downstream effects of the funding freeze have become clearer this week. Here are some key impacts.
— Some community health centers, which primarily serve low-income patients, have said they haven't received the federal funding that keeps them afloat, forcing some to temporarily shutter.
— Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee, said a safety-net hospital in her state couldn't provide medical services last month because of a freeze in Medicaid funds.
— Dozens of Head Start providers serving nearly 20,000 children report delays in accessing federal grant dollars, according to survey data from the National Head Start Association, an industry group representing the providers. That's despite officials later clarifying that Head Start was excluded from the freeze. HHS has said 'technical issues,' now resolved, affected the payment management system last week, but some providers may experience lags, Mackenzie reports.
On Thursday, several Democratic lawmakers demanded answers from the Trump administration. Senate health leaders Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) wrote to the administration asking why the Medicaid platform was inoperable.
'These repeated blackouts are causing panic, confusion, and unnecessary frustration for our doctors, community health centers, hospitals and patients,' Schumer said in a statement.
Virginia's Democratic senators, Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, also sent a letter Thursday to HHS asking why some health centers — including those in Virginia — weren't receiving funding.
An HHS spokesperson told Pulse that the administration was aware of 'ongoing technical issues' affecting the payment system.
'The system is back up and running now, but some PMS users are experiencing lags due to the high volume of request. HHS is working to expedite a resolution ASAP,' they said.
The confusion comes as many federal employees face a looming decision to resign and take deferred compensation. On Thursday, a judge hit pause on the plan until at least Monday, giving workers a bit more time.
WELCOME TO FRIDAY PULSE. GO BIRDS! Send your tips, scoops and feedback to ccirruzzo@politico.com and khooper@politico.com and follow along @ChelseaCirruzzo and @Kelhoops.
In Congress
MEDICAID CUTS NOT OFF THE TABLE — Despite Medicaid 'love' from President Donald Trump, his administration and House Republicans are poised to make deep cuts in the program, POLITICO's Ben Leonard and Adam Cancryn report.
Trump said last week that Medicaid was on the list of programs he wants to protect. He said he won't 'do anything' to Medicaid, except in cases of abuse or waste, claiming it wouldn't impact beneficiaries. 'It will only be more effective and better,' Trump said.
The comments come as Republicans explore a sweeping overhaul of existing health policies that would likely include major changes to Medicaid to fund a significant portion of party-line legislation to enact Trump's domestic agenda.
Working with the White House, the House Energy and Commerce Committee was already on track to slash hundreds of billions of dollars from programs within the panel's purview to offset the budget reconciliation effort, much of it coming from Medicaid.
Now, fiscal hawks in the House Republican Conference are calling for even deeper spending cuts, threatening to exacerbate an already difficult task of explaining to constituents why Republicans want to scale back a program that insures more than 70 million Americans.
'He wants to protect people's health care, and so do we,' said Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) in an interview. 'I'm afraid we're going to get to a point where this is going to implode with $1.8 trillion worth of debt. It's better to fix it now than later. … I absolutely agree with the sentiment he's saying.'
A White House spokesperson said the Trump administration 'is committed to closely examining Medicaid to improve care for beneficiaries while identifying waste and abuse.'
While further discussions with the White House are needed, Guthrie said, he expects that many of the proposals would still fit Trump's criteria.
KENNEDY PROCEDURAL VOTE — Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is one step closer to becoming the head of all federal health agencies after a key procedural vote Thursday night.
The Senate voted 52-47 to move to executive session on Kennedy's nomination, setting up a confirmation vote next week.
Kennedy still has to clear two more votes in the coming days to become Health and Human Services secretary as Democrats used delaying tactics permitted under Senate rules, indicating their particular displeasure with the Kennedy nomination.
Still, it's been all but certain Kennedy will be confirmed as HHS secretary since Tuesday when Republican senators on the Finance Committee united to move his bid forward in a party-line vote. That included Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chair Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a doctor who initially said he was 'struggling' with Kennedy's reluctance to disavow false claims about vaccine safety but then agreed to support Kennedy after receiving several assurances from him.
During his confirmation hearings, Kennedy said he'd prioritize combating chronic diseases that he believes are the result of additives in the food Americans eat and pollution in the environment. He said health agencies have spent too much time and money on infectious diseases, allowing chronic diseases to grow.
NEW SUBCOMMITTEE TARGETS COVID SPENDING — A congressional panel dedicated to a Trump administration effort to cut spending in the government is taking aim at Covid-19-era funds in its first hearing.
The House Oversight Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency will hold its first hearing on Feb. 12 titled 'The War on Waste: Stamping Out the Scourge of Improper Payments and Fraud.'
According to a notice from Chair Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), the hearing will examine improper payments and fraud, which the notice says were exacerbated during the Biden administration by 'massively expanding Medicaid spending and rushing pandemic-era funding out the door without proper oversight mechanisms in place.'
Why it matters: House Republicans and the new administration have criticized the Biden White House's handling of Covid-19 and threatened retribution.
Hearing witnesses include a former FBI agent who's now part of The Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank and director of an antiwelfare fraud organization.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
RTO PENDING — A memo from the Office of Personnel Management sent to federal employees earlier this week urged managers to prepare to bring workers back to the office, but CMS told its employees this week it doesn't have a date yet.
According to a Thursday email sent to CMS employees and viewed by POLITICO, CMS upper management told employees that they have no further details on when they will be expected back in the office and will update them once officials speak with the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents many HHS employees.
The AFGE did not respond to requests for comment, but the group has pushed back on orders from the Trump administration impacting federal employees, including an early resignation offer many employees received last month. CMS also did not respond to requests for comment.
In a separate email viewed by POLITICO, CMS employees were told by leadership not to speak with reporters and instead direct them to the official media email.
Names in the News
Kelly Langford, formerly an online communications director at HHS, is joining PhRMA's public affairs team as senior director working on paid media. Kim McCune, former vice president at Weber Shandwick, is also joining the PhRMA public affairs team as senior director of executive visibility.
Dr. Meena Seshamani has been named Maryland Department of Health secretary, pending confirmation. She most recently was deputy administrator and director at CMS' Center for Medicare.
WHAT WE'RE READING
POLITICO's Ben Leonard reports that more Democrats joined Republicans in the House to pass legislation to crack down on fentanyl.
The Associated Press reports that its diabetes and weight-loss drug propelled Eli Lilly's fourth-quarter profits last year.
POLITICO's Rory O'Neill and Csongor Körömi report that Hungary is mulling an exit from the World Health Association.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Musk cool it — for now
Trump and Musk cool it — for now

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Trump and Musk cool it — for now

Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben LATEST: The Supreme Court this afternoon gave the Department of Government Efficiency unfettered access to the Social Security records of millions of Americans, our JOSH GERSTEIN reports. The justices granted the Trump administration's emergency request to lift a lower court ruling that blocked a DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration from viewing or accessing the personal information in the agency's systems. In a separate order from the high court today, the justices gave DOGE another win, limiting access to its records from outside groups, Josh reports. TGIF: This week started with a question: Will DONALD TRUMP have a call with Chinese President XI JINPING to deescalate a trade war that could prove mutually ruinous to the world's largest economies? And now, it's ending with a new one: Will the president have a call with ELON MUSK to deescalate a war of words that could prove mutually destructive? While the White House is billing today's relative quiet as a détente, Trump allies, ill at ease about the possibility of another blowup at any minute, are calling it something else. 'Reminds me of the Cold War: mutual assured destruction,' said one Trump ally. Even as both men appeared to walk away from the edge, some White House officials and allies are privately acknowledging an uncomfortable truth: Trump is the most politically powerful man in the world, Musk is the wealthiest man in the world, and their fates have become inextricably linked. Musk needs U.S. contracts to support his businesses, and the U.S. needs the services Musk's companies provide. Trump, who overwhelmingly won the popular vote last year and a sizable social media following, has a singular platform he has shown willing to use at any moment to devastate Musk's businesses and send stocks crashing. And Musk, not only as owner of the social media platform X but the top GOP political donor last year, wields immense power to scramble the president's legislative agenda — with vast implications for the country's economic future, Trump's legacy and Republicans' majorities in Congress. Those factors are, at least in part, why Trump allies say the fight hasn't escalated. 'Of course,' the Trump ally added, 'the MAD deterrence worked — there was no nuclear war.' By today, mutual friends had pulled both back from the brink after a spat over the Trump-backed megabill and who should get credit for Trump winning the 2024 presidential election quickly escalated into a firestorm of personal insults and accusations. Musk on Thursday called for Trump's impeachment and suggested he has more links to a well known sex offender than previously known, while Trump threatened to cancel the billions of dollars in government contracts that form the foundation of Musk's businesses. Emblematic of Trumpworld's intervention, hedge fund manager BILL ACKMAN in a post on X urged the men to 'make peace for the benefit of our great country,' adding that 'we are much stronger together than apart,' a point that Musk in a separate post conceded was 'not wrong.' Trump, meanwhile, in multiple telephone interviews with reporters over the last 24 hours, including POLITICO, claimed he 'wasn't even thinking about Elon' and that the two wouldn't speak 'for awhile.' Amid rampant speculation about whether a call between the two men would happen, one White House official told POLITICO it was 'very possible' the two wouldn't speak today, adding that it was the 'most predictable schism ever.' Musk on Thursday night was hinting at his desire to call a truce after a dive in Tesla's stock price and Trump's threats to cancel his SpaceX contracts made clear the financial stakes. As for Trump, advisers and Hill leaders are likely to push him to refocus on passing his megabill — an effort that's likely to be far more difficult if he continues to goad Musk and the billions of dollars at his disposal. Read the full story here. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER In 1979, what tennis scandal embroiled JIMMY CARTER? (Answer at bottom.) Musk Radar SOMEBODY THAT I USED TO KNOW: JAMES FISHBACK, the chief architect behind the proposal to send 'DOGE checks' to Americans, told Sophia today that he's stepping back from the movement after Musk trashed the president. 'The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the president, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay,' Fishback said. 'What's not okay is his baseless personal attacks against President Trump.' Fishback, the founder of an investment firm, made headway in conservative circles after proposing sending $5,000 payments to taxpayers funded by a share of DOGE's projected savings. Though Fishback never formally joined DOGE, the idea gained support from Musk and the president. CAN WE TAKE A STEP BACK? Republicans in Congress really want this détente between Trump and Musk, our GISELLE RUHIYYIH EWING, RACHAEL BADE, NICHOLAS WU and MEREDITH LEE HILL report. 'I just hope it resolves quickly, for the sake of the country,' said Speaker MIKE JOHNSON on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' this morning. 'Oh, it's OK,' Trump told POLITICO in a brief telephone call on Thursday when asked about the breakup. 'It's going very well, never done better.' A senior administration official and person close to the White House said Trump had been convinced that continuing to brawl with Musk would be counterproductive and a distraction from a host of good news the White House should be focused on, including his talks with the Chinese leader. Still, the president has continued his subtle jabs at Musk. He told ABC News this morning that the billionaire had 'lost his mind' and that he is 'not particularly' interested in engaging with him. Trump also told CNN that 'the poor guy's got a problem.' DOGE caucus chair Rep. AARON BEAN (R-Fla.) said he was 'shocked and dismayed' to see his 'two friends fighting,' but remains optimistic that the two men can mend relations. 'I believe there's a Diet Coke in their future, that they can settle it and cooler heads will prevail,' Bean said. 'We need them together. We need to be united, and we're stronger together.' In the Courts HELP US OUT: The Trump administration today asked the Supreme Court to green light its mass firings at the Department of Education, Gerstein reports. In an emergency appeal filed this morning, Solicitor General JOHN SAUER asked the high court to lift a preliminary injunction issued last month. While Trump has pledged to eliminate the department in its entirety, Sauer insisted that the reductions in force only target 'inefficiency' and are not an attempt to tear down the agency. Sauer said Boston-based U.S. District Judge MYONG JOUN's order was part of a pattern of federal judges overstepping their role. Agenda Setting CALIFORNICATION: The Trump administration is preparing to cancel a large swath of federal funding for California as soon as today, CNN's ANNIE GRAYER and GABE COHEN report. Agencies are being told to start looking for grants the administration can withhold from the state. On the Hill, at least one committee was told recently by a whistleblower that all research grants to California are going to be terminated. DANCING ON MY OWN: The fallout between Trump and Musk has left Tesla on a political life float, our DAVID FERRIS reports. Trump on Thursday threatened to pull all subsidies for his companies and just like that, Tesla's stock suffered its largest one-day drop in history. The share price fell more than 14 percent, lopping off more than $150 billion from its market value. According to Bloomberg, it tanked Musk's personal net worth by $34 billion. ONE WINNER: THE MOON … The U.S. moon mission suddenly has a brighter future following Musk and Trump's fallout, our SAM SKOVE reports. Musk has argued against returning astronauts to the moon. But the forced exit of Musk's handpicked nominee to lead NASA, JARED ISAACMAN, and Musk's rupture with the president, has landed moon backers in Congress and industry an opening. 'Elon was the main reason for the fork in the road for NASA's human exploration plans,' said CLAYTON SWOPE, a former congressional adviser on space. 'With his exodus from D.C., there's a good chance NASA will refocus back to the moon with the plan: moon then Mars.' A number of major space companies, excluding SpaceX, are now launching a television ad campaign going big on the moon. What We're Reading Elon Musk goes on a warpath against Trump and the GOP (POLITICO's Andrew Howard and Adam Wren) MAGA Faithful Shrug Off the Trump-Musk Dust-Up (POLITICO's Ben Jacobs) Trump races to fix a big mistake: DOGE fired too many people (WaPo's Hannah Natanson, Adam Taylor, Meryl Kornfield, Rachel Siegel and Scott Dance) Silicon Valley isn't joining Musk's Trump-bashing — yet (POLITICO's Chase DiFeliciantonio and Christine Mui) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER When Carter first arrived in Washington, he played tennis 'more than any other single thing.' But that became a source of controversy after former White House speechwriter JIM FALLOWS said that requests to use the tennis court on the White House grounds needed to be approved directly by the president, according to the White House Historical Association. 'I have never personally monitored who used or did not use the White House tennis court,' Carter said of the accusation. He did admit to letting his secretary, SUSAN CLOUGH, receive requests from White House staff 'so that more than one person would not want to use the same tennis court simultaneously.'

Tesla stock jumps after wipeout sparked by the Musk-Trump blowup
Tesla stock jumps after wipeout sparked by the Musk-Trump blowup

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla stock jumps after wipeout sparked by the Musk-Trump blowup

Tesla stock rose on Friday after shares dropped 14% in Thursday's session. Elon Musk and President Donald Trump publicly traded barbs following criticism from the Tesla CEO. Trump threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's companies amid escalating personal attacks. Tesla stock rose on Friday after dropping sharply in Thursday's session following a public spat between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Shares of the EV maker rose as much as 6% on Friday to around $302.55. The stock is down 26% for the year. Tesla closed more than 14% lower on Thursday— its worst single-day performance since March—after a barrage of posts from Musk attacking both the president and his "Big Beautiful Bill." The decline dragged the stock below the $1 trillion market cap threshold. The rebound on Friday began as both Musk and the US president signalled they were open to making amends. On X, Musk responded to a post from billionaire investor Bill Ackman, which suggested that Trump and Musk "should make peace for the benefit of our great country." "You're not wrong," Musk wrote in reply. "Oh it's okay," Trump told the outlet when asked about his public conflict with Musk. "It's going very well, never done better," he added. However, after Politico reported that White House aides said Musk and Trump have also scheduled a phone call on Friday, a senior White House official told NBC that the president was not interested in a call. Analysts at Wedbush Securities including Dan Ives, a Tesla permabull, said in a Friday note they believed cooler heads would prevail. "Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares," they wrote. "We will be monitoring the situation closely today but we believe Tesla shares are way oversold." The feud between Musk and Trump began simmering earlier this week when Musk criticized the sweeping tax and budge bill that is a cornerstone of Trump's agenda. By Thursday, tensions had escalated significantly. Trump said Musk was upset about the bill's phasing-out of EV tax credits, which could hurt Tesla. Musk fired back and accused Trump of lying, before claiming credit for Trump's reelection. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," he wrote on X. Trump responded by saying that Musk "went CRAZY" in a post on Truth Social and threatened to cancel federal contracts with Musk's companies, saying it would save "billions." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

‘Mutually assured destruction': Trump's and Musk's quiet day is less détente than Cold War
‘Mutually assured destruction': Trump's and Musk's quiet day is less détente than Cold War

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Mutually assured destruction': Trump's and Musk's quiet day is less détente than Cold War

The White House is billing Friday's relative quiet following a public and fiery clash between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk as a détente. Trump allies, ill at ease about the possibility of another blowup at any minute, are calling it something else. 'Reminds me of the Cold War: mutual assured destruction,' said one Trump ally, who like others in this story was granted anonymity to speak candidly about the dynamic. Even as both men appeared to walk away from the edge, some White House officials and allies are privately acknowledging an uncomfortable truth: Trump is the most politically powerful man in the world, Musk is the wealthiest man in the world, and their fates have become inextricably linked. Musk needs U.S. contracts to support his businesses, and the U.S. needs the services Musk's companies provide. Trump, who overwhelmingly won the popular vote last year and a sizable social media following, has a singular platform he has shown willing to use at any moment to devastate Musk's businesses and send stocks crashing. And Musk, not only as owner of the social media platform X but the top GOP political donor last year, wields immense power to scramble the president's legislative agenda — with vast implications for the country's economic future, Trump's legacy and Republicans' majorities in Congress. Those factors are, at least in part, why Trump allies say the fight hasn't escalated. 'Of course,' the Trump ally added, 'the MAD deterrence worked — there was no nuclear war.' By Friday, mutual friends had pulled both back from the brink after a spat over the Trump-backed megabill and who should get credit for Trump winning the 2024 presidential election quickly escalated into a firestorm of personal insults and accusations. Musk on Thursday called for Trump's impeachment and suggested he has more links to a well known sex offender than previously known, while Trump threatened to cancel the billions of dollars in government contracts that form the foundation of Musk's businesses. Emblematic of Trumpworld's intervention, hedge fund manager Bill Ackman in a post on X urged the men to 'make peace for the benefit of our great country,' adding that 'we are much stronger together than apart,' a point that Musk in a separate post conceded was 'not wrong.' Trump, meanwhile, in multiple telephone interviews with reporters over the last 24 hours, including POLITICO, claimed he 'wasn't even thinking about Elon' and that the two wouldn't speak 'for awhile.' Amid rampant speculation about whether a call between the two men would happen, one White House official told POLITICO it was 'very possible' the two wouldn't speak on Friday, adding that it was the 'most predictable schism ever.' Musk on Thursday night was hinting at his desire to call a truce after a dive in Tesla's stock price and Trump's threats to cancel his SpaceX contracts made clear the financial stakes. As for Trump, advisers and Hill leaders are likely to push him to refocus on passing his megabill — an effort that's likely to be far more difficult if he continues to goad Musk and the billions of dollars at his disposal. Still, allies within Trumpworld hope that Musk and the president will bury the hatchet — even if some tensions simmer beneath the surface. '[Musk] isn't delusional, he understands what he is and what Trump is and they're going to kiss and make up,' said one longtime Trump friend who has also worked with Musk. The tentacles of Musk's businesses reach deep into the bowels of the federal government, creating both financial vulnerabilities for Musk and national security risks for the U.S. Slashing Musk's contracts, as Trump threatened, would starve the tech mogul and his companies of billions in government funding — of which they have reportedly received at least $38 billion over two decades — and devastate his business empire. Russ Vought, Trump's budget director, wouldn't rule out that possibility in a CNN interview Friday, adding that the administration recognizes 'that Elon benefits from, and his companies benefit from, the taxpayer dollars.' But cutting those contracts also risks crippling significant defense and space programs, including the rapid and low-cost launches the Pentagon contracts out to SpaceX. It's a point Musk used to his advantage Thursday when he threatened to preemptively decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which could leave NASA relying on Russia to get American astronauts to the International Space Station. While Musk has since appeared to walk back that threat, he could offer his space services to an adversary like Russia or China, exposing U.S. strategies and imperiling plans to launch commercial space stations under a NASA-funded program. Musk's satellite-based internet service, Starlink, also has multiple defense contracts with the U.S. government to support military operations in remote areas. It also this spring launched a batch of next-gen spy satellites known as Starshield for the Pentagon.'If for some reason SpaceX was not launching for the U.S. military, you would just have satellites piling up waiting to launch,' said Todd Harrison, a space and defense analyst with the American Enterprise Institute. SpaceX does so much classified work that it's hard to know how far Musk's reach extends. One example: The National Reconnaissance Office, which builds and operates the U.S. government's most sensitive spy satellites, is relying on SpaceX for a new 'proliferated layer' of surveillance satellites — an effort to get away from concentrated space assets that could be vulnerable to a Russian or Chinese anti-satellite weapon.'They have been using SpaceX to build and launch those,' Harrison said. 'What we don't know is how many more are left to be deployed … It's a black program.' The U.S.'s dependence on Musk's businesses for many core national security operations is a microcosm of broader vulnerabilities the U.S. faces as a result of its decision to lean on both private companies and foreign governments for key portions of its national defense infrastructure — limiting the leverage it has when it needs to protect itself. Reliance on China for rare earth minerals and magnets has, for instance, weakened the U.S.'s hand on trade negotiations, which are, in part, aimed at reducing American dependence on China. While many White House allies spent Friday urging the two men to make up, longtime Trump adviser and Musk nemesis Steve Bannon was still calling for all-out war. Bannon is advocating that the White House use the Defense Production Act to seize control of SpaceX and Starlink, strip Musk of his government security clearances, investigate any links between Musk and China and deport the naturalized South African native. It's unclear whether any of those proposals are resonating within the White House. 'There's no truce. All these people, the Ackmans, and everybody that tried to get him to deescalate, that tried to get the president to take a phone call and let Elon apologize, he just said, it's not happening,' Bannon said in an interview. 'There's not going to be any phone call. What he did — he crossed the rubicon.' Contracts aren't the only reasons for the men to make peace, though. For as much as Musk has played sidekick to Trump the last few months, he is a cultural personality with an entire social media company at his disposal. And he knows how to wield it to devastating effect. Musk sent congressional Republicans scrambling this week after his multi-day barrage of posts lambasting the reconciliation package under debate in the Senate, saying it doesn't do enough to cut government spending. Those comments jeopardized the fragile peace Speaker Mike Johnson brokered among House Republicans and the one Majority Leader John Thune is trying to negotiate in the Senate. The president's so-called 'big beautiful bill' cuts taxes and boosts border and military spending, key priorities the president needs to deliver ahead of the midterm elections or risk losing thin Republican majorities in Congress. Plus, Musk has immense sums at his disposal that he could use to run ads influencing public opinion on the reconciliation package — or to issue electoral challenges to the Republicans who vote for it. Those stakes have led many in the White House to conclude that the best strategy is for Trump to put his head down and focus on reconciliation and not provoke Musk further. Musk doesn't have an infinite leash either when it comes to his extracurricular activities, acknowledging before his White House departure that he has spent 'a bit too much time on politics.' Tesla sales plunged during his time in the White House, and its stock price nosedived Thursday following Trump's threat to cut government contracts and, perhaps more important for Tesla, subsidies. 'Bigger picture, Musk has potent tools for politics via social media and financial firepower,' said Steve Cortes, a GOP operative who led Hispanic outreach on Trump's 2020 campaign. 'He's clearly not a populist nationalist, but hopefully he will realize that victories by the Democrats in 2026 and 2028 would be ruinous for America.' Jake Traylor, Paul McLeary, Sam Skove and Eli Stokols contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store