Don't fear whistleblower channels like Edisi Siasat, enforcement agencies told
EAIC chairman Ismail Bakar said information from sources such as Edisi Siasat, if credible and relevant, should warrant prompt investigations.
PETALING JAYA : The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) has advised enforcement agencies not to view allegations of misconduct, including those from unofficial sources like Edisi Siasat, as threats.
EAIC chairman Ismail Bakar said such disclosures should be seen as opportunities for agencies to strengthen their integrity and public trust, Berita Harian reported.
He said information from channels such as Edisi Siasat could still warrant attention and spur investigations if deemed credible and relevant.
'In some cases, such information can serve as the basis for initiating early investigation efforts,' he was quoted as saying.
'Under the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Act 2009 (Act 700), EAIC is empowered to initiate investigations on its own accord if it deems that the matter is of significant public interest or necessary.'
Edisi Siasat, an anonymous Telegram channel, is known for publishing whistleblower-style allegations, particularly targeting public institutions and enforcement agencies.
Despite being unofficial, its posts often gain traction and trigger public debates.
Ismail said investigating such allegations, whether true or false, would show transparency and a commitment to institutional reform.
'If the allegations are baseless, investigations can clear the agency's name. But if misconduct is proven, further action can be taken against those involved.
'This approach aligns with the principles of accountability and good governance,' he said.
Ismail added that the EAIC welcomed information that could help boost integrity and urged the public to cooperate to ensure investigations were fair and evidence-based.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
DAP demands AG justify ‘no further action' ruling in Teoh Beng Hock case, backs judicial review
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — DAP today called on Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar to explain in detail his decision to classify Teoh Beng Hock's death as requiring no further action (NFA). In a joint statement issued by DAP national chairman Gobind Singh Deo and secretary-general Loke Siew Fook, the party said the Attorney General must justify why he believes there is insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone for Teoh's death. 'The Attorney General and no one else has the discretion to prosecute under the Constitution. He must explain why he is unable to do so in this case particularly in light of the decisions of the Court of Appeal and civil proceedings in the High Court,' the statement said, as published on the DAP's official Facebook page. On May 21, the Attorney General classified the case as NFA after receiving investigation papers from the police, and on May 30, issued a letter to the family's lawyers stating that there was not enough evidence to support criminal prosecution. The party said it had consistently pushed for accountability since Teoh's death in 2009 and had formed a legal team that initiated an inquest to determine the cause of death. The inquest found bruises on Teoh's neck, but on January 5, 2011, the coroner returned an open verdict. DAP then challenged the finding in the High Court, which upheld the coroner's decision, prompting an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal overturned the earlier findings, concluding that Teoh's death was caused by 'an unlawful act or acts of persons unknown, inclusive of MACC officers who were involved in the arrest and investigation of the deceased.' DAP also supported the family in a civil suit that led to a government admission of liability for negligence and a RM600,000 compensation award with RM60,000 in costs. The party argued that both the Court of Appeal and civil court decisions provided grounds for renewed police investigations to identify those responsible. DAP said it supports the family's intention to challenge the NFA decision through a judicial review. 'We support this action and also call upon the Attorney General to review his decision and push ahead with charges against those responsible for Teoh Beng Hock's death without further delay,' the party said.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Fine, see you in court': Fahmi Reza calls out authorities over travel ban confusion, says no one taking responsibility; vows legal action
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — Graphic artist and activist Fahmi Reza has criticised the government over his recent overseas travel ban, saying no authorities have taken responsibility for the incident. In a strongly worded statement posted on Facebook, Fahmi said despite government claims that there was 'no official travel restriction' against him, he was still barred from leaving the country due to what authorities described as a 'confusion during an immigration check'. 'I don't see any government body owning up to the mistake that resulted in the restriction of my freedom of movement,' he said. 'You keep saying there is 'no official ban'. But in reality, I was still blocked and denied my right to travel,' he added. Fahmi questioned the government's accountability, saying he had lost time and money because of the incident, yet no agency had taken the blame. He also pointed out the double standards in how regular citizens are swiftly prosecuted for offences, whereas authorities often escape responsibility. 'This time, it's the people's turn to drag those in power to court,' Fahmi said. He insisted that no government or authority is above the law and that citizens should not be afraid to challenge injustice. 'You always tell me to 'use the right channel', don't you? Fine, see you in court,' he said. The travel issue came to light after Fahmi was reportedly prevented from boarding an international flight yesterday. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had earlier denied the existence of a blacklist order against Fahmi, saying there was no directive from the government to restrict his movement. Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain similarly stated that police did not issue any instruction to bar Fahmi from leaving the country and attributed the matter to possible confusion at the immigration checkpoint.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Police: Civil servant held over car scratching incidents at Ampang apartment
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — A civil servant was arrested yesterday for allegedly scratching two vehicles with a key at an apartment car park in Taman Pandan Mewah, Ampang. Ampang Jaya District Police Chief Assistant Commissioner Mohd Azam Ismail said the 41-year-old man was suspected of committing the acts on May 19 and 22. The victims, both local women, had parked in the same lot during both incidents. 'In the first case on May 19, the victim parked her Honda and later discovered scratch marks on the front and rear right doors. She was unsure who caused the damage. 'On May 22, at about 1am, her cousin parked a Toyota in the same spot and found scratches on the rear door at around 6.40am,' he said in a statement. The victims filed a complaint with the apartment management, leading to a review of CCTV footage that captured the incidents. According to police, the same man — a resident of the apartment — was seen walking beside both cars during the time of the incidents. 'Acting on the footage, police arrested the suspect at 5.35pm on Friday in the apartment's parking area. 'He is employed as a clerk at a public university. A bunch of keys was seized to assist in the investigation,' Mohd Azam said. He added that the suspect and the victims live in the same apartment block but are believed to be strangers. The motive remains under investigation. Checks revealed the suspect has no prior criminal record. The case is being investigated under Section 427 of the Penal Code for committing mischief.
