logo
AAXA M8 Laser Projector: Big Light for Budget Price

AAXA M8 Laser Projector: Big Light for Budget Price

CNET13-05-2025

6.9
/ 10
SCORE AAXA M8 Laser Projector $370 at Amazon Pros Super bright
Built-in battery
Some streaming apps Cons Wildly inaccurate
Mobile, 480p version of Netflix
Loud fans
AAXA M8 Laser Projector
6.9/10 CNET Score
$370 at Amazon
The tiny AAXA M8 is a powerful, portable projector that is impressively bright for its size and price. It has a built-in battery for off-grid movie nights, as well as some streaming apps. Its decent contrast ratio is a solid building block for a great image, but its oversaturated colors give it a look that is best described as "unique."
While the Anker Nebula Capsule Air is a better option overall with fewer vices, the M8 fits into a specific niche that makes it worth considering for some people. That niche? Lots of light from a tiny box. You'll need to adjust a few picture settings, but as long as you can get past the colors, the overall image is pretty good for the category.
Specs and such
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Resolution: 1,920x1,080
HDR-compatible: No
4K-compatible: Yes (4K30)
Lumens spec: 1,500
Zoom: No
Lens shift: No
Battery capacity: 1,5000 mAh, 1.2 hours (Bright mode, claimed), 2.5 hours (Eco mode, claimed)
Lamp life (Normal mode): 30,000 hours (laser)
The little M8 is roughly the size of a stack of six CD cases, for the people that remember those, just a little wider. There's no zoom or lens shift on the unit, but given the price, there's no surprise there. The focus is electronic, and you can adjust it using physical buttons on the back, which is convenient.
The headline spec is, of course, brightness. AAXA claims 1,500 lumens, which, like most brightness claims, is a bit high. In the Boost laser mode and Light picture mode, I got 456. This is still really bright for a small, inexpensive projector. For comparison, the Anker Nebula Capsule Air costs roughly the same as the M8 and could only manage 102. The far larger (and a little more expensive) TCL A1 was only slightly brighter. The M8 in its Normal mode and more accurate Custom picture mode produced a still-impressive 343 lumens.
The contrast ratio was also impressive, even if it's not graded on a scale of price and size. I measured an average of about 1,081:1. That's more than most projectors I've reviewed lately, including those that cost four to five times the M8's price. I keep coming back to the Capsule Air because it's so close in price and use to the M8, but it only managed 381:1.
The AAXA's internal battery, in Eco mode at least, should get you through about the length of a normal movie. However, this mode was the least accurate, and that's saying something. More on that later.
Connections
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
HDMI inputs: 1
USB port: USB-A (1), USB-C (1)
Audio output: Bluetooth, 3.5mm headphone output
Internet: Wi-Fi
Remote: Not backlit
For such a small projector, there are a lot of connections. So many that they're on two sides. On the left side there's a full-size HDMI input, a USB-A port, 3.5mm headphone jack, and a microSD card slot that can play the major audio and video file formats. On the back is USB-C, the power connection (sadly, it doesn't get power from USB-C), and the focus buttons.
On the right side is a tiny speaker powered by 4 watts. It's not very loud and can barely compete with the fans in Normal and Boost modes. Speaking of which, those little fans are working overtime to cool the laser light engine. The M8 is quite loud. You're never not going to notice it unless it's far enough away that you can't hear the speaker. That's the actual price of the M8: noise. It's super bright, but you need to deal with a mildly unpleasant whirr from its fans. This is largely physics at play. To quiet the fans, they'd either need to be larger or have a larger enclosure to muffle their sound. The laser could run at lower power to reduce the heat generation, but then you'd have a dimmer picture. All product design is a series of trade-offs.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
While the M8 does technically have some streaming apps built in, this is a little more complex than it seems. First, the Netflix app is the standard-definition, mobile version. Not only is this difficult to navigate, it also looks soft and blocky on the 1080p M8. Some other apps are available, like YouTube, Amazon Prime, Hulu, as well as the older HBO Go (but not Max), which didn't load, and Disney Plus, which did and looked fine. Will you be able to watch something via the included apps? Yes. Will you be able to watch everything like you would with a projector that has Google TV? Not without getting a streaming stick. Conveniently, the HDMI and USB-A ports are right next to each other, so you can connect and power any streaming device.
Picture quality comparisons
Anker Nebula Capsule 3
Anker Nebula Capsule Air
The Anker Nebula Capsule Air is slightly cheaper than the M8, and far dimmer, but it's also physically smaller and has Google TV. The Capsule 3 is larger than the Air and is close to the same overall volume as the M8. It's more capable than the Air and more expensive than the M8, but still dimmer than the latter. I connected each of them to a Monoprice distribution amplifier and viewed them side-by-side on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Firstly, both the Capsule 3 and the M8 look more detailed than the Capsule Air, which makes sense since they're 1080p, while the Air is 720p. However, given how small an image you're likely going to make with the Air due to its limited light output, that difference in resolution is far less important than it seems.
Anker's Air and the Capsule 3 are definitely more similar than they are different. In terms of brightness, the 3 is just barely noticeably brighter. It's 84 versus 123 lumens. That's not nothing, but then there's the M8, which is just screaming next to them at 343. It's worth noting that I'm comparing them all in their most accurate modes. All are capable of more light, but the Ankers at their brightest still can't compete with the M8 at its most accurate. The AAXA's Boost mode is even brighter and, unlike most projectors, this isn't its least accurate mode. The bigger issue with Boost mode is not the color or color temperature accuracy, but the noise. This is a loud little projector, and in Boost mode, it's a bit much in a quiet room. Eco mode is quieter, but also looks far more green.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
The AAXA also stands out with its contrast ratio. The 1081:1 I measured was above the 897:1 average of the projectors I've measured at CNET and well above the median of 490:1. The Air and 3 managed 381 and 471, respectively, which is actually decent for small projectors. There are several larger projectors that barely manage those numbers. The AAXA just looks far more punchy than either Anker. With the much higher brightness and that contrast ratio, two vital aspects of picture quality, the M8 blows the Ankers away... sort of. As often happens, there's a catch.
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
Oh my dog, the color. This is one of the least accurate projectors I've ever reviewed. The colors are wildly oversaturated. Green is green, blue is blue, red is red. It definitely draws the eye, I'll give it that, but yikes, it can look pretty weird. The colors are at least off in roughly the right direction. As in, everything is just "extra," not "bizarre." Grass is the greenest grass you've ever seen, but it's still identifiable as grass with no extra yellow or cyan. It looks pretty artificial, but it's not unwatchable. You can turn that saturation down in the picture settings, but as you decrease it, the colors get less accurate (green is more cyan, for instance), and the colors don't decrease evenly, so the desaturated image actually looks worse. The Ankers, on the other hand, are practically subdued in comparison. Despite not being particularly accurate in their own right, they're practically reference displays compared to the AAXA. They create a more accurate (again, relatively speaking) image that's far more natural looking.
Boxes over cans
Geoffrey Morrison/CNET
My recommendation for most people looking for an inexpensive portable projector is to get the Capsule Air. It's tiny, inexpensive, and has Google TV built in. The Capsule 3 offers a little bit more performance, but it's also larger and more expensive. In certain situations, though, the M8 is way better than both. It's a tiny little flamethrower, and if a tiny little flamethrower is what you need, it's great. It has its flaws, but what it does well, it does really well. For some people, it's going to hit the spot.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Google Pixel 9 deals: Both at all-time low prices!
Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Google Pixel 9 deals: Both at all-time low prices!

Android Authority

time29 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Google Pixel 9 deals: Both at all-time low prices!

C. Scott Brown / Android Authority Are you looking for a great phone that won't break the bank? If you still want something high-end, I usually recommend phones like the Samsung Galaxy S25 or the Google Pixel 9 base models. These still offer a premium experience, but the price is more reasonable. They also happen to be smaller phones, which many of us prefer. They are also both at their all-time low prices right now, but which one should you pick? Buy the Samsung Galaxy S25 for $624.99 ($175 off) Buy the Google Pixel 9 for $599 ($200 off) Both of these offers come from Amazon, but there are some things you need to keep in mind. The Samsung Galaxy S25 deal is only available for two color models: Silver Shadow and Mint. In the case of the Google Pixel 9, all color versions are equally discounted. Samsung Galaxy S25 Samsung Galaxy S25 Samsung Galaxy S25 Refined software, AI smarts, and next-gen hardware With an emphasis on AI features, and a move to Gemini, the Samsung Galaxy S25 is an exciting update to the Galaxy S line. Equipped with a 6.2-inch FHD+ display, Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC, 12GB of RAM, a powerful 50MP camera, and updated hardware materials, we expect big things from the base model of Samsung's 2025 flagship phone. See price at Amazon Save $175.00 Limited Time Deal! The Samsung Galaxy S25 series has an excellent reputation. In fact, S25 phones might be even more popular than Google's own devices! It's for a good reason, though. These phones are awesome, offering a premium experience that is really hard to beat. We'll be straight and tell you it isn't quite as amazing as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus and Ultra, but it is still a high-end handset. To be honest, most people will do just fine with this phone, and the others may be a bit overkill for many. The Samsung Galaxy S25 still comes with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor and 12GB of RAM. Performance won't really suffer, and this phone can still handle any app, game, or task. As already mentioned, the phone is smaller, so it has a 6.2-inch display with a Full HD+ resolution. It still has a 120Hz refresh rate, so motion is just as smooth. It's still a Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2x panel, so it looks gorgeous, with vibrant colors and deep blacks. C. Scott Brown / Android Authority Furthermore, the design is gorgeous, offering a sleek look and a really solid construction. It has an aluminum frame, and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front and back. Just like all other high-end modern phones, it also gets an IP68 rating. It has a really nice camera system. It's actually the same as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus one. While neither of these phones can match the Ultra model in terms of picture quality, both can take outstanding photos. The battery is smaller at 4,000mAh, but we found it can still last a whole day on a full charge. When depleted, you can juice up the phone at 25W wired or 15W wireless speeds. All things considered, you'll get a phone with plenty of power, a really nice design, and an overall higher-end experience. The Samsung UI is also more complex, which means it has a bunch of cool features you don't always find in other smartphones. It helps that it also gets a seven-year update promise, which is among the best update commitments in the industry. The only brand that matches Samsung in this regard is Google. If you want to learn more, we have a full Samsung Galaxy S25 review. Google Pixel 9 Google Pixel 9 Google Pixel 9 The vanilla Pixel 9. The Pixel 9 rocks a 6.3-inch display, Tensor G4 chipset, 12GB of RAM, and at least 128GB of internal storage. See price at Amazon Save $200.00 The Samsung Galaxy S25 is excellent, but many of you prefer the Google experience. The UI is cleaner, and Pixel phones are always among the first to get Android updates. The Google Pixel 9 is technically also a high-end phone, but it is the smaller brother in its premium family, just like the S25. They are direct competitors, so the offerings are quite similar. The Pixel 9 still has a great design, features an aluminum frame, and even has the same Gorilla Glass Victus construction, along with the IP68 rating. This phone is quite powerful, featuring a Google Tensor G4 chipset and 12GB of RAM. The performance will be more than enough to keep the majority of people happy. You would honestly need to push the phone really hard to see it slow down. C. Scott Brown / Android Authority The display is also smaller, at 6.3 inches. It's an OLED panel with a Full HD+ resolution. And yes, it also has a 120Hz refresh rate. Even battery life is about the same, averaging about a full day per charge. It charges a bit faster, but not by much. It can reach 27W speeds wired or 15W wirelessly. Pixels are known for their cameras, and the Google Pixel 9 is no exception. Of course, the Pro models have better cameras, but the Pixel 9 still shoots outstanding photos. Remember we told you the only brand that matches Samsung in update promises is Google? Yeah, the Google Pixel 9 also gets a seven-year update commitment. You really can't go wrong with the Pixel 9. It's likely a better option if you like the vanilla Android UI, would prefer getting faster Android updates, and like Google's design language better. Otherwise, the experience will actually be quite similar. Here's our full Google Pixel 9 review, if you're interested. Both of these phones are amazing, and right now, they offer a bunch of value for your hard-earned dollars. If you want more help, though, here is our full comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 and the Google Pixel 9. Of course, you can always refer to our list of the best Android phones to find some other alternatives.

Amazon (AMZN) Target Lifted to $248 by BofA on AI, Robotics Momentum
Amazon (AMZN) Target Lifted to $248 by BofA on AI, Robotics Momentum

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon (AMZN) Target Lifted to $248 by BofA on AI, Robotics Momentum

June 2 - Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) has raised its price target for Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) to $248 from $230, citing accelerating adoption of robotics and artificial intelligence across the company's logistics network, according to a Monday note. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with AMZN. Analysts maintained a Buy rating and said Amazon's expanding use of automation is improving operational efficiency, helping manage costs, and likely supporting faster delivery speeds across its retail business. Amazon now uses more than 750,000 robots, which assist with roughly 75% of customer orders. In May, the company introduced eight new robots at delivery stations, building on the rollout of its first 12th-generation automated fulfillment center in late 2024. Bank of America noted that Amazon's deployment of AI-powered robotics is reducing its reliance on manual labor and enabling more scalable warehouse operations. Analysts added that Amazon Web Services' AI tools are giving it an edge in bringing these technologies to market faster than rivals. The firm estimates Amazon's retail margins could expand by up to two percentage points over the long term. In 2024, the company's retail operating margin rose to 5.4%, with further upside expected from advertising, third-party services, and subscriptions. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

AI isn't coming for your job—it's coming for your company
AI isn't coming for your job—it's coming for your company

Fast Company

time30 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

AI isn't coming for your job—it's coming for your company

Debate about whether artificial intelligence can replicate the intellectual labor of doctors, lawyers, or PhDs forgoes a deeper concern that's looming: Entire companies—not just individual jobs—may be rendered obsolete by the accelerating pace of AI adoption. Reports suggesting OpenAI will charge $20,000 per month for agents trained at a PhD level spun up the ongoing debate about whose job is safe from AI and whose job is not. 'I've not seen it be that impressive yet, but it's likely not far off,' James Villarrubia, head of digital innovation and AI at NASA CAS, told me. Sean McGregor, the founder of Responsible AI Collaborative who earned a PhD in computer science, pointed out how many jobs are about more than just a set of skills: 'Current AI technology is not sufficiently robust to allow unsupervised control of hazardous chemistry equipment, human experimentation, or other domains where human PhDs are currently required.' The big reason I polled the audience on this one was because I wanted to broaden my perspective on what jobs would be eliminated. Instead, it changed my perspective. AI needs to outperform the system, not the role Suzanne Rabicoff, founder of the human agency think tank and fractional practice, The Pie Grower, gave me some reading assignments from her work, instead of a quote. Her work showed me that these times are unprecedented. But something clicked in my brain when she said in her writing that she liked the angle of more efficient companies rising instead of jobs being replaced at companies with a lot of tech and human capital debt. Her response to that statement? 'Exactly my bet.' Sure, this is the first time that a robot is doing the homework for some college students. However, there is more precedent for robots moving market share than for replacing the same job function across a sector. Fortune 500 companies—especially those bloated with legacy processes and redundant labor—are always vulnerable to decline as newer, more nimble competitors rise. And not because any single job is replaced, but because the foundational economics of their business models no longer hold. AI doesn't need to outperform every employee to render an enterprise obsolete. It only needs to outperform the system. Case study: The auto industry Take, for example, the decline of American car manufacturers in the late 20th century. In the 1950s, American automakers had a stranglehold on the car industry, not unlike today's tech giants. In 1950, the U.S. produced about 75% of the world's cars. But in the 1970s, Japanese automakers pioneered the use of robotics in auto manufacturing. These companies produced higher-quality vehicles at great value thanks to leaner operations that were also more precise. Firms like GM struggled to keep up, burdened by outdated factories and excessive human capital costs—including bloated pensions. The seismic shift in the decades to follow paints a picture of what could be in store for large companies now. In 1960, the U.S. produced about 48% of the world's cars, while Japan accounted for just 5%. By 1980, Japan had captured around 29% of the market, while the U.S. had fallen to 23%. Today's AI shakeup could look similar. Decades from now, we could look at Apple similarly to how we look at Ford now. AI startups with more agile structures are poised to eat market share. On top of that, startups can focus on solving specialized problems, sharpening their competitive edge. Will your company shrivel and die? The fallout has already begun. Gartner surveyed organizations in late 2023, finding that about half were developing their own AI tools. By the end of 2024, that dropped to 20%. As hype around generative AI cools, Gartner notes that many chief information officers are instead using outside vendors—either large language model providers or traditional software sellers with AI-enhanced offerings. In 2024, AI startups received nearly half of the $209 billion in global venture funding. If only 20% of legacy organizations currently feel confident competing with these upstarts, how many will feel that confidence as these startups mature? While headlines continue to fixate on whether AI can match PhD-level expertise, the deeper risk remains largely unspoken: Giant companies will shrivel and some may die. And when they do, your job is at risk whether you greet customers at the front desk or hold a PhD in an engineering discipline. But there are ways to stay afloat. One of the most impactful pieces of advice I ever received came from Jonathan Rosenberg, former SVP of products at Google and current advisor to Alphabet, when I visited the company's campus in college. 'You can't just be great at what you do, you have to catch a great wave. Early people think it's about the company, then the job, then the industry. It's actually industry, company, job…' So, how do you catch the AI wave? Ankur Patel, CEO of Multimodal, advises workers to learn how to do their current jobs using AI tools that enhance productivity. He also notes that soft skills—mobilizing people, building relationships, leading teams—will become increasingly valuable as AI takes over more technical or routine tasks. 'You can't have AI be a group leader or team leader, right? I just don't see that happening, even in the next generation forward,' Patel said. 'So I think that's a huge opportunity…to grow and learn from.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store