logo
Live Updates: Violence as Deadline Passes for Israeli Troop Withdrawal in Lebanon

Live Updates: Violence as Deadline Passes for Israeli Troop Withdrawal in Lebanon

New York Times26-01-2025

Pinned
At least 15 people were killed and more than 80 injured by Israeli forces on Sunday in southern Lebanon, Lebanese officials said, as the 60-day deadline for both Hezbollah and Israel to withdraw from the south expired and thousands of Lebanese displaced by the war poured onto roads leading south back to their homes.
The agreement, which was signed in November and halted the deadliest war in decades between the two sides, stipulated that both Hezbollah and Israel withdraw, while the Lebanese Army and U.N. peacekeepers would be deployed in force to secure the area. Negotiators had hoped the cease-fire deal would become permanent, returning a measure of calm to a turbulent region.
But as the deadline passed on Sunday, a very different scenario was taking shape.
Israeli forces remained in parts of southern Lebanon in violation of the cease-fire agreement, stoking fears of a sustained Israeli occupation and renewed hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah. Israeli officials warned Lebanese not to return to their homes in many towns and villages in the south.
'In the near future, we will continue to inform you about the places to which you can return,' Avichai Adraee, the Arabic spokesman of the Israeli military, posted on social media on Sunday morning. 'Until further notice, all previously published instructions remain in effect.'
Lebanon's Health Ministry said that those killed and injured on Sunday morning had been trying to enter their villages along the border when they were attacked by Israeli forces. Residents of some southern towns had called for their neighbors to gather early Sunday morning and head to their homes in a convoy, despite the warnings from Israel. The Lebanese military said it was accompanying civilians returning to several border towns to try to ensure their safety. The military said in a statement that a Lebanese soldier was among those killed by Israeli fire.
It marked one of the deadliest days in Lebanon since the cease-fire came into effect in November.
Image
Work resumed late last month to clear the rubble from a barrage of Israeli airstrikes in the southern city of Nabatieh, Lebanon.
Credit...
Laura Boushnak for The New York Times
The Israeli military said in a statement that it had fired 'warning shots' after what it described as 'suspects' approached their forces. It also said that an unspecified number of people had been arrested and were now being questioned at the scene.
In the southern town of Aita al-Shaab, much of which now lies in ruin, many began streaming back to their homes on Sunday, arriving to rubble-strewed streets and flattened buildings.
Mohamed Srour, the town's mayor, was among those returning after being displaced for more than a year. He said that Israeli soldiers had not yet fully withdrawn from the town and claimed that they were firing sporadically at civilians. The claims could not be independently verified. Still, Mr. Srour remained resolute.
'Today, Aita is celebrating the long-awaited return.' he said. 'The houses are destroyed and the livelihood is gone, but our will to live is stronger. We will build again.'
In recent days, Israeli officials have cited concerns that Hezbollah remains active in southern Lebanon and doubts about the Lebanese Army's ability to stymie the group.
Those claims could not be independently verified, and the five-member committee overseeing the implementation of the cease-fire has not publicly released any information regarding Hezbollah's compliance with the terms of the truce.
The situation poses a critical test for Lebanon's new leaders, President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam, as they seek to wrest back some political control from Hezbollah, the country's dominant political and military force, and build a functioning state. Mr. Aoun urged civilians to exercise restraint on Sunday, but stressed that the country's sovereignty was 'nonnegotiable.'
Any prolonged Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon could breathe new life into Hezbollah, a group that was founded to liberate Lebanon from Israeli occupation and that has portrayed itself as the only force capable of protecting Lebanon's borders, experts say.
It also threatens to derail the current political momentum in Lebanon, where for the first time in decades there is a serious push to consolidate all military power within the state and do away with Hezbollah's justification for its vast arsenal.
Image
Lebanese soldiers next to a poster of the Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed in September in an Israeli airstrike on his headquarters just south of Beirut.
Credit...
Daniel Berehulak/The New York Times
The focus in Lebanon now is toward 'disarming Hezbollah and transitioning from the era in which Hezbollah was seen as having the right to acquire weapons,' said Mohanad Hage Ali, the deputy director for research at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, the Lebanese capital. Any prolonged Israeli occupation 'would put the breaks on that momentum, which is happening organically,' he added.
Hezbollah officials did not respond to Israel's accusations that the group remained militarily active in southern Lebanon, but said that they were 'committed' to upholding the terms of the truce.
On Saturday, Lebanese Army officials said they were prepared to complete their deployment in the south.This month, the American general overseeing the cease-fire monitoring committee expressed confidence in the Lebanese Army's ability to secure southern Lebanon. The army continues to demonstrate that 'it has the capability, intent and leadership to secure and defend Lebanon,' Maj. Gen. Jasper Jeffers said in a statement.
The 60-day truce took effect more than a year after Hezbollah began firing rockets toward Israeli positions in solidarity with its ally Hamas, the Palestinian militant group in Gaza that led the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel. Israel retaliated by assassinating Hezbollah's leadership, leveling towns and villages along the border and invading southern Lebanon.
Image
Vehicles crowded the road in November as families tried to return to homes they fled when Israel's offensive in Lebanon intensified.
Credit...
Daniel Berehulak/The New York Times
Even before Sunday's deadline, thousands of Lebanese who were displaced by the war from homes along the southern border were preparing to return home. On Saturday, the main highway leading from Beirut to southern Lebanon was packed with cars, even as people received automated phone calls from the Israeli military warning them not to return home.
Israeli forces appeared to be continuing efforts that persisted during the 60-day truce to bulldoze and block roads between some villages in southern Lebanon, according to local news media. Israel currently occupies roughly 70 percent of the areas that it captured after invading Lebanon last fall, according to the United Nations peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon.
Hezbollah has not said how it plans to respond to Israel's continued occupation of Lebanese soil. Some Hezbollah lawmakers have vowed retaliation. But other officials from Hezbollah instead shifted responsibility for responding to Israel to the Lebanese government. The group's statement on Friday said that it was up to the state 'to reclaim the land and wrest it from the grip of the occupation.'
That shifting of responsibility is a tried-and-true tactic for Hezbollah, which just a few months ago had called on the state to provide for thousands of Lebanese displaced by a war it had pulled the country into. Still, the political posturing from a group whose founding principle is resisting Israeli occupation reflects Hezbollah's current weakened state.
Image
A family climbing over rubble after a memorial ceremony for Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. For the first time in decades, there is a serious push in Lebanon to consolidate all military power within the state.
Credit...
Daniel Berehulak/The New York Times
After 14 months of fighting, the Shiite Muslim group's military ranks are battered, and its loyal support base is weary. Its patron Iran has also been weakened by Israel.And in neighboring Syria, rebels toppled an Iran ally, the dictator Bashar al-Assad, cutting off Hezbollah's land bridge for receiving weapons and cash from Iran.
These blows have loosened Hezbollah's once iron grasp on political power in Lebanon, shifting the country's political sands for the first time in decades. This month, Lebanese lawmakers elected a new president, Mr. Aoun, after years of political gridlock that many analysts had attributed to Hezbollah. Days later, lawmakers named Mr. Salam, a prominent diplomat whom Hezbollah had long opposed, as prime minister.
Still, Middle East experts have warned against writing off Hezbollah's political weight. And if Israel continues to occupy Lebanon, it could revitalize the group's mostly Shiite Muslim support base as it looks for a patron and protector against Israeli forces.
'I believe neither parties have an interest in resuming the war,' said Sami Nader, the director of the Institute of Political Science at Saint Joseph University of Beirut. 'But as long as Israel is occupying Lebanon, it's reviving the narrative of Hezbollah.'
Hwaida Saad , Dayana Iwaza and Sara Chaito contributed reporting.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why the West is bracing for war in the Middle East
Why the West is bracing for war in the Middle East

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why the West is bracing for war in the Middle East

The signs could hardly be more ominous. The United States is withdrawing non-essential diplomats and the families of American servicemen from across the Middle East. Britain has warned commercial vessels in and around the Gulf to exercise caution. It seems clear that Western officials are bracing for a potentially imminent Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities – and the retaliation Tehran would unleash in response. The sudden movement of personnel is being interpreted as a signal that Donald Trump has privately told Benjamin Netanyahu he will not stand in the way should the Israeli prime minister decide to act. Such a message would mark a significant shift from the US president's position just a few weeks ago, when he reportedly stayed the Israeli prime minister's hand. That does not mean military action is inevitable. Frustrated by the slow pace of nuclear talks, Mr Trump – a dove at heart – may simply be trying to rattle Tehran. He was deeply riled last month after being branded 'Taco' – an acronym that stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. Keenly aware that his adversaries may now view his threats as bluster, and assume the safest course is to wait him out, the US president may be trying to persuade the mullahs in Tehran that playing chicken with him is a dangerous miscalculation. Likewise, even if Washington has given Mr Netanyahu the green light, the Israeli prime minister has backed down at the last minute in the past on the advice of his generals. Ideally, any serious assault on Iran's nuclear programme would include a commando component to cripple its deeply-buried enrichment facilities. But earlier this year, Israel's generals reportedly told the prime minister that planning for a commando operation would not be completed until the autumn. Mr Netanyahu may decide to press on regardless. There are certainly increasingly convincing reasons to believe that, after 16 years of threatening military action, Israel may now be preparing to follow that through. Much has changed since April, when Mr Trump is said to have talked him down, arguing that negotiations remained a better path to prevent Iran from building a bomb. Credit: Reuters Israel is believed to have a strike plan in place, with or without commandos, and Mr Netanyahu was ready to implement it last month. Yet without US backing, he had to back down. No Israeli attack is feasible without American operational support and a commitment to help defend Israel from Iranian retaliation. That calculus appears to be shifting. This week, Mr Trump acknowledged for the first time that diplomacy may be failing, and that he is no longer sure Tehran can be persuaded to halt nuclear enrichment. That impression was reinforced on Thursday when the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, formally found Iran in breach of its nuclear obligations for the first time in two decades. Tehran responded defiantly, announcing plans for a new enrichment facility. In Israel's eyes, that declaration may well amount to a casus belli. The stakes are high. Less hawkish voices in the Trump administration doubt that Israeli strikes could destroy Iran's nuclear capability and warn that strikes could prompt Tehran to race to build a bomb while triggering a wider regional war. Aware of these risks, Israel may instead opt for a more limited assault aimed not at eliminating Iran's nuclear programme but at delaying it by a year. Such an operation, Israeli officials believe, is more likely to succeed now than in the past. Iran's proxy forces – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and, to a lesser extent, the Houthis in Yemen – have been weakened by Israeli strikes, diminishing Tehran's capacity for retaliation. Iran's principal deterrent has been blunted. Moreover, Iran's nuclear facilities are more exposed after Israeli retaliatory strikes last year that destroyed much of its air defence capacity. Still, the regime's most important nuclear facilities remain deeply buried. In the absence of commandos, the only realistic way to destroy them would be with US B-2 bombers carrying 30,000lb bunker-busting bombs flying in support of an Israeli-led mission. It is unclear whether Mr Trump would have the appetite for such a mission. Even a limited Israeli strike, however, risks triggering a wider regional conflagration. Iran is expected to retaliate with missile strikes on Israel – although, given the strength of Israeli air defences, the effectiveness of such an attack would be uncertain. Two Iranian missile assaults last year caused only limited damage. Iranian strikes on US interests in the region or on energy infrastructure in the Gulf would be far more dangerous – steps that could draw Saudi Arabia and its allies into the conflict. Oil prices would soar, exacerbating strains on a global economy reeling from Mr Trump's trade wars. There is still a chance to avert the worst. US and Iranian negotiators are due to meet in Oman on Sunday. What would once have been a routine round of talks has taken on far greater significance. If they go ahead at all, they may now mark a moment of reckoning, with the Americans delivering a final ultimatum – get serious, or face the consequences. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Egypt deports dozens planning pro-Palestinian march, organisers say
Egypt deports dozens planning pro-Palestinian march, organisers say

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Egypt deports dozens planning pro-Palestinian march, organisers say

CAIRO (Reuters) -Egyptian authorities have deported dozens of foreign nationals who arrived in Egypt to take part in a pro-Palestinian march and dozens more face deportation, the organisers and airport and security sources said on Thursday. Hundreds of people came to Egypt this week for the Global March to Gaza, an international initiative intended to exert pressure for an end to an Israeli blockade of the Palestinian enclave and draw attention to the humanitarian crisis there. Organisers said people from 80 countries were set to begin the march to Egypt's Rafah Crossing with Gaza, and confirmed some had been deported or were detained at the airport. Three airport sources told Reuters at least 73 foreign nationals had been deported on a flight to Istanbul on Thursday after authorities said they violated entry protocols, and that about 100 more were at the airport awaiting deportation. The Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. It had earlier said visits to the Rafah border region must be coordinated in advance with Egyptian embassies or government entities, and underlined the need to follow official procedures to ensure safety and security. The organisers said in a statement late on Wednesday they had complied with all the stated requirements. "In the two months leading up to the march, organisers coordinated directly with Egyptian embassies in over 15 countries and with the Foreign Ministry to ensure transparency at every stage," the organisers said, urging Egypt to free all those who had been detained. Israel's defence minister told the Israeli military on Wednesday to prevent demonstrators entering Gaza from Egypt, and said the march was a threat to Israeli and regional security. Egyptian officials have said the Rafah crossing is closed by Israel on the Gaza side and want international pressure applied on Israel to open it to allow in aid.

Iran Threatens to Attack U.S. Forces if Israel Strikes Nuclear Sites
Iran Threatens to Attack U.S. Forces if Israel Strikes Nuclear Sites

Miami Herald

time42 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Iran Threatens to Attack U.S. Forces if Israel Strikes Nuclear Sites

Tehran has vowed to unleash an "unprecedented response" if Israel launches a military strike on its nuclear facilities, warning that any such action would engulf the region in war and drag U.S. forces into the line of fire. As tensions mount, Washington has begun evacuating embassy personnel in Baghdad and other regional countries, with President Donald Trump citing fears that the Middle East "could be a dangerous place." The statement, broadcast by Iranian state TV, comes as multiple Iranian officials issue escalating threats of retaliation amid indications that Israel is finalizing plans for an imminent attack on Iran's nuclear infrastructure. The standoff between Israel and Iran has long simmered, but a confluence of military posturing, inconclusive nuclear talks, and open threats now suggests a turning point. If Israel strikes, Iran has indicated it will retaliate not only against Israeli targets but also U.S. bases across the region. The warning has increased the possibility of a broader regional war. Iran has warned it will unleash a massive regional response if Israel targets its nuclear facilities, with Defense Minister General Aziz Nasirzadeh declaring, "In case of any conflict, the U.S. must leave the region because all its bases are within our range, and we will target all of them in the host countries regardless." Echoing the threat, Commander-in-Chief of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Major General Hossein Salami, said on Thursday, "If our hands are untied, we will win victories that will make the enemy regret its actions." Meanwhile, according to the New York Times, an Iranian official confirmed that Tehran has finalized a detailed retaliation plan modeled after its October 2024 missile barrage, when nearly 200 ballistic missiles were launched at Israel. The official said a future response would match or exceed that scale. Iran-aligned Houthi forces in Yemen have also entered a state of high alert. A Houthi source told Newsweek they are "at the highest level of preparedness for any possible American escalation," adding that a broader conflict "will drag the entire region into the abyss of war." Diplomatic efforts continue in parallel. A sixth round of nuclear negotiations between Iran and the U.S. will take place in Muscat this Sunday, Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi confirmed. "I am pleased to confirm the 6th round of Iran US talks will be held in Muscat this Sunday the 15th," he wrote on X. U.S. President Donald Trump: "They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple – they can't have a nuclear weapon." Iranian Defense Minister General Aziz Nasirzadeh: "If a conflict is imposed on us, all US bases are within our reach, and we will boldly target them in host countries." All eyes now turn to the sixth round of nuclear talks scheduled for this weekend in Oman. With the stakes rising and Tehran preparing a counterproposal after rejecting a U.S. offer, the outcome of the negotiations may determine whether the region steps back from the brink. Related Articles Iran Fails to Meet Nuclear Obligations for First Time in 20 YearsExclusive: Houthis Warn US and Israel of 'War' If Iran AttackedUS Embassy in Middle East Prepares to Evacuate After Warning From IranTrump Puts Iran Nuclear Deal in Doubt, Raising Risk of War 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store