Gary Families Can Now Test Home Air, Soil and Water for Toxins
Gary and other Lake County residents are being asked to help gauge dangerous pollutants after an initial study found contamination at alarming levels.
'By participating, you could learn more about pollution in your home, whether you have been exposed, and how that might affect the health of your family and the community,' said Ellen Wells, director of the occupational and environmental health sciences program at Purdue University and lead researcher of the study.
In the first phase of the study, researchers and volunteers collected hundreds of dust and air samples. They found road-dust levels in Gary and northern Lake County to be far above those in other Indiana cities. Lead in Gary soil measured twice the EPA's safety limit for polluted areas, and elevated levels of iron and manganese contamination were discovered as well.
Now, researchers are recruiting hundreds more volunteers from across the county — including Gary, Hammond, East Chicago and Whiting — to help quantify how pollution and other environmental contaminants affect residents' health.
Tim DaSilva, a community ambassador for the study from East Chicago and research assistant with Purdue University Northwest, says it's important to get the 'Black perspective' on studies like this, especially in areas like East Chicago, Hammond, Whiting and Gary, because when people aren't informed on these issues, they aren't given the proper compensation from the environmental hardship they endure.
'Historically, many minorities, not just Black people, but Black people included, have been gate kept from the environmental sector, even though it's their communities that are most affected, because a lot of times low-income areas are built on heavily polluted soil or areas that have very, very bad air pollution,' DaSilva said.
He pointed to examples like the West Calumet housing complex in East Chicago, a public housing complex predominantly occupied by minorities, which was built atop an old lead refinery. A 1998 government report found that 30% of children at the complex had high levels of lead in their blood, but residents weren't officially notified by the Department of Housing and Urban Development of the contamination until 2016. In 2019, the last of the complex was torn down after strong community protest.
The study aims to collect data from residents of northern Lake County, focusing on environmental contaminants and their impact on neurological health. Upon completion, the study's findings could inform regulatory levels and community actions to improve environmental conditions.
Chemicals tested include air particles (soot), gas and fumes, heavy metals (including lead), and PFAS chemicals — man-made chemicals used in industrial sites, cookware, and clothing. Exposure to lead can lead to severe brain damage, including developmental delays and behavioral problems, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Air particles, like particulate matter, are tiny pieces of soot caused by pollution and fumes that can settle deep into the lungs and cause respiratory issues, asthma, and premature death. PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — known as 'forever chemicals' for their inability to be destroyed — have been linked to a number of health issues, including cancer, liver damage, infertility, endocrine disruption and developmental problems in children.
Participants will be given an environmental sampling kit, which can be used to collect water, dust, soil, and air in and around their home.
Participants will also be given two silicone wristbands, one to test for pollutants in the air to wear during daily activities, and the other to leave in their home to test home pollution for a week.
After about one to two weeks, participants will be brought to Purdue University Northwest to submit their environmental samples, undergo a standard assessment, fill out a questionnaire, and collect biological samples (hair, nails, a drop of blood and saliva). No DNA measurements will be performed on any samples. After analysis, any samples used will be destroyed.
Wells said their testing methodology considers both environmental contaminants and socioeconomic factors that influence people's health to help determine specific environmental risks to health outcomes.
'There are a lot of things that can influence health conditions,' she said. 'In public health, the concept is that for any given health condition, it's usually the result of multiple risk factors. When we're running the statistical analysis, we can control for those other factors so that we get a better idea of what is the independent relationship of an environmental risk factor on the health outcome, while we're controlling for what we know about other factors that can influence health.'
Community ambassadors are set to expand recruitment efforts this summer. Anyone interested in participating can email LakeCountyEnv@purdue.edu or call (765) 496-4823.
The post Gary Families Can Now Test Home Air, Soil and Water for Toxins appeared first on Capital B Gary.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
U.S. cancer survivors grow to 18.6M predicted to reach 22M by 2035
ST. PAUL, Minn., May 30 (UPI) -- The number of cancer survivors living in the United States is continuing its steady increase, rising to an estimated at 18.6 million as of Jan. 1, according to a study published Friday by the American Cancer Society. That number is projected to exceed 22 million by 2035, and is up from 18 million survivors in 2022, the authors found. Friday's peer-reviewed study, published in the cancer society's CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, also found that about half of those 18.6 million survivors were diagnosed within the past 10 years, and that nearly 4r out of 5 of them were 60 years old and older. The latest figures continue a pattern in which the numbers of U.S. cancer survivors are increasing each year, partly as a result of the growth and aging of the population, but also due to improvements in early detection practices and breakthroughs in cancer treatments. As in its previous estimates, the cancer society collaborated with the National Cancer Institute to tap data from a number of sources, including cancer registries kept by several federal agencies and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, as well as information from the U.S. Census Bureau. Using that data, cancer society researchers determined that among men, the three most prevalent cancers are prostate (3.55 million survivors), melanoma of the skin (816,580), and colorectal (729,550). Among women, the most common cancers were breast (4.3 million survivors), uterine corpus (945,540) and thyroid (859,890). "The increase in cancer survivors in the United States is a testament to the tremendous progress made by cancer research efforts across multiple collaborative stakeholders resulting in improvements in prevention, risk reduction, early detection, diagnosis and treatment, said Dr. Crystal S. Denlinger, CEO of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, an alliance of leading cancer centers. "While this milestone should be celebrated, it is important to remember that cancer survivors have unique needs during and after treatment, and disparities still exist in the receipt of these life-saving advances," Denlinger said. "Everyone should have access to high-quality cancer care as outlined in the latest evidence-based, expert consensus-driven guidelines. Through persistent research, broadened awareness, and unwavering access to guideline-concordant care, everyone has the potential to benefit from ongoing advances in cancer care and prevention." Though the numbers of cancer survivors continue to increase, racial and socioeconomic disparities in treatment also remain readily apparent, the study found. For instance, Black people with Stage I or Stage II lung cancer were less likely to undergo surgery than their White counterparts by a 47% to 52% margin. Dr. Nikita Sandeep Wagle, principal scientist within the Surveillance & Health Equity Science department of the cancer society and the study's lead author, told UPI she was surprised at "the extent to which treatment receipt differs in Black people compared to White people for some [other] cancers. "For example, only 39% of Black people with early-stage rectal cancer received surgery, compared to 64% of their White counterparts," she said. "Addressing disparities requires improving access to high-quality cancer early-detection, treatment and survivorship resources by expanding access to affordable insurance coverage through public and private programs." Meanwhile, perhaps the most encouraging aspect of the study relates to breast cancer. There, the statistics showed that the number of female breast cancer survivors is projected to jump from today's 4.3 million to 5.3 million by 2035 -- the largest expected survivor growth among the top 10 most prevalent cancers. In 2022, the ACS estimated slightly more than 4 million women were living in the United States with a history of invasive breast cancer. That included more than 150,000 women living with metastatic breast cancer, three-fourth of whom originally were diagnosed with stage I-III disease. One-third of female breast cancer survivors in 2022 were younger than 65, reflecting the relatively young median age at diagnosis of 63 years. The projected increase to 5.3 million female breast cancer survivors and those living with breast cancer by 2035 "is a testament to progress in early detection and treatment of breast cancer -- but it's only part of the story," according to Susan G. Komen, the U.S.-based breast cancer advocacy organization. While lauding the rising number of survivors, the group noted in a statement to UPI that every day this year, "we still lose about 117 people in the United States to this disease, and nearly 43,000 are expected to die from breast cancer in 2025 alone. "Recent alarming trends also show breast cancer diagnoses are rising among younger women, with the disease being the leading cause of cancer death in women ages 20 to 49," they said. Those survivors must also face complex challenges, ranging from loss of fertility and early menopause to fatigue, fear of recurrence and financial toxicity, "especially for those living with metastatic breast cancer. "While survival rates have improved overall, significant disparities remain -- especially for Black women, who continue to face worse outcomes, as the report highlights," Susan G. Komen said. "Continued investment in research, equal access to care, and comprehensive support are essential to ensure everyone -- not just some -- has the chance to survive and thrive." And, as the number of cancer survivors steadily rises, so does the need to keep them healthy, Wagle said. "It is surprising that there are now as many as 18.6 million cancer survivors, meaning more people need health care access to monitor for cancer recurrence, new cancers and side effects of cancer treatment," she cautioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man escapes Austin psychiatric hospital, authorities continue search
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Authorities are searching for a man they said escaped from a psychiatric hospital in northeast Austin on Wednesday. According to the Grimes County Sheriff's Office, McArthur Deashy Mathis escaped from the Cross Creek Psychiatric and Addiction Hospital, located at 8402 Cross Park Drive. GCSO said Mathis was a 6'2' Black man who weighed approximately 185 lbs. He was described as having multiple tattoos on his head and neck, being bald and having brown eyes. He was last wearing a navy blue shirt and teal pants, according to GCSO. Authorities said Mathis was arrested in January on multiple warrants out of Grimes County and out of Victoria, Texas— including aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. They also said he was a registered sex offender. After his arrest, Mathis was taken to the psychiatric hospital May 21. GCSO said Mathis escaped the facility by kicking the back door open and jumping over a 6-foot fence. The Cross Creek Psychiatric and Addiction Hospital provided the following statement related to the incident. 'We are aware of an incident involving a patient who left Cross Creek Hospital without authorization. While we are unable to comment on individual patient matters, local law enforcement was notified and is actively involved. We want to extend our sincere gratitude to the law enforcement for their prompt response and continued partnership. Cross Creek Hospital remains committed to providing a supportive environment for all individuals in our care.' Cross Creek Psychiatric and Addiction Hospital Anyone with information on Mathis' whereabouts was asked to contact the Grimes County Sheriff's Office at 936-873-2151, Grimes County Crimestoppers (936) 873-2000 or Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
Tech revolutionizes centuries-old search for prime numbers
A laptop represents today's tools fueling the global search for massive prime numbers, essential for both mathematics and cybersecurity. Photo by Tony Avelar/EPA May 30 (UPI) -- A shard of smooth bone etched with irregular marks dating back 20,000 years puzzled archaeologists until they noticed something unique - the etchings, lines like tally marks, may have represented prime numbers. Similarly, a clay tablet from 1800 B.C.E. inscribed with Babylonian numbers describes a number system built on prime numbers. As the Ishango bone, the Plimpton 322 tablet and other artifacts throughout history display, prime numbers have fascinated and captivated people throughout history. Today, prime numbers and their properties are studied in number theory, a branch of mathematics and active area of research today. A history of prime numbers Informally, a positive counting number larger than one is prime if that number of dots can be arranged only into a rectangular array with one column or one row. For example, 11 is a prime number since 11 dots form only rectangular arrays of sizes 1 by 11 and 11 by 1. Conversely, 12 is not prime since you can use 12 dots to make an array of 3 by 4 dots, with multiple rows and multiple columns. Math textbooks define a prime number as a whole number greater than one whose only positive divisors are only 1 and itself. Math historian Peter S. Rudman suggests that Greek mathematicians were likely the first to understand the concept of prime numbers, around 500 B.C.E. Around 300 B.C.E., the Greek mathematician and logician Euler proved that there are infinitely many prime numbers. Euler began by assuming that there is a finite number of primes. Then he came up with a prime that was not on the original list to create a contradiction. Since a fundamental principle of mathematics is being logically consistent with no contradictions, Euler then concluded that his original assumption must be false. So, there are infinitely many primes. The argument established the existence of infinitely many primes, however it was not particularly constructive. Euler had no efficient method to list all the primes in an ascending list. In the middle ages, Arab mathematicians advanced the Greeks' theory of prime numbers, referred to as hasam numbers during this time. The Persian mathematician Kamal al-Din al-Farisi formulated the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which states that any positive integer larger than one can be expressed uniquely as a product of primes. From this view, prime numbers are the basic building blocks for constructing any positive whole number using multiplication - akin to atoms combining to make molecules in chemistry. Prime numbers can be sorted into different types. In 1202, Leonardo Fibonacci introduced in his book "Liber Abaci: Book of Calculation" prime numbers of the form (2p - 1) where p is also prime. Today, primes in this form are called Mersenne primes after the French monk Marin Mersenne. Many of the largest known primes follow this format. Several early mathematicians believed that a number of the form (2p - 1) is prime whenever p is prime. But in 1536, mathematician Hudalricus Regius noticed that 11 is prime but not (211 - 1), which equals 2047. The number 2047 can be expressed as 11 times 89, disproving the conjecture. While not always true, number theorists realized that the (2p - 1) shortcut often produces primes and gives a systematic way to search for large primes. The search for large primes The number (2p - 1) is much larger relative to the value of p and provides opportunities to identify large primes. When the number (2p - 1) becomes sufficiently large, it is much harder to check whether (2p - 1) is prime - that is, if (2p - 1) dots can be arranged only into a rectangular array with one column or one row. Fortunately, Édouard Lucas developed a prime number test in 1878, later proved by Derrick Henry Lehmer in 1930. Their work resulted in an efficient algorithm for evaluating potential Mersenne primes. Using this algorithm with hand computations on paper, Lucas showed in 1876 that the 39-digit number (2127 - 1) equals 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,727, and that value is prime. Also known as M127, this number remains the largest prime verified by hand computations. It held the record for largest known prime for 75 years. Researchers began using computers in the 1950s, and the pace of discovering new large primes increased. In 1952, Raphael M. Robinson identified five new Mersenne primes using a Standard Western Automatic Computer to carry out the Lucas-Lehmer prime number tests. As computers improved, the list of Mersenne primes grew, especially with the Cray supercomputer's arrival in 1964. Although there are infinitely many primes, researchers are unsure how many fit the type (2p - 1) and are Mersenne primes. By the early 1980s, researchers had accumulated enough data to confidently believe that infinitely many Mersenne primes exist. They could even guess how often these prime numbers appear, on average. Mathematicians have not found proof so far, but new data continues to support these guesses. George Woltman, a computer scientist, founded the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search, or GIMPS, in 1996. Through this collaborative program, anyone can download freely available software from the GIMPS website to search for Mersenne prime numbers on their personal computers. The website contains specific instructions on how to participate. GIMPS has now identified 18 Mersenne primes, primarily on personal computers using Intel chips. The program averages a new discovery about every one to two years. The largest known prime Luke Durant, a retired programmer, discovered the current record for the largest known prime, (2136,279,841 - 1), in October 2024. Referred to as M136279841, this 41,024,320-digit number was the 52nd Mersenne prime identified and was found by running GIMPS on a publicly available cloud-based computing network. This network used Nvidia chips and ran across 17 countries and 24 data centers. These advanced chips provide faster computing by handling thousands of calculations simultaneously. The result is shorter run times for algorithms such as prime number testing. The Electronic Frontier Foundation is a civil liberty group that offers cash prizes for identifying large primes. It awarded prizes in 2000 and 2009 for the first verified 1 million-digit and 10 million-digit prime numbers. Large prime number enthusiasts' next two challenges are to identify the first 100 million-digit and 1 billion-digit primes. EFF prizes of US$150,000 and $250,000, respectively, await the first successful individual or group. Eight of the 10 largest known prime numbers are Mersenne primes, so GIMPS and cloud computing are poised to play a prominent role in the search for record-breaking large prime numbers. Large prime numbers have a vital role in many encryption methods in cybersecurity, so every internet user stands to benefit from the search for large prime numbers. These searches help keep digital communications and sensitive information safe. Jeremiah Bartz is an associate professor of mathematics at University of North Dakota. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.