Choking back tears, Sen. Alex Padilla details his LA handcuffing
WASHINGTON – Sen. Alex Padilla delivered an emotional floor speech June 17, his first remarks on the Senate floor since the California Democrat was dragged out of a press conference in Los Angeles held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, pushed to the floor, and handcuffed.
"You've seen the video. I was pushed and pulled. Struggled to maintain my balance. I was forced to the ground, first on my knees and then flat on my chest," Padilla said as he choked back tears. "If that is what the administration is willing to do to a United States senator for having the authority to simply ask a question, imagine what they'll do to any American who dares to speak up."
Federal law enforcement agents forcibly removed Padilla from Noem's June 12 press conference after he interrupted the event amid mass protests over the administration's immigration crackdown.
More: 'Unhinged': Democrats are furious Sen. Alex Padilla was hauled out of Noem briefing
Noem's agency oversees Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, which had been carrying out raids in Los Angeles. Protesters flooded the nation's second most populous city's downtown for days, some of which devolved into violence as protesters burned cars and looted buildings.
Padilla said that he had gone to the federal building in Los Angeles where Noem was holding the press conference that day because he had a briefing with a four-star general about the military deployment in the city.
His briefing was delayed by Noem's press conference, he said, so he asked an FBI agent and a national guardsman whether he could attend. They escorted him to the press conference, where he listened until Noem began speaking about plans to "liberate" Los Angeles.
'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and mayor have placed on this country,' Noem said. Padilla started asking: 'Madam Secretary I want to know why you insist on –' before he was grabbed by security guards.
During his floor speech, Padilla said the administration planned "to somehow liberate us from the very people we democratically elected to lead our city and our state. Let that fundamentally un-American mission statement sink in."
"Are we truly prepared to live in a country where the president can deploy the armed forces to decide which duly elected governors and mayors can lead our constituents?" he continued.
Noem said during the press conference that she didn't recognize the two-term Padilla and that he hadn't requested a meeting with her. They met for for 15 minutes afterward, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Tricia McLaughlin, a Trump DHS official, wrote on X that Padilla's actions were "disrespectful political theatre" and claimed that the Secret Service believed he was an attacker. Republicans in Congress similarly put the blame on Padilla. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, told reporters shortly after the event that Padilla's actions were "wildly inappropriate" and said he should be censured.
Democrats were furious upon viewing the viral video of Padilla being forced to the ground.
"Anybody that looks at that video will understand that this amounts to an assault, a felony," said Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-New York, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. "The White House is unhinged and out of control."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Sen. Padilla chokes back tears in floor speech on handcuffing
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 minutes ago
- CBS News
Sacramento's Cosumnes River Preserve could be impacted by U.S. sale of federal land for housing
U.S. considers selling more than 16 million acres of federal land in California for housing U.S. considers selling more than 16 million acres of federal land in California for housing U.S. considers selling more than 16 million acres of federal land in California for housing SACRAMENTO — The U.S. Senate is considering selling over 16 million acres of federal land in California to turn into housing, including in Sacramento. The plan is part of President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," or budget reconciliation bill, which proposed putting over 250 million acres of public land in western states for sale, including land governed by the Bureau of Land Management U.S. Forest Service. The spot in Sacramento that could be impacted is the Consumnes River Preserve. "We were out there for about three hours this morning and it's a prize. It's really something worth saving," said Josh Schermerhorn, who was enjoying the Consumnes River Preserve with his wife Kathy on Tuesday. Senators who support this bill said selling federal land will generate upward of $10 billion for the government. "The thought of the sale of public lands is pretty un-American," said Katie Hawkins, California program director of the Outdoor Alliance. Hawkins said they are suspicious of the proposal because there are no safeguards in the plan that would prevent pretty much anyone from buying it. "Whether it's extraction, timber sales or if it's development for wealthy developers or even foreign interest," said Hawkins. Her other concern is whether the land is really meant to be built on. Historically, the area has seen flooding with waters spreading across nearby wetlands and rice fields. "I think flooding is natural," said kayaker Kather Schermerhorn. "This is an area that's not hurting anybody and to let it be natural." Mike Lee, a Republican Senator from Utah, has been pushing for the federal land to be sold, but not everyone in his party is on board. "It is so important that the acquisition or disposition of any of these lands be made only after significant and meaningful local input," said Republican California Rep. Kevin Kiley. Kiley openly opposed the idea on the House floor several weeks ago. The House voted against it, but the proposal is still alive on the Senate side. "We have other places where housing could be built and it doesn't have to be on a pristine, precious preserve," said Kathy. A staff member from one of the 10 organizations within the Consumnes River Preserve Partnership told CBS13 that the land is not meant to be built on and thinks solving the housing crisis should not cost Americans losing natural gems. Other California land that could be impacted includes parts of Lake Tahoe, Yosemite and Joshua Tree. Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla sent CBS13 this statement about the proposal: "Make no mistake, this latest Republican proposal is riddled with anti-environment provisions meant to create the largest public land sell off in recent memory to subsidize their tax cuts for billionaires. If Republicans have their way, we will never get our public lands back once they are privatized. Our public lands and natural spaces are some of our nation's greatest gifts and I will do everything I can do to protect them." The Senate has until July 4 to decide on this bill.
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
R.I. Senate unveils revised ban on assault-style weapons
Advertisement On Tuesday, the Senate announced the revised version of the bill, and said Lawson had directed Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Matthew L. LaMountain, a Warwick Democrat, to work with committee members to address concerns raised during a hearing on the bill. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up The amended bill would not ban possession of assault-style weapons, as the House bill did, but it would prohibit the manufacture, purchase, sale, or transfer of certain firearms. The amended bill would apply the ban to fewer pistols and shotguns. It would also remove a voluntary program, proposed in the House-passed legislation, in which people who own the specified weapons could get a certificate of possession from their local police department. 'Removal of this provision helps to assuage concerns that such language was tantamount to an unconstitutional gun registry,' the Senate statement said. Advertisement Under the bill, anyone in lawful possession of the covered firearms before the July 1, 2026, effective date could continue to possess them. Anyone convicted of violating the ban could face up to 10 years in prison or fines up to $10,000, and forfeiture of the firearm. The Senate statement included a quote from Monisha Henley, senior vice president of government affairs for Everytown for Gun Safety, who noted this is the 12th year such legislation has been introduced in Rhode Island. 'Assault weapons bans save lives — period,' Henley said. 'Compromise is a part of public policy progress, and the amended version of this bill is still a massive step forward in limiting access to weapons of war and a Rhode Island free from gun violence.' The group said that while the amended language covers fewer guns, it 'still covers the majority of the assault weapons market.' The Senate statement also quoted Diana Garrington, a volunteer with the Rhode Island chapter of Moms Demand Action and a fellow with the Everytown Survivor Network whose daughter was killed in Providence. 'The pain of having my daughter taken by someone armed with an assault weapon is something I wish no one else experiences,' Garrington said. 'Any restriction on these weapons of war is a step in the right direction for the state of Rhode Island, and if this amended version of the bill has the best path forward, it 100 percent has our support.' But the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence issued a statement that 'expressed dismay' over the amended bill and emphasized that the coalition is the 'only state-based gun safety advocacy group.' Advertisement 'Knowing we have a strong assault weapons ban bill that has already passed the House of Representatives, and knowing that the bill has the votes on the Senate floor, we don't understand how a weakened version of the bill would be acceptable to advocates, lawmakers or partners,' coalition Executive Director Melissa Carden said. The coalition urged Lawson 'to do everything she can to get the amended House bill, or a Senate equivalent, to the floor where we know it would pass.' Senator Louis P. DiPalma, the Middletown Democrat who sponsored the Senate version of the bill, said he understand why some advocates oppose the revised bill. But, he said, " Don't let better be the enemy of good enough." DiPalma said 'the core of the bill remains' intact in the amended legislation. 'I think the 'eye on the prize' is that we are restricting the future sale, manufacture, and purchase of the deadliest weapons currently available to man,' he said. He said that if you asked Rhode Islanders 'Do we do this or do nothing?' the majority would say, 'Do this, do something, we need to do something now.' Senator Pamela J. Lauria, a Barrington Democrat, said she would like to know what the plan is to get the amended bill through the House. 'I don't think it is as strong as the bill that came to us from the House,' she said. The House sponsor, Representative Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat, declined to comment on the amended version of the Senate bill, as did House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi, a Warwick Democrat. Senate Minority Leader Jessica de la Cruz, a North Smithfield Republican, and Senate Minority Whip Gordon Rogers, a Foster Republican, noted they are ex-officio members of the Judiciary Committee, and said they do not support the legislation in either its original or amended form. Advertisement If they vote in committee, as expected, that would increase the number of votes needed to get the bill out of the 10-member Judiciary Committee. 'The amended legislation still goes too far, banning certain shotguns and infringing on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens,' Rogers said in a statement. 'With all eyes on this high-profile vote, maintaining the integrity of the legislative process is crucial.' De la Cruz said that while she does not support the legislation in any form, she gives credit to Lawson and LaMountain 'for not circumventing the process by moving this legislation to any other committee when it unequivocally belongs in Judiciary.' LaMountain said the revised bill reflects varied perspectives on the proposal. 'While some committee members' sincerely held beliefs make them unlikely to support any version of this legislation, I believe that the majority of the committee members brought their concerns to the table in a good faith effort to improve the legislation before us,' he said. 'I encourage all of my colleagues to support this common-sense gun safety legislation.' In a statement, Lawson thanked LaMountain and other Senate Judiciary Committee for their work on the bill. 'I look forward to casting my vote in favor of this legislation with the hope of making Rhode Island a safer place for all,' she said. Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
Hamilton Spectator
12 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Kristi Noem is ‘alert and recovering' after trip to hospital over allergic reaction, official says
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem was taken to the hospital on Tuesday after experiencing an allergic reaction, her spokeswoman said. 'She is alert and recovering,' said the statement from department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, who said the hospital treatment was out of an 'abundance of caution.' Noem, 53, heads a sprawling department with roughly 260,000 employees handling immigration enforcement, airport security, disaster response and other matters. She has been among the more high-profile members of President Donald Trump's cabinet, traveling extensively and maintaining a robust social media presence. She is often the public face of his mass deportation effort, frequently goes out on immigration enforcement operations and has appeared in commercials encouraging immigrants in the country illegally to voluntarily leave the U.S. She held a press conference last week in California where U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat, was forcibly removed as he tried to speak to Noem about immigration raids. Padilla recalled the incident during an emotional speech from the Senate floor Tuesday. Homeland Security said the Secret Service, which is responsible for protecting the secretary, 'thought he was an attacker.' They also accused Padilla of 'disrespectful political theater.' Video of the incident shows a Secret Service agent on Noem's security detail grabbing Padilla by his jacket and shoving him from the room. In the hallway outside he was forced to the ground and handcuffed. Noem told Fox LA afterward that she had a 'great' conversation with Padilla after the scuffle, but called his approach 'something that I don't think was appropriate at all.' Before being tapped to head Homeland Security, Noem was a two-term governor of South Dakota, a former member of Congress and a staunch Trump supporter. She has said she specifically asked Trump for the Homeland Security portfolio because she knew it dealt with Trump's top priorities. Earlier this year Noem's purse was stolen on Easter Sunday while she was out to dinner with her family. The purse reportedly contained about $3,000 in cash, her keys, driver's license, passport and Homeland Security badge. The Homeland Security Department said Noem had cash in her purse to pay for gifts, dinner and other activities for her family on Easter. A suspect was later arrested in connection with the theft and has been charged in federal court with aggravated identity theft, robbery and fraud. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
