ChatGPT now lets you download Deep Research reports as PDFs - here's how
Deep Research is a feature that helps users conduct multi-step investigations on complex topics. When you enter a prompt, ChatGPT searches through hundreds of websites and compiles the information into a single report. This process takes minutes, compared to the hours it might take a person to do the same work manually.
Also read: Scammers steal over Rs. 11.55 crore from bank accounts after hacking mobile number
Previously, users could only copy the report text, but pasting it elsewhere disrupted the formatting. The new PDF download option maintains the report's structure and makes it more convenient for saving or printing. Steps to Download Deep Research as a PDF
A user on X first noticed the rollout of this feature. It is now live on the web version of ChatGPT. After generating a Deep Research report, users will see an option to export it as a PDF. This allows for easier sharing and archiving without altering the format.
Also read: Google renames Find My Device to Find Hub: What's new, and why Android trackers still need work
To download a Deep Research report as a PDF, follow these steps: Click the share icon in the upper right corner of the Deep Research report
Select 'Download as PDF' from the menu
Tap to save the file on your device Feature Now Available for All ChatGPT Users
On May 17, OpenAI confirmed the rollout of the feature for all users. It is available across ChatGPT's free and paid plans, including ChatGPT Plus, Team, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu. Alongside this update, OpenAI also announced the launch of a GitHub connector for Deep Research.
Also read: How to quietly limit someone on Instagram without blocking, unfollowing, or causing drama Professor Faces Backlash for AI Use in Class
In other news, a controversy has arisen at Northeastern University involving a professor who used ChatGPT to prepare lecture notes while advising students not to rely on AI tools. Business student Ella Stapleton spotted errors and odd images in the lecture materials, including a direct reference to ChatGPT. She raised concerns with the university and requested a tuition refund, but the school denied her claim after several meetings.
Professor Rick Arrowood admitted to using AI tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gamma to create lectures, saying he reviewed the content but missed some AI-generated mistakes. Speaking to The New York Times, he said, 'In hindsight, I wish I would have looked at it more closely.' He expressed regret for not examining the materials more closely.
First Published Date: 19 May, 16:44 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Kerala HC bars district courts from using AI for legal reasoning, decisions
In a landmark move, the Kerala High Court has come out with an Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage policy which specifically prohibits usage of such tools for decision making or legal reasoning by the district judiciary. The High Court has come out with the 'Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary' for a responsible and restricted use of AI in judicial functions of the district judiciary of the state in view of the increasing availability of and access to such software tools. According to court sources, it is a first-of-its-kind policy. It has advised the district judiciary to "exercise extreme caution" as "indiscriminate use of AI tools might result in negative consequences, including violation of privacy rights, data security risks and erosion of trust in the judicial decision making". "The objectives are to ensure that AI tools are used only in a responsible manner, solely as an assistive tool, and strictly for specifically allowed purposes. The policy aims to ensure that under no circumstances AI tools are used as a substitute for decision making or legal reasoning," the policy document said. The policy also aims to help members of the judiciary and staff to comply with their ethical and legal obligations, particularly in terms of ensuring human supervision, transparency, fairness, confidentiality and accountability at all stages of judicial decision making. "Any violation of this policy may result in disciplinary action, and rules pertaining to disciplinary proceedings shall prevail," the policy document issued on July 19 said. The new guidelines are applicable to members of the district judiciary in the state, the staff assisting them and also any interns or law clerks working with them in Kerala. "The policy covers all kinds of AI tools, including, but not limited to, generative AI tools, and databases that use AI to provide access to diverse resources, including case laws and statutes," the document said. Generative AI examples include ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and Deepseek, it said. It also said that the new guidelines apply to all circumstances wherein AI tools are used to perform or assist in the performance of judicial work, irrespective of location and time of use and whether they are used on personal, court-owned or third party devices. The policy directs that usage of AI tools for official purposes adhere to the principles of transparency, fairness, accountability and protection of confidentiality, avoid use of cloud-based services -- except for the approved AI tools, meticulous verification of the results, including translations, generated by such software and all time human supervision of their usage. "AI tools shall not be used to arrive at any findings, reliefs, order or judgement under any circumstances, as the responsibility for the content and integrity of the judicial order, judgement or any part thereof lies fully with the judges," it said. It further directs that courts shall maintain a detailed audit of all instances wherein AI tools are used. "The records in this regard shall include the tools used and the human verification process adopted," it said. Participating in training programmes on the ethical, legal, technical and practical aspects of AI and reporting any errors or issues noticed in the output generated by any of the approved AI tools, are the other guidelines mentioned in the policy document. The High Court has requested all District Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates to communicate the policy document to all judicial officers and the staff members under their jurisdiction and take necessary steps to ensure its strict compliance. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
AI tools not for decision making: Kerala HC guidelines to district judiciary on AI usage
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills In a landmark move, the Kerala High Court has come out with an Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage policy which specifically prohibits usage of such tools for decision making or legal reasoning by the district judiciary The High Court has come out with the 'Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary' for a responsible and restricted use of AI in judicial functions of the district judiciary of the state in view of the increasing availability of and access to such software to court sources, it is a first-of-its-kind has advised the district judiciary to "exercise extreme caution" as "indiscriminate use of AI tools might result in negative consequences, including violation of privacy rights, data security risks and erosion of trust in the judicial decision making"."The objectives are to ensure that AI tools are used only in a responsible manner, solely as an assistive tool, and strictly for specifically allowed purposes. The policy aims to ensure that under no circumstances AI tools are used as a substitute for decision making or legal reasoning," the policy document policy also aims to help members of the judiciary and staff to comply with their ethical and legal obligations, particularly in terms of ensuring human supervision, transparency, fairness, confidentiality and accountability at all stages of judicial decision making."Any violation of this policy may result in disciplinary action, and rules pertaining to disciplinary proceedings shall prevail," the policy document issued on July 19 new guidelines are applicable to members of the district judiciary in the state, the staff assisting them and also any interns or law clerks working with them in Kerala."The policy covers all kinds of AI tools, including, but not limited to, generative AI tools, and databases that use AI to provide access to diverse resources, including case laws and statutes," the document AI examples include ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and Deepseek , it also said that the new guidelines apply to all circumstances wherein AI tools are used to perform or assist in the performance of judicial work, irrespective of location and time of use and whether they are used on personal, court-owned or third party policy directs that usage of AI tools for official purposes adhere to the principles of transparency, fairness, accountability and protection of confidentiality, avoid use of cloud-based services -- except for the approved AI tools, meticulous verification of the results, including translations, generated by such software and all time human supervision of their usage."AI tools shall not be used to arrive at any findings, reliefs, order or judgement under any circumstances, as the responsibility for the content and integrity of the judicial order, judgement or any part thereof lies fully with the judges," it further directs that courts shall maintain a detailed audit of all instances wherein AI tools are used."The records in this regard shall include the tools used and the human verification process adopted," it in training programmes on the ethical, legal, technical and practical aspects of AI and reporting any errors or issues noticed in the output generated by any of the approved AI tools, are the other guidelines mentioned in the policy High Court has requested all District Judges and Chief Judicial Magistrates to communicate the policy document to all judicial officers and the staff members under their jurisdiction and take necessary steps to ensure its strict compliance.
Mint
5 minutes ago
- Mint
What is Baby Grok? Elon Musk announces kids-friendly AI app after controvery over sexualized AI avatar
Elon Musk has announced a new Grok app that xAI is creating to cater to kid-friendly content. The move comes after the billionaire faced criticism for Grok's sexualised AI avatars, which were said to have a negative effect on children. In a post on X, Musk 'We're going to make Baby Grok @xAI, an app dedicate to kid-friendly content' Beyond this, Musk did not disclose details on how the children-focused AI app will differ from xAI's usual offering. Before xAI's announcement, Google had revealed it is working on a special Gemini app for children, designed to help them with homework, answer questions, and create stories. Parents will also have the ability to disable Gemini access for their kids via the Family Link app. Google has clarified there will be no ads or data collection from the kids' version of Gemini, with a focus solely on learning and creative expression. The Grok app recently introduced a new AI avatar called Ani, a blonde anime character resembling a young woman in an off-shoulder black dress with a corset, fishnet tights, and a lacy choker. The character responds to user prompts in a slow, sultry voice, further cementing its profile as an adult AI companion. Many users on social media complained that Ani could encourage dangerous behaviour among minors by providing access to explicit and sexualised content. While the avatar does not use overtly explicit language, it has been reported to disrobe in response to conversations. The biggest concern was that Ani reportedly performed these actions even when the Grok app's Kids Mode was enabled. Earlier this month, xAI also launched the latest version of its language model, Grok 4, which quickly found itself at the centre of controversy after the chatbot began posting anti-Semitic sentiments online and portraying itself as 'Mecha Hitler.' xAI later apologised for Grok's responses, blaming deprecated code and the extremist views of X users for the incident.
