Passing police detention powers to NHS staff ‘could cause significant harm'
The Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, the Royal College of Nursing and Association of Directors of Adult Social Services are among those saying proposed changes to the Mental Health Bill will set a 'dangerous precedent' that puts people at risk.
In March, the Government suffered several defeats in the Lords as peers debated ways to modernise mental health legislation.
Conservative shadow health minister Lord Kamall proposed a change to the Mental Health Bill so that nurses, doctors and other staff could carry out detentions of patients without the need for police officers to attend incidents.
Health minister Baroness Merron told the Lords the Government did not support 'extending police powers in this way' but peers backed the Conservative proposal, resulting in changes to the draft new law.
The changes mean powers previously reserved only for police could be transferred to health or other professionals to detain and restrain people in crisis, in public spaces or at home.
It comes after concerns have repeatedly been raised by police leaders about the pressures mental health issues are placing on policing.
Launching a joint statement, major health organisations have expressed 'grave concerns' and argue the 'police play a crucial role in carrying out many tasks that medical practitioners cannot perform, such as assessing whether a home is safe to enter'.
They said 'reducing police involvement in mental health emergencies could lead to serious risks for both patients and clinicians.'
The joint statement said wording accompanying the amendment 'states that 'the proposed amendments would remove the need for the presence of police at mental health incidents in the absence of any risk.'
'This is misleading as instances of detentions under the Mental Health Act where there is no risk are almost non-existent.
'It also negates the fact that the mere presence of uniformed officers can ensure that an otherwise risky situation remains contained and safe.'
Transferring police powers to health professionals also risks damaging their 'therapeutic relationships' with patients, the signatories said.
This has the 'double-effect' of hindering the ability to provide care, while also deterring people from seeking help from services where they might be forcibly detained, they added.
The organisations said the changes 'have not been tested' with health professionals or discussed with patients.
Their statement said: 'We are keen to work with police and Government to find ways to improve responses to mental health crises to ensure the safety of all professionals involved, patients and the community.'
Dr Lade Smith, president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, said delegating police powers to health professionals 'would not be within the spirit' of the proposed reforms to the Mental Health Act.
She added: 'It is well known that at times, people experiencing a mental health crisis cannot be safely reached and cared for without the assistance of the police.
'Delegating police powers without proper consultation or planning is likely to disproportionately affect those from minoritised backgrounds and would increase risk to patients and compromise the safety of others. It sets a dangerous precedent.
'Like mental health services, the police are facing significant workload pressures.
'It is simply logical and now vital that we work together to develop more effective ways of responding to mental health crises.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Extending police powers to other professionals would represent a major shift in the roles, responsibilities and practice for health and care staff and would place additional resource on an already stretched NHS at a time where we are trying to rebuild a health service fit for the future.
'It also raises questions around whether it is right for the health and social care professionals to have powers to use reasonable force which could have implications for patient, public and staff safety, as well as potentially damaging the relationships clinicians have with patients.
'We are grateful to health and social care stakeholders for their in-depth engagement on this complex issue.'
Signatories to the joint statement are:
– Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE)
– Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS)
– Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) Leads Network
– British Association of Social Workers (BASW)
– British Medical Association (BMA)
– College of Paramedics
– Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM)
– Royal College of Nursing (RCN)
– Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Kemi is walking into an ECHR trap of her own making
If you think Keir Starmer is rattled by Reform's awkward-squad views on human rights, spare a thought for Kemi Badenoch. In a speech today obviously aimed at Conservative voters thinking of defecting to Nigel Farage with his unapologetic call to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), she will announce that the Tories too are indeed deeply unsatisfied with the convention, and are determined to do something about it. So far so good. Listen further, however, and you see not so much as a position taken as an exercise in bet-hedging. Rather than going full-on for withdrawal, she is – you guessed it – setting up a committee, albeit one embodying the 'sharpest legal minds'. One can see why she has chosen a non-committal managerialist solution like this. Unfortunately, there is every indication that Kemi's scheme will turn out to be a damp squib. The first difficulty is that, while many issues lend themselves to committee-style compromise, ECHR membership is not one of them.
Cambrian News
an hour ago
- Cambrian News
Senedd rejects public inquiry into Betsi health board failures
He said: 'A decade on, the Welsh Government has acknowledged that Betsi could languish in this state indefinitely. This is not just a failure of management, it's a failure of accountability, leadership and political will under Labour's stewardship.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Walking wounded told not to go to A&E as Labour plots £450m shake-up to end 'corridor care' in hospitals
The walking wounded will be told to avoid visiting A&E amid a major NHS shake-up revealed today which aims to divert them to a series of new urgent care centres. The Government has come up with the plan in an attempt to ensure hundreds of thousands fewer patients face long A&E waits in a bid to end 'corridor care'. Almost £450million will be put into creating better care and more facilities with an emphasis on caring for people closer to their homes, according to officials. Some 40 new same day emergency care and urgent treatment centres will also be established across England to treat and discharge patients the same day. The centres will deal with all but the most serious cases, with millions of patients urged to visit them instead of A&E to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions. Units located next to A&Es are likely to be within the network, focusing on patients with issues that are not life threatening who can be discharged the same day. Deteriorations in chronic illnesses and wound infections are among the issues that medics will be able to deal with at the new centres, reported The Telegraph. It is hoped the plan will result in 800,000 fewer patients each year waiting more than four hours at A&E and free up space for genuine emergencies to be dealt with. There are also proposals for 15 mental health crisis assessment centres, which are designed to ensure mentally ill people do not have to wait in A&E for hours for care. It comes after the NHS experienced a crisis over winter, with patients waiting hours for beds and regularly being treated in corridors - so-called corridor care. A&E waiting time targets have not been met for more than a decade, while the 18-minute target for category 2 ambulance calls - such as those suffering stroke, heart attack, sepsis or major trauma - has never been hit outside the pandemic. The new Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for England says more needs to be done to drive down long waits, cut delayed discharges and improve care for patients. An earlier version of the document said NHS trusts would need to show how, by this winter, systems will 'improve flow through hospitals, with a particular focus on patients waiting over 12 hours, and eliminate corridor care'. But the later version does not commit to a timescale for ending corridor care, instead saying systems must 'improve flow through hospitals, with a particular focus on reducing patients waiting over 12 hours and making progress on eliminating corridor care'. Ministers have also set an ambition for a minimum of 78 per cent of patients who attend A&E (up from the current 75 per cent) to be admitted, transferred or discharged within four hours, meaning 'over 800,000 people a month will receive more timely care'. There will also be a focus on seeing more children, according to the Department of Health and NHS England. The Government wants to slash the number of patients waiting more than 12 hours for a hospital bed - or to be discharged from A&E - so this occurs 'less than 10 per cent of the time', according to the new document. Around 1.7million attendances at A&E every year currently exceed this time frame. Further measures in the plan are intended to drive down delayed discharges from hospital, which occur when people are medically fit to leave but care in their homes or community has not yet been put in place. Local performance targets will be set to improve patient discharge times, and 'eliminate internal discharge delays of more than 48 hours in all settings', the plan said. Experts said A&E 'league tables' will be published to drive up performance. Those patients who need an overnight emergency admission will also have their overall stay reduced where appropriate - the average is 'currently nearly a day longer than in 2019'. The plan further sets out how ambulance waiting times for category 2 patients will be cut by more than 14 per cent, from 35 to 30 minutes. A previous target of 18 minutes has been repeatedly missed. In the document, there is an aim to 'eradicate' last winter's lengthy ambulance handover delays by meeting a maximum 45-minute target for patients to be handed over to A&E. This should help 'get 550,000 more ambulances back on the road for patients', it says. According to the document, almost 500 new ambulances will also be rolled out across the country by March 2026. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'No patient should ever be left waiting for hours in hospital corridors or for an ambulance which ought to arrive in minutes. 'We can't fix more than a decade of underinvestment and neglect overnight. 'But through the measures we're setting out today, we will deliver faster and more convenient care for patients in emergencies. 'Far too many patients are ending up in A&E who don't need or want to be there, because there isn't anywhere else available. 'Because patients can't get a GP appointment, which costs the NHS £40, they end up in A&E, which costs around £400 - worse for patients and more expensive for the taxpayer. 'The package of investment and reforms we are announcing today will help the NHS treat more patients in the community, so they don't end up stuck on trolleys in A&E.' Under the plans, paramedics will play a bigger role in the community, with patients given 'more effective treatment at the scene of an accident or in their own homes from ambulance crews'. More patients will also be seen by urgent community response teams in their own homes to try to avoid hospital admission. The NHS is also pledging better use of virtual wards, where patients are monitored by hospital staff from their home, and there are plans to drive up vaccination rates among NHS staff to help protect patients. Royal College of Emergency Medicine president Dr Adrian Boyle said: 'There is some good and some bad - but we wholeheartedly welcome the commitment to publish A&E performance data for each and every hospital and we thank NHS England and the Department of Health for heeding our recommendation. 'In this plan, for possibly the first time, NHS England acknowledges the shameful situation being experienced by patients and clinicians across the country's emergency departments - and that must be commended. 'However, some parts lack ambition - for example accepting that 10 per cent of people will face A&E waits of more than 12 hours, when no patient should. 'Also maintaining the four-hour standard at 78 per cent when the stated aim is that 95 per cent of patients should move through the emergency department within this time - something which hasn't happened for a decade.' He said there were also concerns about how the maximum 45-minute ambulance handover will be achieved 'without exposing patients to risk and increasing overcrowding in our departments'. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives managing director Anna Parry said: 'We are particularly heartened to see the plan's emphasis on the reduction and improved management of hospital handover delays. 'Handover delays have the greatest detrimental impact on ambulance resources and create unnecessary delays and additional harm for thousands of patients each year. 'The elimination of corridor care and the focus on reducing 12-hour waits at emergency departments is also welcomed.' The Liberal Democrats claimed the Government had listened to their calls to end corridor care, but called on ministers to follow through on their promises. Lib Dem health spokesperson Helen Morgan MP said: 'Patients have heard these kinds of promises before only to be led up the garden path. 'We can't bear any more of the shameful neglect and failed delivery that we saw for a decade under the Conservatives. 'It's good to see ministers finally listen to Liberal Democrat demands to end corridor care but the misery in our A&Es will only be prolonged if they continue to move at a snail's pace on social care. 'Until they grasp this nettle, millions are at risk of dangerously long waits in A&E. They must see sense and conclude their review into social care by the end of this year.'
