India's GDP Growth In 2025-2026 Estimated To Be Highest Among G20 Nations: Report
Quick Read
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
The OECD's 2025 Economic Outlook Report predicts India's GDP growth will lead G20 nations at 6.3% in 2025 and 6.4% in 2026. Amid global economic slowdowns, India aims for a $32 trillion economy by 2047, focusing on increased business ties with the EU.
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on Tuesday released its 2025 Economic Outlook Report at a press conference held in its Paris headquarters.
The report estimates that India's GDP growth (in real terms) will continue to be the highest amongst G20 nations in 2025 and 2026, touching 6.3% and 6.4% respectively. The report was released as delegations from member states and partners such as India assembled in Paris for an informal WTO Ministerial-level meeting.
"India is looking to become a 32 Trillion economy by 2047. This exponential growth will be possible because of our talent, and I'm here to reiterate people-to-people contact,' said Piyush Goyal, Union Minister for Commerce and Industry, while speaking at the India-France Business Conference. The Union Minister is in the French capital for the OECD Ministerial meet.
'Our razor focus is to make it easier to do business in India,' said Goyal as he reiterated the vast opportunities in India for those looking to do business and invest in the country.
However, global growth figures are not expected to witness a positive trend according to the OECD, which estimates that the global economy is on course to slow down from 3.3% last year to 2.9% in 2025 and 2026.
The Paris-based organisation's estimates come at a time of global disruptions - tariff threats from the US under the Trump administration and geopolitical tensions in Eastern Europe and Middle-East.
"Additional increases in trade barriers or prolonged uncertainty will further lower growth prospects and likely push inflation higher in countries imposing tariffs," said the OECD Secretary General Mathias Cormann as he presented the report.
Despite these global uncertainties, India's economic forecasts look on track, and the country hopes to increase business with the European Union as well as France.
The European Union (EU), which consists of 27 nations, views the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) as important for strengthening economic ties with India. India and the EU are reaching for a comprehensive FTA instead of an interim deal. French minister of foreign trade Laurent Saint-Martin said that a deal can come through as early as 'in the coming weeks and months'. 'India is one of our priorities and I know the European Commission really wants to accelerate (FTA),' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Delhi Assembly unveils 100-day ‘report card'
NEW DELHI: The Assembly on Friday celebrated the completion of 100 days of the Eighth Delhi Legislative Assembly with a ceremonial release of its Report Card – a document that highlights its key achievements, innovations, and its 'evolving, inclusive legislative ethos.' The event was held within the Assembly premises in the presence of Union minister Harsh Malhotra who lauded the Assembly's work, describing the Report Card as 'a reflection of remarkable accomplishments' and lauding its theme of 'Virasat' and 'Vikas'. He further praised Speaker Vijender Gupta's balanced leadership, highlighting a shift in the conduct of Assembly proceedings in the first 100 days. 'In this period, not once have we witnessed the kind of disruptions that had become commonplace in the previous decade,' he remarked. 'Gupta has upheld democratic traditions, provided equal space to the Opposition, and ensured the dignity of the House.' Gupta, in his address, reaffirmed the Assembly's commitment to transparency, sustainable development, and cultural preservation. He highlighted key milestones achieved during the Assembly's first 100 days, including the implementation of the National e-Vidhan Application (NeVA) to facilitate a paperless legislature and the laying of the foundation stone for a 500 kW solar power plant.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's ambition collides with law on sending migrants to dangerous countries
As the Trump administration ships migrants to countries around the world, it is abandoning a long-standing US policy of not sending people to places where they would be at risk of torture and other persecution. The principle emerged in international human rights law after World War II and is also embedded in US domestic law. It is called "non-refoulement," derived from a French word for return. The issue came into sharp relief in the past month as the Trump administration has tried to deport migrants with criminal records to Libya and South Sudan, countries considered so dangerous that they are on the State Department 's "do not travel" list. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Birla Evara 3 and 4 BHK from ₹ 1.68 Crore* Birla Estates Learn More Undo "What the US is doing runs afoul of the bedrock prohibition in US and international law of non-refoulement," said Robert K. Goldman, faculty director of the War Crimes Research Office at American University's law school. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) In a recent affidavit, Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the Trump administration's efforts to send migrants to those two countries as part of a diplomatic push to improve relations. He acknowledged that the Libyan capital, Tripoli, was wracked by violence and instability. Live Events You Might Also Like: Trump administration proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visas: memo To critics of the administration, the sworn statement shows that the United States is no longer considering whether a deportee is more likely than not to be at risk of abuse through repatriation or transfer to a third country. State Department employees were also recently told to stop noting in annual human rights reports whether a nation had violated its obligations not to send anyone "to a country where they would face torture or persecution." The State Department said in a statement that it dropped that requirement to focus the reports on "human rights issues themselves rather than a laundry list of politically biased demands and assertions." "Enforcing US immigration law, including removing those without a legal basis to remain in the United States, is critical to upholding the rule of law and protecting Americans," the statement said. You Might Also Like: Trump's ban on Harvard international students blocked by US judge A judge blocked the transfer of migrants to South Sudan, which is teetering on the brink of civil war, and the men were being held at a US military outpost in Djibouti pending more court action. The Trump administration is also in a showdown in another court over its transfer of Venezuelan deportees described as dangerous gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador without due process. "If they were sending them to Sweden, that would be a different thing than sending them to South Sudan, which is one of the most dangerous places on the planet," said Michael H. Posner, director of the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University's Stern School of Business. Posner, who was the assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor from 2009 to 2013, said the United States could send someone from Cuba or Venezuela to another country if it had been determined at a hearing that the place was safe. "We should not be deporting people to third countries where they have no connections and where their lives will be in serious jeopardy," he said. You Might Also Like: Trump travel ban: Why is Trump banning millions from entering the US again? The White House likens its crackdown on illegal migration to combating a national security threat from a hostile enemy. It has pressed military troops into service at the southwestern border and at a small detention operation for migrants at Guantánamo Bay. But even after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States abided by its non-refoulement obligation for prisoners it was holding at Guantánamo Bay, during a period when it flouted international law by torturing other detainees in secret overseas prisons called black sites. In 2004, Secretary of State Colin Powell concluded that the United States would not repatriate Chinese citizens from the Uyghur Muslim minority who had been rounded up in the war against terrorism in 2001 and held at the military base at Guantánamo. The United States believed that the men would be at risk if they were sent to China. Eventually, in 2013, the State Department found other countries to take in all of the Uyghurs. In the past, State Department officials have essentially asked two questions to determine where a detainee could be sent: Would the destination be safe for the individual? Would the United States and its allies be safe if the person was sent there? US officials had to assess whether the receiving country could monitor the activities of the detainees to prevent them from endangering the United States or an ally. Officials were also required to assess whether a deportee would be subjected to torture or other inhumane treatment. The United States adopted the same approach to its efforts to send home Islamic State group members or their relatives who were being housed in camps in northern Syria. "Consistent with both long-standing policy and its legal obligations, the US government cannot send people to a country where there are substantial grounds to believe that they will be mistreated," said Ian Moss, a lawyer and a former senior counterterrorism official at the State Department. In his affidavit, Rubio accused the courts that were reviewing deportation challenges of undermining US foreign policy. He also said that plans to announce "expanded activities of a US energy company in Libya" had been postponed. Rubio did not mention whether any diplomatic agreements surrounding the proposed resettlement included guarantees about how the migrants would be treated. "If these individuals are as dangerous as the administration represents them to be," Moss said, "sending them to a conflict area or country where there is a lack of capacity to manage them undermines the national security justification," Moss said. The State Department statement referred questions about "the removals process, including screening for credible or reasonable fear," to the Department of Homeland Security . The eight men who were to be sent to South Sudan were at a holding site in Texas when they were informed of their destination. An immigration division official, Garrett J. Ripa, said in a sworn statement May 23 that none of the men declared himself afraid to go. Court records showed that an immigration officer gave the men a form that listed their intended place of deportation. None signed the document. "By not signing, people are protesting being sent to a third country in the only way they know how," said Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the migrants in the case. Administration officials had previously planned to deport one of the men to Libya, which has been so unstable that Congress has since 2015 not allowed detainees who are cleared for release from Guantánamo Bay to be sent there.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Lebanon Threatens To Exit Ceasefire Talks After Israel Strikes Beirut On Eid Eve
/ Jun 07, 2025, 10:48AM IST Lebanon's army has threatened to withdraw from the ceasefire monitoring body following Israeli airstrikes on Hezbollah targets in Beirut's southern suburbs. The army said the strikes, which occurred just before the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, have undermined its role in maintaining the fragile truce. Although Israel issued evacuation warnings, the timing of the attacks provoked strong local outrage. Lebanese officials warned that future strikes could end their cooperation in monitoring and search efforts. They accused Israel of violating the ceasefire and bypassing official communication channels. France condemned the attacks, calling them a threat to regional stability. In a statement, French authorities urged Israel to withdraw from Lebanese territory and called on all parties to honour the ceasefire signed in November.#lebanon #israel #hezbollah #MiddleEastTensions #CeasefireViolation #BeirutStrikes #EidAlAdha #LebaneseArmy #IsraelAirstrike #FranceCondemns #BlueLineCrisis #unpeacekeepers #middleeastconflict #CeasefireCrisis #RegionalSecurity
