logo
Domestic abuse victims say their ordeals continue or even worsen despite family law proceedings

Domestic abuse victims say their ordeals continue or even worsen despite family law proceedings

Irish Times2 days ago

Adult and child victims of domestic abuse are being 'retraumatised' during family law proceedings, research suggests, with almost all those affected being subjected to abuse after separation and during court cases.
While the prevalence of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in all family law cases is disproportionately high, the Irish family law system as a whole 'is not sufficiently DVA informed or responsive', according to the research report.
Women's Aid
, which commissioned the research, said this 'systemic blind spot' left victims feeling disbelieved, silenced and at risk from further abuse.
The study, which involved almost 440 victims of DVA, was carried out by
Trinity College Dublin
and
University College Cork
.
READ MORE
Victims described their experience of family law proceedings as 'horrific', 'retraumatising' and 'relentless', with one woman saying: 'It's essentially a stage for the abuse to continue.'
The study argues that the courts and the family law system often operate under the 'flawed assumption' that once a couple separate then any violence or abuse is considered to be historical.
'This premise can lead to decisions and judgments that may not fully account for the ongoing risks or impacts of abuse on the victim-survivors, as it overlooks the possibility that abuse can continue even after separation,' it said.
Among participants who were victims of DVA, 91 per cent of women and 93 per cent of men indicated that abuse continued or began post-separation and while proceedings were under way.
'The abuse never stopped after separation, it just changed,' one woman said.
A common perception among participants was that perpetrators were able to 'play' the system to maintain control or cause disruption to inflict harm on former partners by repeat summoning or through multiple adjournments.
Researchers found that the court's 'neutral stance' regularly failed to capture subtle, nuanced patterns of abuse.
Most victims also indicated that forms of abuse such as coercive control, emotional abuse, financial abuse and stalking increased post-separation.
Victims managing court-ordered access, meanwhile, reported intimidation and threats while handing their children over, with 78 per cent of victims experiencing ongoing problems or abuse connected with access arrangements.
To avoid being charged with violating court-ordered access, victims were required to engage with their abuser, which 'frequently provided court-sanctioned opportunities for further abuse to occur'.
Some women reported assaults, threats, intimidation and manipulation, while others perceived court-ordered access being used by abusers as an 'ongoing tactic of control and abuse'.
Women also reported being wrongly accused of 'parental alienation' when they said their children did not wish to go on visits because of their experiences of DVA.
A common theme arising from interviews with child participants was feeling unsafe during access or contact with their father, with a 14-year-old girl saying: 'You just don't know what he's going to do next.'
Most children perceived their experiences as being discounted or disbelieved and their wishes being ignored throughout proceedings.
Trinity College Professor Stephanie Holt, the chief investigator for the study, said it provided evidence and insights into a 'fundamentally flawed' family law system when dealing with victims of domestic abuse.
'The findings paint a predominantly negative picture of that journey through the family law system for adult and child victim-survivors of domestic violence and abuse,' she said.
Sarah Benson, chief executive of Women's Aid, said while there were some examples of informed practices, it was 'completely inadequate when the system itself is not attuned and responsive to the tactics and impacts of domestic abuse post-separation'.
Women's Aid is urging the Government to 'fundamentally reform' the family law system in a DVA-informed manner which would include compulsory domestic abuse training for all professionals.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Families paying highest childcare costs to benefit from cap in September
Families paying highest childcare costs to benefit from cap in September

Irish Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Families paying highest childcare costs to benefit from cap in September

Families paying some of the country's highest childcare fees will see costs reduced in September after the Department of Children confirmed new caps on what providers can charge. The new ceilings should mean no parents pay more than €295 per week for a child attending a service participating in the Government's Core Funding scheme for between 40 and 50 hours a week. That figure will, in most cases, reduce to €198.70 after other supports are factored in. The caps vary according to the number of hours involved. The reductions, however, will only affect those parents whose children attend the most expensive services in receipt of Core Funding, with about 10 per cent of the almost 4,500 Government-supported providers charging at least one type of fee that will have to be reduced. In many cases, however, the savings should amount to more than €100 per child per month. READ MORE The imposition of fee caps from September on service providers in receipt of Core Funding had been scheduled for some time, but they had only previously applied to services that signed up to Core Funding for the first time. The department said on Thursday that the new caps would bring the gross fees paid by parents at more expensive services closer to the national average cost of €197 per week. At the announcement, Minister for Children Norma Foley acknowledged the Government still has considerable ground to cover to honour commitments that costs to parents will be cut to €200 per month. She said this would be done during the life of the Government, but said it was too early to indicate what scale of reductions might be funded in this year's budget. The childcare sector funding year runs from September to August and most of the big funding changes set to take effect later this year were announced before the current Government was elected. 'The programme for government has a very clear commitment around the €200 and that is our absolute goal,' she said. 'I've been very clear that we will do that over the lifetime of this Government. It will be incremental, and we're starting at the very top where there are extraordinarily high costs to parents, and we're beginning to bring that down.' Ms Foley said Core Funding would increase from €331 million in the current year to at least €350 million in the year from September with up to €45 million in additional funding to support pay in the sector which is widely seen as a barrier to the provision of additional places and services due to the difficulty in attracting and retaining staff. Minimum rates in the sector are only fractionally above the minimum wage. Talks between employer groups and unions on a new sector-wide agreement on minimum rates are ongoing and while progress is said to have been made, it is not clear that any new deal would be in place by September. If it is not, or the increases agreed are too small, some of the €45 million will be retained by the department. 'This funding is welcome, but the scale of it has to be reflected in the pay of staff in the sector,' said Darragh O'Connor of Siptu. 'Otherwise, it will be impossible for anyone to go back and make the case for similar supports in future years.' Karen Clince, chief executive at one of the country's largest providers, Tigers, welcomed the increased levels of Core Funding to be provided. But she said 'it doesn't go nearly far enough to address the horrific staffing we find ourselves in. We need more focus on pay and conditions rather than just vote-winning affordability.'

Nine e-scooters seized as gardaí use new safety technology in Dublin
Nine e-scooters seized as gardaí use new safety technology in Dublin

Irish Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Nine e-scooters seized as gardaí use new safety technology in Dublin

Gardaí have begun trialling new safety devices that can measure the speed of e-scooters and e-bikes. The portable devices, called mobile dynamometers, can determine the maximum speed that the vehicles are capable of. New laws governing the use of e-scooters were introduced in May 2024 and include limiting their maximum speed to 20km/h. They must also meet lighting and braking standards. The use of such vehicles by those under the age of 16 was also banned. READ MORE Any e-scooters that do not comply with these requirements can be seized by gardaí and a fixed charge notice can be issued to the user. In a post on X, the Garda said checks were carried out using the new dynamometer technology in Dublin on Thursday. Nine e-scooters were seized for a range of offences, including speeding and exceeding the maximum rated power output. [ E-scooters perceived as most dangerous form of transport in Ireland, report finds Opens in new window ] Fine Gael councillor for Dublin's north inner city Ray McAdam welcomed the new technology. 'We see e-scooters and similar machines travelling at speeds much greater than 20km/h across our city streets'. 'Those that ride those machines, I believe, are at risk because of the speeds they travel at, but they're also a huge risk to other road users and other pedestrians in the city centre'. Janet Horner, a Green Party councillor in the same district, said that while the speed enforcement is generally positive, 'it will also exasperate some road safety campaigners who have been calling for more enforcement on cars and other vehicles in the city. 'There is widespread and blatant flouting of the current speed limits around the city by all vehicles and we urgently need more enforcement mechanisms, including speed cameras, red light cameras and more visible traffic policing.'

Jury being picked in trial of Dublin firefighter accused of rape in US over St Patrick's weekend
Jury being picked in trial of Dublin firefighter accused of rape in US over St Patrick's weekend

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Jury being picked in trial of Dublin firefighter accused of rape in US over St Patrick's weekend

Jury selection has begun in a Boston court in the case against a Dublin firefighter charged with raping a woman in a hotel during St Patrick's Day weekend in 2024. Opening statements are expected on Monday at the Suffolk Superior Courthouse in the trial of Terence Crosbie (38). Mr Crosbie faces up to 20 years in prison if found guilty over the alleged assault of a 28-year-old woman in a Boston hotel room. He has pleaded not guilty and denied having 'any sort of sexual contact whatsoever' with the woman, his attorney Daniel C Reilly told the court. READ MORE He is accused of assaulting the woman after his colleague Liam O'Brien met her at a nearby bar and brought her back to the men's shared hotel room. Mr O'Brien is one of more than two dozen witnesses expected to testify, the court heard on Thursday morning. Potential jurors were informed that detectives, crime lab specialists and Boston area residents were also expected to testify, in addition to Aer Lingus staff. Mr Crosbie flew into Boston on Thursday, March 14th, 2024 with his colleagues to take part in the city's St Patrick's Day celebrations. On Thursday, Judge Sarah Ellis asked potential jurors if the defendant's nationality 'or the fact that he speaks with an accent' would make it difficult for them to be fair and impartial. She also asked them about their personal histories with sexual assault, alcohol consumption and other potential biases. US assistant district attorney Erin Murphy previously told the court that the accuser and Mr O'Brien met at The Black Rose, a downtown bar, and left together for the Omni Parker House, a historic hotel in Boston, at about 11.30pm. It is claimed that the complainant then had consensual sex with Mr O'Brien before falling asleep. According to Ms Murphy, Mr Crosbie entered the hotel room at 1.55am and the accuser woke up to find Mr Crosbie 'actively raping her.' The complainant allegedly asked Mr Crosbie to stop and he did not. Instead, he is alleged to have said he 'knew that she wanted this' and that it was 'pathetic' that his colleague was asleep. The complainant reported the alleged assault to police the following morning. After being questioned by Boston police about the alleged assault, Mr Crosbie attempted to leave the country on an early flight home. Mr Crosbie has been held in the Nashua Street jail in Boston since his arrest. His attorney previously claimed he was unable to make bail.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store