India will no longer tolerate cross-border attacks, warns senior parliamentarian
India will no longer tolerate 'cross-border terrorism' and will respond to any future attacks, a senior Indian parliamentarian said, as a fragile ceasefire between his country and Pakistan continues to hold. The warning follows a terrorist attack last month in the Pahalgam area of Indian-administered Kashmir, where gunmen killed 26 civilians, including 25 Indians. India accused Pakistan of being behind the assault. Islamabad denies the claim. 'This cannot happen again and again. Everyone has a threshold, and this is ours,' Shrikant Shinde, an MP for India's Shiv Sena party, told The National. 'This is the new normal: if they hit us, we will hit back. And we did, with restraint. Operation Sindoor was a measured response. We targeted only the camps of terrorist organisations.' Mr Shinde this week led an eight-member delegation to the UAE as part of a diplomatic push to highlight India's stance against cross-border attacks. It is one of seven all-party delegations dispatched to 32 countries to deliver the message. This month, India launched Operation Sindoor in response to the Pahalgam attack. The military response included missile strikes on what India said were nine militant camps in Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistani officials said the strikes killed 31 civilians. India and Pakistan fought for four days before a ceasefire was reached on May 10. The truce was announced by US President Donald Trump in a social media post and later confirmed by New Delhi and Islamabad, though each gave different accounts of how it was reached. While Mr Trump asserted a key US role in brokering the deal, Pakistan credited the involvement of several governments. India, in line with its long-standing policy of viewing the Kashmir dispute as a bilateral issue, downplayed any third-party role. 'The ceasefire was a mutual agreement between India and Pakistan,' said Mr Shinde. 'There's an established mechanism and a hotline between the two countries. Pakistan contacted us and requested the ceasefire, and we responded positively.' Both nations historically blame each other for initiating hostilities, while insisting their own actions are retaliatory. Kashmir, claimed in full by India and Pakistan, remains the most contentious issue between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. They have fought two of their three wars over the region, and tensions have shaped their relationship through decades of conflict and suspicion. While India and Pakistan have each claimed victory, some experts fear that a return to hostilities is almost inevitable. In a speech last week, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi insisted that the military offensive against Pakistani terrorist groups was ongoing and described the ceasefire as merely a pause. 'Pakistan has to make the choice now. The ball is in their court,' said Mr Shinde. The UAE was the first stop on Mr Shinde's four-nation diplomatic tour, which also includes Liberia, the Republic of Congo and Sierra Leone. During the visit, the delegation met with several UAE officials, including Sheikh Nahyan bin Mubarak, Minister of Tolerance and Coexistence. The Emirates played a quiet role in helping de-escalate tensions after the Pahalgam attack. Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, called for restraint and engaged repeatedly with both sides to prevent further military escalation. 'The UAE has a zero-tolerance policy on terrorism,' said Mr Shinde. 'We are here to reinforce the fact that we all speak the same language when it comes to terrorism.' India and the UAE share deep-rooted ties based on trade, cultural exchange and a large Indian diaspora. Over the years, the bilateral ties between Abu Dhabi and New Delhi have evolved into a strategic partnership, with co-operation spanning energy, security and investment. The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, which entered into force in 2022, has accelerated trade and investment flows. Mr Modi has visited the UAE seven times over the past decade. 'We are building major infrastructure − hospitals, roads − and attracting investment, including from the UAE, in Kashmir,' stated Mr Shinde. 'This has created jobs and fuelled a tourism boom. Last year, we had 25 million visitors to Kashmir, and the economy has significantly improved.' The MP believes the attack in Pahalgam was aimed at disrupting this progress. 'This is peak tourist season. Maybe the terrorists don't like that Kashmir is thriving,' he said. 'But what's different now is that the people of Kashmir took to the streets to condemn the attack. The mood has changed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
29 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Don't 'politicise' stampede incident, says BCCI VP Shukla
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) vice president and Congress MP Rajeev Shukla believes the ruling party, Congress, "should not be blamed" for the stampede that broke out outside the M Chinnaswamy Stadium during the Royal Challengers Bengaluru's IPL winning celebrations on Wednesday. After the stampede incident, Karnataka Legislative Council member, BK Hariprasad, said that 11 people, including a woman, died in the stampede during the event. Shukla feels the stampede outside the stadium should not be "politicised" and revealed he spoke to the franchise. According to Shukla, RCB didn't expect such a huge crowd to attend the celebrations. He also assured that efforts are being made to provide maximum help to the families of the deceased. "This can happen in any state, and the ruling party should not be blamed for it. It should not be politicised. If this happens in a BJP-ruled state, we should not blame them. The crowd was huge. I spoke to the franchise, and they also did not think that such a huge crowd would come, and this incident happened suddenly. Efforts are being made to provide maximum help to the families of the deceased," Shukla told reporters. "The government did stop the roadshow in order to avoid a stampede or any such situation. But it was not anticipated that a stampede would happen outside the stadium. Everybody should work together on the damage control," he added. Opposition parties in the state, including the Janata Dal (Secular), have squarely blamed the Congress-led state government for what they describe as a complete failure of planning and public safety. Union Minister of Heavy Industries HD Kumaraswamy said the primary reason for this "massive tragedy is the lack of proper planning and complete failure to take precautionary measures". Kumaraswamy, a former Karnataka Chief Minister, said the state's Congress government must take full responsibility for this disaster. "The tragic incident of a stampede near Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium during the RCB victory celebrations, resulting in the unfortunate death of people, has left me deeply shocked. It is extremely painful to see innocent lives lost even before the celebrations could begin," he said.
Zawya
6 hours ago
- Zawya
Reliance, Airtel group challenges 'low' India satcom fee which can help Starlink
NEW DELHI - A group representing Indian telecom giants Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel has said their businesses will suffer if India prices satellite spectrum at "unjustifiably low" rates that benefit satellite internet services such as Elon Musk's Starlink. India's telecom regulator in May proposed satellite service providers pay 4% of their annual revenue to the government for offering services. Starlink had lobbied India not to auction spectrum but just assign licences in line with a global trend, saying it is a natural resource that should be shared by companies. The Cellular Operators Association of India in a May 29 letter to the telecoms ministry sought a review of those pricing proposals, saying traditional players pay higher upfront auction charges for telecoms spectrum which make their payments to the government for spectrum roughly 21% higher, when compared to what satellite players would pay. "Price per MHz should be equivalent or at least comparable for both, especially when used to reach the same consumers for identical services," said the letter, seen by Reuters. "Satellite services can offer competitive and affordable alternatives to terrestrial broadband," it added. Reliance, led by Asia's richest man Ambani, and Airtel didn't respond to Reuters' request for comment. Starlink was not immediately available for comment. A senior Indian government source told Reuters on Wednesday the telecoms ministry is still reviewing the pricing recommendations made by the regulator, adding such industry concerns have been raised in the past. Telecom players like Reliance Jio are concerned they will be offering similar wireless broadband services as satellite providers but paying much more, said an industry source with direct knowledge of the situation. Reliance and others have spent nearly $20 billion in recent years to get 5G spectrum via auctions to offer telecom, data and broadband services. Ambani's company unsuccessfully lobbied New Delhi for months to auction satellite spectrum, and not allot it administratively as Musk's Starlink wanted. Though Reliance and Airtel have signed distribution deals in March for Starlink equipment, they will continue to compete with Musk's offerings to customers once launched.
Khaleej Times
8 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Pakistan: 200,000 Afghans left since deportations renewed
More than 200,000 Afghans have left Pakistan since the government renewed a deportation drive in April, with Iran also stepping up expulsions of Afghans. Generations of Afghans have fled to neighbouring Pakistan and Iran during decades of successive wars, seeking safety and better economic opportunities. Both governments have grown weary of large migrant populations and ordered millions to leave under the threat of arrest. Pakistan has launched a strict campaign to evict more than 800,000 Afghans who have had their residence permits cancelled, including some who were born in the country or lived there for decades. According to the interior ministry, more than 135,000 Afghans left Pakistan in April, while around 67,000 departed in May and more than 3,000 were sent back in the first two days of June. The UN's International Organization for Migration (IOM) on Tuesday voiced concern over a surge in Afghan families being deported from Iran, recording 15,675 crossing in May, a more than two-fold increase from the previous month. Iranian officials have ordered Afghans without documentation to leave by July 6. Nader Yarahmadi, from the Iranian interior ministry, said on state television that it would affect around four million of the more than six million Afghans who Iran says are in the country. The IOM said the influx across both borders threatens to strain Afghanistan's already "fragile reception and reintegration systems". It again called for "all countries to immediately suspend the forced return of Afghans, regardless of their immigration status, until safe, voluntary, and dignified return conditions are in place". Rise in border violence Millions of Afghans have poured into Pakistan over the past several decades, fleeing successive wars, as well as hundreds of thousands who arrived after the return of the Taliban government in 2021. A campaign to evict them began in 2023, prompting hundreds of thousands to cross the border in a matter of weeks, fearing harassment or arrest. In total, more than one million Afghans have left Pakistan. Islamabad has labelled Afghans "terrorists and criminals", but analysts say the expulsions are designed to pressure neighbouring Afghanistan's Taliban authorities to control militancy in the border regions. Last year, Pakistan recorded the highest number of deaths from attacks in a decade. Pakistan's security forces are under enormous pressure along the border with Afghanistan, battling a growing insurgency by ethnic nationalists in Balochistan in the southwest, and the Pakistani Taliban and its affiliates in the northwest. The government frequently accuses Afghan nationals of taking part in attacks and blames Kabul for allowing militants to take refuge on its soil, a charge Taliban leaders deny. Some Pakistanis have grown weary of hosting a large Afghan population as security and economic woes deepen, and the deportation campaign has widespread support. Pakistan is now threatening to lift the protection granted to the 1.3 million Afghans holding refugee cards issued by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees at the end of June.
